Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3491371.3491378acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnsyssConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Balancing Worker Utility and Recruitment Cost in Spatial Crowdsensing: A Nash Game Approach

Published: 21 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Leveraging the power of mobile crowdsensing (MCS) to achieve unparalleled coverage of tasks by utilizing the crucial spatio-temporal co-relation between the workers and tasks results in the distributed sensing system named spatio-temporal crowdsensing system (STCS). An STCS outsources sensing tasks to ubiquitous mobile computing devices to exploit their multi-modal sensing capabilities, collects the sensing results and process those to provide meaningful services. While realizing sustainable crowdsensing services, an STCS struggles with two conflicting objectives- maximizing the assignment quality and minimizing the recruitment cost. The first one requires assigning highly reputed workers in the spatio-temporal task blocks which results in higher recruitment costs. Thus a tradeoff between the aformentioned objectives is required. Existing works bring this tradeoff either by formulating a single objective as the linear weighted sum of both of the objectives or incorporating one of these as a constraint to another, yielding to an unfair and skewed tradeoff. In this work, we formulate the worker recruitment problem in STCS as a Nash game to attain fairness between the objectives while bringing this tradeoff. The performance of the proposed system is evaluated using MATLAB and results show its effectiveness compared to the state-of-the-art works in terms of fairness and per cost utility gain.

References

[1]
F. Fuchs-Kittowski and D. Faust. [n. d.]. ”‘Architecture of mobile crowdsourcing systems”. in Collaboration and Technology (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), N. Baloian, F. Burstein, H. Ogata, F. Santoro, and G. Zurita, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
[2]
Hui Gao, Yu Xiao, Han Yan, Ye Tian, Danshi Wang, and Wendong Wang. 2020. A Learning-Based Credible Participant Recruitment Strategy for Mobile Crowd Sensing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7, 6 (2020), 5302–5314. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2976778
[3]
Jayavardhana Gubbi, Rajkumar Buyya, Slaven Marusic, and Marimuthu Palaniswami. 2013. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future generation computer systems 29, 7 (2013), 1645–1660.
[4]
Qing Liu, Talel Abdessalem, Huayu Wu, Zihong Yuan, and Stéphane Bressan. 2016. Cost minimization and social fairness for spatial crowdsourcing tasks. In International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications. Springer, 3–17.
[5]
An-qi Lu and Jing-hua Zhu. 2020. Worker recruitment with cost and time constraints in mobile crowd sensing. Future Generation Computer Systems 112 (2020), 819–831.
[6]
Sujan Sarker, Md Abdur Razzaque, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, Ahmad Almogren, Giancarlo Fortino, and Mengchu Zhou. 2019. Optimal selection of crowdsourcing workers balancing their utilities and platform profit. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 6, 5 (2019), 8602–8614.
[7]
Liang Wang, Zhiwen Yu, Daqing Zhang, Bin Guo, and Chi Harold Liu. 2018. Heterogeneous multi-task assignment in mobile crowdsensing using spatiotemporal correlation. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 18, 1 (2018), 84–97.
[8]
N. Wang and J. Wu. 2018. Cost-efficient Heterogeneous Worker Recruitment under Coverage Requirement in Spatial Crowdsourcing. IEEE Transactions on Big Data(2018), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2018.2865755
[9]
N. Wang, J. Wu, and P. Ostovari. 2017. Coverage and workload cost balancing in spatial crowdsourcing. In 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence Computing, Advanced Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing Communications, Cloud Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC.2017.8397518
[10]
Dong Zhao, Huadong Ma, and Liang Liu. 2014. Energy-efficient opportunistic coverage for people-centric urban sensing. Wireless networks 20, 6 (2014), 1461–1476.
[11]
Yangming Zhao, Sheng Wang, Shizhong Xu, Xiong Wang, Xiujiao Gao, and Chunming Qiao. 2013. Load balance vs energy efficiency in traffic engineering: A game Theoretical Perspective. In 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM. 530–534. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2013.6566829

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Edge Resource Prediction and Auction for Distributed Spatial Crowdsourcing With Differential PrivacyIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2022.31830069:17(15554-15569)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Profit and Satisfaction Aware Order Assignment for Online Food Delivery Systems Exploiting Water Wave OptimizationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.318769210(71194-71208)Online publication date: 2022

Index Terms

  1. Balancing Worker Utility and Recruitment Cost in Spatial Crowdsensing: A Nash Game Approach
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NSysS '21: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networking, Systems and Security
    December 2021
    138 pages
    ISBN:9781450387378
    DOI:10.1145/3491371
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. cost and quality
    2. fair trade-off
    3. mobile crowdsensing
    4. nash bargaining

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    8th NSysS 2021

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 12 of 44 submissions, 27%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Edge Resource Prediction and Auction for Distributed Spatial Crowdsourcing With Differential PrivacyIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2022.31830069:17(15554-15569)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
    • (2022)Profit and Satisfaction Aware Order Assignment for Online Food Delivery Systems Exploiting Water Wave OptimizationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.318769210(71194-71208)Online publication date: 2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media