Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3488560.3498454acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

POLE: Polarized Embedding for Signed Networks

Published: 15 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

From the 2016 U.S. presidential election to the 2021 Capitol riots to the spread of misinformation related to COVID-19, many have blamed social media for today's deeply divided society. Recent advances in machine learning for signed networks hold the promise to guide small interventions with the goal of reducing polarization in social media. However, existing models are especially ineffective in predicting conflicts (or negative links) among users. This is due to a strong correlation between link signs and the network structure, where negative links between polarized communities are too sparse to be predicted even by state-of-the-art approaches. To address this problem, we first design a partition-agnostic polarization measure for signed graphs based on the signed random-walk and show that many real-world graphs are highly polarized. Then, we propose POLE (POLarized Embedding for signed networks), a signed embedding method for polarized graphs that captures both topological and signed similarities jointly via signed autocovariance. Through extensive experiments, we show that POLE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in signed link prediction, particularly for negative links with gains of up to one order of magnitude.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (WSDM22-fp427.mp4)
Presentation video for the paper "POLE: Polarized Embedding for Signed Networks" (WSDM 2022), presented by Zexi Huang.

References

[1]
Ghazaleh Beigi, Suhas Ranganath, and Huan Liu. 2019. Signed link prediction with sparse data: The role of personality information. In WebConf .
[2]
Ghazaleh Beigi, Jiliang Tang, Suhang Wang, and Huan Liu. 2016. Exploiting emotional information for trust/distrust prediction. In SDM .
[3]
Francesco Bonchi, Edoardo Galimberti, Aristides Gionis, Bruno Ordozgoiti, and Giancarlo Ruffo. 2019. Discovering polarized communities in signed networks. In CIKM .
[4]
Yiqi Chen, Tieyun Qian, Huan Liu, and Ke Sun. 2018. "Bridge" Enhanced Signed Directed Network Embedding. In CIKM .
[5]
Kai-Yang Chiang, Nagarajan Natarajan, Ambuj Tewari, and Inderjit S Dhillon. 2011. Exploiting longer cycles for link prediction in signed networks. In CIKM .
[6]
Michael D Conover, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew Francisco, Bruno Goncc alves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011. Political polarization on twitter. In ICWSM .
[7]
J-C Delvenne, Sophia N Yaliraki, and Mauricio Barahona. 2010. Stability of graph communities across time scales. PNAS, Vol. 107, 29 (2010), 12755--12760.
[8]
Carl Eckart and Gale Young. 1936. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, Vol. 1, 3 (1936), 211--218.
[9]
Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2017. Reducing controversy by connecting opposing views. In WSDM .
[10]
Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2018. Quantifying controversy on social media. TSC, Vol. 1, 1 (2018), 1--27.
[11]
Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella and Ingmar Weber. 2017. A long-term analysis of polarization on Twitter. In ICWSM .
[12]
Nabeel Gillani, Ann Yuan, Martin Saveski, Soroush Vosoughi, and Deb Roy. 2018. Me, my echo chamber, and I: introspection on social media polarization. In WebConf .
[13]
Palash Goyal and Emilio Ferrara. 2018. Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 151 (2018), 78--94.
[14]
Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. 2016. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In SIGKDD. 855--864.
[15]
Pedro Calais Guerra, Wagner Meira Jr, Claire Cardie, and Robert Kleinberg. 2013. A measure of polarization on social media networks based on community boundaries. In ICWSM .
[16]
Andrew Guess, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2018. Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. European Research Council, Vol. 9, 3 (2018), 4.
[17]
Ramanthan Guha, Ravi Kumar, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Andrew Tomkins. 2004. Propagation of trust and distrust. In WebConf .
[18]
Fritz Heider. 1946. Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of psychology, Vol. 21, 1 (1946), 107--112.
[19]
Cho-Jui Hsieh, Kai-Yang Chiang, and Inderjit S Dhillon. 2012. Low rank modeling of signed networks. In SIGKDD .
[20]
Zexi Huang, Arlei Silva, and Ambuj Singh. 2021. A Broader Picture of Random-walk Based Graph Embedding. In SIGKDD .
[21]
Mohammad Raihanul Islam, B Aditya Prakash, and Naren Ramakrishnan. 2018. Signet: Scalable embeddings for signed networks. In PAKDD .
[22]
Amin Javari, Tyler Derr, Pouya Esmailian, Jiliang Tang, and Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang. 2020. ROSE: Role-based Signed Network Embedding. In WebConf .
[23]
Amin Javari and Mahdi Jalili. 2014. Cluster-based collaborative filtering for sign prediction in social networks with positive and negative links. TIST, Vol. 5, 2 (2014), 1--19.
[24]
Jinhong Jung, Woojeong Jin, Lee Sael, and U Kang. 2016. Personalized ranking in signed networks using signed random walk with restart. In ICDM .
[25]
Ravi Kannan, Santosh Vempala, and Adrian Vetta. 2004. On clusterings: Good, bad and spectral. JACM, Vol. 51, 3 (2004), 497--515.
[26]
Junghwan Kim, Haekyu Park, Ji-Eun Lee, and U Kang. 2018. Side: representation learning in signed directed networks. In WebConf .
[27]
Victor Kristof, Matthias Grossglauser, and Patrick Thiran. 2020. War of words: The competitive dynamics of legislative processes. In WebConf .
[28]
Srijan Kumar, Francesca Spezzano, VS Subrahmanian, and Christos Faloutsos. 2016. Edge weight prediction in weighted signed networks. In ICDM .
[29]
Jérôme Kunegis, Stephan Schmidt, Andreas Lommatzsch, Jürgen Lerner, Ernesto W De Luca, and Sahin Albayrak. 2010. Spectral analysis of signed graphs for clustering, prediction and visualization. In SDM .
[30]
Mirko Lai, Viviana Patti, Giancarlo Ruffo, and Paolo Rosso. 2018. Stance evolution and twitter interactions in an italian political debate. In NLDB .
[31]
Renaud Lambiotte, Jean-Charles Delvenne, and Mauricio Barahona. 2014. Random walks, Markov processes and the multiscale modular organization of complex networks. IEEE TSNE, Vol. 1, 2 (2014), 76--90.
[32]
Andrea Lancichinetti, Santo Fortunato, and Filippo Radicchi. 2008. Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms. Physical review E, Vol. 78, 4 (2008), 046110.
[33]
Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, and Jon Kleinberg. 2010a. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In WebConf .
[34]
Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, and Jon Kleinberg. 2010b. Signed networks in social media. In SIGCHI .
[35]
Linyuan Lü and Tao Zhou. 2011. Link prediction in complex networks: A survey. Physica A: statistical mechanics and its applications, Vol. 390, 6 (2011), 1150--1170.
[36]
Jacqueline M. Otala, Gillian Kurtic, Isabella Grasso, Yu Liu, Jeanna Matthews, and Golshan Madraki. 2021. Political Polarization and Platform Migration: A Study of Parler and Twitter Usage by United States of America Congress Members. In Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, Ethics and Society on the Web. 224--231.
[37]
Clare Malone. 2017. A Q&A with the house Democrat who's voted with Trump 75 percent of the time. FiveThirtyEight (2017).
[38]
V'ictor Mart'inez, Fernando Berzal, and Juan-Carlos Cubero. 2016. A survey of link prediction in complex networks. CSUR, Vol. 49, 4 (2016), 1--33.
[39]
David McCumber. 2014. From the house on the hill: congressman looks back at his life. Laredo Morning Times (2014).
[40]
Salman Bin Naeem, Rubina Bhatti, and Aqsa Khan. 2021. An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk. Health Information & Libraries Journal, Vol. 38, 2 (2021), 143--149.
[41]
Mark EJ Newman. 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. PNAS, Vol. 103, 23 (2006), 8577--8582.
[42]
Bryan Perozzi, Rami Al-Rfou, and Steven Skiena. 2014. Deepwalk: Online learning of social representations. In SIGKDD . 701--710.
[43]
Ben Pershing. 2009. Pelosi, Harman have long history. The Washington Post (2009).
[44]
Avinash Prabhu, Dipanwita Guhathakurta, Mallika Subramanian, Manvith Reddy, Shradha Sehgal, Tanvi Karandikar, Amogh Gulati, Udit Arora, Rajiv Ratn Shah, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, et al. 2021. Capitol (Pat) riots: A comparative study of Twitter and Parler. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06914 (2021).
[45]
Michael T Schaub, Jean-Charles Delvenne, Renaud Lambiotte, and Mauricio Barahona. 2019. Multiscale dynamical embeddings of complex networks. Physical Review E, Vol. 99, 6 (2019), 062308.
[46]
George Skelton. 1998. California and the west: in the ring, with contenders for governor. Los Angeles Times (1998).
[47]
Dongjin Song and David A Meyer. 2015. Link sign prediction and ranking in signed directed social networks. Social network analysis and mining, Vol. 5, 1 (2015), 1--14.
[48]
Jiliang Tang, Xia Hu, Yi Chang, and Huan Liu. 2014. Predictability of distrust with interaction data. In CIKM .
[49]
Sean M Theriault. 2006. Party polarization in the US Congress: Member replacement and member adaptation. Party Politics, Vol. 12, 4 (2006), 483--503.
[50]
Matt Thomas, Bo Pang, and Lillian Lee. 2006. Get out the vote: determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In EMNLP .
[51]
Joshua A Tucker, Andrew Guess, Pablo Barberá, Cristian Vaccari, Alexandra Siegel, Sergey Sanovich, Denis Stukal, and Brendan Nyhan. 2018. Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature . Technical Report. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
[52]
Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Bruno Ordozgoiti, and Aristides Gionis. 2020. Discovering conflicting groups in signed networks. In NeurIPS .
[53]
Jing Wang, Jie Shen, Ping Li, and Huan Xu. 2017a. Online matrix completion for signed link prediction. In WSDM .
[54]
Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, Charu Aggarwal, Yi Chang, and Huan Liu. 2017b. Signed network embedding in social media. In SDM .
[55]
Andrew Scott Waugh, Liuyi Pei, James H Fowler, Peter J Mucha, and Mason Alexander Porter. 2011. Party polarization in congress: a network science approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.3509 (2011).
[56]
Robert West, Hristo S Paskov, Jure Leskovec, and Christopher Potts. 2014. Exploiting social network structure for person-to-person sentiment analysis. TACL, Vol. 2 (2014), 297--310.
[57]
Pinghua Xu, Wenbin Hu, Jia Wu, and Bo Du. 2019. Link prediction with signed latent factors in signed social networks. In SIGKDD .
[58]
Jihang Ye, Hong Cheng, Zhe Zhu, and Minghua Chen. 2013. Predicting positive and negative links in signed social networks by transfer learning. In WebConf .
[59]
Xiaoyan Yin, Xiao Hu, Yanjiao Chen, Xu Yuan, and Baochun Li. 2021. Signed-PageRank: An Efficient Influence Maximization Framework for Signed Social Networks. IEEE TKDE, Vol. 33, 5 (2021), 2208--2222.
[60]
Shuhan Yuan, Xintao Wu, and Yang Xiang. 2017. Sne: signed network embedding. In PAKDD .
[61]
Weiwei Yuan, Kangya He, Donghai Guan, Li Zhou, and Chenliang Li. 2019. Graph kernel based link prediction for signed social networks. Information Fusion, Vol. 46 (2019), 1--10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Link Polarity Prediction from Sparse and Noisy Labels via Multiscale Social BalanceProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3627673.3679786(1689-1699)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)PolarDSN: An Inductive Approach to Learning the Evolution of Network Polarization in Dynamic Signed NetworksProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3627673.3679654(1099-1109)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Proper network randomization is key to assessing social balanceScience Advances10.1126/sciadv.adj010410:18Online publication date: 3-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSDM '22: Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
February 2022
1690 pages
ISBN:9781450391320
DOI:10.1145/3488560
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 February 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. representation learning
  2. signed embedding
  3. social polarization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

WSDM '22

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)294
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)78
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Link Polarity Prediction from Sparse and Noisy Labels via Multiscale Social BalanceProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3627673.3679786(1689-1699)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)PolarDSN: An Inductive Approach to Learning the Evolution of Network Polarization in Dynamic Signed NetworksProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3627673.3679654(1099-1109)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Proper network randomization is key to assessing social balanceScience Advances10.1126/sciadv.adj010410:18Online publication date: 3-May-2024
  • (2024)Toward Secrecy-Aware Attacks Against Trust Prediction in Signed Social NetworksIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security10.1109/TIFS.2024.336436619(3567-3580)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)A Signed Social Network Dataset from YouTube Comments2024 IEEE/ACIS 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)10.1109/SNPD61259.2024.10673929(87-90)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2024
  • (2024)SHEEP, a Signed Hamiltonian Eigenvector Embedding for ProximityCommunications Physics10.1038/s42005-023-01504-67:1Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2024)An unclosed structures-preserving embedding model for signed networksNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127320576:COnline publication date: 25-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Filter Bubbles and the Unfeeling: How AI for Social Media Can Foster Extremism and PolarizationPhilosophy & Technology10.1007/s13347-024-00758-437:2Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
  • (2024)DynamiSE: dynamic signed network embedding for link predictionMachine Language10.1007/s10994-023-06473-z113:7(4037-4053)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Polarized Communities Search via Co-guided Random Walk in Attributed Signed NetworksACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/361344923:4(1-22)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media