research-article

Toward Efficient Block Replication Management in Distributed Storage

Authors:

Alok N. Choudhary,

Yutaka IshiakwaAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems (TOMPECS), Volume 5, Issue 3

Article No.: 13, Pages 1 - 27

https://doi.org/10.1145/3412450

Published: 19 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Distributed/parallel file systems commonly suffer from load imbalance and resource contention due to the bursty characteristic exhibited in scientific applications. This article presents an adaptive scheme supporting dynamic block data replication and an efficient replica placement policy to improve the I/O performance of a distributed file system. Our goal is not only to yield a balanced data replication among storage servers but also a high degree of data access parallelism for the applications. We first present mathematical cost models to formulate the cost of data block replication by considering both the overhead and reduced data access time to the replicated data. To verify the validity and feasibility of the proposed cost model, we implement our proposal in a prototype distributed file system and evaluate it using a set of representative database-relevant application benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that the proposed approach can boost the usage efficiency of the data replicas with acceptable overhead of data replication management. Consequently, the overall data throughput of storage system can be noticeably improved. In summary, the proposed replication management scheme works well, especially for the database-relevant applications that exhibit an uneven access frequency and pattern to different parts of files.

References

[1]

C. Abad, Y. Lu, and R. Campbell. 2011. Dare: Adaptive data replication for efficient cluster scheduling. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER’11). 159--168.

[2]

A. Aral and T. Ovatman. 2018. A decentralized replica placement algorithm for edge computing. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 15, 2 (2018), 516--529.

[3]

R. Arpaci-Dusseau and C. Arpaci-Dusseau. 2014. Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces (0.8 ed.). Arpaci-Dusseau Books.

[4]

M. Bhadkamkar, J. Guerra, L. Useche, S. Burnett, J. Liptak, R. Rangaswami, and V. Hristidis. 2009. BORG: Block-reORGanization for self-optimizing storage systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST’09). 183--196.

[5]

V. Chandakanna. 2018. REHDFS: A random read/write enhanced HDFS. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 103 (2018), 85--100.

Digital Library

[6]

L. Chen, M. Qiu, J. Song, Z. Xiong, and H. Hassan. 2018. E2FS: An elastic storage system for cloud computing. Journal of Supercomputing 74, 3 (2018), 1045--1060.

Digital Library

[7]

H. Ciritoglu, L. Almeida, E. Almeida, T. Buda, J. Murphy, and C. Thorpe. 2018. Investigation of replication factor for performance enhancement in the Hadoop Distributed File System. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering. 135--140.

[8]

L. Cui, J. Zhang, L. Yue, Y. Shi, H. Li, and D. Yuan. 2018. A genetic algorithm based data replica placement strategy for scientific applications in clouds. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 11, 4 (2018), 727--739.

[9]

C. Curino, E. Jones, Y. Zhang, and S. Madden. 2010. Schism: A workload-driven approach to database replication and partitioning. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 3, 1--2 (2010), 48--57.

Digital Library

[10]

S. C. Deshmukh and S. S. Deshmukh. 2015. Improved load balancing for distributed file system using self acting and adaptive loading data migration process. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies, and Optimization (ICRITO’15) (Trends and Future Directions). 1--6.

[11]

A. Ganesan, R. Alagappan, A. Arpaci-Dusseau, and R. Arpaci-Dusseau. 2017. Redundancy does not imply fault tolerance: Analysis of distributed storage reactions to file-system faults. ACM Transactions on Storage 13, 3 (2017), Article 20.

Digital Library

[12]

M. Garey and D. Johnson. 1979. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman.

[13]

S. Ghemawat, H. Gobioff, and S. Leung. 2003. The Google File System. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP’03). 29--43.

[14]

GitHub. 2015. FUSE: Filesystem in Userspace. Retrieved August 5, 2020 from http://fuse.sourceforge.net/.

[15]

C. Guerrero, I. Lera, and C. Juiz. 2018. Migration-aware genetic optimization for MapReduce scheduling and replica placement in Hadoop. Journal of Grid Computing 16, 2 (2018), 265--284.

Digital Library

[16]

J. Han, J. Pei, Y. Yin, and R. Mao. 2004. Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation: A frequent-pattern tree approach. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8, 1 (2004), 53--87.

Digital Library

[17]

J. He, D. Nguyen, A. Arpaci-Dusseau, and R. Arpaci-Dusseau. 2015. Reducing file system tail latencies with Chopper. In Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST’15). 119--133.

[18]

S. He and X. Sun. 2018. A cost-effective distribution-aware data replication scheme for parallel I/O systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers 67, 10 (2018), 1374--1387.

[19]

H. Hsiao, H. Chung, H. Shen, and Y. Chao. 2013. Load rebalancing for distributed file systems in clouds. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 24, 5 (2013), 951--962.

Digital Library

[20]

D. Huang, D. Han, J. Wang, J. Yin, X. Chen, X. Zhang, J. Zhou, and M. Ye. 2018. Achieving load balance for parallel data access on distributed file systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers 67, 3 (2018), 388--402.

[21]

M. Klems, A. Silberstein, J. Chen, M. Mortazavi, S. Albert, P. Narayan, A. Tumbde, and B. Cooper. 2012. The Yahoo!: Cloud datastore load balancer. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cloud Data Management (CloudDB’12).

[22]

J. Li, X. Xu, X. Peng, and J. Liao. 2019. Pattern-based write scheduling and read balance-oriented wear-leveling for solid state drivers. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Massive Storage Systems and Technology (MSST’19).

[23]

J. Liao, L. Li, H. Chen, and X. Liu. 2015. Adaptive replica synchronization for distributed file systems. IEEE Systems Journal 9, 3 (2015), 865--877.

[24]

J. Liao, F. Trahay, Z. Cai, J. Zhou, and G. Xiao. 2018a. Adaptive process migrations in coupled applications for exchanging data in local file cache. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems 13, 2 (2018), Article 9.

Digital Library

[25]

J. Liao, Z. Cai, F. Trahay, and X. Peng. 2018b. Block placement in distributed file systems based on block access frequency. IEEE Access 6, 1 (2018), 38411--38420.

[26]

J. Liao, F. Trahay, Z. Cai, H. Xiong, S. Chen, and Y. Ishikawa. 2019. Fine granularity and adaptive cache update mechanism for client caching. IEEE Systems Journal 27, 9 (2019), 2698--2710.

[27]

Y. Lin and H. Shen. 2017. EAFR: An energy-efficient adaptive file replication system in data-intensive clusters. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 28, 4 (2017), 1017--1030.

Digital Library

[28]

Y. Liu, R. Gunasekaran, X. Ma, and S. Vazhkudai. 2014. Automatic identification of application I/O signatures from noisy server-side traces. In Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST’14). 213--228.

Digital Library

[29]

S. Long, Y. Zhao, and W. Chen. 2014. A three-phase energy-saving strategy for cloud storage systems. Journal of Systems and Software 87 (2014), 38--47.

Digital Library

[30]

N. Mansouri and M. Javidi. 2018. A new prefetching-aware data replication to decrease access latency in cloud environment. Journal of Systems and Software 144 (2018), 197--215.

Digital Library

[31]

MySQL Database. 2016. MySQL Community Downloads. Retrieved July 1, 2016 from http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/.

[32]

D. Narayanan, A. Donnelly, and A. Rowstron. 2008. Write off-loading: Practical power management for enterprise storage. ACM Transactions on Storage 4, 3 (2008), Article 10.

Digital Library

[33]

NOAA. 2018. Data Access. Retrieved July 2, 2018 from https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access.

[34]

P. Padmanabhan, L. Gruenwald, A. Vallur, and M. Atiquzzaman. 2008. A survey of data replication techniques for mobile ad hoc network databases. VLDB Journal—The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases 17, 5 (2008), 1143--1164.

[35]

A. Paul, A. Goyal, F. Wang, S. Oral, A. Butt, M. Brim, and S. Srinivasa. 2018. I/O load balancing for big data HPC applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data.

[36]

F. Schmuck and R. Haskin. 2002. GPFS: A shared-disk file system for large computing clusters. In Proceedings of the Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST’02). 231--244.

Digital Library

[37]

K. Shvachko, H. Kuang, S. Radia, and R. Chansler. 2010. The Hadoop Distributed File System. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST’10). 1--10.

[38]

T. Shwe and M. Aritsugi. 2018. PRTuner: Proactive-reactive re-replication tuning in HDFS-based cloud data center. IEEE Cloud Computing 5, 6 (2018), 48--57.

[39]

A. Singh, M. Korupolu, and D. Mohapatra. 2008. Server-storage virtualization: Integration and load balancing in data centers. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC’08). 1--12.

[40]

G. Stavrinides, F. Duro, H. Karatza, J. Blas, and J. Carretero. 2017. Different aspects of workflow scheduling in large-scale distributed systems. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 70 (2017), 120--134.

[41]

W. Sun, V. Simon, S. Monnet, and P. Sens. 2017. Analysis of a stochastic model of replication in large distributed storage systems: A mean-field approach. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems 1, 1 (2017), Article 24, 21 pages.

[42]

Transaction Processing Performance Council. 2016a. TPC-C Benchmark Revision 5.11.0. Retrieved February 1, 2016 from http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/.

[43]

Transaction Processing Performance Council. 2016b. TPC-E Benchmark Version 1.14.0. Retrieved February 1, 2016 from http://www.tpc.org/tpce/.

[44]

M. Tu. 2006. A Data Management Framework for Secure and Dependable Data Grid. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Texas at Dallas.

[45]

J. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Wang, R. Wang, and D. Huang. 2017. Deister: A light-weight autonomous block management in data-intensive file systems using deterministic declustering distribution. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 108 (2017), 3--13.

[46]

L. Wang, Y. Ma, A. Zomaya, R. Ranjan, and D. Chen. 2015. A parallel file system with application-aware data layout policies for massive remote sensing image processing in Digital Earth. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 26, 6 (2015), 1497--1508.

Digital Library

[47]

X. Wang, Y. Wang, and Y. Cui. 2014. A new multi-objective bi-level programming model for energy and locality aware multijob scheduling in cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems 36 (2014), 91--101.

[48]

Q. Wei, B. Veeravalli, B. Gong, L. Zeng, and D. Feng. 2010. CDRM: A cost-effective dynamic replication management scheme for cloud storage cluster. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER’10). 188--196.

[49]

S. Weil, K. Pollack, S. Brandt, and E. Miller. 2004. Dynamic metadata management for petabyte-scale file systems. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC’04). 4--15.

[50]

Z. Yang, J. Bhimani, J. Wang, D. Evans, and N. Mi. 2017. Automatic and scalable data replication manager in distributed computation and storage infrastructure of cyber-physical systems. Journal of Scalable Computing 18, 4 (2017), 291--311.

[51]

Y. Yin, J. Li, J. He, X. Sun, and R. Thakur. 2013. Pattern-direct and layout-aware replication scheme for parallel I/O systems. In Proceedings of the 27th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS’13). 345--356.

[52]

M. Yu, Y. Yu, Y. Zheng, B. Yang, and W. Wang. 2020. RepBun: Load-balanced, shuffle-free cluster caching for structured data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’20). 1--10.

[53]

Q. Zhang, S. Zhang, A. Leon-Garcia, and R. Boutaba. 2015. Aurora: Adaptive block replication in distributed file systems. In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’15). 442--451.

[54]

Y. Zhao, C. Li, L. Li, and P. Zhang. 2017. Dynamic replica creation strategy based on file heat and node load in hybrid cloud. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT’17). 213--220.

Cited By

Sundara Kumar MMohan H(2024)Improving big data analytics data processing speed through map reduce scheduling and replica placement with HDFS using genetic optimization techniquesJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems10.3233/JIFS-24006946:4(10863-10882)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-240069
Dawei YHengxiang YMeihui HJun M(2022)Research on the Application of Distributed Key-Value Storage Technology in Computer Database Platform2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Power, Electronics and Computer Applications (ICPECA)10.1109/ICPECA53709.2022.9719107(690-694)Online publication date: 21-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPECA53709.2022.9719107

Index Terms

Toward Efficient Block Replication Management in Distributed Storage
1. Information systems
  1. Information storage systems
    1. Storage architectures
      1. Distributed storage

Recommendations

Efficient replication management in distributed systems
Adaptive data replication strategy in cloud computing for performance improvement

Cloud computing is becoming a very popular word in industry and is receiving a large amount of attention from the research community. Replica management is one of the most important issues in the cloud, which can offer fast data access time, high data ...
Efficient privacy-preserving data replication in fog-enabled IoT
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) devices generate a high volume of data that is processed and stored in traditional cloud computing. The processing including data replication in traditional cloud computing often results in excessive resource ...
Highlights
- We propose data replication schemes to efficiently preserve data replicas privacy in Fog-enabled IoT.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems

ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems Volume 5, Issue 3

September 2020

130 pages

ISSN:2376-3639

EISSN:2376-3647

DOI:10.1145/3403640

Editor:
Leana Golubchik
University of Southern California, United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 October 2020

Accepted: 01 July 2020

Revised: 01 May 2020

Received: 01 September 2019

Published in TOMPECS Volume 5, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

National Natural Science Foundation of China
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC
Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
198
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)20
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Sundara Kumar MMohan H(2024)Improving big data analytics data processing speed through map reduce scheduling and replica placement with HDFS using genetic optimization techniquesJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems10.3233/JIFS-24006946:4(10863-10882)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-240069
Dawei YHengxiang YMeihui HJun M(2022)Research on the Application of Distributed Key-Value Storage Technology in Computer Database Platform2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Power, Electronics and Computer Applications (ICPECA)10.1109/ICPECA53709.2022.9719107(690-694)Online publication date: 21-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPECA53709.2022.9719107

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents