Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2755573.2755596acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Randomized Local Network Computing

Published: 13 June 2015 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we carry on investigating the line of research questioning the power of randomization for the design of distributed algorithms. In their seminal paper, Naor and Stockmeyer [STOC 1993] established that, in the context of network computing, in which all nodes execute the same algorithm in parallel, any construction task that can be solved locally by a randomized Monte-Carlo algorithm can also be solved locally by a deterministic algorithm. This result however holds in a specific context. In particular, it holds only for distributed tasks whose solutions can be locally checked by a deterministic algorithm. In this paper, we extend the result of Naor and Stockmeyer to a wider class of tasks. Specifically, we prove that the same derandomization result holds for every task whose solutions can be locally checked using a 2-sided error randomized Monte-Carlo algorithm. This extension finds applications to, e.g., the design of lower bounds for construction tasks which tolerate that some nodes compute incorrect values. In a nutshell, we show that randomization does not help for solving such resilient tasks.

References

[1]
L. M. Adleman: Two Theorems on Random Polynomial Time. In proc. 19th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, pp75--83, 1978.
[2]
H. Arfaoui, P. Fraigniaud: What can be computed without communications? SIGACT News 45(3): 82--104 (2014)
[3]
H. Arfaoui, P. Fraigniaud, D. Ilcinkas, F. Mathieu: Distributedly Testing Cycle-Freeness. In proc. 40th Int. Work. on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG), Springer LNCS, pp15--28, 2014.
[4]
L. Barenboim, M. Elkin: Distributed Graph Coloring: Fundamentals and Recent Developments. Synthesis Lectures on Distributed Computing Theory, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2013.
[5]
H. T.-H. Chan, M. Dinitz, A. Gupta: Spanners with Slack. In proc. 14th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA), pp196--207, 2006.
[6]
K.-M. Chung, S. Pettie, H.-H. Su: Distributed algorithms for the Lovász local lemma and graph coloring. In proc. 33rd ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp134--143, 2014.
[7]
A. Das Sarma, S. Holzer, L. Kor, A. Korman, D. Nanongkai, G. Pandurangan, D. Peleg, R. Wattenhofer: Distributed Verification and Hardness of Distributed Approximation. SIAM J. Comput. 41(5): 1235--1265 (2012)
[8]
M. Dinitz: Compact routing with slack. In proc. 26th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp81--88, 2007.
[9]
Y. Emek, C. Pfister, J. Seidel, R. Wattenhofer: Anonymous networks: randomization $=$ 2-hop coloring. In proc. 33rd ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp96--105, 2014.
[10]
P. Floréen, J. Kaasinen, P. Kaski, J. Suomela: An optimal local approximation algorithm for max-min linear programs. In proc. 21st ACM Symp. on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA), pp260--269, 2009.
[11]
P. Fraigniaud, M. Göös, A. Korman, M. Parter, D. Peleg: Randomized distributed decision. Distributed Computing 27(6): 419--434 (2014)
[12]
P. Fraigniaud, M. Göös, A. Korman, J. Suomela: What can be decided locally without identifiers? In proc. 32nd ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC) 2013: 157--165
[13]
P. Fraigniaud, A. Korman, D. Peleg: Towards a complexity theory for local distributed computing. J. ACM 60(5): 35 (2013)
[14]
P. Fraigniaud, S. Rajsbaum, C. Travers: Locality and checkability in wait-free computing. Distributed Computing 26(4): 223--242 (2013)
[15]
P. Fraigniaud, S. Rajsbaum, C. Travers: On the Number of Opinions Needed for Fault-Tolerant Run-Time Monitoring in Distributed Systems. In proc. 5th International Conference on Runtime Verification (RV), pp92--107, 2014.
[16]
C. Gavoille, A. Kosowski, M. Markiewicz: What Can Be Observed Locally? In proc. 23rd Int. Symp. on Distributed Computing (DISC), Springer LNCS, pp243--257, 2009.
[17]
M. Göös, J. Hirvonen, J. Suomela: Lower bounds for local approximation. J. ACM 60(5): 39 (2013)
[18]
H. Hasemann, J. Hirvonen, J. Rybicki, J. Suomela: Deterministic Local Algorithms, Unique Identifiers, and Fractional Graph Colouring. In proc. 19th Colloq. on Struct. Information and Comm. Complexity (SIROCCO), Springer LNCS, pp48--60, 2012.
[19]
G. Konjevod, A. W. Richa, D. Xia, H. Yu: Compact routing with slack in low doubling dimension. In proc. 26th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp71--80, 2007.
[20]
A. Korman, Shay Kutten, D. Peleg: Proof labeling schemes. Distributed Computing 22(4): 215--233 (2010)
[21]
A. Korman, J.-S. Sereni, L. Viennot: Toward more localized local algorithms: removing assumptions concerning global knowledge. Distributed Computing 26(5--6): 289--308 (2013)
[22]
F. Kuhn, T. Moscibroda, R. Wattenhofer: What cannot be computed locally! In proc. 23rd ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp300--309, 2004.
[23]
C. Lenzen, Y. Anne Oswald, R. Wattenhofer: What can be approximated locally?: case study: dominating sets in planar graphs. In proc. 20th ACM Symp. on Parallelism in Algo. and Arch. (SPAA), pp46--54, 2008.
[24]
C. Lenzen, R. Wattenhofer: Leveraging Linial's Locality Limit. In proc. 22nd Int. Symp. on Distributed Computing (DISC), pp394--407, 2008.
[25]
N. Linial: Locality in Distributed Graph Algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 21(1): 193--201 (1992)
[26]
T. Moscibroda, R. Wattenhofer: Coloring unstructured radio networks. In proc. 17th ACM Symp. on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA), pp39--48, 2005.
[27]
M. Naor: A Lower Bound on Probabilistic Algorithms for Distributive Ring Coloring. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 4(3): 409--412 (1991)
[28]
M. Naor, L. J. Stockmeyer: What Can be Computed Locally? SIAM J. Comput. 24(6): 1259--1277 (1995)
[29]
D. Peleg: Distributed Computing: A Locality- Sensitive Approach. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2000.
[30]
J. Suomela: Survey of local algorithms. ACM Comput. Surv. 45(2): 24 (2013)

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Randomized Local Network Computing: Derandomization Beyond Locally Checkable LabelingsACM Transactions on Parallel Computing10.1145/34706408:4(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2021
  • (2021)On the Power of Randomization in Distributed Algorithms in Dynamic Networks with Adaptive AdversariesJournal of Parallel and Distributed Computing10.1016/j.jpdc.2021.09.004Online publication date: Oct-2021
  • (2020)Derandomizing local distributed algorithms under bandwidth restrictionsDistributed Computing10.1007/s00446-020-00376-1Online publication date: 18-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Randomized Local Network Computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SPAA '15: Proceedings of the 27th ACM symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
    June 2015
    362 pages
    ISBN:9781450335881
    DOI:10.1145/2755573
    • General Chair:
    • Guy Blelloch,
    • Program Chair:
    • Kunal Agrawal
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 13 June 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. distributed computing
    2. distributed decision
    3. distributed verification
    4. local computing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SPAA '15

    Acceptance Rates

    SPAA '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 31 of 131 submissions, 24%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 447 of 1,461 submissions, 31%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Randomized Local Network Computing: Derandomization Beyond Locally Checkable LabelingsACM Transactions on Parallel Computing10.1145/34706408:4(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2021
    • (2021)On the Power of Randomization in Distributed Algorithms in Dynamic Networks with Adaptive AdversariesJournal of Parallel and Distributed Computing10.1016/j.jpdc.2021.09.004Online publication date: Oct-2021
    • (2020)Derandomizing local distributed algorithms under bandwidth restrictionsDistributed Computing10.1007/s00446-020-00376-1Online publication date: 18-Apr-2020
    • (2020)On the Power of Randomization in Distributed Algorithms in Dynamic Networks with Adaptive AdversariesEuro-Par 2020: Parallel Processing10.1007/978-3-030-57675-2_24(376-391)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2020
    • (2019)Distributed Detection of CyclesACM Transactions on Parallel Computing10.1145/33228116:3(1-20)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2019
    • (2019)Deciding and verifying network properties locally with few output bitsDistributed Computing10.1007/s00446-019-00355-1Online publication date: 13-Jun-2019
    • (2017)Distributed Detection of CyclesProceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures10.1145/3087556.3087571(153-162)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2017
    • (2016)Local Conflict Coloring2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS.2016.73(625-634)Online publication date: Oct-2016
    • (2016)An Exponential Separation between Randomized and Deterministic Complexity in the LOCAL Model2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS.2016.72(615-624)Online publication date: Oct-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media