Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531639acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

MyPosition: sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization

Published: 15 February 2014 Publication History

Abstract

We present the design and evaluation of MyPosition, a public display in the form of a large projection, featuring an interactive poll visualization. MyPosition aims at facilitating the deliberation and comparison of individual opinions on locally relevant topics in an opportunistic and engaging way. We evaluated MyPosition in an in-the-wild study and demonstrated that the engaging nature of the installation was effective in enticing public discussion. We found that (i) the increased identifiability of users positively impacted the engagement with and the social debate around the installation, however lowered the actual polling rate; (ii) people submitted their personal opinion instead of playing around with the interactive features; and (iii) the display led to considerable discussion as well as nudging among people, in particular in zones beyond the interaction area in front of the screen.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (cscw0268-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Ananny, M., & Strohecker, C. (2009). TexTales: Creating Interactive Forums with Urban Publics. In Foth, M. ed. Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2009.
[2]
Bødker, S. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. In Proc. NordiCHI 2006, 1--8.
[3]
Cheok, A.D., Fernando, O.N.N., Wijesena, J.P. Mustafa, A., Shankar, R., Barthoff, A.K., Tosa, N., Choi, Y., and Agarwal, M. BlogWall: Social and Cultural Interaction for Children. In Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (2008).
[4]
Coleman, S. and Gotze, J. Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation, Hansard Society, London, UK, 2001
[5]
Dalsgaard, P., & Halskov, K. Designing Urban Media Façades : Cases and Challenges. In Proc. CHI 2010, 2277--2286.
[6]
Dalsgaard, P., Nielsen, R. and Halskov, K.: Towards a Design Space Explorer for Media Facades. In Proc. OZCHI 2008, 219--22
[7]
Danis, C., Viegas, F., Wattenberg, M. and Kriss, J. Your Place or Mine?: Visualization as a Community Component. In Proc. CHI 2008, 275--284.
[8]
Donath, J., Karahalios, K. and Viegas, F. Visualizing Conversations. Computer-Mediated Communication 4, 4 (1998).
[9]
Fatah Gen. Schieck, A., Briones, C. and Mottram, C. The Urban Screen as a Socializing Platform: Exploring the Role of Place within the Urban Space. In F. Eckardt, J. Geelhaar, L. Colini, K.S. Willis, K. Chorianopoulos and R. Hennig (Eds.) MediaCity: Situations, Practices and Encounters (2008), Frank & Timme GmbH, 285--305.
[10]
Fischer, P. T., & Hornecker, E. Urban HCI : Spatial Aspects in the Design of Shared Encounters for Media Façades, In Proc. CHI 2012, 307--316.
[11]
Fritsch, J. & Brynskov, M. Between Engagement, Affect and Information - Experimental Urban Media in the Climate Change Debate. In Foth, M., Forlano, L., Gibbs, M., & Satchell, C. (Eds.). From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement (2011), MIT Press, 115--135.
[12]
Gilbert, E. & Karahalios, K. Using Social Visualization to Motivate Social Production. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia - Special Section on Communities and Media Computing 11, 3 (2009), 413--421.
[13]
Grasso, A., Muehlenbrock, M., Roulland, F., and Snowdon, D. Public and Situated Displays: Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies, Chapter 11: Supporting Communities of Practice with Large Screen Displays (2003), Springer, 261--282.
[14]
Greenberg, S., & Rounding, M. The Notification Collage: Posting Information to Public and Personal displays. In Proc. CHI 2001.
[15]
Greenfield, A., Shepard, M.: Urban Computing and Its Discontents. The Architectural League of New York, New York (2007).
[16]
Harrison, S. & Dourish, P. Re-place-ing Space: the Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems. In Proc. CSCW 1996, 67--76.
[17]
Hinrichs, U., Schmidt, H., & Carpendale, S. EMDialog: Bringing Information Visualization into the Museum. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 6 (2008), 1181--1189.
[18]
Huang, E. M., & Mynatt, E. D. Semi-public Displays for Small, Co-located groups. In Proc. CHI 2003, 49--56).
[19]
Jancke, G. Venolia, G., Grudin, J., Cadiz, J. and Gupta. J. Linking Public Spaces: Technical and Social Issues. In Proc. CHI 2001, 530--537.
[20]
Leong, T. W., & Brynskov, M. CO2nfession: Engaging with Values through Urban Conversations. In Proc. OZCHI 2009, 209--216.
[21]
McCarthy, F. Public and Situated Displays: Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies, Chapter 12: Promoting a Sense of Community with Ubiquitous Peripheral displays (2003), Springer, 283--308.
[22]
McCullough, M. On Typologies of Situated Interaction. Human- Computer Interaction 16, 2--4 (2001), 336--349.
[23]
Müller, J., Walter, R., Bailly, G., Nischt, M., & Alt, F. Looking Glass: A Field Study on Noticing Interactivity of a Shop Window, In Proc. CHI 2012, 297--306.
[24]
Networked Neighbourhoods Study. http://networkedneighbourhoods.com/?page_id=409.
[25]
O'Hara, K., Lipson, M., Jansen, M., Unger, A., Jeffries, H. and Macer, P. Jukola: Democratic Music Choice in a Public Space. In Proc. DIS 2010, ACM (2010), 145--154.
[26]
Oates, B.J. The Potential Contribution of ICTs to the Political Process. Electronic Journal of e-Government 1, 1 (2003), 32--42.
[27]
Peltonen, P., Kurvinen, E., Salovaara, A., Jacucci, G., Ilmonen, T. Evans, J., Oulasvirta, A. and Saarikko, P. It's mine, Don't Touch!: Interactions at a Large Multi-touch Display in a City Centre. In Proc of CHI, 2008, 1285--1294.
[28]
Putnam, R.D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
[29]
Rogers, E.M., Collins-Jarvis, L. and Schmitz, J. The PEN Project in Santa Monica: Interactive Communication, Equality, and Political Action. Journal of the America Society for Information Science 45, 6 (1994), 401--410.
[30]
Satchell, C., Hearn, G., Foth, M., & Schroeter, R. Suburban Nostalgia : The Community Building Potential of Urban Screens. In Proc. OZCHI 2008, 243--246.
[31]
Schroeter, R. Engaging New Digital Locals with Interactive Urban Screens to Collaboratively Improve the City. Proc. CSCW'2012, 227--236.
[32]
Schuler, D. Community Networks: Building a New Participatory Medium. Communications of the ACM 37, 1 (1994), 38--51.
[33]
Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, 1990.
[34]
Struppek, M. The Social Potential of Urban Screens. In Journal for Visual Communication 5, 2 (2007), 173--188.
[35]
Taylor, N., Marshall, J., & Blum-Ross, A. Viewpoint: Empowering Communities with Situated Voting Devices. In Proc. CHI 2012, 1361--1370.
[36]
Valkanova, N., Jorda, S., Tomitsch, M., & Vande Moere, A. Reveal-it!: The Impact of a Social Visualization Projection on Public Awareness and Discourse. In Proc. CHI 2013, 3461--3470.
[37]
Vande Moere A. and Hill D. Designing for the Situated and Public Visualization of Urban Data, Journal of Urban Technology 19, 2 (2012), 25--46.
[38]
Walter, R., Bailly, G., Müller, J. StrikeAPose: Revealing Mid-Air Gestures on Public Displays. In Proc. CHI 2013, 841--850

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)What Can Interactive Visualization Do for Participatory Budgeting in Chicago?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345634331:1(415-425)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)Policy Sandboxing: Empathy As An Enabler Towards Inclusive Policy-MakingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869088:CSCW2(1-42)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Configurations of Digital Participatory BudgetingACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363514431:2(1-28)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. MyPosition: sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
    February 2014
    1600 pages
    ISBN:9781450325400
    DOI:10.1145/2531602
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 February 2014

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. awareness
    2. gestural interaction.
    3. in-the-wild study
    4. public display
    5. reflection
    6. urban screen
    7. urban visualization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW'14
    Sponsor:
    CSCW'14: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    February 15 - 19, 2014
    Maryland, Baltimore, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 134 of 497 submissions, 27%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)166
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)What Can Interactive Visualization Do for Participatory Budgeting in Chicago?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345634331:1(415-425)Online publication date: Jan-2025
    • (2024)Policy Sandboxing: Empathy As An Enabler Towards Inclusive Policy-MakingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869088:CSCW2(1-42)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Configurations of Digital Participatory BudgetingACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363514431:2(1-28)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Input Visualization: Collecting and Modifying Data with Visual RepresentationsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642808(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)"To Click or not to Click": Back to Basic for Experience Sampling for Office Well-being in Shared Office SpacesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642295(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)Exploratory Multimethod Evaluation of Experience and Behaviour in Large Public Total Media SituationsProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Culture and Computer Science: Code and Materiality10.1145/3623462.3624634(1-11)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Beyond human sensors: More-than-human Citizen Sensing in biodiversity Urban Living LabsProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Communities and Technologies10.1145/3593743.3593753(27-38)Online publication date: 29-May-2023
    • (2023)PosterTalk: Expanding Participatory Agency in Public Survey Platforms via Middle-Out GatekeepingProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3595984(2573-2592)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2022)SenseMyStreet: Sensor Commissioning Toolkit for CommunitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35552156:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Revisiting Reflection in HCIProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35172336:1(1-27)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media