Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2424321.2424346acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

GeoCrowd: enabling query answering with spatial crowdsourcing

Published: 06 November 2012 Publication History

Abstract

With the ubiquity of mobile devices, spatial crowdsourcing is emerging as a new platform, enabling spatial tasks (i.e., tasks related to a location) assigned to and performed by human workers. In this paper, for the first time we introduce a taxonomy for spatial crowdsourcing. Subsequently, we focus on one class of this taxonomy, in which workers send their locations to a centralized server and thereafter the server assigns to every worker his nearby tasks with the objective of maximizing the overall number of assigned tasks. We formally define this maximum task assignment (or MTA) problem in spatial crowdsourcing, and identify its challenges. We propose alternative solutions to address these challenges by exploiting the spatial properties of the problem space. Finally, our experimental evaluations on both real-world and synthetic data verify the applicability of our proposed approaches and compare them by measuring both the number of assigned tasks and the travel cost of the workers.

References

[1]
Amazon mechanical turk. http://www.mturk.com.
[2]
Center for embedded networked sensing (cens). http://urban.cens.ucla.edu/projects/.
[3]
Crowdflower. http://www.crowdflower.com.
[4]
Google map maker. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google Map Maker.
[5]
Gowalla. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gowalla.
[6]
Minimum-cost maximum flow problem. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum-cost flow problem.
[7]
Openstreetmap. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap.
[8]
Scheduling. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheduling(computing).
[9]
Wikimapia. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiMapia.
[10]
University of california berkeley, 2008-2009. http://traffic.berkeley.edu/.
[11]
O. Alonso, D. E. Rose, and B. Stewart. Crowdsourcing for relevance evaluation. SIGIR Forum, 42(2):9--15, 2008.
[12]
F. Alt, A. S. Shirazi, A. Schmidt, U. Kramer, and Z. Nawaz. Location-based crowdsourcing: extending crowdsourcing to the real world. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI '10, pages 13--22, 2010.
[13]
M. Bulut, Y. Yilmaz, and M. Demirbas. Crowdsourcing location-based queries. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages 513--518, 2011.
[14]
K.-T. Chen, C.-C. Wu, Y.-C. Chang, and C.-L. Lei. A crowdsourceable qoe evaluation framework for multimedia content. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Multimedia, MM '09, pages 491--500.
[15]
C. Cornelius, A. Kapadia, D. Kotz, D. Peebles, M. Shin, and N. Triandopoulos. Anonysense: privacy-aware people-centric sensing. In MobiSys '08, pages 211--224.
[16]
J. Cranshaw, E. Toch, J. Hong, A. Kittur, and N. Sadeh. Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing, Ubicomp '10, pages 119--128, 2010.
[17]
A. Doan, R. Ramakrishnan, and A. Y. Halevy. Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Commun. ACM, 54(4):86--96, 2011.
[18]
Y. F. Dong, S. Kanhere, C. T. Chou, and N. Bulusu. Automatic collection of fuel prices from a network of mobile cameras. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, DCOSS '08, pages 140--156, 2008.
[19]
M. J. Franklin, D. Kossmann, T. Kraska, S. Ramesh, and R. Xin. Crowddb: answering queries with crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Management of data, SIGMOD '11, pages 61--72, 2011.
[20]
I. Guy, A. Perer, T. Daniel, O. Greenshpan, and I. Turbahn. Guess who?: enriching the social graph through a crowdsourcing game. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '11, pages 1373--1382.
[21]
B. Hull, V. Bychkovsky, Y. Zhang, K. Chen, M. Goraczko, A. Miu, E. Shih, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Madden. Cartel: a distributed mobile sensor computing system. In SenSys'06, pages 125--138.
[22]
P. G. Ipeirotis. Analyzing the amazon mechanical turk marketplace. XRDS, 17(2):16--21, 2010.
[23]
L. Kazemi and C. Shahabi. A privacy-aware framework for participatory sensing. SIGKDD Explorations, 13(1), 2011.
[24]
J. Kleinberg and E. Tardos. Algorithm Design. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 2005.
[25]
A. Marcus, E. Wu, S. Madden, and R. C. Miller. Crowdsourced databases: Query processing with people. In CIDR, pages 211--214, 2011.
[26]
P. Mohan, V. N. Padmanabhan, and R. Ramjee. Nericell: rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. In SenSys'08, pages 323--336.
[27]
A. Parameswaran and N. Polyzotis. Answering queries using humans, algorithms and databases. In Conference on Inovative Data Systems Research (CIDR 2011), 2011.
[28]
A. Parameswaran, A. D. Sarma, H. Garcia-Molina, N. Polyzotis, and J. Widom. Human-assisted graph search: it's okay to ask questions. Proc. VLDB Endow., 4(5):267--278, 2011.
[29]
E. Paulos, R. Honicky, and E. Goodman. Sensing atmosphere. In In Workshop on Sensing on Everyday Mobile Phones in Support of Participatory Research, 2007.
[30]
J. Ross, L. Irani, M. S. Silberman, A. Zaldivar, and B. Tomlinson. Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI EA '10, pages 2863--2872.
[31]
R. Snow, B. O'Connor, D. Jurafsky, and A. Y. Ng. Cheap and fast---but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '08, pages 254--263.
[32]
A. Sorokin and D. Forsyth. Utility data annotsation with amazon mechanical turk. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, 0, 2008.
[33]
J. Surowiecki. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. 2004.
[34]
L. H. U, M. L. Yiu, K. Mouratidis, and N. Mamoulis. Capacity constrained assignment in spatial databases. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, SIGMOD '08, pages 15--28. ACM, 2008.
[35]
L. von Ahn and L. Dabbish. Designing games with a purpose. Commun. ACM, 51(8):58--67, 2008.
[36]
R. C.-W. Wong, Y. Tao, A. W.-C. Fu, and X. Xiao. On efficient spatial matching. In Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on Very large data bases, VLDB '07, pages 579--590. VLDB Endowment, 2007.
[37]
X. Xie, H. Chen, and H. Wu. Bargain-based stimulation mechanism for selfish mobile nodes in participatory sensing network. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual IEEE communications society conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON'09, pages 72--80, 2009.
[38]
T. Yan, V. Kumar, and D. Ganesan. Crowdsearch: exploiting crowds for accurate real-time image search on mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, MobiSys '10, pages 77--90.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Leveraging Crowdsourcing for Mapping Mobility Restrictions in Data-Limited RegionsSmart Cities10.3390/smartcities70501007:5(2572-2593)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Towards Efficient and Deposit-Free Blockchain-Based Spatial CrowdsourcingACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/365634320:3(1-22)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
  • (2024)“I Prefer Regular Visitors to Answer My Questions”: Users’ Desired Experiential Background of Contributors for Location-based Crowdsourcing PlatformProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642520(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGSPATIAL '12: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
November 2012
642 pages
ISBN:9781450316910
DOI:10.1145/2424321
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. crowdsourced query
  2. spatial crowdsourcing
  3. spatial task assignment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGSPATIAL'12
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 257 of 1,238 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)64
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Leveraging Crowdsourcing for Mapping Mobility Restrictions in Data-Limited RegionsSmart Cities10.3390/smartcities70501007:5(2572-2593)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Towards Efficient and Deposit-Free Blockchain-Based Spatial CrowdsourcingACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/365634320:3(1-22)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
  • (2024)“I Prefer Regular Visitors to Answer My Questions”: Users’ Desired Experiential Background of Contributors for Location-based Crowdsourcing PlatformProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642520(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Clustering Based Priority Queue Algorithm for Spatial Task Assignment in CrowdsourcingIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2024.335329317:2(452-465)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)Prediction-Aware Adaptive Task Assignment for Spatial CrowdsourcingIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2024.342339623:12(13048-13061)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)CrowdKit: A Generic Programming Framework for Mobile Crowdsensing ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2024.338157823:11(10584-10597)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • (2024)Task Assignment Framework for Online Car-Hailing Systems With Electric VehiclesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2024.343456736:12(9361-9373)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Task Allocation in Spatial Crowdsourcing: An Efficient Geographic Partition FrameworkIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2024.337408636:9(4943-4955)Online publication date: Sep-2024
  • (2024)Longer Pick-Up for Less Pay: Towards Discount-Based Mobility ServicesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2024.336289336:8(3992-4006)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024)Trajectory-Aware Task Coalition Assignment in Spatial CrowdsourcingIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2023.333664236:11(7201-7216)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media