Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1125451.1125622acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

"Girls don't waste time": pre-adolescent attitudes toward ICT

Published: 21 April 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Relying on naturalistic observation, via video self-documentaries, contextual interviews, and focus groups, we explored gender differences in the information and communication technology (ICT) perception and use of United States middle school students. Our study revealed four key dimensions which foreground the significant gender differences in how students of this age approach and interact with technology. These differences should be considered when developing age appropriate technology and education programs. Our later research will explore the relationship among ICT use, self-efficacy, and career choices through a large-scale survey.

References

[1]
Chaika, M. Ethical Considerations in Gender-Oriented Entertainment Technology. Crossroads, ACM Press (1999). http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds2-2/gender.html.
[2]
Druin, A. The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour and Information Technology (BIT) 21, 1 (2002), 1--25.
[3]
Druin, A. What Children Can Teach Us: Developing Digital Libraries for Children with Children. Library Quarterly, 75, 1 (2005), 20--41.
[4]
Druin, A., Inkpen, K., When Are Personal Technologies for Children? Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5, (2001), 191--194.
[5]
Evers, V. Cultural Aspects of User Interface Understanding. Dissertation. The Open University, London, England. (2001).
[6]
Gaicquinta, J. B., Baur, J.A., and Levin, J. Beyond Technology's Promise: An examination of children's educational computing at home. Cambridge University Press: Great Britain, 1993.
[7]
Grunner, C., Bennet, D., Clements, M., Hawkins, J., Honey, M., and Moeller, B. Gender and technological imagination. Presented at the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA., 1990
[8]
Inkpen, K., Upitis, R., Klawe, M., Lawry, J., Anderson, A., Ndunda, M., Sedighian, K., Leroux, S., Hsu, D. "We Have Never Forgetful Flowers in Our Garden:" Girls' Responses To Electronic Games. Journal of Computers in Math and Science Teaching, 13, (4) 1994, 383--403.
[9]
Laurel, B. Games Women Play: Some Alternative Approaches. The Journal of Computer Game Design, 2, 5 (1989).
[10]
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., and Hackett, G. Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, (1994), 79--122.
[11]
Markopoulos, P and Bekker, M. On the assessment of usability testing methods for children. Interacting with Computers, 15, 3 (2003) 227--243.
[12]
Mynatt, E.D., Essa, I., and Rogers, W. Increasing the opportunities for Aging-in-Place. In Proc. Universal Usability, ACM Press (2000), 65 -- 71.
[13]
Mynatt, E. D., Rowan, J., Craighill, S., and Jacobs, A. Digital family portraits: Providing peace of mind for extended family members. In Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 333 -- 340.
[14]
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1998.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gender-Related Preferences for Learning by Tinkering: Updated Research is NeededProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241272118Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Measuring User Experience Inclusivity in Human-AI Interaction via Five User Problem-Solving StylesACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/366374014:3(1-90)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
  • (2024)The use of makerspaces for the development of computational thinking skills and dispositions: pedagogical practices facilitators useComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2024.2374679(1-40)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. "Girls don't waste time": pre-adolescent attitudes toward ICT

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '06: CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2006
    1914 pages
    ISBN:1595932984
    DOI:10.1145/1125451
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 April 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ICT perceptions and use
    2. gender differences
    3. middle school students
    4. user studies

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    CHI06
    Sponsor:
    CHI06: CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 22 - 27, 2006
    Québec, Montréal, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '25
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Gender-Related Preferences for Learning by Tinkering: Updated Research is NeededProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241272118Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Measuring User Experience Inclusivity in Human-AI Interaction via Five User Problem-Solving StylesACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/366374014:3(1-90)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
    • (2024)The use of makerspaces for the development of computational thinking skills and dispositions: pedagogical practices facilitators useComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2024.2374679(1-40)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
    • (2022)How Gender-Biased Tools Shape Newcomer Experiences in OSS ProjectsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2020.298417348:1(241-259)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Assessing user stories: the influence of template differences and gender-related problem-solving stylesRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-022-00389-127:4(521-544)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2022
    • (2020)Are there gender differences when interacting with social goal models?Empirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-020-09883-yOnline publication date: 18-Sep-2020
    • (2019)From Gender Biases to Gender-Inclusive DesignProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300283(1-14)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • (2018)Gender in open source softwareProceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering10.1145/3195570.3195572(21-24)Online publication date: 28-May-2018
    • (2018)Open source barriers to entry, revisitedProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3180155.3180241(1004-1015)Online publication date: 27-May-2018
    • (2018)Semi-Automating (or not) a Socio-Technical Method for Socio-Technical Systems2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506514(23-32)Online publication date: Oct-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media