article

Place learning in humans: The role of distance and direction information

Authors:

Jack M. Loomis,

Reginald G. Golledge,

Andrew C. BeallAuthors Info & Claims

Spatial Cognition and Computation, Volume 2, Issue 4

Pages 333 - 354

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015514424931

Published: 06 May 2001 Publication History

Abstract

Although the process of establishing a memory of a location is necessary for navigation, relatively little is known about the information that humans use when forming place memories. We examined the relative importance of distance and angular information about landmarks in place learning. Participants repeatedly learned a target location in relation to three distinct landmarks in an immersive computer-generated (virtual) environment. Later, during testing, they attempted to return to that location. The configurations of landmarks used during testing were altered from those participants learned in order to separate the effects of metric distance information and information about inter-landmark angles. In general, participants showed greater reliance on distance information than angular information. This reliance was affected by nonmetric relationships present during learning, as well as by the degree to which the learned environment contained right or straight angles.

References

[1]

Astur, R.S., Ortiz, M.L. and Sutherland, R.J. (1998). A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference, Behavioural Brain Research 93: 185-190.

[2]

Beall, A.C., Blascovich, J. and Loomis, J.M. (2001). PC-based immersive virtual environment technology as a behavioral science research tool. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara. See also http://www.recveb.ucsb.edu/vrut/.

[3]

Benhamou, S. and Poucet, B. (1996). A comparative analysis of spatial memory processes, Behavioural Processes 35: 113-126.

[4]

Benhamou, S. and Poucet, B. (1998). Landmark use by navigating rats (rattus norvegicus): Contrasting geometric and featural information, Journal of Comparative Psychology 112: 317-322.

[5]

Cartwright, B.A. and Collett, T.S. (1983). Landmark learning in bees, Journal of Comparative Physiology A 151: 521-543.

[6]

Chase, W.G. and Chi, M.T.H. (1981). Cognitive skill: Implications for spatial skill in large-scale environments. In J.H. Harvey (ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 111-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[7]

Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation, Cognition 23: 149-178.

[8]

Cheng, K. and Spetch, M.L. (1998). Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. In S. Healy (ed.), Spatial Representation in Animals (pp. 1-17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[9]

Collett, T.S., Cartwright, B.A. and Smith, B.A. (1986). Landmark learning and visuospatial memories in gerbils, Journal of Comparative Physiology A 158: 835-851.

[10]

Franklin, N. and Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119: 63-76.

[11]

Gallistel, C.R. (1990). The Organization of Learning. MIT Press: Cambridge.

[12]

Gaunet, F. and Loomis, J. (1999). Self-localization as a function of the information content of landmarks. Unpublished manuscript.

[13]

Greene, C.M. and Cook, R.G. (1997). Landmark geometry and identity controls spatial navigation in rats, Animal Learning and Behavior 25: 312-323.

[14]

Hamilton, D.A. and Sutherland, R.J. (1999). Blocking in human place learning: Evidence from virtual navigation, Psychobiology 27: 453-461.

[15]

Hermer, L. and Spelke, E. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation, Cognition 61: 195-232.

[16]

Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. and Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial locations, Psychological Review 98: 352-376.

[17]

Jacobs, W.J., Laurance, H.E. and Thomas, K.G.F. (1997). Place learning in virtual space I: Acquisition, overshadowing, and transfer, Learning and Motivation 28: 521-542.

[18]

Jacobs, W.J., Thomas, K.G.F., Laurance, H.E. and Nadel, L. (1998). Place learning in virtual space II: Topographical relations as one dimension of stimulus control, Learning and Motivation 29: 288-308.

[19]

Kamil, A.C. and Jones, J.E. (2000). Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 26: 439- 453.

[20]

Levitt, T.S. and Lawton, D.T. (1990). Qualitative navigation for mobile robots, Artificial Intelligence 44: 305-360.

Digital Library

[21]

Loomis, J.M. and Knapp, J.M. (in press). Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L.J. Hettinger and M.W. Haas (eds.), Virtual and Adaptive Environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[22]

Maurer, R. and Derivaz, V. (2001). Rats in a transparent morris water maze use elemental and configural geometry of landmarks as well as distance to the pool wall, Spatial Cognition and Computation 2: 135-156.

Digital Library

[23]

Morris, R.G.M. (1981). Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues, Learning and Motivation 12: 239-260.

[24]

Pick, H.L., Heinrichs, M.R., Montello, D.R., Smith, K., Sullivan, C.N. and Thompson, W.B. (1995). Topographic map reading. In P. Hancock, J. Flach, J. Caird and K. Vicente (eds.), Local Applications of the Ecological Approach to Human-Machine Systems (pp. 255- 284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[25]

Sandstrom, N.J., Kaufman, J. and Huettel, S.A. (1998). Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task, Cognitive Brain Research 6: 351-360.

[26]

Schlichting, C. (1999). Effect of field of view on perception of spatial layout. Unpublished masters thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.

[27]

Spetch, M.L., Cheng, K., MacDonald, S.E., Linkenhoker, B.A., Kelly, D.M. and Doerkson, S.R. (1997). Use of landmark configuration in pigeons and humans: II Generality across search tasks, Journal of Comparative Psychology 111: 14-24.

[28]

Sutherland, K.T. (1994/1995). The stability of geometric inference in location determination. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota 1994), Dissertation Abstracts International 55: 2860.

Digital Library

[29]

Thomas, K.G.F., Hsu, M., Laurance, H.E., Nadel, L. and Jacobs, W.J. (2001). Place learning in virtual space III: Investigation of spatial navigation training procedures and their application to fMRI and clinical neuropsychology, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 33: 21-37.

[30]

Thompson, W.B., Valiquette, C.M., Bennett, B.H. and Sutherland, K.T. (2000). Geometric reasoning under uncertainty for map-based localization, Spatial Cognition and Computation 1: 291-321.

Digital Library

[31]

Witmer, B.G. and Kline, P.B. (1998). Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7: 144-167.

Digital Library

[32]

Wiest, W.M. and Bell, B. (1985). Stevens exponent for psychophysical scaling of perceived, remembered, and inferred distance, Psychological Bulletin 98: 457-470.

Cited By

Mallot HLancier S(2018)Place recognition from distant landmarksBiological Cybernetics10.1007/s00422-018-0751-4112:4(291-303)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00422-018-0751-4
Pickup LFitzgibbon AGlennerster A(2013)Modelling human visual navigation using multi-view scene reconstructionBiological Cybernetics10.1007/s00422-013-0558-2107:4(449-464)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00422-013-0558-2
Boonsuk WGilbert SKelly JKonstan JChi EHöök K(2012)The impact of three interfaces for 360-degree video on spatial cognitionProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2207676.2208647(2579-2588)Online publication date: 5-May-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2207676.2208647
Show More Cited By

Place learning in humans: The role of distance and direction information
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Merging environments for shared spaces in mixed reality
VRST '18: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology

In virtual reality a real walking interface limits the extent of a virtual environment to our local walkable space. As local spaces are specific to each user, sharing a virtual environment with others for collaborative work or games becomes complicated. ...
Observing Virtual Avatars: The Impact of Avatars’ Fidelity on Identifying Interactions
Academic Mindtrek '21: Proceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek Conference

There are many cases where observing the interactions of a virtual avatar can be useful. However, it is unclear to what extent the avatar fidelity affects bystanders’ performance when observing gestures performed by avatars. We, therefore, conducted an ...
Investigating the process of emotion recognition in immersive and non-immersive virtual technological setups
VRST '16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology

This paper investigates the use of Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE) to evaluate the process of emotion recognition from faces (ERF). ERF has been mostly probed by using still photographs resembling universal expressions. However, this approach does ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Spatial Cognition and Computation

Spatial Cognition and Computation Volume 2, Issue 4

2001

234 pages

ISSN:1387-5868

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Copyright © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 06 May 2001

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

11
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Mallot HLancier S(2018)Place recognition from distant landmarksBiological Cybernetics10.1007/s00422-018-0751-4112:4(291-303)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00422-018-0751-4
Pickup LFitzgibbon AGlennerster A(2013)Modelling human visual navigation using multi-view scene reconstructionBiological Cybernetics10.1007/s00422-013-0558-2107:4(449-464)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00422-013-0558-2
Boonsuk WGilbert SKelly JKonstan JChi EHöök K(2012)The impact of three interfaces for 360-degree video on spatial cognitionProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2207676.2208647(2579-2588)Online publication date: 5-May-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2207676.2208647
Brunyé TGardony AMahoney CTaylor H(2012)Going to townComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.00828:1(257-266)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.008
Trinh TChevaillier PBarange MSoler JDe Loor PQuerrec R(2011)Integrating semantic directional relationships into virtual environmentsProceedings of the 17th Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments & Third Joint Virtual Reality10.5555/2386082.2386095(67-74)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2386082.2386095
Chellali Rbaizid KLi ZMollet NLiu Y(2009)2D and 3D virtual environment for human robot interactionProceedings of the 2009 international conference on Robotics and biomimetics10.5555/1819998.1820137(694-699)Online publication date: 19-Dec-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1819998.1820137
Schmid F(2008)Knowledge-based wayfinding maps for small display cartographyJournal of Location Based Services10.1080/174897208022795442:1(57-83)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1080/17489720802279544
Sancaktar İDemirkan H(2008)Spatial updating of objects after rotational and translational body movements in virtual environmentsComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.01324:6(2682-2696)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.013
Clementini EBillen R(2006)Modeling and Computing Ternary Projective Relations between RegionsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2006.10218:6(799-814)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2006
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TKDE.2006.102
Kuhl SSutherland KBrown JCai Y(2004)Self localization in virtual environments using visual anglesProceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGGRAPH international conference on Virtual Reality continuum and its applications in industry10.1145/1044588.1044692(472-475)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2004
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1044588.1044692
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents