Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: : Integrating institutional, market and technical factors

Published: 01 February 2020 Publication History

Highlights

Framework for capturing the challenges and issues that organisations face when adopting blockchain technology.
A holistic organisational framework integrating Institutional, Market and Technical factors for blockchain adoption.
Framework offers companies an initial frame of reference when adopting blockchain applications.

Abstract

The adoption of blockchain technologies require the consideration of a broad range of factors, over and above the predominantly technology focus of most current work. Whilst scholarly literature on blockchain technology is only beginning to emerge, majority are focused on the technicalities of the technology and tend to ignore the organizational complexities of adopting the technology. Drawing from a focused review of literature, this paper proposed a conceptual framework for adoption of blockchain technology capturing the complex relationships between institutional, market and technical factors. The framework highlights that varying outcomes are possible, and the change process is focal as this shapes the form blockchain applications take. Factors presented in the framework (institutional, market and technical) interact and mutually influence each other. The proposed framework can be used by organisations as a reference point for adopting blockchain applications and by scholars to expand, refine and evaluate research into blockchain technology.

References

[1]
W. Al-Saqaf, N. Seidler, Blockchain technology for social impact: Opportunities and challenges ahead, Journal of Cyber Policy 2 (3) (2017) 338–354.
[2]
T. Andreasyan, ISITC Europe and oasis to define technical standards for blockchain, Banking Technology 13 (2016) available at: http://www.bankingtech.com/608572/isitc-europe-and-oasis-to-define-technical-standards-for-blockchain/ (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[3]
E. Androulaki, A. Barger, V. Bortnikov, C. Cachin, K. Christidis, A. De Caro, et al., Hyperledger fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains, Proceedings of the thirteenth EuroSys conference (2018) 30.
[4]
N. Bauerle, What is a distributed ledger?, 2018, (Accessed on 23 July 2018) https://www.coindesk.com/information/what-is-a-distributed-ledger/.
[5]
M. Benoliel, Understanding the difference between coins, utility tokens and tokenized securities, Medium (2017) available at: https://medium.com/startup-grind/understanding-the-difference-between-coins-utility-tokens-and-tokenized-securities-a6522655fb91 (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[6]
K. Behnke, M.F.W.H.A. Janssen, Boundary conditions for traceability in food supply chains using blockchain technology, International Journal of Information Management (2019).
[7]
Blockchain, Blockchain size, available at https://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size?timespan=all (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2018.
[8]
G. Brandman, S. Thampapillai, Blockchain – Considering the regulatory horizon, Oxford Business Law Blog, 2016, available at: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2016/07/blockchain---considering-regulatory-horizon (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[9]
C. Brennan, W. Lunn, Blockchain: The trust disrupter, Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Ltd., London, UK, 2016, available at https://paymentscompliance.com/premium-content/research_report/credit-suisse-report-blockchain-trust-disrupter (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[10]
K. Buehler, D. Chiarella, H. Heidegger, M. Lemerle, A. Lal, J. Moon, Beyond the hype: Blockchains in capital markets, McKinsey working papers on corporate & investment banking (2015).
[11]
V. Buterin, et al., Ethereum white paper", GitHub repository, in: G. Lee, J. Lavin, D. Larimer, T. Cox, N. Hourt, Q. Ma (Eds.), EOS.IO technical white paper v2, Github, 2013, (March 2018), available at https://github.com/EOSIO/Documentation/blob/master/TechnicalWhitePaper.md (Accessed 5 April 2018).
[12]
V. Buterin, Ethereum white paper: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform, available at https://www.weusecoins.com/assets/pdf/library/Ethereum_white_paper a_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2014.
[13]
C. Cachin, Architecture of the Hyperledger blockchain fabric, Workshop on distributed cryptocurrencies and consensus ledgers (2016) available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f852/c5f3fe649f8a17ded391df0796677a59927f.pdf (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[14]
J.S. Cermeño, Blockchain in financial services: Regulatory landscape and future challenges for its commercial application, BBVA Research, Madrid, Spain, 2016.
[15]
K. Christidis, M. Devetsikiotis, Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things, IEEE Access 4 (2016) 2292–2303.
[16]
Court of Justice of the European Union, The exchange of traditional currencies for units of the ‘bitcoin’ virtual currency is exempt from VAT, available at http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2015-10/cp150128en.pdf. (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2015.
[17]
M. Crosby, P. Pattanayak, S. Verma, V. Kalyanaraman, Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin, Applied Innovation 2 (2016) 6–10.
[18]
Deloitte, Blockchain: Enigma. Paradox. Opportunity, Deloitte LLP, London, 2016, available at https://www2.deloitte.com/content/ (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[19]
A. Deshpande, K. Stewart, L. Lepetit, S. Gunashekar, Distributed ledger technologies/blockchain: Challenges, opportunities and the prospects for standards, Overview report The British Standards Institution (BSI), 2017, available at Distributed_Ledger_(aka_blockchain)_Standards_2016.11_v2.4.pdf (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[20]
ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authorities), The distributed ledger technology applied to securities markets, available at https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/dlt_report_-_esma50-1121423017-285.pdf (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2017.
[21]
ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority), Discussion paper: The distributed ledger technology applied to securities markets, available at https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2016-773_dp_dlt.pdf (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2016.
[22]
ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority), Report: The distributed ledger technology applied to securities markets, available at https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2016-773_dp_dlt.pdf (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2016.
[23]
Euro Banking Association Working Group On Electronic Alternative Payments, Applying cryptotechnologies to trade finance: Information paper, available at https://www.abe-eba.eu/downloads/knowledgeand-research/EBA_May2016_eAPWG_Applying_cryptotechnologies_to_Trade_Finance.pdf (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2016.
[24]
M. Harwood-Jones, Blockchain and T2S: A potential disruptor, Beyond Borders Report, SCB, 2016, available at https://www.sc.com/BeyondBorders/blockchain-mass-adoption (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[25]
L. Hughes, Y.K. Dwivedi, S.K. Misra, N.P. Rana, V. Raghavan, V. Akella, Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda, International Journal of Information Management 49 (2019) 114–129.
[26]
T.I. Kiviat, Beyond bitcoin: Issues in regulating blockchain tranactions, Duke LJ 65 (2015) 569.
[27]
W. Knight, The technology behind bitcoin is shaking up much more than money, Technology Review (2017) available at https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604148/the-technology-behind-bitcoin-is-shaking-up-much-more-than-money/ (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[28]
J. Koppenjan, J. Groenewegen, Institutional design for complex technological systems, International Journal of Technology Policy and Management 5 (3) (2005) 240–257.
[29]
N. Kshetri, 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives, International Journal of Information Management 39 (2018) 80–89.
[30]
M. Mainelli, S. Mills, The missing links in the chains? Mutual distributed ledger (aka blockchain) standards, [Long Finance report] Z/Yen Group, London, 2016.
[31]
M. Mainelli, M. Smith, Sharing ledgers for sharing economies: an exploration of mutual distributed ledgers (aka blockchain technology), The Journal of Financial Perspectives 3 (3) (2015) 38–69.
[32]
M.L. Marsal-Llacuna, Future living framework: Is blockchain the next enabling network?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 128 (2018) 226–234.
[33]
R. Miller, IBM unveils blockchain as a service based on open source Hyperledger Fabric technology, available at https://techcrunch.com/2017/03/19/ibm-unveils-blockchain-as-a-service-based-on-open-source-hyperledger-fabric-technology/?guccounter=1 (Accessed 25 May 2018). 2017.
[34]
D.C. Mills, K. Wang, B. Malone, A. Ravi, J.C. Marquardt, A.I. Badev, et al., Distributed ledger technology in payments, clearing, and settlement, available at https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2016-773_dp_dlt.pdf (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2016.
[35]
S. Ølnes, J. Ubacht, M. Janssen, Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing, Government Information Quarterly 34 (3) (2017) 355–364.
[36]
J. Palfreyman, Blockchain for government?, available at https://www.ibm.com/blogs/insights-on-business/government/blockchain-for-government/ (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2015.
[37]
Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, Distributed ledgers – Closed POST breakfast event, Parliamentary Office, London, 2016.
[38]
F.W. Scharpf, Games real actors play. Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research, Westview Press, Boulder, 1997.
[39]
K. Sedgwick, Five countries where bitcoin is illegal, available at https://news.bitcoin.com/five-countries-where-bitcoin-is-illegal/ (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2017.
[40]
S.J. Shackelford, S. Myers, Block-by-block: leveraging the power of blockchain technology to build trust and promote cyber peace, Yale Journal of Law and Technology 19 (2017) 334.
[41]
V. Shah, Block.one eyes 35% increase in transaction speeds with EOSIO 1.6.0 blockchain update, available at https://blokt.com/news/block-one-eyes-35-increase-in-transaction-speeds-with-eosio-1-6-0-blockchain-update (Accessed 14 May 2019) 2019.
[42]
U. Sivarajah, M.M. Kamal, Z. Irani, V. Weerakkody, Critical analysis of big data challenges and analytical methods, Journal of Business Research 70 (2017) 263–286.
[43]
U. Sivarajah, Z. Irani, V. Weerakkody, Evaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government, Government Information Quarterly 32 (4) (2015) 473–487.
[44]
M. Swan, Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy, O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2015.
[45]
T. Swanson, Consensus-as-a-service: A brief report on the emergence of permissioned, distributed ledger systems, available at http://www.ofnumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Permissioned-distributed-ledgers.pdf (Accessed 18 March 2018) 2015.
[46]
K. Sweet, On the money: Credit cards to perfect targeting programs, available at https://apnews.com/e1ca14ae82664f7f87504e7bbf862bfa (Accessed 25 May 2018) 2018.
[47]
SWIFT Institute & Accenture, (2016). SWIFT on distributed ledger technologies, SWIFT. Available at http://www.ameda.org.eg/ (Accessed 18 March 2018).
[48]
D. Tapscott, A. Tapscott, Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world, Penguin Random House, New York, NY, 2016.
[49]
S. van Engelenburg, M. Janssen, B. Klievink, Design of a software architecture supporting business-to-government information sharing to improve public safety and security, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems (2017) 1–24.
[50]
H. Vranken, Sustainability of bitcoin and blockchains, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 28 (2017) 1–9.
[51]
M. Vukolić, The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: Proof-of-work vs. BFT replication, International workshop on open problems in network security (2015) 112–125.
[52]
O.E. Williamson, Transaction cost economics: How it works; where it is headed, De Economist 146 (1) (1998) 23–58.
[53]
G. Wood, Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger, Ethereum Project Yellow Paper 151 (2014) 1–32.
[54]
P. Yeoh, Regulatory issues in blockchain technology, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 25 (2) (2017) 196–208.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Investigation and Modelling of Barriers in Adoption of Blockchain Technology for Accounting and FinanceJournal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.35396032:1(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Blockchain applications for Internet of Things (IoT)Multiagent and Grid Systems10.3233/MGS-23007419:4(363-379)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Disintermediation of consumer services through blockchain? The role of intermediary brands, value-added services, and privacy concernsInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.10280678:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
        International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals  Volume 50, Issue C
        Feb 2020
        586 pages

        Publisher

        Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

        Netherlands

        Publication History

        Published: 01 February 2020

        Author Tags

        1. Blockchain technology
        2. Distributed ledger
        3. Adoption
        4. Diffusion
        5. Trust
        6. Markets
        7. Intermediaries

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Investigation and Modelling of Barriers in Adoption of Blockchain Technology for Accounting and FinanceJournal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.35396032:1(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2024
        • (2024)Blockchain applications for Internet of Things (IoT)Multiagent and Grid Systems10.3233/MGS-23007419:4(363-379)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
        • (2024)Disintermediation of consumer services through blockchain? The role of intermediary brands, value-added services, and privacy concernsInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.10280678:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2024
        • (2024)Blockchain and agency theory in supply chain managementInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.10274775:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2024
        • (2024)Navigating Through the Unknowns-Organizational Readiness Assessment Model for Quantum-Safe TransitionElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_27(438-453)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024
        • (2024)Interoperability for Emerging Technologies: A Systematic Scoping ReviewElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_24(387-401)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024
        • (2024)Challenges and solutions in the development of blockchain applicationsJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.265136:8Online publication date: 5-Aug-2024
        • (2023)The Application and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in BlockchainJournal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.32365631:7(1-32)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
        • (2023)The Role of Governments in Driving Industry 4.0 Adoption in Emerging CountriesJournal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.32343931:1(1-31)Online publication date: 18-May-2023
        • (2023)The Paradoxes of Trust and Transparency of Blockchain TechnologiesJournal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.32111131:5(1-22)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        View options

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media