Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Whose and what chatter matters? The effect of tweets on movie sales

Published: 01 November 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Social broadcasting networks such as Twitter in the U.S. and ''Weibo'' in China are transforming the way online word of mouth (WOM) is disseminated and consumed in the digital age. In the present study, we investigated whether and how Twitter WOM affects movie sales by estimating a dynamic panel data model using publicly available data and well-known machine learning algorithms. We found that chatter on Twitter does matter; however, the magnitude and direction of the effect depend on whom the WOM is from and what the WOM is about. Incorporating the number of followers the author of each WOM message had into our study, we found that the effect of WOM from users followed by more Twitter users is significantly larger than those followed by less Twitter users. In support of some recent findings about the importance of WOM valence on product sales, we also found that positive Twitter WOM is associated with higher movie sales, whereas negative WOM is associated with lower movie sales. Interestingly, we found that the strongest effect on movie sales comes from those tweets in which the authors expressed their intention to watch a certain movie. We attribute this finding to the dual effects of such intention tweets on movie sales: the direct effect through the WOM author's own purchase behavior, and the indirect effect through either the awareness effect or the persuasive effect of the WOM on its recipients. Our findings provide new perspectives to understand the effect of WOM on product sales and have important managerial implications. For example, our study reveals the potential values of monitoring people's intentions and sentiments on Twitter and identifying influential users for companies wishing to harness the power of social broadcasting networks.

References

[1]
Arellano, M. and Bond, S., Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies. v58. 277-297.
[2]
Chevalier, J. and Mayzlin, D., The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research. v43. 345-354.
[3]
Chintagunta, P., Gopinath, S. and Venkataraman, S., The effect of online user reviews on movie box office performance: accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science. v29. 944-957.
[4]
Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X. and Awad, N., Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: the case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing. v21. 23-45.
[5]
den Bulte, C.V. and Joshi, Y., New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Science. v26. 400-421.
[6]
Dhar, V. and Chang, E., Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing. v23. 300-307.
[7]
Duan, W., Gu, B. and Whinston, A., Do online reviews matter? An investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems. v45. 1007-1016.
[8]
Gladwell, M., The Tipping Point. 2000. Back Bay Books.
[9]
Godes, D. and Mayzlin, D., Using online conversation to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science. v23. 545-560.
[10]
Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P., Personal Influence. 1955. Free Press.
[11]
Liu, Y., Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing. v70. 74-89.
[12]
Mitchell, T., Machine Learning. 1997. McGraw-Hill.
[13]
Onishi, H. and Manchanda, P., Marketing activity, blogging and sales. International Journal of Research in Marketing. v29. 221-234.
[14]
Rui, H., Whinston, A. and Winkler, E., Follow the Tweets. Wall Street Journal.
[15]
Sharda, R. and Delen, D., Predicting box-office success of motion pictures with neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications. v30. 243-254.
[16]
Siegel, A., Practical Business Statistics. 2011. Academic Press.
[17]
Slywotzky, A. and Shapiro, B., Leveraging to beat the odds: the new marketing mind-set. Harvard Business Review. v71. 97-107.
[18]
Sonnier, G., McAlister, L. and Rutz, O., A dynamic model of the effect of online communications on firm sales. Marketing Science. v30. 702-716.
[19]
Steinwart, I. and Christmann, A., Support Vector Machines. 2008. Springer-Verlag.
[20]
Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. and Pauwels, K., Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing. v73. 90-102.
[21]
Bose-Einstein dynamics and adaptive contracting in the motion picture industry. The Economic Journal. v106. 1493-1514.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Exploration of the Dynamics Between Social Media and Box Office PerformanceInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-023-10389-326:2(591-608)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
  • (2023)A contest between users and marketers? The economic value of social media content for adverse eventsInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2023.10349660:6Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Sentiment analysis: A survey on design framework, applications and future scopesArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-023-10442-256:11(12505-12560)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Decision Support Systems
Decision Support Systems  Volume 55, Issue 4
November, 2013
139 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2013

Author Tags

  1. Dynamic panel data
  2. Movie sales
  3. Social broadcasting networks
  4. Social media
  5. Twitter
  6. Word-of-mouth

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Exploration of the Dynamics Between Social Media and Box Office PerformanceInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-023-10389-326:2(591-608)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
  • (2023)A contest between users and marketers? The economic value of social media content for adverse eventsInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2023.10349660:6Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Sentiment analysis: A survey on design framework, applications and future scopesArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-023-10442-256:11(12505-12560)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2023
  • (2022)The Effect of Online Reviews on Movie Box Office SalesJournal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.29865230:1(1-16)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2022
  • (2022)A Hashtag Is Worth a Thousand WordsInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2022.110733:4(1403-1427)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Visualization Analysis of Consumer Engagement Research Based on the Perspective of Knowledge MappingProceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Human Machine Interaction10.1145/3560470.3560475(36-46)Online publication date: 6-May-2022
  • (2022)Portrayals of Race and Gender: Sentiment in 100 Years of Children’s LiteratureProceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/3530190.3534811(20-28)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Can people hear others’ crying?Information Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2022.10299759:5Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Factors influencing fake news rebuttal acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the moderating effect of cognitive abilityComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2021.107174130:COnline publication date: 1-May-2022
  • (2022)Review on sentiment analysis for text classification techniques from 2010 to 2021Multimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-14112-382:6(8137-8193)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media