Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

When does higher degree of interaction lead to higher learning in visualizations? Exploring the role of 'Interactivity Enriching Features'

Published: 01 March 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Interactive visualizations are being used extensively for effective teaching and learning. Higher degree of interaction in visualizations improves comprehension and leads to deeper learning. However, some research studies have reported ambiguous, inconclusive results in terms of learning benefits of interactive visualizations. The conditional results in such studies suggest some additional features to be instrumental in assisting learners in deriving benefits of interactivity in visualizations. We refer to these features as 'Interactivity Enriching Features'. This study examines how degree of interaction of the user with the visualization affects learning outcome. The study proposes how interactivity in visualizations can be enriched by offering apt affordances and evaluates what additional features could make learning from interactive visualizations more effective at the same degree of interaction. The study has been carried out in the context of a course on Signals and Systems in Electrical Engineering on second year engineering students (N = 134). The subjects were assigned to one of the four conditions: a Non-Interactive Visualization, an Animation, a Simulation, and an Interactivity Enriched Visualization. The dependent variable was test-score for 'Understand conceptual knowledge', 'Understand procedural knowledge' and 'Apply procedural knowledge' categories. The research findings indicate that, i) different degrees of interaction are required for learning different types of knowledge and ii) interactive visualization could not deliver its learning benefits unless it was augmented by 'Interactivity Enriching Features' in the form of appropriate affordance for variable manipulation, especially for higher learning outcomes. This research study contributes towards the design of educationally effective interactive visualizations. We examine if higher degree of interaction in visualization leads to higher learning.We find that different types of knowledge demand different degrees of interaction.Higher degree of interaction augmented with appropriate affordance improves learning.Affordance of 'Permutative Variables' in visualization boosts procedural knowledge.Constrained exploration of variables shows higher learning than open exploration.

References

[1]
A. Aleksandrova, N. Nancheva, Electromagnetism: interaction of simulation and real lab experiment, International Journal of Information Technologies and Knowledge, 1 (2007) 44-50.
[2]
L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl, P.W. Airasian, K.A. Cruikshank, R.E. Mayer, P.R. Pintrich, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, in: A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Longman, New York, 2001.
[3]
K.A. Austin, Multimedia learning: cognitive individual differences and display design techniques predict transfer learning with multimedia learning modules, Computers & Education, 53 (2009) 1339-1354.
[4]
M. Barak, T. Ashkar, Y.J. Dori, Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students' thinking and motivation, Computers & Education, 56 (2011) 839-846.
[5]
M. Bétrancourt, B. Tversky, Effect of computer animation on users' performance: a review, Le Travail Humain: A Bilingual and Multi-Disciplinary Journal in Human Factors, 63 (2000) 311-329.
[6]
J.-M. Boucheix, E. Schneider, Static and animated presentations in learning dynamic mechanical systems, Learning and Instruction, 19 (2009) 112-127.
[7]
J. Brooke, SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale, in: Usability evaluation in Industry, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996, pp. 189-194.
[8]
S.K. Card, J.D. Mackinlay, B. Shneiderman, Readings in information visualization; using vision to think, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1999.
[9]
S.K. Chaturvedi, A. Osman, Simulation and visualization enhanced engineering education, in: Proceedings of an International Mechanical Engineering Education Conference, 2006, pp. 1-8.
[10]
C. Chen, Information visualization: Beyond the horizon, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 2004.
[11]
R.C. Clark, L. Chopeta, Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for Planning, Designing, and Evaluating visuals in training materials, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, 2004.
[12]
L. Cohen, L. Manion, K. Morrison, Research methods in education, Routledge, New York, 2007.
[13]
S.G. Crutchfield, W.J. Rugh, Interactive exercises and demonstrations on the Web for basic signals, systems and control, in: Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on, Vol. 4, 1997, pp. 3811-3815.
[14]
S. Domagk, R.N. Schwartz, J.L. Plass, Computers in Human Behavior Interactivity in multimedia learning: an integrated model, Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (2010) 1024-1033.
[15]
A. El Saddik, Interactive multimedia learning: shared reusable visualization-based modules, Springer-Verlag, NY, 2001.
[16]
Engin, Modeling and simulation concepts in engineering education: virtual tools, Engineering Education, 14 (2006) 113-127.
[17]
T. Gao, J.D. Lehman, The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a web-based learning environment, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14 (2003) 367-386.
[18]
J.J. Gibson, The theory of affordances, in: Perceiving, acting and knowing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977.
[19]
G.V. Glass, K.D. Hopkins, One factor analysis of variance, in: Statistical methods in education and psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1970, pp. 371-421.
[20]
T. Grunwald, C. Corsbie-Massay, Guidelines for cognitively efficient multimedia learning tools: educational strategies, cognitive load, and interface design, Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 81 (2006) 213-223.
[21]
X. Guan, M. Zhang, Y. Zheng, Matlab simulation in signals & systems using Matlab at different levels, in: Education Technology and Computer Science, ETCS '09. First International Workshop on, 2, 2009, pp. 952-955.
[22]
J.L. Guzman, S. Dormido, M. Berenguel, Interactivity in education: an experience in the automatic control field, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 21 (2010) 360-371.
[23]
F. Hanisch, W. Straíßer, How to include visuals and interactivities in an educational computer graphics repository, Computers & Graphics, 29 (2005) 237-243.
[24]
S. Hansen, Designing educationally effective algorithm visualizations, Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 13 (2002) 291-317.
[25]
J. Hiebert, P. Lefevre, Procedural and conceptual knowledge in mathematics: an introductory analysis, in: Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986, pp. 1-27.
[26]
B. Imhof, K. Scheiter, P. Gerjets, Learning about locomotion patterns from visualizations: effects of presentation format and realism, Computers & Education, 57 (2011) 1961-1970.
[27]
D.H. Jonassen, Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change, Pearson Education, Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2006.
[28]
S. Kalyuga, Prior knowledge principle, in: Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005, pp. 325-337.
[29]
S. Kalyuga, Enhancing instructional efficiency of interactive e-learning environments: a cognitive load perspective, Educational Psychology Review, 19 (2007) 387-399.
[30]
S. Kalyuga, P. Ayres, P. Chandler, J. Sweller, The expertise reversal effect, Educational Psychologist, 38 (2003) 23-31.
[31]
N. Kehtarnavaz, P. Loizou, M. Rahman, An interactive hybrid programming approach to signals and systems laboratory, in: Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2008. IEEE International Conference on, 2008, pp. 2633-2636.
[32]
U. Kombartzky, R. Ploetzner, Beneficial effects of learning from animations, in: Learning by effective utilization of technologies: Facilitating intercultural understanding. Supplementary Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Computers in Education, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2007, pp. 3-4.
[33]
G. Korakakis, E. Pavlatou, J. Palyvos, N. Spyrellis, 3D visualization types in multimedia applications for science learning: a case study for 8th grade students in Greece, Computers & Education, 52 (2009) 390-401.
[34]
D.R. Krathwohl, A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: an overview, Theory Into Practice, 41 (2002) 212-218.
[35]
S. Kriz, M. Hegarty, Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (2007) 911-930.
[36]
T. Kühl, K. Scheiter, P. Gerjets, S. Gemballa, Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations?, Computers & Education, 56 (2011) 176-187.
[37]
E. Lahtinen, T. Ahoniemi, Visualizations to support programming on different levels of cognitive development, in: Proceedings of The Fifth Koli Calling Conference on Computer Science Education, 2005, pp. 87-94.
[38]
M. Lattu, V. Meisalo, J. Tarhio, A visualisation tool as a demonstration aid, Computers & Education, 41 (2003) 133-148.
[39]
R. Lengler, M.J. Eppler, Towards a periodic table of visualization methods for management, in: IASTED Proceedings of the Conference on Graphics and Visualization in Engineering (GVE 2007), Clearwater, Florida, USA, 2007.
[40]
H. Liang, Interactivity of visual mathematical representations: factors affecting learning, Learning, 17 (2006) 179-212.
[41]
H.-N. Liang, K. Sedig, Application of frameworks in the analysis and (re) design of interactive visual learning tools, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20 (2009) 215-254.
[42]
H.-N. Liang, K. Sedig, Can interactive visualization tools engage and support pre-university students in exploring non-trivial mathematical concepts?, Computers & Education, 54 (2010) 972-991.
[43]
L. Lin, R.K. Atkinson, Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes, Computers & Education, 56 (2011) 650-658.
[44]
R.K. Lowe, Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics, Learning and Instruction, 13 (2003) 157-176.
[45]
R. Low, J. Sweller, The modality principle in multimedia learning, in: Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge, New York, 2005, pp. 147-158.
[46]
H. McManus, E. Rebentisch, Experiences in simulation-based education in engineering processes, in: Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. FIE 2008. 38th Annual, IEEE, 2008, pp. S1C 21-26.
[47]
D.L. Millard, Interactive learning modules for electrical engineering education, in: Electronic Components & Technology Conference, 2000. Proceedings. 50th, IEEE, 2000, pp. 1042-1047.
[48]
R. Moreno, R.E. Mayer, Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (1999) 358.
[49]
R. Moreno, A. Valdez, Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: the role of student interactivity and feedback, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53 (2005) 35-45.
[50]
J.K. Nelson, M.A. Hjalmarson, K.E. Wage, J.R. Buck, Students' interpretation of the importance and difficulty of concepts in signals and systems, in: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010 IEEE, IEEE, 2010, pp. T3G1-6.
[51]
S.I. Park, G. Lee, M. Kim, Do students benefit equally from interactive computer simulations regardless of prior knowledge levels?, Computers & Education, 52 (2009) 649-655.
[52]
R. Pinter, D. Radosav, S.M. Cisar, Interactive animation in developing e-learning contents, in: MIPRO, 2010 Proceedings of the 33rd International Convention, IEEE, 2010, pp. 1007-1010.
[53]
J.L. Plass, B.D. Homer, E.O. Hayward, Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21 (2009) 31-61.
[54]
N.S. Podolefsky, E.B. Moore, K.K. Perkins, Implicit scaffolding in interactive simulations: Design strategies to support multiple educational goals, 2013.
[55]
R. Rabenstein, SYSTOOL - an online learning tool for signals and systems, in: ICASSP, IEEE, 2002, pp. 4128-4131.
[56]
R. Reichert, W. Hartmann, On the Learning in e-Learning, in: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vol. 2004, 2004, pp. 1590-1595.
[57]
G.D. Rey, Time advice and learning questions in computer simulations, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27 (2011) 397-410.
[58]
N. Rutten, W.R. Van Joolingen, J.T. Van der Veen, The learning effects of computer simulations in science education, Computers & Education, 58 (2012) 136-153.
[59]
O. de los Santos Vidal, R.M. Jameson, M.F. Iskander, A. Balcells, J.C. Catten, Interaction and simulation-based multimedia modules for electromagnetics education, in: Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996. FIE'96. 26th Annual Conference, Proceedings of, Vol. 3, IEEE, 1996, pp. 1067-1070.
[60]
R. Schulmeister, Taxonomy of multimedia component interactivity. A contribution to the current metadata debate, Studies in Communication Sciences. Studi di scienze della communicazione, 3 (2003) 61-80.
[61]
S. Schwan, R. Riempp, The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots, Learning and Instruction, 14 (2004) 293-305.
[62]
K. Sedig, H.-N. Liang, Interactivity of visual mathematical representations: factors affecting learning and cognitive processes, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17 (2006) 179-212.
[63]
K. Sedig, M. Sumner, Characterizing interaction with visual mathematical representations, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11 (2006) 1-55.
[64]
J. Shaffer, J. Hamaker, J. Picone, Visualization of signal processing concepts, in: Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1998. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on, vol. 3, IEEE, 1998, pp. 1853-1856.
[65]
A. Spanias, R. Chilumula, C.W. Huang, Work in progress: collaborative signals and systems laboratories at ASU, UWB, UCF, UTD, and URI, in: Frontiers in Education Conference, 36th Annual, IEEE, 2006, pp. 12-13.
[66]
I.A.E. Spanjers, T. Van Gog, P. Wouters, J.J.G. Van Merriënboer, Explaining the segmentation effect in learning from animations: the role of pausing and temporal cueing, Computers & Education, 59 (2012) 274-280.
[67]
R. Spence, Information visualization: Design for interaction, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, UK, 2007.
[68]
M. Stieff, U. Wilensky, Connected chemistry-incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12 (2003) 285-302.
[69]
B.L. Sturm, J.D. Gibson, Signals and Systems using MATLAB: an integrated suite of applications for exploring and teaching media signal processing, in: Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE'05. Proceedings 35th Annual Conference, IEEE, 2005, pp. F2E21-26.
[70]
R. Taraban, A. Definis, A. Brown, E.E. Anderson, M.P. Sharma, A paradigm for assessing conceptual and procedural knowledge in engineering students, Journal of Engineering Education, 96 (2007) 335-345.
[71]
Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics, in: Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005.
[72]
M. Tory, T. Möller, A model-based visualization taxonomy, School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, 2002.
[73]
B. Tversky, J.B. Morrison, M. Betrancourt, Animation: can it facilitate?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57 (2002) 247-262.
[74]
K.E. Wage, J.R. Buck, C.H. Wright, T.B. Welch, The signals and systems concept inventory, Education, IEEE Transactions on, 48 (2005) 448-461.
[75]
P.-Y. Wang, B.K. Vaughn, M. Liu, The impact of animation interactivity on novices' learning of introductory statistics, Computers & Education, 56 (2011) 300-311.
[76]
C. Ware, Information visualization: Perception for design, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 2004.
[77]
H.K. Wu, J.S. Krajcik, E. Soloway, Promoting understanding of chemical representations: students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (2001) 821-842.
[78]
M. Yaman, C. Nerdel, H. Bayrhuber, Computers & Education the effects of instructional support and learner interests when learning using computer simulations, Computers & Education, 51 (2008) 1784-1794.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Virtual Reality in Digital Education: An Affordance Network Perspective on Effective Use BehaviorACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3663682.366368555:2(14-41)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
  • (2021)Algodynamics: Algorithms as systems2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637441(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Towards Classification of Interactive Non-programming Tasks Promoting Computational ThinkingInformatics in Schools. Rethinking Computing Education10.1007/978-3-030-90228-5_2(16-28)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. When does higher degree of interaction lead to higher learning in visualizations? Exploring the role of 'Interactivity Enriching Features'

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Computers & Education
        Computers & Education  Volume 82, Issue C
        March 2015
        497 pages

        Publisher

        Elsevier Science Ltd.

        United Kingdom

        Publication History

        Published: 01 March 2015

        Author Tags

        1. Affordance
        2. Engineering education
        3. Interactive learning environments
        4. Multimedia learning
        5. Simulations

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Virtual Reality in Digital Education: An Affordance Network Perspective on Effective Use BehaviorACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3663682.366368555:2(14-41)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
        • (2021)Algodynamics: Algorithms as systems2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637441(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
        • (2021)Towards Classification of Interactive Non-programming Tasks Promoting Computational ThinkingInformatics in Schools. Rethinking Computing Education10.1007/978-3-030-90228-5_2(16-28)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2021
        • (2016)Design and implementation of an interactive virtual control laboratory using haptic interface for undergraduate engineering studentsComputer Applications in Engineering Education10.1002/cae.2172724:4(508-518)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016

        View Options

        View options

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media