Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/647489.727158guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Learning the Empirical Hardness of Optimization Problems: The Case of Combinatorial Auctions

Published: 09 September 2002 Publication History

Abstract

We propose a new approach for understanding the algorithm-specific empiricalh ardness of NP-Hard problems. In this work we focus on the empirical hardness of the winner determination problem--an optimization problem arising in combinatorial auctions--when solved by ILOG's CPLEX software. We consider nine widely-used problem distributions and sample randomly from a continuum of parameter settings for each distribution. We identify a large number of distribution-nonspecific features of data instances and use statisticalregression techniques to learn, evaluate and interpret a function from these features to the predicted hardness of an instance.

References

[1]
D. Achlioptas, C. Gomes, H. Kautz, and B. Selman. Generating satisfiable instances. In AAAI-00 , 2000.
[2]
A. Anderson, M. Tenhunen, and F. Ygge. Integer programming for combinatorial auction winner determination. In ICMAS , 2000.
[3]
P. Cheeseman, B. Kanefsky, and W. M. Taylor. Where the Really Hard Problems Are. In IJCAI-91 , 1991.
[4]
S. de Vries and R. Vohra. Combinatoriala uctions: A brief survey. Unpublished, 2000.
[5]
J. Friedman. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Annals of Statistics , 19, 1991.
[6]
Y. Fujishima, K. Leyton-Brown, and Y. Shoham. Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: Optimal and approximate approaches. In IJCAI-99 , 1999.
[7]
Carla P. Gomes and Bart Selman. Problem structure in the presence of perturbations. In AAAI/IAAI , 1997.
[8]
R. Gonen and D. Lehmann. Optimal solutions for multi-unit combinatorial auctions: Branch and bound heuristics. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce , 2000.
[9]
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. Elements of Statistical Learning . Springer, 2001.
[10]
R. C. Holte. Combinatorial auctions, knapsack problems, and hill-climbing search. In Canadian Conference on AI , 2001.
[11]
H.H. Hoos and C. Boutilier. Solving combinatorial auctions using stochastic local search. In AAAI-00 , 2000.
[12]
E. Horvitz, Y. Ruan, C. Gomes, H. Kautz, B. Selman, and M. Chickering. A bayesian approach to tackling hard computational problems, 2001.
[13]
R. Kastner, C. Hsieh, M. Potkonjak, and M. Sarrafzadeh. On the sensitivity of incrementalal gorithms for combinatorial auctions, 2002. UCLA CS Tech. Report 020000.
[14]
R. Korf and M. Reid. Complexity analysis of admissible heuristic search. AAAI- 98 , 1998.
[15]
K. Leyton-Brown, M. Pearson, and Y. Shoham. Towards a universalt est suite for combinatorialau ction algorithms. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce , 2000.
[16]
K. Leyton-Brown, Yoav Shoham, and Moshe Tennenholtz. An algorithm for multiunit combinatoriala uctions. In Proceedings of AAAI-00 , 2000.
[17]
R. Monasson, R. Zecchina, S. Kirkpatrick, B. Selman, and L. Troyansky. Determining computationalc omplexity for characteristic 'phase transitions'. Nature , 400, 1998.
[18]
N. Nisan. Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce , 2000.
[19]
D. C. Parkes. iBundle: An efficient ascending price bundle auction. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce , 1999.
[20]
M.H. Rothkopf, A. Pekec, and R. M. Harstad. Computationally manageable combinatoriala uctions. Management Science , 44(8), 1998.
[21]
T. Sandholm. An algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. In IJCAI-99 , 1999.
[22]
T. Sandholm, S. Suri, A. Gilpin, and D. Levine. Cabob: A fast optimal algorithm for combinatorialau ctions. In IJCAI-01 , 2001.
[23]
Dale Schuurmans, Finnegan Southey, and Robert C. Holte. The exponentiated subgradient algorithm for heuristic boolean programming. In IJCAI-01 , 2001.
[24]
J. Slaney and T. Walsh. Backbones in optimization and approximation. In IJCAI- 01 , 2001.
[25]
W. Zhang. State-Space Search: Algorithms, Complexity, Extensions, and Applications . Springer, 1999.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Adaptive Hypermutation for Search-Based System Test Generation: A Study on REST APIs with EvoMasterACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/346494031:1(1-52)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2021
  • (2019)Making a case for (Hyper-)parameter tuning as benchmark problemsProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion10.1145/3319619.3326857(1755-1764)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2019
  • (2017)Per instance algorithm configuration of CMA-ES with limited budgetProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference10.1145/3071178.3071343(681-688)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
CP '02: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming
September 2002
798 pages
ISBN:3540441204

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 09 September 2002

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Adaptive Hypermutation for Search-Based System Test Generation: A Study on REST APIs with EvoMasterACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/346494031:1(1-52)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2021
  • (2019)Making a case for (Hyper-)parameter tuning as benchmark problemsProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion10.1145/3319619.3326857(1755-1764)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2019
  • (2017)Per instance algorithm configuration of CMA-ES with limited budgetProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference10.1145/3071178.3071343(681-688)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
  • (2016)MAS-based, Scalable Allocation of Resources in Large-scale, Dynamic EnvironmentsProceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems10.5555/2936924.2937240(1530-1531)Online publication date: 9-May-2016
  • (2016)Portfolio approaches for constraint optimization problemsAnnals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence10.1007/s10472-015-9459-576:1-2(229-246)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016
  • (2015)Statistical regimes and runtime predictionProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/2832249.2832293(318-324)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2015
  • (2015)Algorithm selection for black-box continuous optimization problemsInformation Sciences: an International Journal10.1016/j.ins.2015.05.010317:C(224-245)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
  • (2014)Improved features for runtime prediction of domain-independent plannersProceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conferenc on International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling10.5555/3038794.3038837(355-359)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2014
  • (2014)Understanding the empirical hardness of NP-complete problemsCommunications of the ACM10.1145/2594413.259442457:5(98-107)Online publication date: 1-May-2014
  • (2013)Identifying Key Algorithm Parameters and Instance Features Using Forward SelectionRevised Selected Papers of the 7th International Conference on Learning and Intelligent Optimization - Volume 799710.1007/978-3-642-44973-4_40(364-381)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media