Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00097acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

When software development meets the shopfloor: the case of industrial fablabs

Published: 25 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of how software is being developed in industrial fabrication laboratories (fablabs) located in real production environments, by the example of a smart factory project conducted by a large company in Europe. Our findings suggest that, when developing software in industrial fablabs, teams tend to drift away from established software engineering methods and practices and to adapt them impromptu in order to cope with the seemingly arcane sociotechnical environment of the factory.

References

[1]
L. Monostori, "Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges," Procedia CIRP, vol. 17, 2014, pp. 9--13.
[2]
S. Viller and I. Sommerville. "Ethnographically informed analysis for software engineers," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 53(1), 2000, pp. 169--196.
[3]
D. Martin, J. Rooksby, M. Rouncefield, and I. Sommerville, "'Good' organisational reasons for 'Bad' software testing: An ethnographic study of testing in a small software company," Proc. IEEE Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 07), IEEE Computer Society, 2007, pp. 602--611.
[4]
T. B. Ionescu, "Anthropocentrism in Software Design: A New Reference Problem in the Design of Intelligent Sociotechnical Systems?," Proc. IEEE Software Architecture Workshops (ICSAW 17), IEEE Computer Society, 2017, pp. 171--174.
[5]
H. Robinson, J. Segal, and H. Sharp, "Ethnographically-informed empirical studies of software practice," Information and Software Technology, vol. 49(6), 2007, pp. 540--551.
[6]
S. A. Snook, Friendly fire. The accidental shootdown of US Black Hawks over northern Iraq. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2002.
[7]
C. V. Lundestad and A. Hommels, "Software vulnerability due to practical drift," Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 9(2), 2007, pp. 89--100.
[8]
J. P. Spradley, Participant observation. Long Grove: Waveland Press, 2016.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSE '19: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings
May 2019
369 pages

Sponsors

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 25 May 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. kanban
  2. practical drift
  3. robots
  4. smart factory

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICSE '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 44
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media