Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

How Different Elements of Audio Affect the Word Error Rate of Transcripts in Automated Medical Reporting

Topics: Design and Development of Methodologies for Healthcare IT; Electronic Health Records and Standards; Human-Machine Interfaces; Integration and Scaling-up of Healthcare IT in Real Care Settings; Medical Informatics; Software Systems in Medicine; Usability and UX of Healthcare IT

Authors: Emma Kwint ; Anna Zoet ; Katsiaryna Labunets and Sjaak Brinkkemper

Affiliation: Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Keyword(s): Speech Recognition, Automated Speech Recognition Software, Automated Medical Reporting, Word Error Rate.

Abstract: Automated Speech Recognition software is implemented in different fields. One of them is healthcare in which it can be used for automated medical reporting, the field of focus of this research. For the first step of automated medical reporting, audio files of consultations need to be transcribed. This research contributes to the investigation of the optimization of the generated transcriptions, focusing on categorizing audio files on specific characteristics before analyzing them. The literature research within this study shows that specific elements of speech signals and audio, such as accent, voice frequency and noise, can have influence on the quality of a transcription an Automated Speech Recognition system carries out. By analyzing existing medical audio data and conducting an pilot experiment, the influence of those elements is established. This is done by calculating the Word Error Rate of the transcriptions, a useful percentage that shows the accuracy. Results of the analysis of the existing data show that noise is an element that carries out significant differences. However the data of the experiment did not show significant differences. This was mainly due to having not enough participants to reason with significance. Further research into the effect of noise, language and different Automated Speech Recognition technologies should be done based on the outcomes of this research. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 65.254.225.175

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Kwint, E.; Zoet, A.; Labunets, K. and Brinkkemper, S. (2023). How Different Elements of Audio Affect the Word Error Rate of Transcripts in Automated Medical Reporting. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2023) - HEALTHINF; ISBN 978-989-758-631-6; ISSN 2184-4305, SciTePress, pages 179-187. DOI: 10.5220/0011794100003414

@conference{healthinf23,
author={Emma Kwint. and Anna Zoet. and Katsiaryna Labunets. and Sjaak Brinkkemper.},
title={How Different Elements of Audio Affect the Word Error Rate of Transcripts in Automated Medical Reporting},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2023) - HEALTHINF},
year={2023},
pages={179-187},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0011794100003414},
isbn={978-989-758-631-6},
issn={2184-4305},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2023) - HEALTHINF
TI - How Different Elements of Audio Affect the Word Error Rate of Transcripts in Automated Medical Reporting
SN - 978-989-758-631-6
IS - 2184-4305
AU - Kwint, E.
AU - Zoet, A.
AU - Labunets, K.
AU - Brinkkemper, S.
PY - 2023
SP - 179
EP - 187
DO - 10.5220/0011794100003414
PB - SciTePress

<style> #socialicons>a span { top: 0px; left: -100%; -webkit-transition: all 0.3s ease; -moz-transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out; -o-transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out; -ms-transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out; transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out;} #socialicons>ahover div{left: 0px;} </style>