Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Authors: Christian Kücherer and Barbara Paech

Affiliation: Heidelberg University, Germany

Keyword(s): Decision Support System, DSS, Personal DSS, Requirements Specification, Task-oriented Requirements Engineering, TORE.

Related Ontology Subjects/Areas/Topics: Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support Systems ; Coupling and Integrating Heterogeneous Data Sources ; Databases and Information Systems Integration ; Enterprise Information Systems ; Information Systems Analysis and Specification ; Model Driven Architectures and Engineering ; Requirements Analysis And Management ; Strategic Decision Support Systems ; Tools, Techniques and Methodologies for System Development

Abstract: [Context and motivation] Personal Decision Support Systems (PDSSs) are information systems which support executives in decision-making by a decision- and user-specific data presentation. PDSSs operate on current data with predefined queries and provide a rich user interface (UI). Thus, a Requirements Engineering (RE) method for PDSSs should support the elicitation and specification of detailed requirements for specific decisions. However, existing RE approaches for decision support systems typically focus on ad-hoc decisions in the area of data warehouses. [Question/problem] Task-oriented RE (TORE) emphasizes a comprehensive RE specification which covers stakeholders’ tasks, data, system functions, interactions, and UI. TORE allows an early UI prototyping which is crucial for PDSS. Therefore, we want to explore TORE’s suitability for PDSSs. [Principal ideas/results] According to the Design Science methodology, we assess TORE for its suitability of PDSS specification in a problem investigation. We propose decision-specific adjustments of TORE (DsTORE), which we evaluate in a case study. [Contribution] The contribution of this paper is threefold. First, the suitability of the task-oriented RE method TORE for the specification of a PDSS is investigated as problem investigation. Second, a decision-specific extension of TORE is proposed as the DsTORE-method in order to identify and specify details of decisions to be supported by a PDSS. DsTORE is evaluated in a case study. Third, experiences from the study and method design are presented. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 65.254.225.175

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Kücherer, C. and Paech, B. (2017). A Task-oriented Requirements Engineering Method for Personal Decision Support Systems - A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS; ISBN 978-989-758-248-6; ISSN 2184-4992, SciTePress, pages 99-110. DOI: 10.5220/0006325300990110

@conference{iceis17,
author={Christian Kücherer. and Barbara Paech.},
title={A Task-oriented Requirements Engineering Method for Personal Decision Support Systems - A Case Study},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS},
year={2017},
pages={99-110},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006325300990110},
isbn={978-989-758-248-6},
issn={2184-4992},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS
TI - A Task-oriented Requirements Engineering Method for Personal Decision Support Systems - A Case Study
SN - 978-989-758-248-6
IS - 2184-4992
AU - Kücherer, C.
AU - Paech, B.
PY - 2017
SP - 99
EP - 110
DO - 10.5220/0006325300990110
PB - SciTePress

<style> #socialicons>a span { top: 0px; left: -100%; -webkit-transition: all 0.3s ease; -moz-transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out; -o-transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out; -ms-transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out; transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out;} #socialicons>ahover div{left: 0px;} </style>