Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Next Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicle Isolation and Characterization from Periprosthetic Joint Synovial Fluid in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of rhTSH on Lipids
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/jcm9020514
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk Factors for Mortality among Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: What Is the Influence of XDR Phenotype on Outcomes?

by
María Milagro Montero
1,
Inmaculada López Montesinos
1,*,
Hernando Knobel
1,
Ema Molas
1,
Luisa Sorlí
1,
Ana Siverio-Parés
2,
Nuria Prim
2,
Concepción Segura
2,
Xavier Duran-Jordà
3,
Santiago Grau
4 and
Juan Pablo Horcajada
1
1
Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), CEXS-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
2
Microbiology Service, Laboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Hospital del Mar, 08820 Barcelona, Spain
3
Methodology and Biostatistics Support Unit, Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
4
Pharmacy Service, Hospital del Mar, Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), CEXS-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(2), 514; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020514
Submission received: 11 January 2020 / Revised: 6 February 2020 / Accepted: 8 February 2020 / Published: 14 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the patients included in the study.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Susceptibility to different antimicrobial agents of the 382 isolates of <span class="html-italic">Pseudomonas aeruginosa.</span></p> ">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to assess the impact of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotype on mortality in Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia. A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary hospital from January 2000 to December 2018. All consecutive prospectively recorded P. aeruginosa bacteremia in adult patients were assessed. In this study, 382 patients were included, of which 122 (31.9%) due to XDR P. aeruginosa. Independent factors associated with 14-day mortality were as follows: high-risk source of bacteremia (hazard ratio (HR) 3.07, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.73–5.46), septic shock (HR 1.75, 95% CI, 1.12–2.75), and higher Pitt scores (one-point increments; HR 1.25, 95% CI, 1.12–1.38). Otherwise, the appropriateness of definitive antibiotic therapy was a protective factor (HR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.24–0.62). The same variables were also associated with 30-day mortality. XDR phenotype was not associated with 14- or 30-day mortality. In a subanalysis considering only high-risk source cases, combined antimicrobial therapy was independently associated with 14-day favorable outcome (HR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33–0.93). In conclusion, XDR phenotype was not associated with poor prognosis in patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia in our cohort. However, source of infection, clinical severity, and inappropriate definitive antibiotic therapy were risk factors for mortality. Combined antimicrobial therapy should be considered for high-risk sources.

1. Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most difficult-to-treat microorganisms due to its intrinsic resistance profile and its extraordinary ability to develop additional resistance through selection of chromosomal mutations and acquisition of resistance genes [1,2]. In recent years, the emergence of high-risk clones that select multidrug- (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains widely disseminated in hospitals throughout the world is also a factor of concern [2,3,4]. The increase in MDR/XDR strains seriously compromises antibiotic treatment options and consequently the probability of receiving appropriate early antimicrobial drugs, which may lead to poor outcomes, particularly in the presence of severe infections [5,6,7].
P. aeruginosa has an extraordinary capacity for causing a wide range of infections. Bloodstream infection (BSI) is considered one of its most serious and dreaded complications, with a reported mortality ranging from 18% to 61% [8]. It has been hypothesized that BSIs caused by antimicrobial-resistant strains lead to worse outcomes than those caused by susceptible ones, although controversial findings have been reported over the years [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. These conflicting results could partly be due to the difficulty of elucidating the influence of other factors on outcomes, such as underlying conditions, infectious syndrome severity, source of infection, therapeutic management, or bacterial virulence determinants [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Those studies have some limitations: some results were obtained before Magiorakos et al. [5] standardized the terminology, or included different sources of infection, or were limited by insufficient sample sizes, and reliable conclusions could not be drawn. Furthermore, most were focused only on carbapenem-resistant or MDR P. aeruginosa strains, but not specifically on XDR isolates, which have only few active drugs available and are more prone to be linked to high-risk clones. In line with this, previous studies showed that almost all XDR isolates analyzed at our institution belonged to well-described P. aeruginosa high-risk clones, with sequence type 175 (ST175) being by far the most frequent high-risk clone observed [18,19,20,21]. Unpublished local data also showed that 85% of our XDR P. aeruginosa isolates were clonally related, showing an endemic situation at our center.
Hence, we present a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of P. aeruginosa bacteremia designed to assess the impact of XDR phenotype on mortality.

2. Methods

2.1. Hospital Setting, Study Design, and Participants

The study was conducted at the Hospital del Mar, a 420-bed tertiary-care university hospital in Barcelona, Spain. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients aged ≥ 18 years old that had been prospectively recorded with positive blood cultures for P. aeruginosa from January 2000 to December 2018. Positive blood cultures were reported daily by the Microbiology Department. Patients were followed for up to 30 days from the onset of BSI to assess 14- and 30-day all-cause mortality. Only the first episode of bacteremia per each patient was considered. Polymicrobial BSIs were excluded.
The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Parc de Salut (register no. 2019/8758I). The need for written informed consent was waived due to the observational nature of the study and retrospective analysis.

2.2. Study Objectives and Outcomes

We aimed to assess the impact of XDR phenotype on patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia. The main outcomes were mortality at 14 and 30 days after the onset of bacteremia. An additional subanalysis was performed involving only the patients with high-risk sources of infection.

2.3. Variables and Data Source

Trained study investigators collected demographic, clinical, and microbiological data from the hospital or primary care electronic medical charts and the microbiology laboratory database, including the following: sex, age, underlying diseases, site of acquisition, source of infection, severity of BSI, antibiotic treatment, BSI microbiological resistance profile, and 14- and 30-day all-cause mortality. Follow-up information for up to 30 days after the onset of bacteremia was obtained by reviewing electronic medical charts.

2.4. Microbiological Studies

Bacterial growth in blood cultures was detected by the BacT/Alert® System (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Bacterial identification was performed by standard biochemical tests and by MALDI-TOF since 2014. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was routinely performed by two dilution-based methods in two different periods due to changes in the laboratory workflow: broth microdilution panels MicroScan® using the WalkAway® system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California, United States) from 2000 to 2008, and AST cards using the VITEK®2 System (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) from then on. Antimicrobials tested were the following: ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin. and colistin. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were categorized according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) until 2013, and thenceforth according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Isolates categorized as intermediate were considered as resistant.
P. aeruginosa isolates were classified as XDR when they were non-susceptible to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antipseudomonal antimicrobial categories, and as MDR when they were non-susceptible to at least one agent in three or more antipseudomonal antimicrobial categories [5]. Those strains that did not meet the previous criteria were classified as non-MDR P. aeruginosa. Both non-MDR and MDR isolates were included in the non-XDR group.
Clonality and antibiotic resistance mechanisms were not investigated specifically for this study, but some strains had been analyzed by our group before [18,20,21]. As previously reported in detail, clonal relatedness of XDR P. aeruginosa isolates was analyzed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing, and whole-genome sequencing. Regarding resistant mechanisms, overexpression of chromosomal β-lactamase AmpC or efflux pumps, OprD deficiency, or horizontal acquired enzymes were investigated, among others [18,20,21].

2.5. Definitions

P. aeruginosa bacteremia was defined as at least one positive blood culture obtained from a patient with signs and symptoms of infection.
Presence of comorbidities and severity of underlying diseases were assessed by the Charlson comorbidity index [22] and McCabe score [23]. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count of ≤500 cells/mm3. Site of acquisition was defined according to the classification by Friedman et al. [24]. BSIs that did not meet the nosocomial or healthcare-associated criteria were considered as of community acquisition. BSI severity was evaluated by Pitt score [25], the need of intensive care unit admission, and the presence of septic shock, defined as the need for vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure of at least 65 mmHg [26]. Source of infection was defined as the most likely origin of infection responsible for the BSI according to medical records. Catheter-related bloodstream infection, urinary tract infection, respiratory tract infection, skin and soft tissue infection, intraabdominal infection, and other sources (including endocarditis, otorhinolaryngologic, central nervous system, and surgical site sources) were included. When the origin of the infection was unclear, it was defined as BSI of unknown origin. For risk of mortality [10], sources of infection were divided into two groups: (a) low-risk sources or those involving either catheter-related bloodstream infections or urinary tract infections and (b) high-risk sources or those involving others.
Appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy was considered when at least 1 antipseudomonal antibiotic with in vitro activity was administered during the first 24 h after taking the blood cultures, whereas appropriate definite antibiotic therapy refers to the moment of knowing bacteria susceptibility results. When pneumonia was the source of infection, aminoglycoside monotherapy was considered an inadequate treatment [27]. Combination therapy was defined as two antipseudomonal drugs used for at least 24 h.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Continuous quantitative variables were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). For categorical variables, number of cases and percentages were used. The Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test were applied to compare continuous variables, and Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s χ2 test to contrast categorical variables, as appropriate. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to explore 14- and 30-day mortality events. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed, and results were reported as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The proportional hazard assumption checked by examining Schoenfeld residuals (for overall model and variable-by-variable) was not violated. The variables introduced into the multivariate analysis included those with a crude p value ≤ 0.1 in the univariate analysis or those considered clinically relevant for the outcome and the study hypothesis. The explained criteria are based on backward selection but controlling by clinical significance. All p-values were two-tailed and statistical significance was <0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 15.1.

3. Results

A total of 506 episodes of P. aeruginosa bacteremia were assessed during the study period. Of these, 124 were excluded: 114 had polymicrobial bacteremia, 9 patients presented more than one episode of P. aeruginosa BSI, and another was lost to follow-up. Therefore, 382 patients were finally recorded, and 122 (31.9%) of these episodes corresponded to XDR P. aeruginosa (Figure 1). In the non-XDR group, 35/260 (13.5%) were MDR and 225/260 (86.5%) non-MDR strains.
The rate of antimicrobial susceptibility of the total cohort and according to XDR pattern are shown in Figure 2. With respect to the XDR antimicrobial susceptibility profile, the most common pattern observed was non-susceptibility to all antipseudomonal agents except colistin (98.4%, n = 120/122) and amikacin (89.3%, n = 109/122).
Demographics and clinical characteristics of the total cohort and according to XDR pattern are shown in Table 1. Compared to patients with non-XDR P. aeruginosa bacteremia, those with XDR P. aeruginosa were more likely to have a low-risk source of bacteremia (50.8% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.005), but a higher Pitt score (median points, 2 (IQR 1 to 4) vs. 2 (IQR 0 to 3); p = 0.017). Among patients with XDR bacteremia, the following significant differences were also observed when compared with non-XDR BSI episodes: history of hematologic malignancy (22.1% vs. 11.9%; p = 0.01), nosocomial acquisition (82.8% vs. 55%; p < 0.001), receiving inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (88.5% vs. 42.3%; p < 0.001), and use of combined antimicrobial therapy (51.6% vs. 33.5%; p < 0.001).

3.1. Mortality and Risk Factors for Mortality

The 14-day all-cause mortality rate for all patients was 23.3% (89/382), whereas at day 30, it was 30.9% (118/382). No statistically significant differences in mortality rates were found between XDR and non-XDR P. aeruginosa groups at either day 14 or day 30.
Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for sex and age, showed that the independent risk factors for 14-day all-cause mortality were as follows: a high-risk source of bacteremia (HR 3.07, 95% CI, 1.73 to 5.46; p < 0.001), presentation with septic shock (HR 1.75, 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.75; p = 0.015), and higher Pitt scores (one-point increments; HR 1.25, 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.38; p < 0.001). Receiving appropriate definitive antimicrobial therapy was a protective factor (HR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.62; p < 0.001). XDR P. aeruginosa BSI was not related to 14-day mortality (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.67; p = 0.777) (Table 2).
Regarding 30-day mortality, the independent risk factors for mortality observed in a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for sex and age, were as follows: a high-risk source of infection (HR 2.49, 95% CI, 1.56 to 3.99; p < 0.001), septic shock (HR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.65; p = 0.006), and Pitt scores (one-point increments; HR 1.25, 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.37; p < 0.001), whereas appropriate definitive therapy (HR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66; p < 0.001) was identified as a protective factor. XDR P. aeruginosa BSI was not related to 30-day mortality (HR 1.14, 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.69; p = 0.504) (Table 3).

3.2. Subanalysis

Because the XDR group more frequently had a low-risk source of bacteremia, an additional analysis was performed that considered only high-risk sources of BSI (Table S1, Supplementary Materials). In multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with 14- and 30-day all-cause mortality were once again Pitt score, septic shock, and inappropriate definitive antibiotic therapy. In addition, at day 14, combined antimicrobial therapy was identified as a protective factor for mortality (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.93; p = 0.027) (Tables S2 and S3, Supplementary Materials).

4. Discussion

Multiple reports have drawn attention to the worryingly high rates of XDR P. aeruginosa infections worldwide [1,2,28,29]. Although previous studies have assessed the impact on the outcome of carbapenem-resistant or MDR P. aeruginosa BSI [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], little is known about the role of XDR strains. In order to obtain a better understanding of this issue, we present here the results of the largest cohort of patients with monomicrobial XDR P. aeruginosa bacteremia published to date.
Our data show that the vast majority of XDR P. aeruginosa strains were non-susceptible to all antipseudomonal agents apart from colistin and amikacin. Although clonality and the resistance mechanisms of the isolates were not specifically investigated in this study, previous ones found that, in XDR P. aeruginosa strains, the ST175 high-risk clone was by far the most frequent at our site [18,19,20,21]. In a Spanish multicenter study by our group (COLIMERO study) [18], 17/21 (81%) strains included from our center belonged to the ST175 high-risk clone. In another recent survey of P. aeruginosa molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance in Spain, del Barrio-Tofiño et al. [19] found that all isolates recovered from our site also belonged to the ST175 high-risk clone. In these two previous reports [18,19], the underlying resistance mechanisms in the XDR phenotype were mainly a combination of chromosomal mutations such as hyperproduction of chromosomal AmpC β-lactamases, efflux pumps, OprD deficiency and/or quinolone resistance-determining region mutations, rather than horizontally acquired carbapenemases.
Our study showed that the all-cause mortality rate for patients with XDR P. aeruginosa bacteremia at day 30 was above 30%, which is similar to results reported in previous series of carbapenem-resistant or MDR isolates [9,10,13,16,17,30]. We observed that severity at presentation or a high-risk source of P. aeruginosa bacteremia were independent predictors of mortality, as has been previously reported [9,10,12,14,15,16]. On the other hand, although it is often assumed that antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa bacteremia results in worse outcomes, our study found that an XDR profile was not associated with higher mortality rates, even after considering only high-risk source BSI. Conflicting results have been reported for carbapenem-resistant or MDR P. aeruginosa infections [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In the case of XDR isolates, the evidence is even scarcer and there are only a few published studies. Recio et al. [31] also failed to identify the XDR phenotype as a predictor of mortality in a cohort of 70 patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia in Spain that included 24 XDR strains (10 of them belonging to the ST175 high-risk clone and 11 to ST235). Another study carried out in Brazil [11] did not find an association in 120 patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia, 31 of them XDR strains. On the other hand, a recent study of a cohort of 243 patients, including 87 XDR isolates (43 strains linked to ST175 high-risk clone and 33 to ST235) [16] found MDR phenotype as an independent predictor of 30-day crude mortality. In line with this, a recent Spanish study aimed at assessing the impact of virulence on the outcome of P. aeruginosa BSI [32] also found that XDR phenotype was statistically linked to 30-day mortality in a cohort of 593 bacteremia cases, 81 of them XDR isolates (61 ST175, 9 ST111, 2 ST235, and 2 ST244), although multivariate analysis data were not provided. Another Spanish study [33] focused on BSIs in solid organ transplant recipients identified a higher mortality rate for patients with bacteremia due to XDR P. aeruginosa (n = 31) compared to those with BSI caused by other microorganisms (n = 287), and it was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality (20/22 studied strains showed the ST175 pattern). Other studies [34,35] have addressed the impact of XDR strains on different sources of infection, not exclusively in bacteremia. For instance, a Thai study of 255 patients with P. aeruginosa infections, including 56 XDR strains, found that an XDR phenotype was an independent factor of mortality attributable to infection when compared to non-XDR isolates [34]. Samonis et al. found the same association with mortality in a cohort of 89 P. aeruginosa infections (52 of them with bacteremia and 22 XDR isolates) in cancer patients in Greece [35].
As was the case for carbapenem-resistant or MDR P. aeruginosa bacteremia, conflicting findings are also reported for XDR strains, suggesting that the prognosis of BSI depends on several factors apart from the resistance phenotype. In our study, no relevant differences were observed between the two groups either for preexisting comorbidities or severity of clinical presentation at the onset of bacteremia, although a low-risk source of bacteremia was more frequently observed in the XDR group. This finding could partially explain the lack of association between XDR phenotype and mortality, although the same results were obtained after adjusting for source of infection, which rules out this hypothesis. In addition, although patients with an XDR P. aeruginosa BSI have a higher probability of receiving inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy, unexpectedly, this was not associated with worse outcomes. Some authors argue that in cases of P. aeruginosa bacteremia, a 48–72 h delay before receiving appropriate antibiotics may not be so crucial to patient outcome, since mortality is mainly due to other factors, such as severity of infection, having a high-risk source, or receiving inappropriate definitive antibiotic therapy [10,12,15,36,37], which is consistent with the results of the present study.
Another hypothesis to explain the lack of impact of XDR phenotype on mortality could be the influence of the acquisition of resistance mechanisms. It has been hypothesized that it may involve a fitness cost resulting in strains with lower virulence, and with a reduced inflammatory response in the host when compared to susceptible isolates [38,39,40,41]. On the other hand, it has also been reported that not all resistance mutations lead to a biological cost such as the OprD deficiency [42]. Indeed, some studies have identified that MDR strains can develop compensatory or suppressor mechanisms that allow them to recover their baseline fitness [12,43,44]. Other studies have found that some high-risk clones can be as virulent as susceptible strains, despite exhibiting many resistance mutations, suggesting that pathogenicity depends not only on the fitness cost of resistance, but also on the presence of certain virulence determinants such as exoU-positive genotype or O11 antigen serotype [16,17,31,32]. The ST235 high-risk clone, for example, appears to be particularly virulent in cases of ExoU production, whereas the virulence of ST175, the most prevalent high-risk clone observed at our institution, is especially low [16,17,31,32]. Thus, it may be inferred that the high prevalence of the less virulent ST175 high-risk clone at our institution may account in part for the lack of detrimental impact on mortality of the XDR phenotype.
One of the most interesting findings of our study is that combined antimicrobial therapy improves prognosis at day 14 in high-risk source bacteremia. Previous studies have addressed this issue [45,46,47,48,49], although they were not focused specifically on XDR P. aeruginosa bacteremia. Some of these [46,47,48] also found a protective effect for patients receiving two active drugs for high-risk sources, mainly pneumonia. In our study, lower respiratory tract infection was the most common high-risk source of infection, closely followed by primary bacteremia. Nevertheless, this finding should be interpreted with caution. As this issue was not one of the main purposes of our research, certain crucial variables, such as the duration of combined therapy, the onset time of this therapy, the antibiotic dosing, or how antibiotic treatment was administered (extended- or continuous-infusion or intermittent bolus) were not accounted for. Further studies are needed to clarify this question.
This study has several limitations. First, although cases were recorded prospectively, several data were obtained retrospectively and are therefore more vulnerable to potential bias. Second, the study was carried out in a single center and the results are not necessarily transferable to other settings with a different epidemiology. Third, although a sample of the included isolates was well characterized in previous studies, clonality and resistance mechanisms were not specifically investigated in all cases. Finally, some relevant variables such as the time until appropriate definitive antibiotic treatment or those related to combined antimicrobial therapy were not recorded, thus their impact on outcomes could have been potentially overlooked. On the other hand, this study has some highlighted strengths. It includes the largest published sample size of XDR P. aeruginosa bacteremia, eliminating the biases of many studies with small sample sizes, which reduce the statistical power to be able to draw reliable conclusions. Furthermore, a wide-ranging statistical analysis was performed to control for confounding variables, including a subanalysis in high-risk sources.

5. Conclusions

Our study identified severity at presentation, having a high-risk source of bacteremia, and inappropriate definitive antibiotic therapy as risk factors for mortality in patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia. On the other hand, the XDR phenotype was not associated with poor prognosis. Decreased virulence in XDR strains, theoretical fitness costs, and a high prevalence of the less virulent ST175 high-risk clone at our institution may be among the reasons for these findings. Nevertheless, the mortality rate for P. aeruginosa bacteremia remains high in our cohort. Since antibiotic treatment is the only modifiable factor to try to improve outcome, strategies aimed at earlier identification of patients with risk factors for P. aeruginosa bacteremia should be implemented to avoid delays in the administration of effective antibiotic therapy, mainly in more severe patients and those with high-risk source bacteremia. Combined antimicrobial therapy should be considered in patients with bacteremia from high-risk sources.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/2/514/s1, Table S1: Baseline characteristics of patients with high-risk sources of infection, Table S2: Univariate and multivariate Cox model of 14-day all-cause mortality in patients with high-risk sources of infection, Table S3: Univariate and multivariate Cox model of 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with high-risk sources of infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.H. and M.M.M.; methodology, I.L.M., M.M.M., and J.P.H.; formal analysis, X.D.-J. and I.L.M.; investigation, I.L.M., M.M.M., J.P.H., L.S., E.M., A.S.-P., N.P., and C.S.; data curation, M.M.M., I.L.M., and X.D.-J.; resources, A.S.-P., N.P., and I.L.M.; writing original draft preparation, I.L.M.; writing—review and editing, J.P.H., M.M.M., I.L.M., L.S., H.K., A.S.-P., N.P., and S.G.; supervision, M.M.M. and J.P.H.; funding acquisition, J.P.H., M.M.M., and I.L.M. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, under grant numbers PI16/00669, PI17/00251 and CM18/00047; RETIC RD16/0016/0015 and FEDER foundings.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Janet Dawson for English editing and the Department of Medicine of Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona for their support of I.L.M.’s PhD studies.

Conflicts of Interest

J.P.H. received fees from Angelini, Pfizer, MSD, Menarini, and Zanbom as a speaker and participant in advisory board meetings, and a research grant from MSD. S.G. received fees as a speaker for Pfizer, Angellini, Kern, and MSD and research grants from Astellas Pharma and Pfizer. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript: or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Horcajada, J.P.; Montero, M.; Oliver, A.; Sorlí, L.; Luque, S.; Gómez-Zorrilla, S.; Benito, N.; Grau, S. Epidemiology and Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00031-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oliver, A.; Mulet, X.; López-Causapé, C.; Juan, C. The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug Resist. Updates 2015, 21–22, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Woodford, N.; Turton, J.F.; Livermore, D.M. Multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria: The role of high-risk clones in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 736–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Cabot, G.; Ocampo-Sosa, A.A.; Domínguez, M.A.; Gago, J.F.; Juan, C.; Tubau, F.; Rodríguez, C.; Moyà, B.; Peña, C.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; et al. Genetic Markers of Widespread Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa High-Risk Clones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 6349–6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kollef, M.H. Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobials and the Treatment of Serious Bacterial Infections: Getting It Right Up Front. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 47, S3–S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cosgrove, S.E. The Relationship between Antimicrobial Resistance and Patient Outcomes: Mortality, Length of Hospital Stay, and Health Care Costs. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006, 42, S82–S89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vidal, F.; Mensa, J.; Almela, M.; Martinez, J.A.; Marco, F.; Casals, C.; Gatell, J.M.; Soriano, E.; de Jimenez Anta, M.T. Epidemiology and outcome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia, with special emphasis on the influence of antibiotic treatment. Analysis of 189 episodes. Arch. Intern. Med. 1996, 156, 2121–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peña, C.; Suarez, C.; Gozalo, M.; Murillas, J.; Almirante, B.; Pomar, V.; Aguilar, M.; Granados, A.; Calbo, E.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of carbapenem resistance on mortality in Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kang, C.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Park, S.; Choe, Y.; Oh, M.; Kim, E.; Choe, K. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia: Risk Factors for Mortality and Influence of Delayed Receipt of Effective Antimicrobial Therapy on Clinical Outcome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ferreira, M.L.; Dantas, R.C.; Ribas, R.M.; Gontijo-Filho, P.P. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: Independent risk factors for mortality and impact of resistance on outcome. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 1679–1687. [Google Scholar]
  12. Suárez, C.; Peña, C.; Gavaldà, L.; Tubau, F.; Manzur, A.; Dominguez, M.A.; Pujol, M.; Gudiol, F.; Ariza, J. Influence of carbapenem resistance on mortality and the dynamics of mortality in Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 14, e73–e78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Joo, E.-J.; Kang, C.-I.; Ha, Y.E.; Kang, S.-J.; Park, S.Y.; Chung, D.R.; Peck, K.R.; Lee, N.Y.; Song, J.-H. Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia: Clinical Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance on Outcome. Microb. Drug Resist. 2011, 17, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tam, V.H.; Rogers, C.A.; Chang, K.T.; Weston, J.S.; Caeiro, J.P.; Garey, K.W. Impact of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia on patient outcomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 3717–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Babich, T.; Naucler, P.; Valik, J.K.; Giske, C.G.; Benito, N.; Cardona, R.; Rivera, A.; Pulcini, C.; Fattah, M.A.; Haquin, J.; et al. Risk factors for mortality among patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia—Retrospective multicenter study. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2019, 55, 105847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Recio, R.; Mancheño, M.; Viedma, E.; Villa, J.; Orellana, M.Á.; Lora-Tamayo, J.; Chaves, F. Predictors of Mortality in Bloodstream Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance and Bacterial Virulence. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peña, C.; Cabot, G.; Gómez-Zorrilla, S.; Zamorano, L.; Ocampo-Sosa, A.; Murillas, J.; Almirante, B.; Pomar, V.; Aguilar, M.; Granados, A.; et al. Influence of virulence genotype and resistance profile in the mortality of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 60, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Del Barrio-Tofiño, E.; López-Causapé, C.; Cabot, G.; Rivera, A.; Benito, N.; Segura, C.; Montero, M.M.; Sorlí, L.; Tubau, F.; Gómez-Zorrilla, S.; et al. Genomics and susceptibility profiles of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01589-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. del Barrio-Tofiño, E.; Zamorano, L.; Cortes-Lara, S.; López-Causapé, C.; Sánchez-Diener, I.; Cabot, G.; Bou, G.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; Oliver, A.; Group, G.-S.P. Study Spanish nationwide survey on Pseudomonas aeruginosa antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and epidemiology. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 1825–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Montero, M.; VanScoy, B.D.; López-Causapé, C.; Conde, H.; Adams, J.; Segura, C.; Zamorano, L.; Oliver, A.; Horcajada, J.P.; Ambrose, P.G. Evaluation of ceftolozane-tazobactam in combination with meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa sequence type 175 in a hollow-fiber infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00026-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Montero, M.M.; Domene Ochoa, S.; López-Causapé, C.; VanScoy, B.; Luque, S.; Sorlí, L.; Campillo, N.; Padilla, E.; Prim, N.; Segura, C.; et al. Colistin plus meropenem combination is synergistic in vitro against extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including high-risk clones. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 18, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; MacKenzie, C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McCabe WR, J.G. Gram negative bacteremia: I. Etiology and ecology. Arch. Intern. Med. 1962, 110, 845–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Friedman, N.D.; Kaye, K.S.; Stout, J.E.; Mcgarry, S.A.; Trivette, S.L.; Briggs, J.P.; Lamm, W.; Clark, C.; Macfarquhar, J.; Walton, A.L.; et al. Health Care—Associated Bloodstream Infections in Adults: A Reason To Change the Accepted Definition of Community—Acquired Infections. Ann. Fam. Med. 2002, 137, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rhee, J.Y.; Kwon, K.T.; Ki, H.K.; Shin, S.Y.; Jung, D.S.; Chung, D.R.; Ha, B.C.; Peck, K.R.; Song, J.H. Scoring systems for prediction of mortality in patients with intensive care unit-acquired sepsis: A comparison of the PITT bacteremia score and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring systems. Shock 2009, 31, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tamma, P.D.; Cosgrove, S.E.; Maragakis, L.L. Combination Therapy for Treatment of Infections with Gram-Negative Bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 450–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Europe—Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) 2017; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2018; ISBN 9789294982797. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shortridge, D.; Gales, A.C.; Streit, J.M.; Huband, M.D.; Tsakris, A.; Jones, R.N. Geographic and Temporal Patterns of Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Over 20 Years From the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, S63–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Buehrle, D.J.; Shields, R.K.; Clarke, L.G.; Potoski, B.A.; Clancy, C.J.; Hong Nguyen, M. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: Risk factors for mortality and microbiologic treatment failure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01243-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Recio, R.; Villa, J.; Viedma, E.; Orellana, M.Á.; Lora-Tamayo, J.; Chaves, F. Bacteraemia due to extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa sequence type 235 high-risk clone: Facing the perfect storm. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sánchez-Diener, I.; Zamorano, L.; Peña, C.; Ocampo-Sosa, A.; Cabot, G.; Gómez-Zorrilla, S.; Almirante, B.; Aguilar, M.; Granados, A.; Calbo, E.; et al. Weighting the impact of virulence on the outcome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bodro, M.; Sabé, N.; Tubau, F.; Lladó, L.; Baliellas, C.; González-Costello, J.; Cruzado, J.M.; Carratalà, J. Extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in solid organ transplant recipients. Transplantation 2015, 99, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Palavutitotai, N.; Jitmuang, A.; Tongsai, S.; Kiratisin, P.; Angkasekwinai, N. Epidemiology and risk factors of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Samonis, G.; Vardakas, K.Z.; Kofteridis, D.P.; Dimopoulou, D.; Andrianaki, A.M.; Chatzinikolaou, I.; Katsanevaki, E.; Maraki, S.; Falagas, M.E. Characteristics, risk factors and outcomes of adult cancer patients with extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Infection 2014, 42, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Osih, R.B.; Mcgregor, J.C.; Rich, S.E.; Moore, A.C.; Furuno, J.P.; Perencevich, E.N.; Harris, A.D. Impact of Empiric Antibiotic Therapy on Outcomes in Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Lodise, T.P.; Patel, N.; Kwa, A.; Graves, J.; Furuno, J.P.; Graffunder, E.; Lomaestro, B.; McGregor, J.C. Predictors of 30-Day Mortality among Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: Impact of Delayed Appropriate Antibiotic Selection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 3510–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Andersson, D.I.; Hughes, D. Antibiotic resistance and its cost: Is it possible to reverse resistance? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, Z.; Jiao, X.; Peng, Q.; Jiang, F.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yao, F. Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is Associated with Decreased Fitness. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 31, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gómez-Zorrilla, S.; Juan, C.; Cabot, G.; Camoez, M.; Tubau, F.; Oliver, A.; Dominguez, M.A.; Ariza, J.; Peña, C. Impact of multidrug resistance on the pathogenicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: In vitro and in vivo studies. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 47, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gómez-Zorrilla, S.; Calatayud, L.; Juan, C.; Cabot, G.; Tubau, F.; Oliver, A.; Dominguez, M.A.; Ariza, J.; Peña, C. Understanding the acute inflammatory response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: Differences between susceptible and multidrug-resistant strains in a mouse peritonitis model. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 49, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yoon, E.-J.; Kim, D.; Lee, H.; Lee, H.S.; Shin, J.H.; Park, Y.S.; Kim, Y.A.; Shin, J.H.; Shin, K.S.; Uh, Y.; et al. Mortality dynamics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections and the influence of defective OprD on mortality: Prospective observational study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 2774–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Olivares Pacheco, J.; Alvarez-Ortega, C.; Alcalde Rico, M.; Martínez, J.L. Metabolic Compensation of Fitness Costs Is a General Outcome for Antibiotic-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mutants Overexpressing Efflux Pumps. mBio 2017, 8, e00500-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Skurnik, D.; Roux, D.; Cattoir, V.; Danilchanka, O.; Lu, X.; Yoder-Himes, D.R.; Han, K.; Guillard, T.; Jiang, D.; Gaultier, C.; et al. Enhanced in vivo fitness of carbapenem-resistant oprDmutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa revealed through high-throughput sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 20747–20752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Paul, M.; Daikos, G.L.; Durante-Mangoni, E.; Yahav, D.; Carmeli, Y.; Benattar, Y.D.; Skiada, A.; Andini, R.; Eliakim-Raz, N.; Nutman, A.; et al. Colistin alone versus colistin plus meropenem for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: An open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khawcharoenporn, T.; Chuncharunee, A.; Maluangnon, C.; Taweesakulvashra, T.; Tiamsak, P. Active monotherapy and combination therapy for extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 828–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rigatto, M.H.; Vieira, F.J.; Antochevis, L.C.; Behle, T.F.; Lopes, N.T.; Zavascki, A.P. Polymyxin B in Combination with Antimicrobials Lacking In Vitro Activity versus Polymyxin B in aMonotherapy in Critically Ill Patients with Acinetobacter baumannii or Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 6575–6580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Apisarnthanarak, A.; Mundy, L.M. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia with intermediate minimum inhibitory concentrations to doripenem: Combination therapy with high-dose, 4-h infusion of doripenem plus fosfomycin versus intravenous colistin plus fosfomycin. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 39, 271–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ribera, A.; Benavent, E.; Lora-Tamayo, J.; Tubau, F.; Pedrero, S.; Cabo, X.; Ariza, J.; Murillo, O. Osteoarticular infection caused by MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa: The benefits of combination therapy with colistin plus β-lactams. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 3357–3365. [Google Scholar]
Jcm 09 00514 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart of the patients included in the study.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the patients included in the study.
Jcm 09 00514 g001
Jcm 09 00514 g002 550
Figure 2. Susceptibility to different antimicrobial agents of the 382 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Figure 2. Susceptibility to different antimicrobial agents of the 382 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Jcm 09 00514 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients. Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise specified. Abbreviations: m (median), IQR (interquartile range), XDR PA (extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa), ICU (intensive care unit).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients. Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise specified. Abbreviations: m (median), IQR (interquartile range), XDR PA (extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa), ICU (intensive care unit).
VariableAll Episodes
(n = 382)		Non-XDR PA
(n = 260)		XDR PA
(n = 122)		p-Value
Demographic information
 Age in years, m (IQR)70.5 (60–78)72 (60.25–78)69 (59–76)0.219
 Male sex276 (72.3)190 (73.1)86 (70.5)0.599
 Nosocomial acquisition244 (63.9)143 (55)101 (82.8)<0.001
Underlying condition
 Diabetes mellitus94 (24.6)63 (24.2)31 (25.4)0.803
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease82 (21.6)53 (20.5)29 (23.8)0.475
 Cirrhosis 28 (7.3)18 (6.9)10 (8.2)0.656
 Hemodialysis25 (6.5)18 (6.9)7 (5.7)0.662
 Hematologic malignancy58 (15.2)31 (11.9)27 (22.1)0.010
 Solid tumor malignancy144 (37.7)102 (39.2)42 (34.4)0.366
 Neutropenia 70 (18.3)51 (19.6)19 (15.6)0.341
Charlson comorbidity index, m (IQR)4 (2–6)4 (2–6)4 (3–6)0.911
McCabe score
 Non-fatal McCabe107 (28)73 (28.1)34 (27.9)0.966
 Rapidly fatal McCabe 117 (30.6)86 (33.1)31 (25.4)0.130
 Ultimately fatal McCabe 158 (41.4)101 (38.8)57 (46.7)0.145
Source of infection
 Catheter-related bloodstream infection39 (10.2)19 (7.3)20 (16.4)0.006
 Urinary tract infection116 (30.4)74 (28.5)42 (34.4)0.237
 Respiratory infection95 (24.9)67 (25.8)28 (23)0.552
 Skin and soft tissue infection19 (5)15 (5.8)4 (3.3)0.297
 Intraabdominal infection45 (11.8)36 (13.8)9 (7.4)0.067
 Primary or Unknown62 (16.2)45 (17.3)17 (13.9)0.404
 Other6 (1.6)4 (1.5)2 (1.6)1
 High-risk source227 (59.4)167 (64.2)60 (49.2)0.005
 Low-risk source155 (40.6)93 (35.8)62 (50.8)0.005
Baseline illness severity
 Pitt score, m (IQR)2 (1–3)2 (0–3)2 (1–4)0.017
 Pitt score ≥ 2206 (53.9)133 (51.2)73 (59.8)0.112
 Septic shock103 (27)65 (25)38 (31.1)0.207
 ICU admission96 (25.1)61 (23.5)35 (28.7)0.272
Antibiotic management
 Appropriate empirical treatment164 (42.9)150 (57.7)14 (11.5)<0.001
 Appropriate definitive treatment332 (86.9)227 (87.3)105 (86.1)0.737
 Combined antimicrobial therapy150 (39.3)87 (33.5)63 (51.6)0.001
All-cause mortality
 Day 1489 (23.3)59 (22.7)30 (24.6)0.682
 Day 30118 (30.9)77 (29.6)41 (33.6)0.431
Table
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate Cox model of 14-day all-cause mortality. Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise specified. Abbreviation: HR (hazard ratio), CI (confidence interval), m (median), IQR (interquartile range), ICU (intensive care unit), XDR PA (extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa), BSI (bloodstream infection).
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate Cox model of 14-day all-cause mortality. Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise specified. Abbreviation: HR (hazard ratio), CI (confidence interval), m (median), IQR (interquartile range), ICU (intensive care unit), XDR PA (extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa), BSI (bloodstream infection).
VariablesAlive
(n = 293)		Death
(n = 89)		Crude HR
(95% CI)		p-ValueHR Multivariate
(95% CI)		p-Value
Demographic information
 Age in years, m (IQR)70 (59.5–78)71 (62.5–78)1.01 (0.99–1.02)0.2521.01 (0.99–1.03)0.119
 Male sex209 (71.3)67 (75.3)1.17 (0.72–1.89)0.5181.12 (0.69–1.82)0.645
 Nosocomial acquisition186 (63.5)58 (65.2)1.05 (0.69–1.4)0.796
Underlying condition
 Diabetes mellitus73 (24.9)21 (23.6)0.96 (0.59–1.56)0.858
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease57 (19.6)25 (28.1)1.49 (0.94–2.37)0.09
 Cirrhosis 21 (7.2)7 (7.9)1.09 (0.51–2.37)0.814
 Hemodialysis22 (7.5)3 (3.4)0.47 (0.15–1.48)0.196
 Hematology malignancy42 (14.3)16 (18)1.22 (0.71–2.1)0.465
 Solid tumor malignancy114 (38.9)30 (33.7)0.81 (0.52–1.26)0.354
 Neutropenia 51 (17.4)19 (21.3)1.22 (0.73–2.02)0.445
Charlson comorbidity index, m (IQR)4 (2–6)4 (2–6)0.99 (0.93–1.07)0.996
McCabe score 1.16 (0.89–1.51)0.249
 Non-fatal McCabe83 (28.3)24 (27)0.98 (0.61–1.56)0.932
 Rapidly fatal McCabe 96 (32.8)21 (23.6)0.67 (0.41–1.09)0.104
 Ultimately fatal McCabe 114 (38.9)44 (49.4)1.41 (0.93–2.14)0.105
Origin of bacteremia
 Catheter-related bloodstream infection37 (12.6)2 (2.2)0.18 (0.05–0.74)0.017
 Urinary tract infection103 (35.2)13 (14.6)0.36 (0.19–0.65)0.001
 Respiratory infection60 (20.5)35 (39.3)2.17 (1.42–3.32)<0.001
 Skin and soft tissue infection13 (4.4)6 (6.7)1.42 (0.62–3.25)0.408
 Intraabdominal infection35 (11.9)10 (11.2)0.94 (0.49–1.81)0.852
 Primary or Unknown40 (13.7)22 (24.7)1.84 (1.14–2.98)0.013
 Other5 (1.7)1 (1.1)0.69 (0.09–4.97)0.715
 High-risk source153 (52.2)74 (83.1)3.85 (2.17–6.67)<0.0013.07 (1.73–5.46)<0.001
 Low-risk source140 (47.8)15 (16.9)0.26 (0.15–0.46))<0.001
Baseline illness severity
 Pitt score, m (IQR)1 (0.5–2)4 (1–4)1.36 (1.24–1.49)<0.0011.25 (1.12–1.38)<0.001
 Pitt score ≥ 2140 (47.8)66 (74.2)2.78 (1.73–4.48)<0.001
 Septic shock63 (21.5)40 (44.9)2.59 (1.71–3.95)<0.0011.75 (1.12–2.75)0.015
ICU admission 56 (19.1)40 (44.9)2.92 (1.92–4.44)<0.001
 Antibiotic management
 Appropriate empirical treatment126 (43)38 (42.7)0.99 (0.65–1.51)0.968
 Appropriate definitive treatment266 (90.8)66 (74.2)0.35 (0.22–0.57)<0.0010.39 (0.24–0.62)<0.001
 Combined antimicrobial therapy114 (38.9)36 (40.4)1.02 (0.67–1.88)0.545
XDR PA BSI92 (31.4)30 (33.7)1.02 (0.68–1.56)0.9151.07 (0.68–1.67)0.777
Table
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate Cox model of 30-day all-cause mortality. Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise specified. Abbreviation: HR (hazard ratio), CI (confidence interval), m (median), IQR (interquartile range), ICU (intensive care unit), XDR PA (extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa), BSI (bloodstream infection).
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate Cox model of 30-day all-cause mortality. Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise specified. Abbreviation: HR (hazard ratio), CI (confidence interval), m (median), IQR (interquartile range), ICU (intensive care unit), XDR PA (extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa), BSI (bloodstream infection).
VariablesAlive
(n = 264)		Death
(n = 118)		Crude HR
(95% CI)		p-ValueHR Multivariate
(95% CI)		p-Value
Demographic information
 Age in years, m (IQR)70 (59–77.75)72 (62.75–78)1.01 (0.99–1.02)0.1591.01 (0.99–1.03)0.052
 Male sex185 (70.1)91 (77.1)1.32 (0.85–2.04)0.2081.25 (0.8–1.95)0.321
 Nosocomial acquisition162 (61.4)82 (69.5)1.31 (0.88–1.94)0.178
Underlying condition
 Diabetes mellitus66 (25)28 (23.7)0.95 (0.62–1.46)0.828
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease50 (19)32 (27.4)1.47 (0.98–2.21)0.0621.1 (0.7–1.73)0.675
 Cirrhosis 19 (7.2)9 (7.6)1.06 (0.54–2.08)0.876
 Hemodialysis22 (8.3)3 (2.5)0.34 (0.11–1.06)0.0640.35 (1.01–1.15)0.083
 Hematology malignancy38 (14.4)20 (16.9)1.15 (0.71–1.86)0.575
 Solid tumor malignancy102 (38.6)42 (35.6)0.88 (0.6–1.28)0.505
 Neutropenia 48 (18.2)22 (18.6)1.03 (0.65–1.64)0.884
Charlson comorbidity index, m (IQR)4 (2–6)4 (2–6)1.01 (0.95–1.07)0.744
McCabe score 1.2 (0.96–1.51)0.116
 Non-fatal McCabe77 (29.2)30 (25.4)0.89 (0.59–1.35)0.596
 Rapidly fatal McCabe 87 (33)30 (25.4)0.72 (0.48–1.09)0.124
 Ultimately fatal McCabe 100 (37.9)58 (49.2)1.43 (0.99–2.05)0.0051.29 (0.89–1.89)0.178
Origin of bacteremia
 Catheter-related bloodstream infection34 (12.9)5 (4.2)0.34 (0.14–0.83)0.017
 Urinary tract infection96 (36.4)20 (16.9)0.41 (0.25–0.66)<0.001
 Respiratory infection49 (18.6)46 (39)2.25 (1.55–3.26)<0.001
 Skin and soft tissue infection12 (4.5)7 (5.9)1.26 (0.58–2.69)0.558
 Intraabdominal infection29 (11)16 (13.6)1.18 (0.69–1.99)0.537
 Primary or Unknown39 (14.8)23 (19.5)1.38 (0.87–2.17)0.165
 Other5 (1.9)1 (0.8)0.51 (0.07–3.63)0.500
 High-risk source134 (50.8)93 (78.8)3.03 (1.96–4.76)<0.0012.49 (1.56–3.99)<0.001
 Low-risk source130 (49.2)25 (21.2)0.33 (0.21–0.51)<0.001
Baseline illness severity
 Pitt score, m (IQR)1 (0–2)4 (1–4)1.38 (1.28–1.49)<0.0011.25 (1.13–1.37)<0.001
 Pitt score ≥ 2120 (45.5)86 (72.9)2.73 (1.82–4.1)<0.001
 Septic shock51 (19.3)52 (44.1)2.63 (1.83–3.79)<0.0011.77 (1.18–2.65)0.006
 ICU admission44 (16.7)52 (44.1)2.99 (2.08–4.3)<0.001
Antibiotic management
 Appropriate empirical treatment114 (43.2)50 (42.4)0.98 (0.68–1.41)0.899
 Appropriate definitive treatment240 (90.9)92 (78)0.42 (0.27–0.65)<0.0010.42 (0.27–0.66)<0.001
 Combined antimicrobial therapy96 (36.4)54 (45.8)1.29 (0.9–1.87)0.157
XDR PA BSI81 (30.7)41 (34.7)1.13 (0.77–1.65)0.5351.14 (0.77–1.69)0.504

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montero, M.M.; López Montesinos, I.; Knobel, H.; Molas, E.; Sorlí, L.; Siverio-Parés, A.; Prim, N.; Segura, C.; Duran-Jordà, X.; Grau, S.; et al. Risk Factors for Mortality among Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: What Is the Influence of XDR Phenotype on Outcomes? J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020514

AMA Style

Montero MM, López Montesinos I, Knobel H, Molas E, Sorlí L, Siverio-Parés A, Prim N, Segura C, Duran-Jordà X, Grau S, et al. Risk Factors for Mortality among Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: What Is the Influence of XDR Phenotype on Outcomes? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(2):514. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020514

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montero, María Milagro, Inmaculada López Montesinos, Hernando Knobel, Ema Molas, Luisa Sorlí, Ana Siverio-Parés, Nuria Prim, Concepción Segura, Xavier Duran-Jordà, Santiago Grau, and et al. 2020. "Risk Factors for Mortality among Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: What Is the Influence of XDR Phenotype on Outcomes?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 2: 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020514

APA Style

Montero, M. M., López Montesinos, I., Knobel, H., Molas, E., Sorlí, L., Siverio-Parés, A., Prim, N., Segura, C., Duran-Jordà, X., Grau, S., & Horcajada, J. P. (2020). Risk Factors for Mortality among Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: What Is the Influence of XDR Phenotype on Outcomes? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(2), 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020514

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop