The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information

• Blake, A., &Bülthoff, H. (1990). Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection?Nature,343, 165–168.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Blake, A., &Bülthoff, H. (1991). Shape from specularities: Computation and psychophysics.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,331, 237–252.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bülthoff, H. H., &Mallot, H. A. (1988). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,5, 1749–1758.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cipolla, R., &Blake, A. (1990). The dynamic analysis of apparent contours. InProceedings of the Third International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 616–623). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Erens, R. G. F., Kappers, A. M. L., &Koenderink, J. J. (1993a). Estimating local shape from shading in the presence of global shading.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 334–342.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Erens, R. G. F., Kappers, A. M. L., &Koenderink, J. J. (1993b). Perception of local shape from shading.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 145–156.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Giblin, P., & Weiss, R. (1987). Reconstruction of surfaces from profiles. InProceedings of the IEEE First International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 136-144). IEEE Computer Society Press.

• Horn, B. K. P., &Brooks, M. J. (1989).Shape from shading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Horn, B. K. P., &Schunck, B. G. (1981). Determining optical flow.Artificial Intelligence,17, 185–203.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ikeuchi, K., &Horn, B. K. P. (1981). Numerical shape from shading and occluding boundaries.Artificial Intelligence,17, 141–184.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnston, A., &Passmore, P. J. (1994a). Shape from shading: I. Surface curvature and orientation.Perception,23, 169–190.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Johnston, A., &Passmore, P. J. (1994b). Shape from shading: II. Geodesic bisection and alignment.Perception,23, 191–200.Koenderink, J. J., Kappers, A. M. L., Todd, J. T., Norman, J. F., & Phillips, F. (in press). Surface range and attitude probing in stereoscopically presented dynamic scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Koenderink, J. J., &van Doorn, A. J. (1980). Photometric invariants related to solid shape.Optica Acta,27, 981–996.

  Google Scholar 

• Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (in press). Relief: Pictorial and otherwise. Proceedings of the 5th British Machine Vision Conference.

• Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., &Kappers, A. M. L. (1992). Surface perception in pictures.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 487–496.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., &Kappers, A. M. L. (1994). On so-called “paradoxical monocular stereoscopy.”Perception,23, 583–594.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (in press). Depth relief.Perception.

• Marr, D. (1982).Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

  Google Scholar 

• Mingolla, E., &Todd, J. T. (1986). Perception of solid shape from shading.Biological Cybernetics,53, 137–151.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nagel, H.-H. (1981). On the derivation of 3D rigid point configurations from image sequences. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Processing (pp. 103–108). New York: IEEE Computer Society Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Nagel, H.-H. (1987). On the estimation of optical flow: Relations between different approaches and some new results.Artificial Intelligence,33, 299–234.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Norman, J. F., &Todd, J. T. (1994). Perception of rigid motion in depth from the optical deformations of shadows and occlusion boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 343–356.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Tittle, J. S. (in press). The visual perception of 3D length.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.

• Pentland, A. (1991). Photometric motion.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,13, 879–890.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, J. F. (in press). The systematic distortion of perceived 3-D structure from motion and binocular stereopsis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.

• Todd, J. T. (1985). Perception of structure from motion: Is projective correspondence of moving elements a necessary condition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 689–710.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Todd, J. T., Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (in press). Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.

• Todd, J. T., &Mingolla, E. (1983). The perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 583–595.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Todd, J. T., &Mingolla, E. (1984). The simulation of curved surfaces from patterns of optical texture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 734–739.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Todd, J. T., &Norman, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 509–523.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (in press). The visual discrimination of relative surface orientation.Perception.

• Todd, J. T., &Reichel, F. D. (1989). Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces.Psychological Review,96, 643–657.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references