Eye and Pen: A new device for studying reading during writing

• Ahlsén, E., &Strömqvist, S. (1999). ScriptLog: A tool for logging the writing process and its possible diagnostic use. In F. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson, & L. Lloyd (Eds.),Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice (pp. 144–149). Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University.

  Google Scholar 

• Alamargot, D., &Chanquoy, L. (2001).Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Alamargot, D., &Chanquoy, L. (2002). Les modèles de rédaction de textes. In M. Fayol (Ed.),Production du langage: Traité des sciences cognitives (pp. 45–65). Paris: Hermes.

  Google Scholar 

• Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., & Chesnet, D. (in press). Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. In M. Torrance, D. Galbraith, & L. van Waes (Eds.),Recent developments in writing-process Research (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

• Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., Ros, C., &Chuy, M. (2005). Rédiger un texte procédural à partir de sources: Relations entre l’empan de mémoire de travail et l’activité oculaire du scripteur. In D. Alamargot, P. Terrier, & J. M. Cellier (Eds.),Production, compréhension et usages des écrits techniques au travail (pp. 51–68). Toulouse: Octarès.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R. (2002). Spanning seven orders of magnitude: A challenge for cognitive modeling.Cognitive Science,26, 85–112.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baccino, T., &Pynte, J. (1998). Spatial encoding and referential processing during reading.European Psychologist,3, 51–61.

  Google Scholar 

• Berninger, V. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes.Learning Disability Quarterly,22, 99–112.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bourdin, B., &Fayol, M. (2002). Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production.International Journal of Psychology,37, 219–227.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Breetvelt, I., van den Bergh, H., &Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). Rereading and generating and their relation to text quality: An application of multilevel analysis on writing process data. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.),Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 10–20). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Burtis, P. J., Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., &Tetroe, J. (1983). The development of planning in writing. In B. M. Kroll & G. Wells (Eds.),Explorations in the development of writing (pp. 153–174). New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. J., &Albertson, L. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence.Educational Psychology Review,8, 239–297.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Caccamise, D. J. (1987). Idea generation in writing. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.),Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 224–253). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  Google Scholar 

• Caporossi, G., Alamargot, D., &Chesnet, D. (2004). Using the computer to study the dynamics of handwriting processes.Lecture Notes in Computer Science,3245, 242–254.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chanquoy, L., &Alamargot, D. (2002). Mémoire de travail et rédaction de textes: Evolution des modèles et bilan des premiers travaux.L’Année Psychologique,102, 363–398.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J.-N., &Fayol, M. (1990). Temporal management of short text writing by children and adults.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive,10, 513–540.

  Google Scholar 

• Chesnet, D., &Alamargot, D. (2005). Analyses en temps réel des activités oculaires et graphomotrices du scripteur: Intérêt du dispositif “Eye and Pen.”L’Année Psychologique,105, 477–520.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chesnet, D., Guillabert, F., &Espéret, E. (1994). G-Studio: Un logiciel pour l’étude en temps réel des paramètres temporels de la production écrite.L’Année Psychologique,94, 115–125.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Collewijn, H., Steinman, R. M., Erkelens, C. J., Pizlo, Z., &van der Steen, J. (1992). Effect of freeing the head on eye movement characteristics during three-dimensional shifts of gaze tracking. In A. Berthoz, W. Graf, & P.-P. Vidal (Eds.),Head-neck sensory-motor System (pp. 412–418). New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Costermans, J., &Fayol, M. (Eds.) (1997).Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Daneman, M., &Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 1–18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dansac, C., &Alamargot, D. (1999). Accessing referential information during text composition: When and why? In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.),Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 79–97). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dansac, C., & Passerault, J. M. (1996, October).Effect of re-reading suppression on the temporal parameters of text production. Paper presented at the European Writing Conference, Barcelona.

• Duin, A. H., &Graves, M. F. (1987). Intensive vocabulary instruction as a prewriting technique.Reading Research Quarterly,22, 311–330.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ehrlichman, H., &Weinberger, A. (1978). Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin,85, 1080–1101.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Fayol, M., Hupet, M., &Largy, P. (1999). The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in written French: From novices’ to experts’ errors.Reading & Writing,11, 153–174.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fayol, M., Largy, P., &Lemaire, P. (1994). When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 437–464.

  Google Scholar 

• Flower, L., &Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamic of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.),Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Foulin, J.-N. (1995). Pauses et débits: Les indicateurs temporels de la production écrite.L’Année Psychologique,95, 483–504.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., &Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering.Memory & Cognition,26, 651–658.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Graham, S., &Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994.Educational Psychology Review,8, 7–87.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Griffin, Z. M., &Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking.Psychological Science,11, 274–279.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gufoni, V., Fayol, M., &Gombert, J. E. (1994). Aided subsequent reports as a technique of studying written production: The effects of viewing and the length of text. In G. Eigler & T. Jechle (Eds.),Writing: Current trends in European research (pp. 45–53). Freiburg, Germany: Hochschul.

  Google Scholar 

• Hacker, D. J. (1994). Comprehension monitoring as a writing process. In E. C. Butterfield & J. S. Carlson (Eds.).Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Vol. 6, pp. 143–172). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.),The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, J. R., &Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.),Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, J. R., &Flower, L. S. (1983). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction of protocol analysis. In P. Mosenthal, S. Walmsley, & L. Tamor (Eds.),Research on writing: Principles and Methods (pp. 206–219). New York: Longman.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, J. R., Flower, L. [S.], Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J. F., &Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.),Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Reading, writing and language learning (Vol. 2, pp. 176–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, J. R., &Nash, J. G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.),The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 29–55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Herst, A. N., Epelboim, J., &Steinman, R. M. (2001). Temporal coordination of the human head and eye during a natural sequential tapping task.Vision Research,41, 3307–3319.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hull, G. A., &Smith, W. L. (1983). Interrupting visual feedback in writing.Perceptual & Motor Skills,57, 963–978.

  Google Scholar 

• Inhoff, A. W., &Gordon, A. M. (1998). Eye movements and eye-hand coordination during typing.Current Directions in Psychological Science,6, 153–157.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Janssen, D., van Waes, L., &van den Bergh, H. (1996). Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.),The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 233–250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Kaufer, D. S., Hayes, J. R., &Flower, L. (1986). Composing written sentences.Research in the Teaching of English,20, 121–140.

  Google Scholar 

• Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes.Memory & Cognition,15, 256–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 355–365.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.),The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Kennedy, A., Radach, R., Heller, D., &Pynte, J. (Eds.) (2000).Reading as a perceptual process. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.

  Google Scholar 

• Kennedy, M. L. (1985). The composing process of students writing from sources.Written Communication,2, 434–456.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kowler, E., Pizlo, Z., Guo-Liang, Z., Erkelens, C. J., Steinman, R. M., &Collewijn, H. (1992). Coordination of head and eyes during the performance of natural (and unnatural) visual tasks. In A. Berthoz, W. Graf, & P.-P. Vidal (Eds.),Head-neck sensory-motor system (pp. 419–426). New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Largy, P., &Dedeyan, A. (2002). Automatisme en détection d’erreurs d’accord sujet-verbe: Étude chez l’enfant et l’adulte.L’Année Psychologique,102, 201–234.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee, C. (1999). Eye and head coordination in reading: Roles of head movement and cognitive control.Vision Research,39, 3761–3768.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Levy, C. M., &Ransdell, S. (1994). Computer-aided protocol analysis of writing processes.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,26, 219–223.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition.Educational Psychology Review,8, 299–325.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McCutchen, D., Francis, M., &Kerr, S. (1997). Revising for meaning: Effects of knowledge and strategy.Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 667–676.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McGinley, W. (1992). The role of reading and writing while composing from sources.Reading Research Quarterly,27, 226–247.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., &Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production.Cognition,66, B25-B33.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Miall, R. C., &Tchalenko, J. (2001). The painter’s eye movements.Leonardo,34, 35–40.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nash, J. G., Schumacher, G. M., &Carlson, B. W. (1993). Writing from sources: A structure mapping model.Journal of Educational Psychology,85, 159–170.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Hara, K., Taylor, A., Newman, W., &Sellen, A. J. (2002). Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources.International Journal of Human Computer Studies,56, 269–305.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Olive, T., &Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of highand low-level production processes in written production.Memory & Cognition,30, 594–600.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Olive, T., &Piolat, A. (2002). Suppressing visual feedback in written composition: Effects on processing demands and coordination of the writing processes.International Journal of Psychology,37, 209–218.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Piolat, A., &Olive, T. (2000). Comment étudier le coût et le déroulement de la rédaction de textes? La méthode de triple tâche: Un bilan méthodologique.L’Année Psychologique,465, 465–502.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Piolat, A., &Pélissier, A. (1998). Étude de la rédaction de textes: Contraintes théoriques et méthodes de recherche. In A. Piolat & A. Pélissier (Eds.),La rédaction de textes: Approche cognitive (pp. 225–269). Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.

  Google Scholar 

• Ransdell, S. E. (1990). Using a real-time replay of students’ word processing to understand and promote better writing.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,22, 142–144.

  Google Scholar 

• Ransdell, S. [E.], Arecco, M. R., &Levy, C. M. (2001). Bilingual long-term working memory: The effects of working memory loads on writing quality and fluency.Applied Psycholinguistics,22, 113–128.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ransdell, S. [E.], &Levy, C. M. (1996). Working memory constraints on writing quality and fluency. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.),The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and Applications (pp. 93–105). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin,124, 372–422.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (2003). The performance of natural (and unnatural) visual tasks. The E-Z reader model of eyemovement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Behavior & Brain Sciences,26, 445–526.

  Google Scholar 

• Richardson, D. C., &Spivey, M. J. (2004a). Eye-tracking: Characteristics and methods. In G. Wnek & G. Bowlin (Eds.),Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering (pp. 568–572). New York: Dekker. Abstract available at dekker.com/sdek/96019590-9133495/abstract~db5enc~content5a713554053?words5%7cspivey&hash52398117647.

  Google Scholar 

• Richardson, D. C., &Spivey, M. J. (2004b). Eye-tracking: Research areas and applications. In G. Wnek & G. Bowlin (Eds.),Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering (pp. 573–582). New York: Dekker. Abstract available at dekker.com/sdek/209608953-62770257/abstract~db5enc~content.

  Google Scholar 

• Salvucci, D. D., &Anderson, J. R. (2001). Automated eye-movement protocol analysis.Human-Computer Interaction,16, 39–86.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Scardamalia, M., &Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic and remedial capabilities in children’s composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.),The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 67–95). New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Schilperoord, J. (1996).It’s about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  Google Scholar 

• Schumacher, G. M., Klare, G. R.,Cronin, F. C., &Moses, J. D. (1984). Cognitive activities of beginning and advanced college writers: A pausal analysis.Research in the Teaching of English,18, 169–187.

  Google Scholar 

• Severinson, E. K., & Kollberg, P. (1994, October).Computer tools for tracing the writing process: From keystroke records to S-notation. Paper presented at the EARLI/ECWC SIG Conference, Utrecht.

• Sirc, G., &Bridwell-Bowles, L. (1988). A computer tool for analysing the composing process.Collegiate Microcomputer,6, 155–160.

  Google Scholar 

• Smyth, M. M., &Silvers, G. (1987). Functions of vision in the control of handwriting.Acta Psychologica,65, 47–64.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tchalenko, J. (2001).Eye-hand coordination in portrait drawing: A case study. London: Camberwell College of Arts.

  Google Scholar 

• Torrance, M., Thomas, G. V., &Robinson, E. J. (1996). Finding something to write about: Strategic and automatic processes in idea generation. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.),The science of writing: Theory, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 199–05). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• van den Bergh, H., &Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). The dynamics of idea generation during writing: An on-line study. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.),Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 99–120). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• van Gelderen, A., &Oostdam, R. H. (2002). Improving linguistic fluency for writing: Effects of explicitness and focus of instruction.L1-Educational Studies in Language & Literature,2, 239–270.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T., &Spilich, G. J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 651–667.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references