Speech perception as categorization

• Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Aldine.

  Google Scholar 

• Beale, J. M., & Keil, F. C. (1995). Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition, 57, 217–239.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 305–330.

  Google Scholar 

• Bimler, D., & Kirkland, J. (2001). Categorical perception of facial expressions of emotion: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 633–658.

  Google Scholar 

• Blumstein, S. E. (1995). The neurobiology of the sound structure of language. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 915–929). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Blumstein, S. E., & Stevens, K. N. (1981). Phonetic features and acoustic invariance in speech. Cognition, 10, 25–32.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Borsky, S., Tuller, B., & Shapiro, L. P. (1998). “How to milk a coat”: The effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2670–2676.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Bradlow, A. R., Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1999). Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 206–219.

  Google Scholar 

• Bradlow, A. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener- and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2074–2085.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Brady, S. A., & Darwin, C. J. (1978). Range effect in the perception of voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 1556–1558.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Carney, A. E., Widin, G. P., & Viemeister, N. F. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 961–970.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, H., & Lefebvre, C. (2005). Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  Google Scholar 

• Colin, C., & Radeau, M. (2003). Les illusions McGurk dans la parole: 25 ans de recherches [The McGurk illusions in speech: 25 years of research]. L’Année Psychologique, 103, 497–542. [With summary in English] doi:10.3406/psy.2003.29649

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Connine, C. M. (1987). Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context. Journal of Memory & Language, 16, 527–538. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90138-0

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cooper, F. S., Delattre, P. C., Liberman, A. M., Borst, J. M., & Gerstman, L. J. (1952). Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 597–606.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Damper, R. I., & Harnad, S. R. (2000). Neural network models of categorical perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 843–867.

  Google Scholar 

• Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 222–241.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Diehl, R. L., & Lindblom, B. (2004). Explaining the structure of feature and phoneme inventories. In S. Greenberg, W. Ainsworth, A. Popper, & R. Fay (Eds.), Speech processing in the auditory system (pp. 101–162). New York: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Diehl, R. L., Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149–179.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Dupoux, E., & Green, K. (1997). Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: Effects of talker and rate changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 914–927.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fant, G. (1966). A note on vocal tract size factors and non-uniform F-pattern scalings. (Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Project Status Report No. 4, pp. 22–30). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.

  Google Scholar 

• Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 78–104.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Francis, A. L., Baldwin, K., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2000). Effects of training on attention to acoustic cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1668–1680.

  Google Scholar 

• Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 349–366.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Frankish, C. (2008). Precategorical acoustic storage and the perception of speech. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 815–836.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fu, Q.-J., & Galvin, J. J., III (2003). The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1065–1072.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361–377.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gay, T. (1978). Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 223–230.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1166–1183.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  Google Scholar 

• Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R.” Neuropsychologia, 9, 317–323.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Goudbeek, M., Smits, R., Swingley, D., & Cutler, A. (2005). Acquiring auditory and phonetic categories. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 497–514). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Goudbeek, M., Swingley, D., & Smits, R. (2009). Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensional acoustic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1913–1933.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greenspan, S. L., Nusbaum, H. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1988). Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 421–433.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Guenther, F. H., Husain, F. T., Cohen, M. A., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (1999). Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2900–2912.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1987). Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnsberger, J. D. (2001). On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 489–503.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 373–405.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hervais-Adelman, A., Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., & Carlyon, R. P. (2008). Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: Effects of feedback and lexicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 460–474.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393–402.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–3111.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Holt, L. L. (2005). Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization. Psychological Science, 16, 305–312.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2006). Cue weighting in auditory categorization: Implications for first and second language acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 3059–3071.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2008). Speech perception within an auditory cognitive science framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 42–46.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Holt, L. L., Lotto, A. J., & Diehl, R. L. (2004). Auditory discontinuities interact with categorization: Implications for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1763–1773.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Holt, L. L., Lotto, A. J., & Kluender, K. R. (1998). Incorporating principles of general learning in theories of language acquisition. In M. C. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. S. Olson, & T. Wysocki (Eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society—Vol. 34: The panels (pp. 253–268). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  Google Scholar 

• House, A. S., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 105–113.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Houtgast, T., & Steeneken, H. J. M. (1973). The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 557.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ingvalson, E. M. (2008). Predicting F3 usage in / r-1/ perception and production by native Japanese speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.

• Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (1995). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 553–562.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47-B57.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Jakobson, R. C., Fant, G. M., & Halle, M. (1952). Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates (Tech. Rep. No. 13). Cambridge, MA: MIT, Acoustics Laboratory.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–165). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kent, R. D., & Minifie, F. D. (1977). Coarticulation in recent speech production models. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 115–133.

  Google Scholar 

• Klatt, D. H., & Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 820–857.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kluender, K. R. (1994). Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 173–217). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kluender, K. R., Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2005). Contributions of nonhuman animal models to understanding human speech perception. In S. Greenberg & W. Ainsworth (Eds.), Listening to speech: An auditory perspective (pp. 203–220). New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Krumhansl, C. L. (1991). Music psychology: Tonal structures in perception and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 277–303.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhl, P. K. (2000). Language, mind, and brain: Experience alters perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 99–115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831–843.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech learning “gated” by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10, 110–120.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 979–1000.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606–608.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 98–104.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Lewicki, M. S. (2002). Efficient coding of natural sounds. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 356–363.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Liberman, A. M. (1957). Some results of research on speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 117–123.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liberman, A. M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. C., & Cooper, F. S. (1952). The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 497–516.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358–368.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lindblom, B. (1986). Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In J. J. Ohala & J. J. Jaeger (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp. 13–44). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lippmann, R. P. (1996). Accurate consonant perception without mid-frequency speech energy. IEEE Transactions on Speech & Audio Processing, 4, 66.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lisker, L. (1986). “Voicing” in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language & Speech, 29, 3–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-linguistic study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.

  Google Scholar 

• Livingston, K. R., Andrews, J. K., & Harnad, S. (1998). Categorical perception effects induced by category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 732–753.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874–886.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2000). The illusion of the phoneme. In S. J. Billings, J. P. Boyle, & A. M. Griffith (Eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society—Vol. 35: The panels (pp. 191–204). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  Google Scholar 

• Lotto, A. J., & Kluender, K. R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 602–619.

  Google Scholar 

• Lotto, A. J., Sato, M., & Diehl, R. L. (2004). Mapping the task for the second language learner: The case of Japanese acquisition of /r/ and /l/. In J. Slifka, S. Manuel, & M. Matthies (Eds.), From sound to sense: 501 years of discoveries in speech communication [Online conference proceedings]. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  Google Scholar 

• Maddox, W. T., Molis, M. R., & Diehl, R. L. (2002). Generalizing a neuropsychological model of visual categorization to auditory categorization of vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 584–597.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magnuson, J. S., McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2003). Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: The ghost of Christmash past. Cognitive Science, 27, 285–298.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mann, V. A. (1980). Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 407–412.

  Google Scholar 

• Mann, V. A., & Repp, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 213–228.

  Google Scholar 

• Massaro, D. W. (1987). Categorical partition: A fuzzy-logical model of categorization behavior. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 254–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Massaro, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.

  Google Scholar 

• McCandliss, B. D., Fiez, J. A., Protopapas, A., Conway, M., & Mc-Clelland, J. L. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[1] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 89–108.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McClelland, J. L. (2001). Failures to learn and their remediation: A Hebbian account. In J. L. McClelland & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives (pp. 97–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• McClelland, J. L., Mirman, D., & Holt, L. L. (2006). Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 363–369.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• McMurray, B., Aslin, R. N., Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey, M. J., & Subik, D. (2008). Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 1609–1631.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86, B33-B42.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Miceli, G., Gainotti, G., Caltagirone, C., & Masullo, C. (1980). Some aspects of phonological impairment in aphasia. Brain & Language, 11, 159–169.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miller, J. L., & Baer, T. (1983). Some effects of speaking rate on the production of /b/ and /w/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1751–1755.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Miller, J. L., & Liberman, A. M. (1979). Some effects of later-Occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 457–465.

  Google Scholar 

• Mirman, D., Holt, L. L., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Categorization and discrimination of nonspeech sounds: Differences between steady-state and rapidly-changing acoustic cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1198–1207.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Mirman, D., McClelland, J. L., Holt, L. L., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Effects of attention on the strength of lexical influences on speech perception: Behavioral experiments and computational mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 32, 398–417.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A. M., Jenkins, J. J., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 331–340.

  Google Scholar 

• Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432–434.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826–859.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nearey, T. M. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 347–373.

  Google Scholar 

• Nittrouer, S. (2004). The role of temporal and dynamic signal components in the perception of syllable-final stop voicing by children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 1777–1790.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 299–370.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 355–376.

  Google Scholar 

• Oden, G. C., & Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85, 172–191.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Öhman, S. E. G. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 151–168.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Pallier, C., Sebastian-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A., & Mehler, J. (1998). Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: A cross-linguistic study. Memory & Cognition, 26, 844–851.

  Google Scholar 

• Palmieri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Visual object understanding. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 291–303.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175–184.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pisoni, D. B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 253–260.

  Google Scholar 

• Pisoni, D. B. (1977). Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1352–1361.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Pitt, M. A., & McQueen, J. M. (1998). Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 347–370.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Carrell, T. D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947–950.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Repp, B. H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 81–110.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Repp, B. H., & Liberman, A. M. (1987). Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 89–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rosen, S. M. (1979). Range and frequency effects in consonant categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 393–402.

  Google Scholar 

• Rosenblum, L. D. (2005). Primacy of multimodal speech perception. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 51–78). Oxford: Blackwell.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Saberi, K., & Perrott, D. R. (1999). Cognitive restoration of reversed speech. Nature, 398, 760.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Samuel, A. G. (1977). The effect of discrimination training on speech perception: Noncategorical perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 321–330.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Samuel, A. G. (1982). Phonetic prototypes. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 307–314.

  Google Scholar 

• Samuel, A. G., & Pitt, M. A. (2003). Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 416–434.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–304.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Sharma, A., & Dorman, M. F. (2000). Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2697–2703.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Slevc, L. R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second-language proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological Science, 17, 675–681.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Smith, E. C., & Lewicki, M. S. (2006). Efficient auditory coding. Nature, 439, 978–982.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Steinschneider, M., Volkov, I. O., Fishman, Y. I., Oya, H., Arezzo, J. C., & Howard, M. A., III (2005). Intracortical responses in human and monkey primary auditory cortex support a temporal processing mechanism for encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 170–186.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Stevens, K. N. (2000). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Stewart, M. E., & Ota, M. (2008). Lexical effects on speech perception in individuals with “autistic” traits. Cognition, 109, 157–162.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Studdert-Kennedy, M., Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., & Cooper, F. S. (1970). Motor theory of speech perception: A reply to Lane’s critical review. Psychological Review, 77, 234–249.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Summerfield, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 1074–1095.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161–204.

  Google Scholar 

• Volaitis, L. E., & Miller, J. L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 723–735.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wade, T., & Holt, L. L. (2005a). Incidental categorization of spectrally complex non-invariant auditory stimuli in a computer game task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 2618–2633.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wade, T., & Holt, L. L. (2005b). Perceptual effects of preceding non-speech rate on temporal properties of speech categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 939–950.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Walley, A. C. (2005). Speech perception in childhood. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 449–468). Oxford: Blackwell.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Werker, J. F. (1994). Cross-language speech perception: Development change does not involve loss. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 93–120). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 49–63.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1999). Influences on infant speech processing: Toward a new synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 509–535.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wilson, B., & Dorman, M. F. (2007). The surprising performance of present-day cochlear implants. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54, 969–972.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Winkler, I., Kujala, T., Tiitinen, H., Sivonen, P., Alku, P., Lehtokoski, A., et al. (1999). Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology, 36, 638–642.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wolfe, J. M., Kluender, K. R., Levi, D. M., Bartoshuk, L. M., Herz, R. S., Klatzky, R. L., et al. (2008). Sensation and perception (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Kotani, M., & Pruitt, J. (2001). Brain plasticity in behavioral and neuromagnetic measures: A perceptual training study [Abstract]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2687.

  Google Scholar 

Download references