This paper clarifies the relations in properties and structures between fuzzy inference methods based on α-cuts and the generalized mean. The group of the inference methods is named the α-GEM (α-cut and generalized-mean-based inference) family. A unified platform is proposed for the inference methods in the α-GEM family by the effective use of the above-mentioned relations. For the unified platform, a criterion is made clear to uniquely determine the value of a parameter in fuzzy-constraint propagation control for facts given by singletons. Moreover, conditions are derived to make the inference methods in the α-GEM family equivalent to singleton-consequent-type fuzzy inference which has been successfully applied to a wide variety of fields. Thereby, the unified platform can contribute to the construction of an inference engine for both the methods in the α-GEM family and singleton-consequent-type fuzzy inference. Such scheme of the inference engine provides an effective way to make these inference methods transformed into each other in learning for selecting the inference methods as well as for optimizing fuzzy rules.

1. [1] A. Kaufmann, “Introduction to the theory of fuzzy subsets,” New York: Academic Press, Vol.1, pp. 8-30, 1975.
2. [2] N. R. Pal and J. C. Bezdek, “Measuring fuzzy uncertainty,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol.2, No.2, pp. 107-118, 1994.
3. [3] R. R. Yager, “On the specificity of a possibility distribution,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., Vol.50, pp. 279-292, 1992.
4. [4] R. R. Yager, “Measuring tranquility and anxiety in decision making: an application of fuzzy sets,” Int. J. General Systems, Vol.8, pp. 139-146, 1982.
5. [5] L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy logic = Computing with words,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol.4, No.2, pp. 103-111, 1996.
6. [6] L. A. Zadeh, “Inference in fuzzy logic via generalized constraint propagation,” Proc. 1996 26th Int. Symp. on Multi-Valued Logic (ISMVL’96), pp. 192-195, 1996.
7. [7] K. Uehara and K. Hirota, “Parallel fuzzy inference based on α-level sets and generalized means,” Int. J. of Information Sciences, Vol.100, No.1-4, pp. 165-206, Aug. 1997.
8. [8] K. Uehara, T. Koyama, and K. Hirota, “Fuzzy inference with schemes for guaranteeing convexity and symmetricity in consequences based on α-cuts,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.13, No.2, pp. 135-149, 2009.
9. [9] K. Uehara, T. Koyama, and K. Hirota, “Inference with governing schemes for propagation of fuzzy convex constraints based on α-cuts,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.13, No.3, pp. 321-330, 2009.
10. [10] K. Uehara, T. Koyama, and K. Hirota, “Inference based on α-cut and generalized mean with fuzzy tautological rules,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.14, No.1, pp. 76-88, 2010.
11. [11] K. Uehara, T. Koyama, and K. Hirota, “Suppression effect of α-cut based inference on consequence deviations,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.14, No.3, pp. 256-271, Apr. 2010.
12. [12] G. Cheng and Y. Fu, “Error estimation of perturbation under CRI,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol.14, No.6, pp. 709-715, Dec. 2006.
13. [13] I. B. Turksen and Y. Tian, “Combination of rules or their consequences in fuzzy expert systems,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., Vol.58, No.1, pp. 3-40, 1993.
14. [14] K. Uehara, T. Koyama, and K. Hirota, “Inference based on α-cut and generalized mean in representing fuzzy-valued functions,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.14 No.6, pp. 581-592, 2010 (JACIII Best Paper Award 2011).
15. [15] K. Uehara and K. Hirota, “Multi-level control of fuzzy-constraint propagation in inference based on α-cuts and generalized mean,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.17, No.4, pp. 647-662, July 2013.
16. [16] K. Uehara and K. Hirota, “Multi-level control of fuzzy-constraint propagation via evaluations with linguistic truth values in generalized-mean-based inference,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.20, No.2, pp. 355-377, 2016.
17. [17] K. Uehara, S. Sato, and K. Hirota, “Inference for nonlinear mapping with sparse fuzzy rules based on multi-level interpolation,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.15, No.3, pp. 264-287, May 2011.
18. [18] K. Uehara and K. Hirota, “Multi-level interpolation for inference with sparse fuzzy rules: An extended way of generating multi-level points,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.17, No.2, pp. 127-148, Mar. 2013.
19. [19] K. Uehara and K. Hirota, “Infinite-level interpolation for inference with sparse fuzzy rules: Fundamental analysis toward practical use,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.17, No.1, pp. 44-59, Jan. 2013.
20. [20] K. Uehara and K. Hirota, “Inference with fuzzy rule interpolation at an infinite number of activating points,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.19, No.1, pp. 74-90, 2015.
21. [21] K. Uehara and K. Hirota, “Multi-level control of fuzzy-constraint propagation in inference with fuzzy rule interpolation at an infinite number of activating points,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.21, No.3, pp. 425-447, May 2017.
22. [22] K. Uehara and K. Hirota, “Fuzzy inference based on α-cut and generalized mean: Relations between the methods in its family,” Proc. of the 7th Int. Symp. on Computational Intelligence and Industrial Applications (ISCIIA2016), Beijing, China, FM-GS3-01, pp. 1-8, Nov. 2016.
23. [23] K. Uehara, “Fuzzy inference based on a weighted average of fuzzy sets and its learning algorithm for fuzzy exemplars,” Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. of the 4th IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems and the 2nd Int. Fuzzy Engineering Symp. (FUZZ-IEEE/IFES’95), Vol.IV, pp. 2253-2260, 1995.
24. [24] K. Uehara and M. Fujise, “Fuzzy inference based on families of α-level sets,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol.1, No.2, pp. 111-124, May 1993.
25. [25] L. T. Kóczy and K. Hirota, “Approximate reasoning by linear rule interpolation and general approximation,” Int. J. Approx. Reason., Vol.9, pp. 197-225, 1993.
26. [26] L. T. Kóczy and K. Hirota, “Size reduction by interpolation in fuzzy rule bases,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, Cybern., Vol.27, No.1, pp. 14-33, Feb. 1997.
27. [27] Z. Huang and Q. Shen, “Fuzzy interpolative reasoning via scale and move transformation,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol.14, No.2, pp. 340-359, April 2006.
28. [28] D. Tikk, Z. C. Johanyák, S. Kovács, and K. W. Wong, “Fuzzy rule interpolation and extrapolation techniques: Criteria and evaluation guidelines,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.15, No.3, pp. 254-263, 2011.
29. [29] Q. Shen, and L. Yang, “Generalization of scale and move transformation-based fuzzy interpolation,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.15, No.3, pp. 288-298, 2011.
30. [30] D. Vincze and S. Kovács, “Performance optimization of the fuzzy rule interpolation method “FIVE”,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.15, No.3, pp. 313-320, 2011.
31. [31] Z. Huang and Q. Shen, “Fuzzy interpolation and extrapolation: A practical approach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol.16, No.1, pp. 13-28, April 2008.
32. [32] K. W. Wong, D. Tikk, T. D. Gedeon, and L. T. Kóczy, “Fuzzy rule interpolation for multidimensional input spaces with applications: A case study,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol.13, No.6, pp. 809-819, Dec. 2005.