Most machine tools comprise a combination of square blocks and plates for each body structure, which is not fully optimized. One reason for the nonoptimal design is that machine tool designers face difficulty in introducing curved structures to fulfill functional requirements. In this paper, completely new structures of the surface profile grinding machine have been developed, pursuing the ideal structure by defying fundamental design rules as well as by utilizing topology and shape optimization methods. The combination of fundamental techniques and state-of-art techniques enables lightweight structures that can achieve two-times higher resonance frequency, 40–50% space-saving, and 60–100% productivity improvement, compared to those with the conventional design.

1. [1] M. Nakaminami, T. Tokuma, T. Moriwaki, and K. Nakamoto, “Optimal Structure Design Methodology for Compound Multiaxis Machine Tools – I – Analysis of Requirements and Specifications –,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.1, No.2, pp. 78-86, 2007.
2. [2] M. Nakaminami, T. Tokuma, K. Matsumoto, S. Sakashita, T. Moriwaki, and K. Nakamoto, “Optimal Structure Design Methodology for Compound Multiaxis Machine Tools – II – Investigation of Basic Structure –,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.1, No.2, pp. 87-93, 2007.
3. [3] Z. Yu, K. Nakamoto, and Y. Takeuchi, “Development of an Interactive Assistance System for Machine Tool Structure Design Considering of Sliding Joint Damping,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.5, No.5, pp. 722-728, 2011.
4. [4] K. Nakanishi, M. Sawada, and J. Sakamoto, “A newly developed multi-axis controlled turning machine equipped with a swing type turret head,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.9, No.6, pp. 707-713, 2015.
5. [5] B. Li, J. Hong, and Z. Liu, “Stiffness design of machine tool structures by a biologically inspired topology optimization method,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., Vol.84, pp. 33-44, 2014.
6. [6] F. Koenigsberger and J. Tlusty, “Machine Tool Structures,” Elsevier, 1970.
7. [7] R. Sato, G. Tashiro, and K. Shirase, “Analysis of the coupled vibration between feed drive systems and machine tool structure,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.9, No.6, pp. 689-697, 2015.
8. [8] L. Uriarte et al., “Machine tools for large parts,” CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol., Vol.62, No.2, pp. 731-750, 2013.
9. [9] H.-C. Möhring, C. Brecher, E. Abele, J. Fleischer, and F. Bleicher, “Materials in machine tool structures,” CIRP Ann., Vol.64, No.2, pp. 725-748, 2015.
10. [10] K. Mori, D. Kono, I. Yamaji, and A. Matsubara, “Support placement for machine tools using stiffness model,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.9, No.6, pp. 680-688, 2015.
11. [11] M. Nakaminami, T. Tokuma, K. Matsumoto, S. Sakashita, T. Moriwaki, and K. Nakamoto, “Optimal Structure Design Methodology for Compound Multiaxis Machine Tools – III – Performance Evaluation –,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.2, No.1, pp. 70-77, 2008.
12. [12] D. Kono, S. Nishio, I. Yamaji, and A. Matsubara, “A method for stiffness tuning of machine tool supports considering contact stiffness,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., Vol.90, pp. 50-59, 2015.
13. [13] K. Mori, D. Kono, and A. Matsubara, “A robust level error estimation method for machine tool installation,” Precis. Eng., Vol.58, pp. 70-76, 2019.
14. [14] T. Hoshi and N. Takenaka, “Parameters of mounting and foundation affecting the structural dynamics of machine tools,” Ann. CIRP, Vol.22, No.1, pp. 129-130, 1973.