A New Test for Simple Tree Alternative in a 2 x k Table

1. A. Futschik and G. C. Pflug, The likelihood ratio test for simple tree order: A useful asymptotic expansion , J. Stat. Plan. Inference 70 (1998) 57–68.

   Google Scholar 

2. A. Genz, Numerical computation of rectangular bivariate and trivariate normal and t-probabilities, Stat. Comput. 14 (2004) 251–260.

   Google Scholar 

3. B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993).

4. B. I. Graubard and E. L. Korn, Choice of column scores for testing independence in ordered 2 x K contingency tables, Biometrics 43 (1987) 471–476.

   Google Scholar 

5. B. Singh, M. J. Schell and F. T. Wright, The power functions of the likelihood ratio tests for a simple tree ordering in normal means: Unequal weights, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods A 22 (1993) 425–449.

   Google Scholar 

6. C. W. Dunnett, A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control, Canad. J. Statist. 50 (1955) 1096–1121.

   Google Scholar 

7. E. Noreen, Computer Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction, (Wiley, New York, 1989).

8. E. Teoh, A. Nyska, U. Wormser and S. D. Peddada, Statistical inference under order restrictions on both rows and columns of a matrix, with an application in toxicology, IMS Collections Beyond Parametrics in Interdisciplinary Research: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Pranab K. Sen 1 (2008) 62–77.

9. F. Bretz, A. Genz and L. A. Hothorn, On the numerical availability of multiple comparison procedures, Biom. J. 43(5) (2001) 645–656.

   Google Scholar 

10. F. Bretz and L. A. Hothorn, Statistical analysis of monotone or non-monotone dose–response data from in vitro toxicological assays, ATLA-ALTERN LAB ANIM 31(1) (2003) 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

11. F. Schaarschmidt, M. Sill and L. A. Hothorn, Approximate simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple contrasts of binomial proportions, Biom, J. 50(5) (2008) 782–792.

    Google Scholar 

12. F. T. Wright and T. Tran, Approximating the level probabilities in order restricted inference:The simple tree ordering, Biometrika 71(2) (1985) 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

13. J. Hwang and S. Peddada, Confidence interval estimation subject to order restrictions, Ann. Stat. 22 (1994) 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

14. J. Romano, A bootstrap revival of some nonparametric distance tests, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83 (1988) 698–708.

    Google Scholar 

15. J. Romano, Bootstrap and randomization tests of some nonparametric hypotheses, Ann. Stat. 17 (1989) 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

16. K. Leuraud and J. Benichou, A comparison of several methods to test for the existence of a monotonic dose-response relationship in clinical and epidemiological studies, Stat. Med. 20 (2001) 3335–3351.

    Google Scholar 

17. K. Leuraud and J. Benichou, Tests for monotonic trend from case-control data: Cochran-Armitage-Mantel trend test, isotonic regression and single and multiple contrast tests, Biom. J. 46 (2004) 731–749.

    Google Scholar 

18. L. A. Hothorn, M. Vaeth and T. Hothorn, Trend tests for the evaluation of exposure-response relationships in epidemiological exposure studies, Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 6 (2009) 1.

19. M. A. Fligner and D. A. Wolfe, Distribution-free tests for comparing several treatments with a control, Stat. Neerl. 36 (1982) 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

20. M. Conaway, C. Pillers, T. Robertson and J. Sconing, A circular-cone test for testing homogeneity against a simple tree order. Canad. J. Statist. 19 (1991) 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

21. M. M. Desu, S. Park and S. Chakraborti, Linear rank statistics for the simple tree alternatives, Biom. J. 38(3) (1996) 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

22. M. T. Tsai, Maximum likelihood estimation of covariance matrices under simple tree ordering, J. Multivar. Anal. 89 (2004) 292–303.

    Google Scholar 

23. P. C. Gupta and H. C. Mehta, Cohort study of all-cause mortality among tobacco users in Mumbai, India, Bull. World Health Organ. 78(7) (2000) 877–883.

    Google Scholar 

24. R. Magel, A test for the equality of k medians against the simple tree alternative under right censorship, Comm. Statist. Simul. Comput. B 17 (1988) 917–925.

    Google Scholar 

25. S. D. Peddada and J. K. Haseman, Tests for a simple tree order restriction with application to dose-response studies, Appl. Stat. 55(4) (2006) 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

26. S. Peddada, K. Prescott and M. Conaway, Tests for order restrictions in binary response, Biometrics 57 (2001) 1219–1227.

    Google Scholar 

27. U. Bandyopadhyay and P. Chakrabarti, Single contrast tests for detecting trends in binomial proportions, J. Korean Statist. Soc. 42 (2013) 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references