Fuzzy-Based Methodology for Integrated Infrastructure Asset Management

1. InfraGuide, An Integrated Approach to Assessment and Evaluation of Municipal Road, Sewer and Water Networks, InfraGuide best practice. National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastrucure, Canada, 2003.

2. M. R. Halfawy, D. Pyzoha and T. El-Hosseiny, an Integrated Framework for GIS-Based Civil Infrastructure Management Systems, an Integrated Framework for GIS-Based Civil Infrastructure Management Systems, no. Montreal, 2002.

3. N. S. Grigg, Viewpoint. Infrastructure: Integrated Issue or Tower of Babel?, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 115–117, 1999.

   Google Scholar 

4. A. C. Lemer, Progress toward Integrated Infrastructure-Asset Management, Innovations in Urban Infrastructure, vol. APWA International Public Works Congress, pp. 7–24, 1998.

5. D. Vanier, Why industry needs asset management tools, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2001.

   Google Scholar 

6. M. R. Halfawy, L. A. Newton and D. J. Vanier, Review of commercial municipal infrastructure asset management systems, ITcon, vol. 11, pp. 211–224, 2006.

   Google Scholar 

7. Z. Geem, Window-Based Decision Support System for the Water Pipe Condition Assessment using Artificial Neural Network, ASCE- Conference Proceeding, World Water & Environmental Resources Congress, 2003.

8. H. Al-Barqawi and T. Zayed, Condition Rating Model for Underground Infrastructure Sustainable Water Mains, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 126–135, 2006.

   Google Scholar 

9. Y. Kleiner and B. Rajani, Dynamic Influences on the Deterioration Rates of Individual Water Mains, Water Research Foundation and the Institute for Research in Construction, 2010.

10. J. C. Devera, Risk assessment model for pipe rehabilitation and replacement in a water distribution system, Doctoral dissertation, California Polytechnic State University, 2013.

11. M. Najafi and G. Kulandaivel, Pipeline Condition Predicting Using Neural Network Models, ASCE-Conference Proceeding, Pipelines 2005: Optimizing Pipeline Design, Operations, and Maintenance , 2005.

12. S. T. Ariaratnam, A. El-Assaly and Y. Yang, Assessment of infrastructure inspection needs using logistic models, Journal of infrastructure systems, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 160–165, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

13. F. Chughtai and T. Zayed, Structural condition models for sewer pipeline, on Pipeline Engineering and Construction: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects, pp. 25–33, 2007.

14. Z. Khan, T. Zayed and O. Moselhi, Structural Condition Assessment of Sewer Pipelines, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 170–179, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

15. M. T. Obaidat and S. A. Al-Kheder, Integration of geographic information systems and computer vision systems for pavement distress classification, Construction and building materials, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 657–672, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

16. J. Cunningham, J. MacNaughton and S. Landers, Managing the Risk of Aging Pavement Infrastructure in New Brunswick Through Innovative Decision Making, Annual Conference of the Transportation Association, 2010.

17. B. Ezell , J. Farr and L. Wiese, Infrastructure Risk Analysis Model, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 114–117, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

18. Y. Kleiner, B. Rajani and R. Sadiq, Failure risk management of buried infrastructure using fuzzy-based techniques, Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 81–94, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

19. B. Rajani, Y. Kleiner and R. Sadiq, Translation of pipe inspection results into condition ratings using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique, Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology, vol. 55, 2006.

20. M. Hahn, R. Palmer and M. S. Merr, Expert System for Prioritizing the Inspection of Sewers: Knowledge Base Formulation and Evaluation, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 121–129, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

21. J. Yan and K. Vairavamoorthy, Fuzzy Approach for Pipeline Condition Assessment, New Pipeline Technologies, Security, and Safety, ASCE, Baltimore, MD, pp. 467–476, 2003.

22. D. A. Paine, Managing Pavements Through Risk Analysis, In 6th International Conference on Managing Pavement, 2004.

23. J. A. Reigle and J. P. Zaniewski, Risk-based life-cycle cost analysis for project-level pavement management, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1816, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

24. B. Rajani and Y. Kleiner, Forecasting Variations and Trends in Water-main Breaks, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 122–131, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

25. B. Practices, Deterioration and Inspection of Water Distribution Systems, Best Practice by the National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure, vol. 1, no. 1, 2003.

26. Z. W. Geem, C. L. Tseng, J. Kim and C. Bae, Trenchless water pipe condition assessment using artificial neural network, The ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, 2007.

27. H. Fares and T. Zayed, Risk Assessment for Water Mains Using Fuzzy Approach, In Construction Research Congress, 2009.

28. C. W. Wang, Z. G. Niu, H. Jia and H. W. Zhang, An assessment model of water pipe condition using Bayesian inference, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 495–504, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

29. J. P. Davies, B. A. Clarke, J. T. Whiter and R. J. Cunningham, Factors influencing the structural deterioration and collapse of rigid sewer pipes, Urban Water, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 73–89, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

30. D. Desilva, S. Burn, G. Tjandraatmadja, M. Moglia, P. Davis, L. Wolf and L. Hafskjold, Sustainable management of leakage from wastewater pipelines, Water Science & Technology, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 189–198, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

31. H. Baik, H. Jeong and D. Abraham, Estimating Transition Probabilities in Markov Chain-Based Deterioration Models for Management of Wastewater Systems, Water Resource Plan Manage, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

32. H. D. Tran, Investigation of deterioration models for storm water pipe systems, Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University, 2007.

33. E. Ana, W. Bauwens, M. Pessemier, C. Thoeye, S. Smolders, I. Boonen and De Gueldre, An investigation of the factors influencing sewer structural deterioration, Urban Water Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 303–312, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

34. C. G. Harral and A. Faiz, Road deterioration in developing countries: Causes and remedies, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1988.

35. Wee and Chanand Teo, Potential Modeling of Pavement Deterioration Rate due to Cracking, UNIMAS e-Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009.

36. H. Behbahani, Prediction of the Pavement Condition for Urban Roadway A Tehran Case Study, International Journal Of Engineering TRANSACTIONS B: Applications, vol. 17, no. 3, pp.219–226, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

37. J. I. Walls and M. R. Smith, Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design, Interim Technical Bulletin, Federal Highway Administration, Vols. FHWA-SA-98-079, 1998.

38. N. Sadeghi, A. R. Fayek and W. Pedrycz, Fuzzy Monte Carlo simulation and risk assessment in construction, Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 238–252, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

39. D. Gransberg and J. Diekmann, Quantifying pavement life cycle cost inflation uncertainty, AACE International Transactions - 48th AACE International Annual Meeting, p RISK.08.1-RISK.08.11, 2004.

40. H. Boussabaine and R. Kirkham, Whole life-cycle costing: risk and risk responses, Oxford UK, Malden, MA: Blackwell publishing, 2004.

41. J. L. Riggs, Engineering economics, McGraw-Hili, New York, 1986.

42. M. Marzouk, M. Madany, A. Abou Zied and M. El said, Handling construction pollutions using multi objective optimization, Construction Management and Economics, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1113–1125, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references