Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article
Free access

Should APL be a declining language?

Published: 01 September 1981 Publication History

Abstract

The evolution of computer languages is compared with the evolution of natural languages. This suggests that APL might one day evolve to, or be replaced by, a non-declining form having only one basic syntax and only one class of object—as LISP has today. These “generalized objects” would embrace files, functions, and workspaces as we now know them. Such objects might be nested arrays with extended indexing and added features for sharing and access control.

References

[1]
Cheney, Carl M., Nested Arrays Reference Manual, STSC Inc., 1981
[2]
Berry, Paul, SHARP APL Reference Manual, I. P. Sharp Associates Ltd., 1979
[3]
Jenkins, M. A., On Combining the Data Structure Concepts of LISP and APL, Technical Report No. 80-109, Queen's University, Sept. 1980
[4]
Martin, James, Computer Data-Base Organization (Chapters 14-16), Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1977

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGAPL APL Quote Quad
ACM SIGAPL APL Quote Quad  Volume 12, Issue 1
September 1981
354 pages
ISSN:0163-6006
DOI:10.1145/390007
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 1981
Published in SIGAPL Volume 12, Issue 1

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)71
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
Reflects downloads up to 23 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media