Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3678884.3681918acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

The Dual Role of Student and Creator: Exploring the TikTok Experience

Published: 13 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

TikTok is one of the most common content-creating social media platforms for youth in the USA. In recent years, its engaging content has significantly influenced people, shaping trends, behaviors, and communication styles among its predominantly young user base. This study evaluates TikTok's impact on college and university students as they invest a lot of time creating content and engaging on TikTok besides their studies. While existing research highlights TikTok's educational benefits and adverse societal and psychological effects, our mixed-method approach provides a focused analysis of student content creators. Survey data quantifies usage patterns and their correlation with academic and mental health indicators, while interviews offer qualitative insights into personal experiences. Findings reveal that TikTok affects students' time management, mental health, academic performance, and self-perception. Although TikTok facilitates creativity and social connections, it also induces stress and distraction. This study aims to fill research gaps and propose new directions, offering practical recommendations for balancing TikTok's benefits and drawbacks for student content creators.

References

[1]
Sergio Barta, Daniel Belanche, Ana Fernández, and Marta Flavián. 2023. Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers? hedonic experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 70 (2023), 103149.
[2]
Maximilian Boeker and Aleksandra Urman. 2022. An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok. In Proceedings of the ACM web conference 2022. 2298--2309.
[3]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
[4]
Ashley Castleberry and Amanda Nolen. 2018. Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning 10, 6 (2018), 807--815.
[5]
Miao Chao, Jing Lei, Ru He, Yunpeng Jiang, and Haibo Yang. 2023. TikTok use and psychosocial factors among adolescents: Comparisons of non-users, moderate users, and addictive users. Psychiatry Research 325 (2023), 115247.
[6]
Francesco Cirillo. 2018. The Pomodoro technique: The acclaimed time-management system that has transformed how we work. Currency.
[7]
Niklas Cosmann, Jana Haberkern, Alexander Hahn, Patrick Harms, Jan Joosten, Katharina Klug, and Tania Kollischan. 2022. The value of mood measurement for regulating negative influences of social media usage: A case study of Tik- Tok. In 2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). IEEE, 1--7.
[8]
William Evans, Jan Tokarczyk, Sheri Rice, and Alison McCray. 2002. Block scheduling: An evaluation of outcomes and impact. The Clearing House 75, 6 (2002), 319--323.
[9]
Grace Falgoust, Emma Winterlind, Prachi Moon, Alden Parker, Heidi Zinzow, and Kapil Chalil Madathil. 2022. Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult?s participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok. Human Factors in Healthcare 2 (2022), 100014.
[10]
Yosi Febrianti, Mutiara Herawati, and Suci Hanifah. 2022. Effect of using TikTok as learning media on academic achievement of pharmacy students. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2645. AIP Publishing.
[11]
Uwe Flick. 2004. Triangulation in qualitative research. A companion to qualitative research 3 (2004), 178--183.
[12]
Federico Gobbo and Matteo Vaccari. 2008. The pomodoro technique for sustainable pace in extreme programming teams. In International conference on agile processes and extreme programming in software engineering. Springer, 180--184.
[13]
Antje RH Graul. 2020. Successful strategies for content creation and design of online classes. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence 4, 1 (2020), 5.
[14]
Franziska Häger, Matthias Uflacker, et al. 2016. Time management practice in educational design thinking projects. DS 85--2: Proceedings of NordDesign 2016, Volume 2, Trondheim, Norway, 10th-12th August 2016 (2016), 319--328.
[15]
Greg Hearn. 2020. The future of creative work: Creativity and digital disruption. In The future of creative work. Edward Elgar Publishing, 1--12.
[16]
Hojjat Khedmatinejad and Saeid Asadi. 2021. Time Management and Decision- Making for Reading in Public Library Clients Based on the Eisenhower Matrix. Digital and Smart Libraries Researches 8, 1 (2021), 63--72.
[17]
Angela Y Lee, Hannah Mieczkowski, Nicole B Ellison, and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2022. The algorithmic crystal: Conceptualizing the self through algorithmic personalization on TikTok. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1--22.
[18]
Jiayan Liu. 2021. The influence of the body image presented through TikTok trend-videos and its possible reasons. In 2nd International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2021). Atlantis Press, 359--363.
[19]
Majdouline Mhalla, Jiang Yun, and Alireza Nasiri. 2020. Video-sharing apps business models: TikTok case study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 17, 07 (2020), 2050050.
[20]
Anggi E Pratiwi, Naura N Ufairah, and Riska S Sopiah. 2021. Utilizing TikTok application as media for learning English pronunciation. In Proceedings International Conference on Education of Suryakancana, Vol. 12. 372--382.
[21]
Rimasari Pramesti Putri. 2021. Tiktok as an Online Learning Media During a Pandemic. In 6th International Conference on Education & Social Sciences (ICESS 2021). Atlantis Press, 282--287.
[22]
Zea Qiyang and Heekyoung Jung. 2019. Learning and sharing creative skills with short videos: A case study of user behavior in tiktok and bilibili. In Int. Assoc. Soc. Des. Res. Conf. 25--50.
[23]
B Narasimha Rao and V Kalyani. 2022. A study on positive and negative effects of social media on society. Journal of Science & Technology (JST) 7, 10 (2022), 46--54.
[24]
Mark A Runco, Sue Hyeon Paek, and Garrett Jaeger. 2015. Is creativity being supported? Further analyses of grants and awards for creativity research. Creativity Research Journal 27, 1 (2015), 107--110.
[25]
Benjamin Saunders, Julius Sim, Tom Kingstone, Shula Baker, Jackie Waterfield, Bernadette Bartlam, Heather Burroughs, and Clare Jinks. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity 52 (2018), 1893--1907.
[26]
Andreas Schellewald. 2023. Understanding the popularity and affordances of TikTok through user experiences. Media, Culture & Society 45, 8 (2023), 1568-- 1582.
[27]
Peng Sha and Xiaoyu Dong. 2021. Research on adolescents regarding the indirect effect of depression, anxiety, and stress between TikTok use disorder and memory loss. International journal of environmental research and public health 18, 16 (2021), 8820.
[28]
Wallaroo. May, 2024. https://wallaroomedia.com/blog/social-media/tiktokstatistics/
[29]
Jing Zeng and D Bondy Valdovinos Kaye. 2022. From content moderation to visibility moderation: A case study of platform governance on TikTok. Policy & Internet 14, 1 (2022), 79--95.
[30]
Qiyang Zhou. 2019. Understanding user behaviors of creative practice on short video sharing platforms-a case study of TikTok and Bilibili. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Cincinnati.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW Companion '24: Companion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
November 2024
755 pages
ISBN:9798400711145
DOI:10.1145/3678884
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 November 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. mental health
  2. social engagement
  3. social media
  4. student content creator
  5. tiktok

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CSCW '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 34
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)34
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media