Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3641822.3641863acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Hybrid Work meets Agile Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Study

Published: 12 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Hybrid work, a fusion of different work environments that allow employees to work in and outside their offices, represents a new frontier for agile researchers to explore. However, due to the nascent nature of the research phenomena, we are yet to achieve a good understanding of the research terrain formulated when hybrid work meets agile software development. This systematic mapping study, we aimed to provide a good understanding of this emerging research area. The systematic process we followed led to a collection of 12 primary studies, which is less than what we expected. All the papers are empirical studies, with most of them employing case studies as the research methodology. The people-centric nature of agile methods is yet to be adequately reflected in the studies in this area. Similarly, there is a lack of a richer understanding of hybrid work in terms of flexible work arrangements. Our mapping study identified various research opportunities that can be explored in future research.

References

[1]
Kent Beck, Mike Beedle, Arie Van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, James Grenning, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, et al. 2001. The agile manifesto.
[2]
Kieran Conboy, Nils Brede Moe, Viktoria Stray, and Jan Henrik Gundelsby. 2023. The Future of Hybrid Software Development: Challenging Current Assumptions. IEEE Software 40, 02 (2023), 26--33.
[3]
Kim Dikert, Maria Paasivaara, and Casper Lassenius. 2016. Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software 119 (2016), 87--108.
[4]
Amy C Edmondson and Mark Mortensen. 2021. What psychological safety looks like in a hybrid workplace. Harvard Business Review 3 (2021), 109.
[5]
Harleen K Flora and Swati V Chande. 2014. A systematic study on agile software development methodologies and practices. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies 5, 3 (2014), 3626--3637.
[6]
Arnav Singh Gusain. 2020. Work from home to work from anywhere: The future of co-working spaces.
[7]
Dron Khanna, Anh Nguyen-Duc, and Xiaofeng Wang. 2018. From MVPs to pivots: a hypothesis-driven journey of two software startups. In Software Business: 9th International Conference, ICSOB 2018, Tallinn, Estonia, June 11--12, 2018, Proceedings 9. Springer International Publishing, 172--186.
[8]
Dron Khanna and Xiaofeng Wang. 2022. Are Your Online Agile Retrospectives Psychologically Safe? the Usage of Online Tools. In International Conference on Agile Software Development. Springer, 35--51.
[9]
Dron Khanna and Xiaofeng Wang. 2022. The Know-How of Agile Retrospectives in Software Startups. In International Conference on Agile Software Development. Springer, 87--96.
[10]
Barbara Kitchenham, Pearl Brereton, Mark Turner, Mahmood Niazi, Stephen Linkman, Rialette Pretorius, and David Budgen. 2009. The impact of limited search procedures for systematic literature reviews---A participant-observer case study. In 2009 3rd international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. IEEE, 336--345.
[11]
Irwin Kwan, Marcelo Cataldo, and Daniela Damian. 2011. Conway's law revisited: The evidence for a task-based perspective. IEEE software 29, 1 (2011), 90--93.
[12]
Anh Nguyen-Duc, Dron Khanna, Giang Huong Le, Des Greer, Xiaofeng Wang, Luciana Martinez Zaina, Gerardo Matturro, Jorge Melegati, Eduardo Guerra, Petri Kettunen, et al. 2023. Work-from-home impacts on software project: A global study on software development practices and stakeholder perceptions. Software: Practice and Experience (2023), 1--31.
[13]
Maria Paasivaara and Xiaofeng Wang. 2023. Unveiling the Spectrum of HybridWork in Software Engineering: Research Directions. In In First International Workshop on Global and Hybrid Work in Software Engineering. Co-located with International Conference on Agile Software Development 2023, 139--148.
[14]
Kai Petersen, Robert Feldt, Shahid Mujtaba, and Michael Mattsson. 2008. Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) 12. 1--10.
[15]
Kai Petersen, Sairam Vakkalanka, and Ludwik Kuzniarz. 2015. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and software technology 64 (2015), 1--18.
[16]
Paul Ralph, Sebastian Baltes, Gianisa Adisaputri, Richard Torkar, Vladimir Kovalenko, Marcos Kalinowski, Nicole Novielli, Shin Yoo, Xavier Devroey, Xin Tan, Minghui Zhou, Burak Turhan, Rashina Hoda, Hideaki Hata, Gregorio Robles, Amin Milani Fard, and Rana Alkadhi. 2020. Pandemic programming. Empirical Software Engineering 25, 6 (2020), 4927--4961.
[17]
Donald J. Reifer. 2006. The "3 P's" Of Software Management. In Software Managment (7th ed.), Donald J. Reifer (Ed.). Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press.
[18]
Daniel Russo, Paul HP Hanel, Seraphina Altnickel, and Niels van Berkel. 2021. Predictors of well-being and productivity among software professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic-a longitudinal study. Empirical Software Engineering 26, 4 (2021), 62.
[19]
Darja Smite, Emily Laue Christensen, Paolo Tell, and Daniel Russo. 2022. The future workplace: Characterizing the spectrum of hybrid work arrangements for software teams. IEEE software 40, 2 (2022), 34--41.
[20]
Darja Smite, Nils Brede Moe, Jarle Hildrum, Javier Gonzalez-Huerta, and Daniel Mendez. 2023. Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies. Journal of Systems and Software 195 (2023), 111552.
[21]
Julia Topp, Jan Hendrik Hille, Michael Neumann, and David Mötefindt. 2022. How a 4-day work week and remote work affect agile software development teams. In International Conference on Lean and Agile Software Development. Springer International Publishing, 61--77.
[22]
Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Dron Khanna, and Usman Rafiq. 2023. How many papers should you review? A research synthesis of systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In 2023 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). IEEE, 1--6.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHASE '24: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 17th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering
April 2024
210 pages
ISBN:9798400705335
DOI:10.1145/3641822
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 June 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. hybrid work
  2. agile software development
  3. flexible working
  4. remote working
  5. work-from-home

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CHASE '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 47 of 70 submissions, 67%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 255
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)255
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)68
Reflects downloads up to 28 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media