Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/359784.359836acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Implicit interest indicators

Published: 01 January 2001 Publication History

Abstract

Recommender systems provide personalized suggestions about items that users will find interesting. Typically, recommender systems require a user interface that can ``intelligently'' determine the interest of a user and use this information to make suggestions. The common solution, ``explicit ratings'', where users tell the system what they think about a piece of information, is well-understood and fairly precise. However, having to stop to enter explicit ratings can alter normal patterns of browsing and reading. A more ``intelligent'' method is to useimplicit ratings, where a rating is obtained by a method other than obtaining it directly from the user. These implicit interest indicators have obvious advantages, including removing the cost of the user rating, and that every user interaction with the system can contribute to an implicit rating.
Current recommender systems mostly do not use implicit ratings, nor is the ability of implicit ratings to predict actual user interest well-understood. This research studies the correlation between various implicit ratings and the explicit rating for a single Web page. A Web browser was developed to record the user's actions (implicit ratings) and the explicit rating of a page. Actions included mouse clicks, mouse movement, scrolling and elapsed time. This browser was used by over 80 people that browsed more than 2500 Web pages.
Using the data collected by the browser, the individual implicit ratings and some combinations of implicit ratings were analyzed and compared with the explicit rating. We found that the time spent on a page, the amount of scrolling on a page and the combination of time and scrolling had a strong correlation with explicit interest, while individual scrolling methods and mouse-clicks were ineffective in predicting explicit interest.

References

[1]
C. Avery and R. Zeckhauser. Recommender Systems for Evaluating Computer Messages. Communications of the ACM, 40:88 { 89, Mar. 1997.
[2]
M. Claypool, A. Gokhale, T. Miranda, P. Murnikov, D. Netes, and M. Sartin. Combining Content-Based and Collaborative Filters in an Online Newspaper. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR Workshop on Recommender Systems, August 19 1999.
[3]
J. Goecks and J. W. Shavlik. Learning Users' Interests by Unobtrusively Observing Their Normal Behavior. In Procedings of the ACM Intelligent User Interfaces Conference (IUI), Jan. 2000.
[4]
J. Grundin. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of the ACM, 35:92 { 105, 1994.
[5]
D. Gupta, M. Digiovanni, H. Narita, and K. Goldberg. Jester 2.0: A New Linear-Time Collaborative Filtering Algorithm Applied to Jokes. In Proceedings of Workshop on Recommender Systems: Algorithms and Evaluation, Aug. 1999.
[6]
D. He and A. Gker. Detecting Session Boundaries from Web User Logs. In Proceedingsof of the BCS-IRSG 22nd Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research, 2000.
[7]
W. Hill, L. Stead, M. Rosenstein, and G. Furnas. Recommending and Evaluating Choices in a Virtual Community ofUse.InProceedings of ACM CHI'95, pages 194 { 201, 1995.
[8]
W. C. Hill, J. D. Hollan, D. Wroblewski, and T. McCandless. Edit Wear and Read Wear. In Procedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 3 { 9, 1992.
[9]
J. Konstan, B. Miller, D. Maltz, J. Herlocker, L. Gordon, and J. Riedl. GroupLens: Applying Collaborative Filtering to Usenet News. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):77 { 87, 1997.
[10]
P. Le and M. Waseda. Curious Browsers. Technical Report Major Qualifying Project MQP-DCB-9906, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, May 2000. Advisors Dave Brown and Mark Claypool.
[11]
H. Lieberman. Autonomous Interface Agents. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 1997.
[12]
M. Morita and Y. Shinoda. Information Filtering Based on User Behavior Analysis and Best Match Text Retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR Conference on Research and Development, pages 272 { 281, 1994.
[13]
D. M. Nichols. Implicit Rating and Filtering. In Proceedings of the Fifth DELOS Workshop on Filtering and Collaborative Filtering, Nov. 1997.
[14]
D. Oard and J. Kim. Implicit Feedback for Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Recommender Systems, July 1998.
[15]
J. Rucker and M. Polanco. Siteseer: Personalized Navigation for the Web. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):73 { 76, Mar. 1997.
[16]
B. Sarwar, J. Konstan, A. Borchers, J. Herlocker, B. Miller, and J. Riedl. Using Filtering Agents to Improve Prediction Quality in the GroupLens Research Collaborative Filtering System. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1998.
[17]
U. Shardanand and P. Maes. Social Information Filtering: Algorithms for Automating `Word of Mouth'. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'95, 1995.
[18]
A. Watson and M. A. Sasse. Measuring Perceived Quality ofSpeech and Video in Multimedia Conferencing Applications. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia Conference, pages 55 { 60, Bristol, UK, Sept. 1998.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Understanding Documentation Use Through Log Analysis: A Case Study of Four Cloud ServicesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642721(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Investigating the Use of Deep Learning and Implicit Feedback in K12 Educational Recommender SystemsIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.327342217(112-123)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Relevance Feedback with Brain SignalsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363787442:4(1-37)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IUI '01: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
January 2001
174 pages
ISBN:1581133251
DOI:10.1145/359784
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

IUI01
Sponsor:
IUI01: International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 2001
January 14 - 17, 2001
New Mexico, Santa Fe, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

Upcoming Conference

IUI '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)72
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Understanding Documentation Use Through Log Analysis: A Case Study of Four Cloud ServicesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642721(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Investigating the Use of Deep Learning and Implicit Feedback in K12 Educational Recommender SystemsIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.327342217(112-123)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Relevance Feedback with Brain SignalsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363787442:4(1-37)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2023
  • (2023)A Systematic Review of Cost, Effort, and Load Research in Information Search and Retrieval, 1972–2020ACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/358306942:1(1-39)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Evaluating the Feasibility of Predicting Information Relevance During Sensemaking with Eye Gaze Data2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00086(713-722)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Survey on Smartphone Sensors and User Intent in Smartphone Usage2023 IEEE 8th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT)10.1109/I2CT57861.2023.10126192(1-9)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2023
  • (2023)What can a swiped word tell us more? Demographic and behavioral correlates from shape-writing text entryNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-023-08559-035:21(15531-15548)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Recommendation Systems and the Use of Machine Learning MethodsApply Data Science10.1007/978-3-658-38798-3_6(79-93)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Enriching the learner’s model through the semantic analysis of learning tracesE-Learning and Digital Media10.1177/2042753022110299320:1(1-24)Online publication date: 20-May-2022
  • (2022)Management of Implicit Requirements Data in Large SRS DocumentsACM SIGMOD Record10.1145/3552490.355249451:2(18-29)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media