research-article

FLeet: Online Federated Learning via Staleness Awareness and Performance Prediction

Authors:

Georgios Damaskinos,

Rachid Guerraoui,

Anne-Marie Kermarrec,

Rhicheek Patra,

Francois TaianiAuthors Info & Claims

Middleware '20: Proceedings of the 21st International Middleware Conference

Pages 163 - 177

https://doi.org/10.1145/3423211.3425685

Published: 11 December 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is very appealing for its privacy benefits: essentially, a global model is trained with updates computed on mobile devices while keeping the data of users local. Standard FL infrastructures are however designed to have no energy or performance impact on mobile devices, and are therefore not suitable for applications that require frequent (online) model updates, such as news recommenders.

This paper presents FLeet, the first Online FL system, acting as a middleware between the Android OS and the machine learning application. FLeet combines the privacy of Standard FL with the precision of online learning thanks to two core components: (i) I-Prof, a new lightweight profiler that predicts and controls the impact of learning tasks on mobile devices, and (ii) AdaSGD, a new adaptive learning algorithm that is resilient to delayed updates.

Our extensive evaluation shows that Online FL, as implemented by FLeet, can deliver a 2.3× quality boost compared to Standard FL, while only consuming 0.036% of the battery per day. I-Prof can accurately control the impact of learning tasks by improving the prediction accuracy up to 3.6× (computation time) and up to 19× (energy). AdaSGD outperforms alternative FL approaches by 18.4% in terms of convergence speed on heterogeneous data.

References

[1]

Martín Abadi, Paul Barham, Jianmin Chen, Zhifeng Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghemawat, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, et al. 2016. TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In OSDI. 265--283.

[2]

Martín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian Goodfellow, H Brendan McMahan, Ilya Mironov, Kunal Talwar, and Li Zhang. 2016. Deep learning with differential privacy. In CCS. ACM, 308--318.

[3]

Haider Al-Lawati and Stark C Draper. 2020. Gradient Delay Analysis in Asynchronous Distributed Optimization. In ICASSP. IEEE, 4207--4211.

[4]

Majid Altamimi, Atef Abdrabou, Kshirasagar Naik, and Amiya Nayak. 2015. Energy cost models of smartphones for task offloading to the cloud. TETC 3, 3 (2015), 384--398.

[5]

Arm. 2020. SIMD ISAs | Neon. https://developer.arm.com/architectures/instruction-sets/simd-isas/neon.

[6]

Arm Mali Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) 2020. https://developer.arm.com/ip-products/graphics-and-multimedia/mali-gpus.

[7]

AWS Device Farm 2020. https://aws.amazon.com/device-farm/.

[8]

Keith Bonawitz, Hubert Eichner, Wolfgang Grieskamp, Dzmitry Huba, Alex Ingerman, Vladimir Ivanov, Chloe Kiddon, Jakub Konecny, Stefano Mazzocchi, H Brendan McMahan, et al. 2019. Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Design. Proceedings of the 2nd SysML Conference (2019).

[9]

Keith Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone, H Brendan McMahan, Sarvar Patel, Daniel Ramage, Aaron Segal, and Karn Seth. 2017. Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In CCS. ACM, 1175--1191.

[10]

Aaron Carroll, Gernot Heiser, et al. 2010. An Analysis of Power Consumption in a Smartphone. In USENIX ATC, Vol. 14. Boston, MA, 21--21.

[11]

Fei Chen, Zhenhua Dong, Zhenguo Li, and Xiuqiang He. 2018. Federated Meta-Learning for Recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07876 (2018).

[12]

Trishul M Chilimbi, Yutaka Suzue, Johnson Apacible, and Karthik Kalyanaraman. 2014. Project Adam: Building an Efficient and Scalable Deep Learning Training System. In OSDI, Vol. 14. 571--582.

Digital Library

[13]

Shaiful Alam Chowdhury, Luke N Kumar, Md Toukir Imam, Mohomed Shazan Mohomed Jabbar, Varun Sapra, Karan Aggarwal, Abram Hindle, and Russell Greiner. 2015. A system-call based model of software energy consumption without hardware instrumentation. In IGSC. 1--6.

[14]

David Chu, Nicholas D Lane, Ted Tsung-Te Lai, Cong Pang, Xiangying Meng, Qing Guo, Fan Li, and Feng Zhao. 2011. Balancing energy, latency and accuracy for mobile sensor data classification. In SenSys. ACM, 54--67.

[15]

Gregory Cohen, Saeed Afshar, Jonathan Tapson, and André van Schaik. 2017. EMNIST: an extension of MNIST to handwritten letters. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05373 (2017).

[16]

Koby Crammer, Ofer Dekel, Joseph Keshet, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, and Yoram Singer. 2006. Online passive-aggressive algorithms. JMLR 7, Mar (2006), 551--585.

[17]

Crushh. 2017. Average text message length. https://crushhapp.com/blog/k-wrap-it-up-mom.

[18]

Eduardo Cuervo, Aruna Balasubramanian, Dae-ki Cho, Alec Wolman, Stefan Saroiu, Ranveer Chandra, and Paramvir Bahl. 2010. MAUI: making smartphones last longer with code offload. In MobiSys. ACM, 49--62.

[19]

Henggang Cui, James Cipar, Qirong Ho, Jin Kyu Kim, Seunghak Lee, Abhimanu Kumar, Jinliang Wei, Wei Dai, Gregory R Ganger, Phillip B Gibbons, et al. 2014. Exploiting Bounded Staleness to Speed Up Big Data Analytics. In USENIX ATC. 37--48.

[20]

Georgios Damaskinos, El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Arsany Guirguis, and Sébastien Louis Alexandre Rouault. 2019. Aggregathor: Byzantine machine learning via robust gradient aggregation. In Conference on Machine Learning and Systems (SysML /MLSys).

[21]

Georgios Damaskinos, El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Rhicheek Patra, Mahsa Taziki, et al. 2018. Asynchronous Byzantine Machine Learning (the case of SGD). In ICML. 1153--1162.

[22]

Deeplearning4j. 2020. DL4J. https://deeplearning4j.org/.

[23]

Bhuwan Dhingra, Zhong Zhou, Dylan Fitzpatrick, Michael Muehl, and William W Cohen. 2016. Tweet2vec: Character-based distributed representations for social media. arXiv preprint arXiv.1605.03481 (2016).

[24]

Yi Ding, Nikita Mishra, and Henry Hoffmann. 2019. Generative and Multi-Phase Learning for Computer Systems Optimization. In ISCA (ISCA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39--52. https://doi.org/10.1145/3307650.3326633

[25]

Sanghamitra Dutta, Viveck Cadambe, and Pulkit Grover. 2016. Shortdot: Computing large linear transforms distributedly using coded short dot products. In NIPS. 2100--2108.

[26]

Cynthia Dwork, Aaron Roth, et al. 2014. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science 9, 3-4 (2014), 211--407.

[27]

EsotericSoftware. 2020. Kryo. https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo/.

[28]

Yuyun Gong and Qi Zhang. 2016. Hashtag Recommendation Using Attention-Based Convolutional Neural Network. In IJCAI. 2782--2788.

[29]

Google. 2020. TensorFlow - Federated Learning. https://www.tensorflow org/federated/federated_learning.

[30]

Google. 2020. Tensorflow text classification. https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/text/text_classification_rnn#create_the_model

[31]

US government. 2018. California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA). https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB375.

[32]

P Greenhalgh. 2013. big. LITTLE Technology: The Future of Mobile. ARM, White paper (2013).

[33]

Grid5000. 2020. Grid5000. https://www.grid5000.fr/.

[34]

Matthew Halpern, Yuhao Zhu, and Vijay Janapa Reddi. 2016. Mobile cpu's rise to power: Quantifying the impact of generational mobile cpu design trends on performance, energy, and user satisfaction. In HPCA. IEEE, 64--76.

[35]

Shuai Hao, Ding Li, William GJ Halfond, and Ramesh Govindan. 2013. Estimating mobile application energy consumption using program analysis. In ICSE. IEEE Press, 92--101.

[36]

Andrew Hard, Kanishka Rao, Rajiv Mathews, Swaroop Ramaswamy, Françoise Beaufays, Sean Augenstein, Hubert Eichner, Chloé Kiddon, and Daniel Ramage. 2018. Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03604 (2018).

[37]

How fast is 4G? 2020. https://www.4g.co.uk/how-fast-is-4g/.

[38]

Eunjeong Jeong, Seungeun Oh, Hyesung Kim, Jihong Park, Mehdi Bennis, and Seong-Lyun Kim. 2018. Communication-Efficient On-Device Machine Learning: Federated Distillation and Augmentation under Non-IID Private Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.11479 (2018).

[39]

Jiawei Jiang, Bin Cui, Ce Zhang, and Lele Yu. 2017. Heterogeneity-aware Distributed Parameter Servers. In SIGMOD. 463--478.

[40]

Yiping Kang, Johann Hauswald, Cao Gao, Austin Rovinski, Trevor Mudge, Jason Mars, and Lingjia Tang. 2017. Neurosurgeon: Collaborative intelligence between the cloud and mobile edge. In ASPLOS. 615--629.

[41]

Jakub Konečny, H Brendan McMahan, Daniel Ramage, and Peter Richtárik. 2016. Federated optimization: distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02527 (2016).

[42]

Dominik Kowald, Subhash Chandra Pujari, and Elisabeth Lex. 2017. Temporal effects on hashtag reuse in twitter: A cognitive-inspired hashtag recommendation approach. In WWW. 1401--1410.

[43]

Alex Krizhevsky. 2009. Cifar dataset. https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~kriz/cifar.html.

[44]

Yongin Kwon, Sangmin Lee, Hayoon Yi, Donghyun Kwon, Seungjun Yang, Byung-Gon Chun, Ling Huang, Petros Maniatis, Mayur Naik, and Yunheung Paek. 2013. Mantis: Automatic performance prediction for smartphone applications. In USENIX ATC. 297--308.

[45]

Su Mon Kywe, Tuan-Anh Hoang, Ee-Peng Lim, and Feida Zhu. 2012. On recommending hashtags in twitter networks. In International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 337--350.

Digital Library

[46]

Primate Labs. 2020. Matrix multiplication benchmark. https://browser.geekbench.com.

[47]

Yann Lecun. 1998. MNIST dataset. http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/.

[48]

Kangwook Lee, Maximilian Lam, Ramtin Pedarsani, Dimitris Papailiopoulos, and Kannan Ramchandran. 2017. Speeding up distributed machine learning using codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 64, 3 (2017), 1514--1529.

[49]

Mu Li, David G Andersen, Jun Woo Park, Alexander J Smola, Amr Ahmed, Vanja Josifovski, James Long, Eugene J Shekita, and Bor-Yiing Su. 2014. Scaling distributed machine learning with the parameter server. In OSDI. 583--598.

Digital Library

[50]

Tian Li, Anit Kumar Sahu, Manzil Zaheer, Maziar Sanjabi, Ameet Talwalkar, and Virginia Smith. 2018. Federated optimization for heterogeneous networks. arXiv preprint arXiv.1812.06127 (2018).

[51]

Yan Liu and Jack YB Lee. 2015. An empirical study of throughput prediction in mobile data networks. In GLOBECOM. IEEE, 1--6.

[52]

Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Arcas. 2017. Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data. In AISTATS. 1273--1282.

[53]

Vox media. 2013. NSA's PRISM. https://www.theverge.com/2013/7/17/4517480/nsa-spying-prism-surveillance-cheat-sheet.

[54]

Vox media. 2018. The Facebook and Cambridge Analytica scandal. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/3/23/17151916/facebook-cambridge-analytica-trump-diagram.

[55]

Gilad Mishne, Jeff Dalton, Zhenghua Li, Aneesh Sharma, and Jimmy Lin. 2013. Fast data in the era of big data: Twitter's real-time related query suggestion architecture. In SIGMOD. ACM, 1147--1158.

[56]

Nikita Mishra, Connor Imes, John D Lafferty, and Henry Hoffmann. 2018. CALOREE: Learning control for predictable latency and low energy. ASPLOS 53, 2 (2018), 184--198.

[57]

Nikita Mishra, Huazhe Zhang, John D Lafferty, and Henry Hoffmann. 2015. A probabilistic graphical model-based approach for minimizing energy under performance constraints. ASPLOS 50, 4 (2015), 267--281.

Digital Library

[58]

Ioannis Mitliagkas, Ce Zhang, Stefan Hadjis, and Christopher Ré. 2016. Asynchrony begets momentum, with an application to deep learning. In Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing. IEEE, 997--1004.

[59]

Radhika Mittal, Aman Kansal, and Ranveer Chandra. 2012. Empowering developers to estimate app energy consumption. In MobiCom. ACM, 317--328.

[60]

Behnam Neyshabur, Ruslan R Salakhutdinov, and Nati Srebro. 2015. Path-sgd: Path-normalized optimization in deep neural networks. In NIPS. 2422--2430.

[61]

Takayuki Nishio and Ryo Yonetani. 2019. Client selection for federated learning with heterogeneous resources in mobile edge. In ICC. IEEE, 1--7.

[62]

NVIDIA. 2020. CUDA GPUs | NVIDIA Developer. https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus.

[63]

Eriko Otsuka, Scott A Wallace, and David Chiu. 2014. Design and evaluation of a twitter hashtag recommendation system. In IDEAS. 330--333.

[64]

Xue Ouyang, Peter Garraghan, David McKee, Paul Townend, and Jie Xu. 2016. Straggler detection in parallel computing systems through dynamic threshold calculation. In AINA. IEEE, 414--421.

[65]

Tien-Dat Phan, Guillaume Pallez, Shadi Ibrahim, and Padma Raghavan. 2019. A new framework for evaluating straggler detection mechanisms in mapreduce. TOMPECS 4, 3 (2019), 1--23.

Digital Library

[66]

Feng Qian, Zhaoguang Wang, Alexandre Gerber, Zhuoqing Mao, Subhabrata Sen, and Oliver Spatscheck. 2011. Profiling resource usage for mobile applications: a cross-layer approach. In MobiSys. ACM, 321--334.

[67]

Aurick Qiao, Abutalib Aghayev, Weiren Yu, Haoyang Chen, Qirong Ho, Garth A Gibson, and Eric P Xing. 2018. Litz: Elastic framework for high-performance distributed machine learning. In USENIX ATC. 631--644.

[68]

Qualcomm. 2020. Adreno™ Graphics Processing Units. https://developer.qualcomm.com/software/adreno-gpu-sdk/gpu.

[69]

Text request. 2016. Average text messages per day. https://www.textrequest.com/blog/how-many-texts-people-send-per-day/.

[70]

Theo Ryffel, Andrew Trask, Morten Dahl, Bobby Wagner, Jason Mancuso, Daniel Rueckert, and Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach. 2018. A generic framework for privacy preserving deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv.1811.04017 (2018).

[71]

S20.ai. 2020. S20.ai. https://www.s20.ai/.

[72]

Virginia Smith, Chao-Kai Chiang, Maziar Sanjabi, and Ameet S Talwalkar. 2017. Federated multi-task learning. In NIPS. 4424--4434.

[73]

Snips. 2020. Snips - Using Voice to Make Technology Disappear. https://snips.ai/.

[74]

Statista. 2018. Percentage of all global web pages served to mobile phones from 2009 to 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/241462/global-mobile-phone-website-traffic-share/.

[75]

Tweepy 2020. https://tweepy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

[76]

European Union. 2016. Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679.

[77]

Shiqiang Wang, Tiffany Tuor, Theodoros Salonidis, Kin K Leung, Christian Makaya, Ting He, and Kevin Chan. 2019. Adaptive federated learning in resource constrained edge computing systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 37, 6 (2019), 1205--1221.

[78]

Zhibo Wang, Mengkai Song, Zhifei Zhang, Yang Song, Qian Wang, and Hairong Qi. 2019. Beyond inferring class representatives: Userlevel privacy leakage from federated learning. In INFOCOM. IEEE, 2512--2520.

[79]

Wikipedia. 2019. Bhattacharyya coefficient. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhattacharyya_distance.

[80]

Xi Wu, Fengan Li, Arun Kumar, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Somesh Jha, and Jeffrey Naughton. 2017. Bolt-on differential privacy for scalable stochastic gradient descent-based analytics. In SIGMOD. 1307--1322.

[81]

Eric P Xing, Qirong Ho, Wei Dai, Jin-Kyu Kim, Jinliang Wei, Seunghak Lee, Xun Zheng, Pengtao Xie, Abhimanu Kumar, and Yaoliang Yu. 2015. Petuum: A New Platform for Distributed Machine Learning on Big Data. In KDD. 1335--1344.

Digital Library

[82]

Timothy Yang, Galen Andrew, Hubert Eichner, Haicheng Sun, Wei Li, Nicholas Kong, Daniel Ramage, and Françoise Beaufays. 2018. Applied federated learning: Improving google keyboard query suggestions. arXiv preprint arXiv.1812.02903 (2018).

[83]

Chanmin Yoon, Dongwon Kim, Wonwoo Jung, Chulkoo Kang, and Hojung Cha. 2012. AppScope: Application Energy Metering Framework for Android Smartphone Using Kernel Activity Monitoring. In USENIX ATC, Vol. 12. 1--14.

[84]

Mikhail Yurochkin, Mayank Agarwal, Soumya Ghosh, Kristjan Greenewald, Nghia Hoang, and Yasaman Khazaeni. 2019. Bayesian Non-parametric Federated Learning of Neural Networks. In ICML. 7252--7261.

[85]

Wei Zhang, Suyog Gupta, Xiangru Lian, and Ji Liu. 2016. Staleness-aware async-sgd for distributed deep learning. In IJCAI. 2350--2356.

[86]

Yue Zhao, Meng Li, Liangzhen Lai, Naveen Suda, Damon Civin, and Vikas Chandra. 2018. Federated learning with non-iid data. arXiv preprint arXiv.1806.00582 (2018).

Cited By

Yu LSun XAlbelaihi RPark CShao S(2024)Dynamic Client Clustering, Bandwidth Allocation, and Workload Optimization for Semi-Synchronous Federated LearningElectronics10.3390/electronics1323458513:23(4585)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13234585
Bakopoulou EYang MZhang JPsounis KMarkopoulou A(2024)Location Leakage in Federated Signal MapsIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2023.333203423:6(6936-6953)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2023.3332034
Yu LSun XAlbelaihi RYi C(2023)Latency-Aware Semi-Synchronous Client Selection and Model Aggregation for Wireless Federated LearningFuture Internet10.3390/fi1511035215:11(352)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15110352
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

FLeet: Online Federated Learning via Staleness Awareness and Performance Prediction
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Machine learning
2. Security and privacy

Recommendations

FLeet: Online Federated Learning via Staleness Awareness and Performance Prediction
Federated learning (FL) is very appealing for its privacy benefits: essentially, a global model is trained with updates computed on mobile devices while keeping the data of users local. Standard FL infrastructures are however designed to have no energy or ...
Deep learning: systematic review, models, challenges, and research directions
Abstract
The current development in deep learning is witnessing an exponential transition into automation applications. This automation transition can provide a promising framework for higher performance and lower complexity. This ongoing transition ...
Online federated learning with imbalanced class distribution
PCI '20: Proceedings of the 24th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics

The federated learning paradigm can be a viable solution for handling huge datasets, and for taking advantage of powerful processing nodes on the edge. The process of online federated learning can be employed in order to maximise the potential of ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

Middleware '20: Proceedings of the 21st International Middleware Conference

December 2020

455 pages

ISBN:9781450381536

DOI:10.1145/3423211

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 December 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

Middleware '20

Sponsor:

ACM

Middleware '20: 21st International Middleware Conference

December 7 - 11, 2020

Delft, Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 203 of 948 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

23
Total Citations
View Citations
613
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)7
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 08 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yu LSun XAlbelaihi RPark CShao S(2024)Dynamic Client Clustering, Bandwidth Allocation, and Workload Optimization for Semi-Synchronous Federated LearningElectronics10.3390/electronics1323458513:23(4585)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13234585
Bakopoulou EYang MZhang JPsounis KMarkopoulou A(2024)Location Leakage in Federated Signal MapsIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2023.333203423:6(6936-6953)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2023.3332034
Yu LSun XAlbelaihi RYi C(2023)Latency-Aware Semi-Synchronous Client Selection and Model Aggregation for Wireless Federated LearningFuture Internet10.3390/fi1511035215:11(352)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15110352
Georgieva Belorgey MDandjee SGama NJetchev DMikushin DBrenner MCostache ARohloff K(2023)Falkor: Federated Learning Secure Aggregation Powered by AESCTR GPU ImplementationProceedings of the 11th Workshop on Encrypted Computing & Applied Homomorphic Cryptography10.1145/3605759.3625261(11-22)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3605759.3625261
Pilla L(2023)Scheduling Algorithms for Federated Learning With Minimal Energy ConsumptionIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2023.324083334:4(1215-1226)Online publication date: Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2023.3240833
Wu QChen XOuyang TZhou ZZhang XYang SZhang J(2023)HiFlash: Communication-Efficient Hierarchical Federated Learning With Adaptive Staleness Control and Heterogeneity-Aware Client-Edge AssociationIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2023.323804934:5(1560-1579)Online publication date: May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2023.3238049
Guo ZWang JLiu SRen JXu YWang Y(2023)SpongeTraining: Achieving High Efficiency and Accuracy for Wireless Edge-Assisted Online Distributed LearningIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2022.315464422:8(4930-4945)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2022.3154644
Rasti-Meymandi ASheikholeslami SAbouei JPlataniotis K(2023)Graph Federated Learning for CIoT Devices in Smart Home ApplicationsIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2022.322872710:8(7062-7079)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3228727
Zhou RWang RYu JLi BLi Y(2023)Heterogeneous Federated Learning for Balancing Job Completion Time and Model Accuracy2022 IEEE 28th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS)10.1109/ICPADS56603.2022.00079(562-569)Online publication date: Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS56603.2022.00079
Hu CChen ZLarsson E(2023)Dynamic Scheduling For Federated Edge Learning With Streaming Data2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW)10.1109/ICASSPW59220.2023.10193322(1-5)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSPW59220.2023.10193322
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents