Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3519826acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

How do Users Expect their Smart Memory Vaults to Utilize Their Shared Memories?

Published: 28 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Social media (SM) is a popular accessible form of smart memory vaults. Prior work shows that users are still unable to understand how their shared memories are used by smart systems to create Smart Interactions involving Personal Memories (SIPMs). This can lead to negative social repercussions such as cyberbullying. This work investigates the most memorable SIPMs on Facebook for Egyptian users and their impact on platform usage. We conducted an online survey (N=53) requesting critical incident reports about surprising Facebook SIPMs. The most remembered SIPMs were: customizing advertisements, cuing offline interactions, sharing data with third parties and personalizing the newsfeed. Our results suggest that SIPMs, particularly customized advertisements act as ambient memory augmentation solutions to the users’ shared memories. Additionally, negative platform perception does not necessarily translate into reduction of platform usage. Our work inspires the discussion about users expectations towards ambient usage of their data on smart memory vaults.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3491101.3519826-video-preview.mp4)
Video Preview
MP4 File (3491101.3519826-talk-video.mp4)
Talk Video

References

[1]
Alessandro Acquisti, Idris Adjerid, Rebecca Balebako, Laura Brandimarte, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Saranga Komanduri, Pedro Giovanni Leon, Norman Sadeh, Florian Schaub, Manya Sleeper, 2017. Nudges for privacy and security: Understanding and assisting users’ choices online. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 50, 3 (2017), 1–41.
[2]
Oscar Alvarado and Annika Waern. 2018. Towards algorithmic experience: Initial efforts for social media contexts. In Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12.
[3]
Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I” like” it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 2016 cHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2371–2382.
[4]
Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. ” I always assumed that I wasn’t really that close to [her]” Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 153–162.
[5]
John C Flanagan. 1954. The critical incident technique.Psychological bulletin 51, 4 (1954), 327.
[6]
B Geethanjali, K Adalarasu, A Hemapraba, S Pravin Kumar, and R Rajasekeran. 2017. Emotion analysis using SAM (Self-Assessment Manikin) scale.Biomedical Research (0970-938X) 28 (2017).
[7]
Joseph Henrich, Steven J Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and brain sciences 33, 2-3 (2010), 61–83.
[8]
Silas Hsu, Kristen Vaccaro, Yin Yue, Aimee Rickman, and Karrie Karahalios. 2020. Awareness, Navigation, and Use of Feed Control Settings Online. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[9]
Yabing Liu, Krishna P Gummadi, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Alan Mislove. 2011. Analyzing facebook privacy settings: user expectations vs. reality. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference. 61–70.
[10]
Digital Marketing Statistics & Metrics. 2018. Social Media Users in Egypt: Facebook Insights and Usage in Egypt, 2018. Article. Retrieved December 12, 2019 from https://www.digitalmarketingcommunity.com/indicators/facebook-insights-usage-in-egypt-2018/, .
[11]
Pawarat Nontasil and Stephen J Payne. 2019. Emotional Utility and Recall of the Facebook News Feed. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9.
[12]
Shruti Phadke and Tanushree Mitra. 2020. Many Faced Hate: A Cross Platform Study of Content Framing and Information Sharing by Online Hate Groups. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376456
[13]
Osnat Roth-Cohen. 2021. Viral feminism: #MeToo networked expressions in feminist Facebook groups. Feminist Media Studies(2021), 1–17.
[14]
John Sadauskas, Daragh Byrne, and Robert K. Atkinson. 2015. Mining Memories: Designing a Platform to Support Social Media Based Writing. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3691–3700. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702383
[15]
Statista. 2019. Number of internet users in Egypt from 2013 to 2019 (in millions). Article. Retrieved December 12, 2019 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/462957/internet-users-egypt/, .
[16]
Diana I Tamir and Jason P Mitchell. 2012. Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 21(2012), 8038–8043.
[17]
H. Tankovska. 2008. Social media - Statistics and Facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/. [Last accessed: 2021-07-15].
[18]
Jeffrey Warshaw, Tara Matthews, Steve Whittaker, Chris Kau, Mateo Bengualid, and Barton A. Smith. 2015. Can an Algorithm Know the ”Real You”? Understanding People’s Reactions to Hyper-Personal Analytics Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 797–806. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702274

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2022
3066 pages
ISBN:9781450391566
DOI:10.1145/3491101
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. advertisements
  2. affect
  3. critical incident report
  4. informed consent
  5. memory vaults
  6. personalization
  7. privacy
  8. social media
  9. user experience

Qualifiers

  • Poster
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Amplify project (ERC) under the European Union?s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme

Conference

CHI '22
Sponsor:
CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 29 - May 5, 2022
LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI '25
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 111
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media