Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3366423.3380281acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Algorithmic Effects on the Diversity of Consumption on Spotify

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

On many online platforms, users can engage with millions of pieces of content, which they discover either organically or through algorithmically-generated recommendations. While the short-term benefits of recommender systems are well-known, their long-term impacts are less well understood. In this work, we study the user experience on Spotify, a popular music streaming service, through the lens of diversity—the coherence of the set of songs a user listens to. We use a high-fidelity embedding of millions of songs based on listening behavior on Spotify to quantify how musically diverse every user is, and find that high consumption diversity is strongly associated with important long-term user metrics, such as conversion and retention. However, we also find that algorithmically-driven listening through recommendations is associated with reduced consumption diversity. Furthermore, we observe that when users become more diverse in their listening over time, they do so by shifting away from algorithmic consumption and increasing their organic consumption. Finally, we deploy a randomized experiment and show that algorithmic recommendations are more effective for users with lower diversity. Our work illuminates a central tension in online platforms: how do we recommend content that users are likely to enjoy in the short term while simultaneously ensuring they can remain diverse in their consumption in the long term?

References

[1]
Panagiotis Adamopoulos and Alexander Tuzhilin. 2014. On over-specialization and concentration bias of recommendations: Probabilistic neighborhood selection in collaborative filtering systems. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 153–160.
[2]
Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (2015), 1130–1132.
[3]
Isaiah Berlin. 1953. The hedgehog and the fox. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
[4]
Elisabeth Bublitz and Florian Noseleit. 2014. The skill balancing act: when does broad expertise pay off?Small Business Economics 42, 1 (2014).
[5]
Charles L.A. Clarke, Maheedhar Kolla, Gordon V. Cormack, Olga Vechtomova, Azin Ashkan, Stefan Büttcher, and Ian MacKinnon. 2008. Novelty and Diversity in Information Retrieval Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Singapore, Singapore) (SIGIR ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 659–666. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390334.1390446
[6]
Hannes Datta, George Knox, and Bart J Bronnenberg. 2017. Changing their tune: How consumers’ adoption of online streaming affects music consumption and discovery. Marketing Science 37, 1 (2017), 5–21.
[7]
Munmun De Choudhury, Scott Counts, and Mary Czerwinski. 2011. Identifying relevant social media content: leveraging information diversity and user cognition. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. ACM, 161–170.
[8]
Gideon Dror, Dan Pelleg, Oleg Rokhlenko, and Idan Szpektor. 2012. Churn Prediction in New Users of Yahoo! Answers. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (Lyon, France) (WWW ’12 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 829–834. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187980.2188207
[9]
Georges Dupret and Mounia Lalmas. 2013. Absence Time and User Engagement: Evaluating Ranking Functions. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Rome, Italy) (WSDM ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2433396.2433418
[10]
Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, and Justin M Rao. 2016. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public opinion quarterly 80, S1 (2016), 298–320.
[11]
Daniel Fleder and Kartik Hosanagar. 2009. Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management science 55, 5 (2009), 697–712.
[12]
Carlos A. Gomez-Uribe and Neil Hunt. 2015. The Netflix Recommender System: Algorithms, Business Value, and Innovation. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 6, 4, Article 13 (Dec. 2015), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2843948
[13]
Eduardo Graells-Garrido, Mounia Lalmas, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2016. Encouraging Diversity- and Representation-Awareness in Geographically Centralized Content. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Sonoma, California, USA) (IUI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2856767.2856775
[14]
Henning Hohnhold, Deirdre O’Brien, and Diane Tang. 2015. Focus on the Long-Term: It’s better for Users and Business. In Proceedings 21st Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Sydney, Australia. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2783258.2788583
[15]
Rong Hu and Pearl Pu. 2011. Helping Users Perceive Recommendation Diversity. In DiveRS@ RecSys. 43–50.
[16]
David Hubbard, Benoit Rostykus, Yves Raimond, and Tony Jebara. 2019. Beta Survival Models. CoRR abs/1905.03818(2019).
[17]
Mounia Lalmas, Janette Lehmann, Guy Shaked, Fabrizio Silvestri, and Gabriele Tolomei. 2015. Promoting Positive Post-Click Experience for In-Stream Yahoo Gemini Users. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Sydney, NSW, Australia) (KDD ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1929–1938. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2788581
[18]
Rishabh Mehrotra, James McInerney, Hugues Bouchard, Mounia Lalmas, and Fernando Diaz. 2018. Towards a Fair Marketplace: Counterfactual Evaluation of the Trade-off Between Relevance, Fairness, and Satisfaction in Recommendation Systems. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management(Torino, Italy) (CIKM ’18). 2243–2251.
[19]
Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781(2013).
[20]
Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).
[21]
Tien T Nguyen, Pik-Mai Hui, F Maxwell Harper, Loren Terveen, and Joseph A Konstan. 2014. Exploring the filter bubble: the effect of using recommender systems on content diversity. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web. ACM, 677–686.
[22]
Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.
[23]
Minsu Park, Ingmar Weber, Mor Naaman, and Sarah Vieweg. 2015. Understanding musical diversity via online social media. In Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
[24]
Lijing Qin and Xiaoyan Zhu. 2013. Promoting diversity in recommendation by entropy regularizer. In Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[25]
Tetsuya Sakai and Zhaohao Zeng. 2019. Which Diversity Evaluation Measures Are ”Good”?595–604. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331215
[26]
Kurt C Stange. 2009. The generalist approach. The Annals of Family Medicine 7, 3 (2009).
[27]
Johan Ugander, Lars Backstrom, Cameron Marlow, and Jon Kleinberg. 2012. Structural diversity in social contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 16(2012), 5962–5966.
[28]
Isaac Waller and Ashton Anderson. 2019. Generalists and Specialists: Using Community Embeddings to Quantify Activity Diversity in Online Platforms. In The World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 1954–1964.
[29]
Qingyun Wu, Hongning Wang, Liangjie Hong, and Yue Shi. 2017. Returning is Believing: Optimizing Long-term User Engagement in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management(Singapore, Singapore) (CIKM ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1927–1936. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3133025
[30]
Yuan Cao Zhang, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Daniele Quercia, and Tamas Jambor. 2012. Auralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 13–22.
[31]
Renjie Zhou, Samamon Khemmarat, and Lixin Gao. 2010. The impact of YouTube recommendation system on video views. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 404–410.
[32]
Tao Zhou, Zoltán Kuscsik, Jian-Guo Liu, Matúš Medo, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, and Yi-Cheng Zhang. 2010. Solving the apparent diversity-accuracy dilemma of recommender systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 10(2010), 4511–4515.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Establishing and evaluating trustworthy AI: overview and research challengesFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2024.14672227Online publication date: 29-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Measuring cultural diversity: policy and methodological issuesEuropean Journal of Cultural Management and Policy10.3389/ejcmp.2023.1240013Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Viewer Traffic Allocation for Small Creator Development: Experimental Evidence from Short-Video PlatformsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4888995Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Algorithmic Effects on the Diversity of Consumption on Spotify
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020
          April 2020
          3143 pages
          ISBN:9781450370233
          DOI:10.1145/3366423
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 20 April 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Conference

          WWW '20
          Sponsor:
          WWW '20: The Web Conference 2020
          April 20 - 24, 2020
          Taipei, Taiwan

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,641
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)212
          Reflects downloads up to 09 Dec 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)Establishing and evaluating trustworthy AI: overview and research challengesFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2024.14672227Online publication date: 29-Nov-2024
          • (2024)Measuring cultural diversity: policy and methodological issuesEuropean Journal of Cultural Management and Policy10.3389/ejcmp.2023.1240013Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024
          • (2024)Viewer Traffic Allocation for Small Creator Development: Experimental Evidence from Short-Video PlatformsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4888995Online publication date: 2024
          • (2024)‘Diversity’ as multidisciplinary keyword for the politics of cultural recommender systems in global digital media platformsInternational Journal of Cultural Studies10.1177/13678779241239342Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
          • (2024)Music consumption and uses in JapanPsychology of Music10.1177/03057356241234071Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
          • (2024)Report on the Search Futures Workshop at ECIR 2024ACM SIGIR Forum10.1145/3687273.368728858:1(1-41)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2024
          • (2024)SARDINE: Simulator for Automated Recommendation in Dynamic and Interactive EnvironmentsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36564812:3(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
          • (2024)Measuring Commonality in Recommendation of Cultural Content to Strengthen Cultural CitizenshipACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36431382:1(1-32)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
          • (2024)The Fault in Our Recommendations: On the Perils of Optimizing the MeasurableProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688144(200-208)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
          • (2024)MuRS 2024: 2nd Music Recommender Systems WorkshopProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3687097(1202-1205)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
          • Show More Cited By

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media