Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3358961.3358970acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesclihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Opinions concerning crowdsourcing applications in agriculture in D.C.

Published: 29 January 2020 Publication History

Abstract

As big data has become increasingly necessary in modern farming techniques, the dependence on high quality and quantity of ground truthing data has risen. Collecting ground truthing data is one of the most labor-intensive aspects of the research process. A crowdsourcing platform application to aid laypeople in completing ground truthing data can improve the quality and quantity of data for growers and agricultural researchers. Focus groups were conducted to gauge opinions on crowdsourcing initiatives in agriculture to inform the design of the platform. Preliminary results demonstrate that the greatest motivation for the participants was having opportunities to develop their skills and access to educational resources. They also discussed having a finite timeframe for collecting the data, feeling appreciated by the researchers, and being informed on the context and next steps of the research. The results of these focus groups will be used to develop design prototypes for the crowdsourcing platform.

References

[1]
M. E. Sykuta1, "Big Data in Agriculture: Property Rights, Privacy and Competition in Ag Data Services," 2016.
[2]
J. Schuster, "Big Data Ethics and the Digital Age of Agriculture," Resource Magazine, vol. 24, (1), pp. 20--21, 2017.
[3]
M. R. Bendre and V. R. Thool, "Analytics, challenges and applications in big data environment: a survey," Journal of Management Analytics, vol. 3, (3), pp. 206--239, 2016.
[4]
(Nov 5, 2015). Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center (PO.DAAC). Available: https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/.
[5]
A. Kamilaris, A. Kartakoullis and F. X. Prenafeta-Boldú, "A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture," Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 143, pp. 23--37, 2017.
[6]
J. Minet et al, "Crowdsourcing for agricultural applications: A review of uses and opportunities for a farmsourcing approach," Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 142, pp. 126--138, 2017.
[7]
R. Lokers et al, "Analysis of Big Data technologies for use in agro-environmental science," Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 84, pp. 494--504, 2016.
[8]
J. L. Dickinson et al, "The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement," Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 10, (6), pp. 291--297, 2012.
[9]
S. Wolfert et al, "Big Data in Smart Farming - A review," Agricultural Systems, vol. 153, pp. 69--80, 2017.
[10]
M. E. Sykuta1, "Big Data in Agriculture: Property Rights, Privacy and Competition in Ag Data Services," 2016.
[11]
P. Pyšek et al, "Naturalized alien flora of the world." Preslia vol. 89, (3), pp. 203--274, 2017.
[12]
A. Poonia and A. Upadhayay, "Chenopodium album Linn: review of nutritive value and biological properties," Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 52, (7), pp. 3977--3985, 2015.
[13]
(April 1, 2019). Lambsquarters, raw. Available: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/169244/nutrients.
[14]
M. Ullah et al, "An ethnobotanical survey of indigenous medicinal plants in Wana district south Waziristan agency, Pakistan," J. Ethnopharmacol., vol. 150, (3), pp. 918--924, 2013.
[15]
N. Yadav et al, "Medicinal properties of genus Chenopodium Linn." 2007.
[16]
D. C. Brabham, "Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application," Information, Communication & Society, vol. 13, (8), pp. 1122--1145, 2010.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
CLIHC '19: Proceedings of the IX Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction
September 2019
233 pages
ISBN:9781450376792
DOI:10.1145/3358961
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 January 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. big data
  2. focus groups
  3. precision agriculture
  4. urban agriculture

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Conference

CLIHC '19
CLIHC '19: IX Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction
September 30 - October 4, 2019
Panama City, Panama

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 14 of 42 submissions, 33%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 79
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media