Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3349263.3351910acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Using gaze-based interactions in automated vehicles for increased road safety

Published: 21 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The development of self-driving vehicles seems to go well with the growing demand for the daily use of mobile devices. However, autonomous vehicles will still need manual intervention in unforeseen or dangerous situations. Therefore, it is important for the driver to stay aware of the traffic situation around, and so to be quickly able to take over. We developed a prototype which represents media content on a simulated windshield display and uses gaze tracking as an additional form of input device for the driver. Although we intentionally pull away the driver's gaze from the driving situation, this seems to be less of a distraction than using hand-held mobile devices or dash-integrated display devices. We hypothesize that the time to regain control with our prototype is shorter compared to traditional media presentation. This work-in-progress paper provides insight to the concept of the prototype while first results will be presented at the conference.

References

[1]
John Eastwood, Alexandra Frischen, Mark Fenske, Daniel Smilek. 2012. The Unengaged Mind: Defining Boredom in Terms of Attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7. 482--495.
[2]
Kathleen Eilers, Friedhelm Nachreiner, Kristina Hänecke. 1986. Entwicklung und Überprüfung einer Skala zur Erfassung subjektiv erlebter Anstrengung. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 40(4), 215--224.
[3]
A. Flemming Seay, David M. Krum, Larry Hodges, William Ribarsky. 2002. Simulator sickness and presence in a high field-of-view virtual environment. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 784--785.
[4]
David Foyle, Beverly D. Sanford, Robert S. McCann. 1991. Attentional issues in superimposed flight symbology. In R.S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 577--582.
[5]
Tom M. Gasser, Daniel Westhoff. 2012. BASt-study: Definitions of automation and legal issues in Germany. In Proceedings of the 2012 Road Vehicle Automation Workshop.
[6]
Wilhelm R. Glaser, H. Waschulewski, D. Schmid. 2005. I-TSA - a standardized procedure to assess the safety impact of driver information and driver assistance systems. In "Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert" (The driver in the 21st century), VDI-Berichte 1919, 17--10. Braunschweig.
[7]
Christian Gold, Moritz Körber, Davis Lechner, Klaus Bengler. 2016. Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of traffic density. Human Factors, 58(4), 642--652.
[8]
Renate Häuslschmid, Sven Osterwald, Marcus Lang, Andreas Butz. 2015. Augmenting the Driver's View with Peripheral Information on a Windshield Display. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 311--321.
[9]
Dagmar Kern, Angela Mahr, Sandro Castronovo, Albrecht Schmidt, Christian Müller. 2010. Making use of drivers' glances onto the screen for explicit gaze-based interaction. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 110--116.
[10]
Fridulf Sagberg, Paul Jackson, Hans-Peter Krüger, Alain Muzet, Adrian Williams. 2004. Fatigue, sleepiness and reduced alertness as risk factors in driving. TOI report 739/2004. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
[11]
Grace Tai, Dagmar Kern, Albrecht Schmidt. 2009. Bridging the Communication Gap: A Driver-Passenger Video Link. In Mensch & Computer 2009: Grenzenlos frei!? Interdisziplinäre Fachtagung (Mensch & Computer '09). Oldenbourg Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 73--82.
[12]
Tom Van Veen, Juffrizal Karjanto, Jacques Terken. 2017. Situation Awareness in Automated Vehicles through Proximal Peripheral Light Signals. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 287--292.
[13]
Kristie Young, Michael Regan. 2007. Driver distraction: A review of the literature. In: I.J. Faulks, M. Regan, M. Stevenson, J. Brown, A. Porter and J.D. Irwin (Eds.), Distracted driving (379--405). Sydney, NSW: Australasian College of Road Safety.
[14]
Ergoneers GmbH: Dikablis 3. Retrieved February 8, 2019 from https://www.ergoneers.com/en/mobile-eye-tracker-dikablis-glasses-3/
[15]
SAE international: Taxonomy and definition for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. 2018.
[16]
Your Autopilot has arrived. 2015. Retrieved February 8, 2019 from https://www.tesla.com/pt_PT/blog/your-autopilot-has-arrived

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Why Do I Have to Take Over Control? Evaluating Safe Handovers with Advance Notice and Explanations in HADProceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3462244.3479884(308-317)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AutomotiveUI '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings
September 2019
524 pages
ISBN:9781450369206
DOI:10.1145/3349263
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 September 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. adaptive user interface
  2. automated driving
  3. automotive
  4. autonomous driving
  5. driver distraction
  6. eye tracking
  7. gaze based interaction
  8. head-up display
  9. mobile device
  10. road safety
  11. windshield display

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress

Conference

AutomotiveUI '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Why Do I Have to Take Over Control? Evaluating Safe Handovers with Advance Notice and Explanations in HADProceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3462244.3479884(308-317)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media