Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3312831acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Cross-country User Connections in an Online Social Network for Music

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Social connections and cultural aspects play important roles in shaping an individual's preferences. For instance, people tend to select friends with similar music preferences. Furthermore, preferences and friending are influenced by cultural aspects. Recommender systems may benefit from these phenomena by using knowledge about the nature of social ties to better tailor recommendations to an individual. Focusing on the specifities of music preferences, we study user connections on Last.fm---an online social network for music. We identify those countries whose users are mainly connected within the same country, and those countries that are characterized by cross-country user connections. Strong cross-country connection pairs are typically characterized by similar cultural, historic, or linguistic backgrounds, or geographic proximity. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Russia are identified as countries having a large relative amount of user connections from other countries. Our results contribute to understanding the complexity of social ties and how they are reflected in connection behavior, and are a promising source for advancements of personalized systems.

References

[1]
Michael Bailey, Ruiqing Rachel Cao, Theresa Kuchler, Johannes Stroebel, and Arlene Wong. 2017. Measuring social connectedness. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[2]
George A Barnett and Grace A Benefield. 2017. Predicting international Facebook ties through cultural homophily and other factors. New Media & Society 19, 2 (2017), 217--239.
[3]
Nancy K Baym and Andrew Ledbetter. 2009. Tunes that bind? Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society 12, 3 (2009), 408--427.
[4]
Diana Boer, Ronald Fischer, Micha Strack, Michael H Bond, Eva Lo, and Jason Lam. 2011. How shared preferences in music create bonds between people: Values as the missing link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, 9 (2011), 1159--1171.
[5]
Richard A. Brown. 2012. Music preferences and personality among Japanese university students. International Journal of Psychology 47, 4 (2012), 259--268.
[6]
Sejung Marina Choi, Yoojung Kim, Yongjun Sung, and Dongyoung Sohn. 2011. Bridging or bonding? A cross-cultural study of social relationships in social networking sites. Information, Communication & Society 14, 1 (2011), 107--129.
[7]
Sanjeev Dewan, Yi-Jen Ho, and Jui Ramaprasad. 2013. Quantifying Social Influence in an Online Music Community. In 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013). AIS, Atlanta, GA, 3259--3267.
[8]
R.I.M. Dunbar, Valerio Arnaboldi, Marco Conti, and Andrea Passarella. 2015. The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world. Social Networks 43 (2015), 39 -- 47.
[9]
John Johnstone and Elihu Katz. 1957. Youth and Popular Music: A Study in the Sociology of Taste. Amer. J. Sociology 62, 6 (1957), 563--568. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2773131
[10]
Thomas Krismayer, Markus Schedl, Peter Knees, and Rick Rabiser. 2017. Prediction of User Demographics from Music Listening Habits. In 15th International Workshop on Content-based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI) (CBMI '17). ACM, New York, NY, Article 8, 7 pages.
[11]
Seth A Myers, Aneesh Sharma, Pankaj Gupta, and Jimmy Lin. 2014. Information network or social network?: the structure of the twitter follow graph. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '14 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, 493--498.
[12]
Nathan Nash. 2010. International Facebook "friends": Toward McLuhan's global village. The McMaster Journal of Communication 5, 1 (2010), 1--12.
[13]
Peter J Rentfrow and Samuel D Gosling. 2006. Message in a ballad: The role of music preferences in interpersonal perception. Psychological science 17, 3 (2006), 236--242.
[14]
Markus Schedl. 2016. The LFM-1b Dataset for Music Retrieval and Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (ICMR '16). ACM, New York, NY, 103--110.
[15]
Markus Schedl and Christine Bauer. 2017. Introducing Global and Regional Mainstreaminess for Improving Personalized Music Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia (MoMM2017). ACM, New York, NY, 74--81.
[16]
Christian Steglich, Tom A. B. Snijders, and Patrick West. 2006. Applying SIENA: an illustrative analysis of the coevolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences 2, 1 (2006), 48--56.
[17]
Gabriel Vigliensoni and Ichiro Fujinaga. 2016. Automatic music recommendation systems: do demographic, profiling, and contextual features improve their performance?. In 17th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (7--11 August). International Society for Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Canada, 94--100.
[18]
XinWang, Steven C.H. Hoi, Martin Ester, Jiajun Bu, and Chun Chen. 2017. Learning personalized preference of strong and weak ties for social recommendation. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '17). InternationalWorld WideWeb Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 1601--1610.
[19]
Shanyang Zhao and David Elesh. 2008. Copresence as 'being with': Social contact in online public domains. Information, Communication & Society 11, 4 (2008), 565--583.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2019
3673 pages
ISBN:9781450359719
DOI:10.1145/3290607
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cross-country user connections
  2. friends
  3. online social networks
  4. social ties

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Funding Sources

  • Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Conference

CHI '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI '25
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How Culture Shapes What People Want From AIProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642660(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Music Mobility PatternsPattern Recognition10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109807143:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2021)Difficulties of Measuring Culture in Privacy StudiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34795225:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Music Recommendation Systems: A SurveyRecommender Systems for Medicine and Music10.1007/978-3-030-66450-3_7(107-118)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media