Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3063955.3063970acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-turcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tide and shock: the influential modern teaching methods on chinese education reform

Published: 12 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

With the increasing pace of education informationization, conventional education mode in China is suffering unprecedented challenges. On one side, new thoughts and new approaches are continuously putting forward, on the other side, old conventions and customs are following the beaten track. Confronted with the fast-changing new technologies which bring totally different ideas to us, how should we deal with the status and what method should we take are the most urgent problems we should seriously think about. This paper begins with the origin of education revolution in China, discusses the impact of modern educational methods to the conventional teaching method, and analyzes whether MOOC and 'Flipped Classroom' can be the catalyst to the Chinese high education reform. Finally, we make an overall summary and outlook about the typical Chinese education reform methods.

References

[1]
2016. Emerging Science and Technology Trends:2016--2045. http://www.weixinrensheng.com/v61eCAFn/. (2016).
[2]
Carlos Alario-Hoyos, Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, Carlos Delgado-Kloos, Mario Muñoz-Organero, Antonio Rodríguez-de-las Heras, and others. 2013. Analysing the impact of built-in and external social tools in a MOOC on educational technologies. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Springer, 5--18.
[3]
Jon Baggaley. 2013. MOOC rampant. Distance Education 34, 3 (2013), 368--378.
[4]
Miguel Ballesteros Mesa and Adriana Wilde. 2016. Data analytics for MOOC providers. (2016).
[5]
Yu Li Bingshan Yin. 2013. MOOC's development and its inspiration to open university. Journal of Beijing radio and TV University 5 (2013), 29--34.
[6]
Lori Breslow, David E Pritchard, Jennifer DeBoer, Glenda S Stump, Andrew D Ho, and Daniel T Seaton. 2013. Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment 8 (2013).
[7]
Gayle Christensen, Andrew Steinmetz, Brandon Alcorn, Amy Bennett, Deirdre Woods, and Ezekiel J Emanuel. 2013. The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? (2013).
[8]
John Dillon, G Alex Ambrose, Nirandika Wanigasekara, Malolan Chetlur, Prasenjit Dey, Bikram Sengupta, and Sidney K D'Mello. 2016. Student affect during learning with a MOOC. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. ACM, 528--529.
[9]
Zhuoming Huang. 2003. Xunzi thought on Education. Reading and writing 5 (2003), 29--30.
[10]
Harry R Lewis. 2006. Excellence without a soul: How a great university forgot education. Citeseer.
[11]
Roger B Ludeman. 1999. Reforming the higher education curriculum: internationalizing the campus. Journal of College Student Development 40, 6 (1999), 753.
[12]
Jenny Mackness, Sui Mak, and Roy Williams. 2010. The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. (2010).
[13]
Alexander McAuley, Bonnie Stewart, George Siemens, and Dave Cormier. 2010. The MOOC model for digital practice. (2010).
[14]
Barton K Pursel, L Zhang, Kathryn W Jablokow, GW Choi, and D Velegol. 2016. Understanding MOOC students: motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 32, 3 (2016), 202--217.
[15]
Zhuanmao Song. 2014. How MOOC can reform the high school teaching method. Fudan Education Forum 12, 4 (2014), 55--58.
[16]
Ye Sun. 2016. The use of mixed teaching tools in the rain class. New Silk Road 11 (2016), 158.
[17]
Zhengping Tian. 2011. Yuanpei Cai and early education reform. Research on Higher Education 7 (2011), 017.
[18]
Bill Tucker. 2012. The flipped classroom. Education next 12, 1 (2012).
[19]
Yulin Zhang. 2005. 2004 Blue Book on the Inequality in Education of China {J}. Reading of the President 5 (2005), 003.
[20]
Yuanqing Zhou. 2001. Reform and innovation of higher education system. Higher Education in China 1 (2001), 4--11.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ACM TURC '17: Proceedings of the ACM Turing 50th Celebration Conference - China
May 2017
371 pages
ISBN:9781450348737
DOI:10.1145/3063955
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 May 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. MOOC
  2. conventional education
  3. education reform
  4. flipped classroom

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ACM TUR-C '17

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 86
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media