Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2611040.2611065acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Edge Weight Method for Community Detection in Scale-Free Networks

Published: 02 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we proposed edge-weight based method to perform a community detection in scale-free networks. Our main idea is that communities are formed from edges. We believe that in scale-free networks, each edge is not equal. Edges that connect to hub nodes are more important and should be weighted more than edges that connect to fewer nodes. Therefore, our proposed method begins with edge weight calculation based on centrality value of each edge. Then, two steps community detection algorithm performs iteratively until the community detection result is balanced. The first step of our algorithm is aimed to extract communities that node degree follows power law (scale-free). While the second step is aimed to extract communities that node degree follows normal degree distribution. The benefit is that our method can work on both scale-free and non scale-free networks. Moreover, in scale-free networks, not all communities contain hub nodes nor node degree distribution follows the power law. For scale-free approaches, this can cause errors in community detection. On the other hand, our method can handle this case correctly because our algorithm contains both scale-free and non scale-free approaches. To evaluate our method, we use NMI - Normalized Mutual Information - to measure our results on both synthetic and real-world datasets comparing with both scale-free and non scale-free community detection methods. The results show that, our method can perform almost equal or better on both scale-free and non scale-free networks.

References

[1]
A.-L. L. Barabási and E. Bonabeau. Scale-free networks. Scientific American, 288(5):60--69, May 2003.
[2]
M. Bastian, S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks, 2009.
[3]
V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), July 2008.
[4]
M. Boguña, R. Pastor-Satorras, A. Díaz-Guilera, and A. Arenas. Models of social networks based on social distance attachment. Phys. Rev. E, 70:056122, Nov 2004.
[5]
C. Dorso and J. Randrup. Early recognition of clusters in molecular dynamics. Physics Letters B, 301(4):328--333, 1993.
[6]
S. Fortunato. Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports 486, pages 75--174, Jan. 2010.
[7]
K. Foster, S. Muth, J. Potterat, and R. Rothenberg. A Faster Katz Status Score Algorithm. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 7(4):275--285, Dec. 2001.
[8]
M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(12):7821--7826, June 2002.
[9]
S. Jarukasemratana, T. Murata, and X. Liu. Community detection algorithm based on centrality and node distance in scale-free networks. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, HT '13, pages 258--262, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
[10]
A. Lancichinetti and S. Fortunato. Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis. Phys. Rev. E, 80:056117, Nov 2009.
[11]
A. Lancichinetti, S. Fortunato, and J. Kertész. Detecting the overlapping and hierarchical community structure in complex networks. New Journal of Physics, 11(3), Mar. 2009.
[12]
A. Lancichinetti, S. Fortunato, and F. Radicchi. Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms. Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics), 78(4), 2008.
[13]
J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graphs over time: Densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining, KDD '05, pages 177--187, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
[14]
J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, 1(1), Mar. 2007.
[15]
D. Lusseau, K. Schneider, O. J. Boisseau, P. Haase, E. Slooten, and S. M. Dawson. The bottlenose dolphin community of Doubtful Sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54(4):396--405, 2003.
[16]
J. McAuley and J. Leskovec. Discovering Social Circles in Ego Networks, Oct. 2012.
[17]
M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2):026113+, Aug. 2003.
[18]
R. Qian, W. Zhang, and B. Yang. Community detection in scale-free networks based on hypergraph model. In Proceedings of the 2007 Pacific Asia conference on Intelligence and security informatics, PAISI'07, pages 226--231, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer-Verlag.
[19]
M. Ripeanu, I. Foster, and A. Iamnitchi. Mapping the gnutella network: Properties of large-scale peer-to-peer systems and implications for system design. IEEE Internet Computing Journal, 6:2002, 2002.
[20]
H.-W. Shen and X.-Q. Cheng. Spectral methods for the detection of network community structure: a comparative analysis. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2010(10):P10020, 2010.
[21]
X. Xu, N. Yuruk, Z. Feng, and T. A. J. Schweiger. Scan: a structural clustering algorithm for networks. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '07, pages 824--833, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[22]
J. Yang and J. Leskovec. Defining and evaluating network communities based on ground-truth. CoRR, abs/1205.6233, 2012.
[23]
W. W. Zachary. An Information Flow Model for Conict and Fission in Small Groups. Journal of Anthropological Research, 33(4):452--473, 1977.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Community detection algorithm for social network based on node intimacy and graph embedding modelEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107947132(107947)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2020)A ground truth contest between modularity maximization and modularity density maximizationArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-019-09802-8Online publication date: 3-Jan-2020
  • (2017)Novel Clique enumeration heuristic for detecting overlapping clusters2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)10.1109/CEC.2017.7969466(1390-1397)Online publication date: Jun-2017

Index Terms

  1. Edge Weight Method for Community Detection in Scale-Free Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WIMS '14: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS14)
      June 2014
      506 pages
      ISBN:9781450325387
      DOI:10.1145/2611040
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      In-Cooperation

      • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Community detection
      2. Edge weight
      3. Scale-free network

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      WIMS '14

      Acceptance Rates

      WIMS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 41 of 90 submissions, 46%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 140 of 278 submissions, 50%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Community detection algorithm for social network based on node intimacy and graph embedding modelEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107947132(107947)Online publication date: Jun-2024
      • (2020)A ground truth contest between modularity maximization and modularity density maximizationArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-019-09802-8Online publication date: 3-Jan-2020
      • (2017)Novel Clique enumeration heuristic for detecting overlapping clusters2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)10.1109/CEC.2017.7969466(1390-1397)Online publication date: Jun-2017

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media