Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1242572.1242686acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

P-TAG: large scale automatic generation of personalized annotation tags for the web

Published: 08 May 2007 Publication History

Abstract

The success of the Semantic Web depends on the availability of Web pages annotated with metadata. Free form metadata or tags, as used in social bookmarking and folksonomies, have become more and more popular and successful. Such tags are relevant keywords associated with or assigned to a piece of information (e.g., a Web page), describing the item and enabling keyword-based classification. In this paper we propose P-TAG, a method which automatically generates personalized tags for Web pages. Upon browsing a Web page, P-TAG produces keywords relevant both to its textual content, but also to the data residing on the surfer's Desktop, thus expressing a personalized viewpoint. Empirical evaluations with several algorithms pursuing this approach showed very promising results. We are therefore very confident that such a user oriented automatic tagging approach can provide large scale personalized metadata annotations as an important step towards realizing the Semantic Web.

References

[1]
H. Alani, S. Kim, D. E. Millard, M. J. Weal, W. Hall, P. H. Lewis, and N. R. Shadbolt. Automatic ontology-based knowledge extraction from web documents. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18(1):14--21, 2003.
[2]
P. G. Anick and S. Tipirneni. The paraphrase search assistant: Terminological feedback for iterative information seeking. In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Intl. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1999.
[3]
R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press / Addison-Wesley, 1999.
[4]
C. H. Brooks and N. Montanez. Improved annotation of the blogosphere via autotagging and hierarchical clustering. In Proc. of the 15th World Wide Web Conference, 2006.
[5]
J. Budzik and K. Hammond. Watson: Anticipating and contextualizing information needs. In Proceedings of the Sixty-second Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 1999.
[6]
L. Carr, W. Hall, S. Bechhofer, and C. Goble. Conceptual linking: ontology-based open hypermedia. In Proc. of the 10th Intl. Conf. on World Wide Web, 2001.
[7]
C. H. Chang and C. C. Hsu. Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized web information retrieval. In Proc. of the 7th Intl. Conf. on World Wide Web, 1998.
[8]
P. A. Chirita, C. Firan, and W. Nejdl. Summarizing local context to personalize global web search. In Proc. of the 15th Intl. CIKM Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, 2006.
[9]
P. A. Chirita, C. S. Firan, and W. Nejdl. Pushing task relevant web links down to the desktop. In Proc. of the 8th ACM Intl. Workshop on Web Information and Data Management held at the 15th Intl. ACM CIKM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2006.
[10]
P. Cimiano, S. Handschuh, and S. Staab. Towards the self-annotating web. In Proceedings of the 13th World Wide Web Conference, 2004.
[11]
P. Cimiano, G. Ladwig, and S. Staab. Gimme' the context: context-driven automatic semantic annotation with c-pankow. In Proc. of the 14th World Wide Web Conference, 2005.
[12]
H. Cunningham, D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, and V. Tablan. Gate: A framework and graphical development environment for robust nlp tools and applications. In Proceedings of the 40th Anniversary Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002.
[13]
S. C. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, G. W. Furnas, and R. A. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(6):391--407, 1990.
[14]
S. Dill, N. Eiron, D. Gibson, D. Gruhl, and R. Guha. Semtag and seeker: Bootstrapping the semantic web via automated semantic annotation. In Proceedings of the 12th World Wide Web Conference, 2003.
[15]
T. Dunning. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19:61--74, 1993.
[16]
H. P. Edmundson. New methods in automatic extracting. Journal of the ACM, 16(2):264--285, 1969.
[17]
E. N. Efthimiadis. User choices: A new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion. Information Processing and Management, 31(4):605--620, 1995.
[18]
D. Fetterly, M. Manasse, M. Najork, and J. Wiener. A large-scale study of the evolution of web pages. In Proc. of the 12th Intl. Conf. on World Wide Web, 2003.
[19]
S. Gauch, J. Wang, and S. M. Rachakonda. A corpus analysis approach for automatic query expansion and its extension to multiple databases. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 17(3):250--250, 1999.
[20]
S. Handschuh and S. Staab. Authoring and annotation of web pages in cream. In Proc. of the 11th Intl. World Wide Web Conf., 2002.
[21]
M. A. Hearst. Untangling text data mining. In Proc. of the 37th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, 1999.
[22]
H. Holz, H. Maus, A. Bernardi, and O. Rostanin. From Lightweight, Proactive Information Delivery to Business Process-Oriented Knowledge Management. Journal of Universal Knowledge Management. Special Issue on Knowledge Infrastructures for the Support of Knowledge Intensive Business Processes, 0(2):101--127, 2005.
[23]
J. Kahan, M. Koivunen, E. Prud'Hommeaux, and R. Swick. Annotea: An Open RDF Infrastructure for Shared Web Annotations. In Proc. of the 10th Intl. World Wide Web Conf., 2001.
[24]
M. -C. Kim and K. Choi. A comparison of collocation based similarity measures in query expansion. Information Processing and Management, 35:19--30, 1999.
[25]
A. Kiryakov, B. Popov, D. Ognyanoff, D. Manov, A. Kirilov, and M. Goranov. Semantic annotation, indexing, and retrieval. In International Semantic Web Conference, 2003.
[26]
A. M. Lam-Adesina and G. J. F. Jones. Applying summarization techniques for term selection in relevance feedback. In Proc. of the 24th Intl. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2001.
[27]
D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, and H. Cunningham. Towards a semantic extraction of named entities. In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 2003.
[28]
G. Miller. Wordnet: An electronic lexical database. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):39--41, 1995.
[29]
J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. The Smart Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 313--323, 1971.
[30]
V. Vinay, K. Wood, N. Milic-Frayling, and I. J. Cox. Comparing relevance feedback algorithms for web search. In Proc. of the 14th Intl. Conf. on World Wide Web, 2005.
[31]
S. C. Wang and Y. Tanaka. Topic-oriented query expansion for web search. In Proc. of the 15th Intl. Conf. on World Wide Web, pages 1029--1030, 2006.
[32]
J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Query expansion using local and global document analysis. In Proc. of the 19th Intl. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 4--11, 1996.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)TAG: Toward Accurate Social Media Content Tagging with a Concept GraphProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3534678.3539077(4332-4341)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Developing a mathematical model of the co-author recommender system using graph mining techniques and big data applicationsJournal of Big Data10.1186/s40537-021-00432-y8:1Online publication date: 6-Mar-2021
  • (2019)A study on features of social recommender systemsArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-019-09684-wOnline publication date: 29-Jan-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web
May 2007
1382 pages
ISBN:9781595936547
DOI:10.1145/1242572
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 May 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. personalization
  2. tagging
  3. user desktop
  4. web annotations

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

WWW'07
Sponsor:
WWW'07: 16th International World Wide Web Conference
May 8 - 12, 2007
Alberta, Banff, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 27 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)TAG: Toward Accurate Social Media Content Tagging with a Concept GraphProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3534678.3539077(4332-4341)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Developing a mathematical model of the co-author recommender system using graph mining techniques and big data applicationsJournal of Big Data10.1186/s40537-021-00432-y8:1Online publication date: 6-Mar-2021
  • (2019)A study on features of social recommender systemsArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-019-09684-wOnline publication date: 29-Jan-2019
  • (2017)Finding Information Faster by Tracing My Colleagues' TrailsAnalyzing the Strategic Role of Social Networking in Firm Growth and Productivity10.4018/978-1-5225-0559-4.ch020(406-426)Online publication date: 2017
  • (2017)A Method of Personalized Tag Prediction Based on Graph Structure2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C)10.1109/QRS-C.2017.71(390-395)Online publication date: Jul-2017
  • (2016)AxGamesACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/2954679.287237651:4(623-636)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2016
  • (2016)Cloud computingACM SIGCAS Computers and Society10.1145/2874239.287424945:3(68-72)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2016
  • (2016)Exploiting Heterogeneous Information for Tag Recommendation in API Management2016 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS)10.1109/ICWS.2016.63(436-443)Online publication date: Jun-2016
  • (2016)CUT: A Combined Approach for Tag Recommendation in Software Information SitesKnowledge Science, Engineering and Management10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_47(599-612)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2016
  • (2016)Folksonomy-Based Recommender SystemsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems10.1002/int.2175331:4(314-346)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media