Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3107411.3116251acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ProMuteHT: A High Throughput Compute Pipeline for Generating Protein Mutants in silico

Published: 20 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Understanding how an amino acid substitution affects a protein's structure is fundamental to advancing drug design and protein docking studies. Mutagenesis experiments on physical proteins provide a precise assessment of the effects of mutations, but they are time and cost prohibitive. Computational approaches for performing in silico amino acid substitutions are available, but they are not suited for generating large numbers of protein variants needed for high-throughput screening studies. We present ProMuteHT, a program for high throughput in silico generating user-specified sets of mutant protein structures with single or multiple amino acid substitutions. We combine our custom mutation algorithm with side chain homology modeling external libraries, and generate energetically feasible mutant structures. Our efficient command-line invocation syntax requires only a few arguments to specify large datasets of mutant structures. We achieve quick run-times due to our hybrid approach in which we limit the use of costly energy calculations when mutating from a large to a small amino acid. We compare our mutant structures with those generated by FoldX, and report faster run-times. We show that the mutants generated by ProMuteHT are of high quality, as determined via all-atom and mutated residue RMSD measurements for existing mutant structures in the PDB.

References

[1]
Pedro J Ballester and John BO Mitchell 2010. A machine learning approach to predicting protein--ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking. Bioinformatics, Vol. 26, 9 (2010), 1169--1175.
[2]
Jeffrey A Bell, Wayne J Becktel, Uwe Sauer, Walter A Baase, and Brian W Matthews 1992. Dissection of helix capping in T4 lysozyme by structural and thermodynamic analysis of six amino acid substitutions at Thr 59. Biochemistry, Vol. 31, 14 (1992), 3590--3596.
[3]
Frances C Bernstein, Thomas F Koetzle, Graheme JB Williams, Edgar F Meyer, Michael D Brice, John R Rodgers, Olga Kennard, Takehiko Shimanouchi, and Mitsuo Tasumi 1977. The protein data bank. European Journal of Biochemistry Vol. 80, 2 (1977), 319--324.
[4]
M J Bower, F E Cohen, and R L Jr Dunbrack 1997. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J Mol Biol, Vol. 267, 5 (1997), 1268--1282.
[5]
Jeffrey R Brender and Yang Zhang 2015. Predicting the effect of mutations on protein-protein binding interactions through structure-based interface profiles. PLoS Comput Biol, Vol. 11, 10 (2015), e1004494.
[6]
Yana Bromberg and Burkhard Rost 2008. Comprehensive in silico mutagenesis highlights functionally important residues in proteins. Bioinformatics, Vol. 24, 16 (2008), i207--i212.
[7]
J. Cheng, A. Randall, and P. Baldi 2006. Prediction of Protein Stability Changes for Single-Site Mutations Using Support Vector Machines. PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Vol. 62 (2006), 1125--1132.
[8]
Warren L DeLano. 2002. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. (2002).
[9]
R.L. Jr. Dunbrack and M. Karplus 1994. Conformational analysis of the backbone-dependent rotamer preferences of protein sidechains. Nature Structural Biology Vol. 1 (1994), 334--340. Issue 5.
[10]
D. Gilis and M. Rooman 1997. Predicting Protein Stability Changes Upon Mutation Using Database-dervied Potentials: Solvent Accessibility Determines the Importance of Local Versus Non-Local Interactions Along the Sequence. Journal of Molecular Biology Vol. 272, 2 (1997), 276--290.
[11]
Jeffrey J Gray, Stewart Moughon, Chu Wang, Ora Schueler-Furman, Brian Kuhlman, Carol A Rohl, and David Baker 2003. Protein--protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. Journal of molecular biology Vol. 331, 1 (2003), 281--299.
[12]
Nicolas Guex and Manuel C Peitsch 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-Pdb Viewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. electrophoresis, Vol. 18, 15 (1997), 2714--2723.
[13]
Maximilian Hecht, Yana Bromberg, and Burkhard Rost. 2015. Better prediction of functional effects for sequence variants. BMC genomics, Vol. 16, 8 (2015), S1.
[14]
F. Jagodzinski, B. Akbal-Delibas, and N. Haspel. 2013. An Evolutionary Conservation & Rigidity Analysis Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Critical Protein Residues. In CSBW (Computational Structural Bioinformatics Workshop), in proc. of ACM-BCB (ACM International conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology). 780--786.
[15]
J Janin and S Wodak. 1978. Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. J Mol Biol Vol. 125 (1978), 357--386.
[16]
Lei Jia, Ramya Yarlagadda, and Charles C Reed. 2015. Structure Based Thermostability Prediction Models for Protein Single Point Mutations with Machine Learning Tools. PloS one, Vol. 10, 9 (2015), e0138022.
[17]
Georgii G Krivov, Maxim V Shapovalov, and Roland L Dunbrack. 2009. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, Vol. 77, 4 (2009), 778--795.
[18]
C. Lee and M. Levitt. 1991. Accurate prediction of the stability and activity effects of site-directed mutagenesis on a protein core. Nature Vol. 352 (1991), 448--451.
[19]
Yunqi Li and Jianwen Fang 2012. PROTS-RF: a robust model for predicting mutation-induced protein stability changes. PloS one, Vol. 7, 10 (2012), e47247.
[20]
Sushil Kumar Mishra, Jan Adam, Michaela Wimmerová, and Jaroslav Koffha 2012. In silico mutagenesis and docking study of Ralstonia solanacearum RSL lectin: performance of docking software to predict saccharide binding. Journal of chemical information and modeling, Vol. 52, 5 (2012), 1250--1261.
[21]
Blaine HM Mooers, Walter A Baase, Jonathan W Wray, and Brian W Matthews 2009. Contributions of all 20 amino acids at site 96 to the stability and structure of T4 lysozyme. Protein Science, Vol. 18, 5 (2009), 871--880.
[22]
James C Phillips, Rosemary Braun, Wei Wang, James Gumbart, Emad Tajkhorshid, Elizabeth Villa, Christophe Chipot, Robert D Skeel, Laxmikant Kale, and Klaus Schulten. 2005. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. Journal of computational chemistry Vol. 26, 16 (2005), 1781--1802.
[23]
J.W. Ponder and F.M. Richards 1987. Tertiary templates for proteins: Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. Journal Molecular Biology Vol. 193 (1987), 775--791. Issue 4.
[24]
Boris Reva, Yevgeniy Antipin, and Chris Sander. 2011. Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Research (2011).
[25]
John A Schellman. 1987. The thermodynamic stability of proteins. Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry, Vol. 16, 1 (1987), 115--137.
[26]
Joost Schymkowitz, Jesper Borg, Francois Stricher, Robby Nys, Frederic Rousseau, and Luis Serrano. 2005. The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic acids research Vol. 33, suppl 2 (2005), W382--W388.
[27]
C.M. Topham, N. Srinivasan, and T. Blundell. 1997. Prediction of the stability of protein mutants based on structural environment-dependent amino acid substitutions and propensity tables. Protein Engineering, Vol. 10, 1 (1997), 7--21.
[28]
C.L. Worth, R. Preissner, and L. Blundell 2011. SDM-a server for predicting effects of mutations on protein stability and malfunction. Nucleic Acids Research Vol. 39, Web Server Issue (2011), W215--W222.
[29]
Lingchong You and John Yin 2002. Dependence of epistasis on environment and mutation severity as revealed by in silico mutagenesis of phage T7. Genetics, Vol. 160, 4 (2002), 1273--1281.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Impactful Mutations in Mpro of the SARS-CoV-2 ProteomeProceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics10.1145/3388440.3414706(1-3)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2020
  • (2020)Using Energy-Minimization Profiles to Measure Protein Resistance to DrugsProceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics10.1145/3388440.3414703(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2020
  • (2018)Predicting the Effect of Single and Multiple Mutations on Protein Structural StabilityMolecules10.3390/molecules2302025123:2(251)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. ProMuteHT: A High Throughput Compute Pipeline for Generating Protein Mutants in silico

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ACM-BCB '17: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology,and Health Informatics
      August 2017
      800 pages
      ISBN:9781450347228
      DOI:10.1145/3107411
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 20 August 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. in silico
      2. modeling
      3. mutagenesis
      4. protein structure

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      BCB '17
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      ACM-BCB '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 42 of 132 submissions, 32%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 885 submissions, 29%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2020)Impactful Mutations in Mpro of the SARS-CoV-2 ProteomeProceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics10.1145/3388440.3414706(1-3)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2020
      • (2020)Using Energy-Minimization Profiles to Measure Protein Resistance to DrugsProceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics10.1145/3388440.3414703(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2020
      • (2018)Predicting the Effect of Single and Multiple Mutations on Protein Structural StabilityMolecules10.3390/molecules2302025123:2(251)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2018
      • (2018)Low Rank Smoothed Sampling Methods for Identifying Impactful Pairwise MutationsProceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics10.1145/3233547.3233714(681-686)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2018
      • (2018)Mutation Sensitivity Maps: Identifying Residue Substitutions That Impact Protein Structure Via a Rigidity Analysis In Silico Mutation ApproachJournal of Computational Biology10.1089/cmb.2017.016525:1(89-102)Online publication date: Jan-2018
      • (2017)Predicting the Effect of Point Mutations on Protein Structural StabilityProceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology,and Health Informatics10.1145/3107411.3107492(247-252)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2017
      • (2012)Low Rank Approximation Methods for Identifying Impactful Pairwise Protein MutationsAlgorithms and Methods in Structural Bioinformatics10.1007/978-3-031-05914-8_4(63-87)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2012

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media