Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2901790.2901859acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Documenting the Research Through Design Process

Published: 04 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Documentation of Research through Design (RtD) processes is essential for capturing and translating design knowledge into broader academic knowledge. Moreover, it can support both design and research objectives internally in RtD projects, as well as external concerns such as project management, knowledge dissemination, and education. In spite of this, RtD documentation has received little sustained attention in prior work. Building on what prior work there is as well as an in-depth analysis of two markedly different cases, we present a framework for planning and evaluating RtD documentation. The framework addresses three core concerns: the medium of documentation, the performativity of documentation, and providing equal support for both research and design.

References

[1]
Michael Atwood and John Horner. 2006. Effective Design Rationale: Understanding the Barriers. In A.H. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik, & B. Paech (Eds.) Rationale management in software engineering. SpringerVerlag, 73--90
[2]
John Langshaw Austin. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[3]
Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2015. Humanistic HCI. Morgan & Claypool.
[4]
Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2015. Immodest Proposals: Research through design and knowledge. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 20932102.
[5]
Ditte Amund Basballe and Kim Halskov. 2012. Dynamics of research through design. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS'12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 58--67. DOI=10.1145/2317956.2317967.
[6]
Thomas Binder and Eva Brandt. 2007. Experimental design research: genealogy, intervention, argument, International association of societies of design research 2007: emerging trends in design, Hong Kong.
[7]
Eli Blevis, Elizabeth Churchill, William Odom, James Pierce, David Roedl, and Ron Wakkary. 2012. Visual thinking & digital imagery. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2715--2718. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212703
[8]
John Bowers. 2012. The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of'research through design'. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS'12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6877. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317968
[9]
Janet Burge and David Brown. 1998. Design Rationale: Types and Tools, Technical Report, Worchester Polytechnic Institute, Computer Science Dept., retrieved on 03 January 2016.
[10]
Janet Burge, 2008. Design rationale: Researching under uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol 22, 311--324.
[11]
Peter Dalsgaard and Christian Dindler. 2014. Between theory and practice: bridging concepts in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1635--1644. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557342
[12]
Peter Dalsgaard, Kim Halskov, and Rune Nielsen, R. 2009. Maps for design reflection. Artifact Journal, Routledge.
[13]
Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2012. Reflective design documentation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS'12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 428--437. DOI=10.1145/2317956.2318020
[14]
Peter Dalsgaard, Kim Halskov, and Ditte Amund Basballe. 2014. Emergent boundary objects and boundary zones in collaborative design research projects. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 745--754. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2600878
[15]
David Davies. 2003. Medium in art. In Jerrold Levinson, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181--191.
[16]
Christopher Frayling. 1993. Research in Art and Design, Royal College of Art Research Papers series 1(1) 1--5.
[17]
William Gaver. 2011. Making spaces: how design workbooks work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1551--1560. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979169
[18]
William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 937946. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538
[19]
Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008. Usability considered harmful (some of the time). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 111--120.
[20]
Kim Halskov and Rune Nielsen. 2008. Virtual video prototyping. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 21, 2 (May 2008), 199--233. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci2102_2.
[21]
Kristina Höök, Jeffrey Bardzell, Simon Bowen, Peter Dalsgaard, Stuart Reeves, and Annika Waern. 2015. Framing IxD knowledge. interactions 22, 6 (October 2015), 32--36. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2824892
[22]
Kristina Höök, Peter Dalsgaard, Stuart Reeves, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jonas Löwgren, Erik Stolterman, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. Knowledge Production in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2429--2432. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702653
[23]
Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012), 18 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362371
[24]
Nadine Jarvis, David Cameron, and Andy Boucher. 2012. Attention to detail: annotations of a design process. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (NordiCHI'12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--20. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399019
[25]
Ilpo Koskinen, Thomas Binder, and Jonas Redström. 2008. Lab, Field, Gallery, and Beyond. Artifact, 2, 1.
[26]
Henrik Korsgaard, Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, Ditte Basballe, Peter Dalsgaard, and Kim Halskov. 2012. Odenplan: a media façade design process. In Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference: Participation (MAB'12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23--32. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2421076.2421081
[27]
Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.interactions 20, 1 (January 2013), 30--34. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2405716.2405725
[28]
Harald Nelson and Erik Stolterman. 2012. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[29]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493502. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704
[30]
John Zimmerman, Erik Stolterman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 310--319. DOI=10.1145/1858171.185822

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Daddy, You Can Be the Fox: Designing Hybrid Playgrounds for Nature Integrated StorytellingProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685360(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Tracing as a Strategy for Orienting to Nonhuman PerspectivesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661621(1087-1100)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Designing Smart Home Technology For Passive Co-Presence Over DistanceProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661508(3389-3406)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Documenting the Research Through Design Process

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
    June 2016
    1374 pages
    ISBN:9781450340311
    DOI:10.1145/2901790
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design process
    2. documentation
    3. research through design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Intel Science and Technology Center for Social Computing
    • Aarhus University
    • Innovation Fund Denmark

    Conference

    DIS '16
    Sponsor:
    DIS '16: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2016
    June 4 - 8, 2016
    QLD, Brisbane, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    DIS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 107 of 418 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)330
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)47
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Daddy, You Can Be the Fox: Designing Hybrid Playgrounds for Nature Integrated StorytellingProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685360(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Tracing as a Strategy for Orienting to Nonhuman PerspectivesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661621(1087-1100)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Designing Smart Home Technology For Passive Co-Presence Over DistanceProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661508(3389-3406)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)"Data Is One Thing, But I Want To Know The Story Behind": Designing For Self-Tracking and Remote Patient Monitoring In The Context Of Multiple Sclerosis CareProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661499(597-618)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Passive Co-presence: Exploring How Peripheral Devices Connect People Over DistanceExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651126(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)A temporal vocabulary of Design Events for Research through DesignProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642560(1-12)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Capra: Making Use of Multiple Perspectives for Capturing, Noticing and Revisiting Hiking Experiences Over TimeProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642284(1-27)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)“It’s Not What We Were Trying to Get At, but I Think Maybe It Should Be”: Learning How to Do Trauma-Informed Design with a Data Donation Platform for Online Dating Sexual ViolenceProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642045(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)An Electronic Engineering Approach for Turning a Lego Brick Piano into a Musical InstrumentIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.338636112(51319-51329)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)A human-centered approach for sharing patient experiences through digital storytelling: a research through design studyDesign Science10.1017/dsj.2024.2610Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media