Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957665acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: acceptance, benefits, and concerns

Published: 06 March 2011 Publication History

Abstract

While much of human-robot interaction research focuses upon people interacting with autonomous robots, there is also much to be gained from exploring human interpersonal interaction through robots. The current study focuses on mobile remote presence (MRP) systems as used by a population who could potentially benefit from more social connectivity and communication with remote people - older adults. Communication technologies are important for ensuring safety, independence, and social support for older adults, thereby potentially improving their quality of life and maintaining their independence [24]. However, before such technologies would be accepted and used by older adults, it is critical to understand their perceptions of the benefits, concerns, and adoption criteria for MRP systems. As such, we conducted a needs assessment with twelve volunteer participants (ages 63-88), who were given first-hand experience with both meeting a visitor via the MRP system and driving the MRP system to visit that person. The older adult participants identified benefits such as being able to see and be seen via the MRP system, reducing travel costs and hassles, and reducing social isolation. Among the concerns identified were etiquette of using the MRP, personal privacy, and overuse of the system. Some new use-cases were identified that have not yet been explored in prior work, for example, going to museums, attending live performances, and visiting friends who are hospitalized. The older adults in the current study preferred to operate the MRP themselves, rather than to be visited by others operating the MRP system. More findings are discussed in terms of their implications for design.

References

[1]
Boissy, P., Corriveau, H., Michaud, F., Labonte, D. and Royer, M.-P. 2007. A qualitative study of in-home robotic telepresence for home care of community-living elderly subjects. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 13, 79--84.
[2]
Caine, K. E., Fisk, A. D. and Rogers, W. A. 2007. Designing privacy conscious aware homes for older adults. In Proceedings of HFES.
[3]
Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Giuliani, M. V., Pecora, F., Scopelliti, M. and Tiberio, L. 2007. Psychological implications of domestic assistive technology for the elderly. PsychNology Journal 5, 3.
[4]
Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A. and Sharit, J. 2006. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 21, 333--352.
[5]
Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M., Koay, K. L. and Werry, I. 2005. What is a robot companion-Friend, assistant or butler? In Proceedings of IROS, IEEE, 1488--1493. DOI=10.1109/IROS.2005.1545189
[6]
Demiris, G., Rantz, M. J., Aud, M. A., Marek, K. D., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M. and Hussam, A. A. 2004. Older adults' attitudes toward and perceptions of 'smart home' technologies: A pilot study. Informatics for Health and Social Care 29, 87--94.
[7]
Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D. and Roger, W. A. 2009. More than a servant: Self-reported willingness of younger and older adults to having a robot perform interactive and critical tasks in the home. In Proceedings of HFES, 136--150. DOI=10.1518/107118109X12524441079382
[8]
Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C. and Gemperle, F. 2004. Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 25--59.
[9]
GeckoSystems 2010. Gecko System Markets: Consumer Family.
[10]
Gitlin, L. 2003. Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. The Gerontologist 43, 5, 628--637.
[11]
Giuliani, M. V., Scopelliti, M. and Fornara, F. 2005. Elderly people at home: Technological help in everyday activities. In Proceedings of RO-MAN, IEEE, 365--370.
[12]
Hansen, S. T., Andersen, H. J. and Bak, T. 2010. Practical evaluation of robots for elderly in Denmark: An overview. In Proceedings of HRI, ACM, Osaka, Japan, 149--150. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1734454.1734517
[13]
Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V. and Wielinga, B. 2006. The influence fo a robot's social abilities on acceptance by elderly users. In Proceedings of RO-MAN, IEEE, 521--526.
[14]
Heerink, M., Krose, B., Wielinga, B. and Evers, V. 2008. Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In Proceedings of HRI, ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 113--119. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1349822.1349838
[15]
Heerink, M., Krose, B., Wielinga, B. and Evers, V. 2009. Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users. In Proceedings of British Computer Society Conference on HCI, 430--439.
[16]
Helal, A. and Abdulrazak, B. 2006. TeCaRob: Tele-care using telepresence and robotic technology for assisting people with special needs. International Journal of ARM 7, 3, 46--53.
[17]
Jouppi, N. P. 2002. First steps toward mutually-immersive mobile telepresence. In Proceedings of CSCW, ACM, New Orleans, LA, USA, 354--363. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/587078.587128
[18]
Kidd, C. D., Taggart, W. and Turkle, S. 2006. A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In Proceedings of ICRA, IEEE, 3972--3976.
[19]
Melenhorst, A. S., Rogers, W. A. and Bouwhuis, D. G. 2006. Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: Evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychology and Aging 21, 190--195.
[20]
Michaud, F., Boissy, P., Labonte, D., Corriveau, H., Grant, A., Lauria, M., Cloutier, R., Roux, M.-A., Iannuzzi, D. and Royer, M.-P. 2007. Remote assistance in caregiving using telerobot. In Proceedings of ICTA.
[21]
Morris, M., Lundell, J. and Dishman, E. 2004. Catalyzing social interaction with ubiquitous computing: A needs assessment of elders coping with cognitive decline. In Proceedings of CHI, Vienna, Austria, 1151--1154. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985921.986011
[22]
Paulos, E. and Canny, J. 2001. Social tele-embodiment: Understanding presence. Autonomous Robots 11, 1, 87--95.
[23]
Pollack, M. E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., Engberg, S., Matthews, J. T., Dunbar-Jacob, J., McCarthy, C. E., Thrun, S., Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J. and Roy, N. 2002. Pearl: A mobile robotic assistant for the elderly AAAI Workshop on automation as caregiver.
[24]
Rogers, W. A. and Mynatt, E. D. 2003. How can technology contribute to the quality of life of older adults? in The technology of humanity: Can technology contribute to the quality of life?, Mitchell, M. E. Ed. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, 22--30.
[25]
Sharit, J., Czaja, S. J., Perdomo, D. and Lee, C. C. 2004. A cost-benefit analysis methodology for assessing product adoption by older user populations. Applied Ergonomics 35, 81--92.
[26]
Taggart, W., Turkle, S. and Kidd, C. D. 2005. An interactive robot in a nursing home: Preliminary remarks CogSci workshop: Towards social mechanisms of android science.
[27]
Tsai, T.-C., Hsu, Y.-L., Ma, A.-I., King, T. and Wu, C.-H. 2006. Developing a telepresence robot for interpersonal communication with the elderly in a home environment. Telemedicine and e-Health 13, 4, 407--424.
[28]
Venolia, G., Tang, J., Cervantes, R., Bly, S., Robertson, G., Lee, B. and Inkpen, K. 2010. Embodied social proxy: Mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite tams. In Proceedings of CHI, ACM, Atlanta, GA, 1049--1058. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753482

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Potential of Telepresence in Libraries: Students’ PerspectivesLibri10.1515/libri-2023-0082Online publication date: 17-May-2024
  • (2024)Dynamic Agent Affiliation: Who Should the AI Agent Work for in the Older Adult's Care Network?Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661500(1774-1788)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)"This really lets us see the entire world:" Designing a conversational telepresence robot for homebound older adultsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660710(2450-2467)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: acceptance, benefits, and concerns

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
      March 2011
      526 pages
      ISBN:9781450305617
      DOI:10.1145/1957656
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      In-Cooperation

      • RA: IEEE Robotics and Automation Society
      • Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc: Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc
      • The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)
      • IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Society

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 06 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. human robot interaction
      2. mobile remote presence
      3. older adults

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      HRI'11
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)97
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
      Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)The Potential of Telepresence in Libraries: Students’ PerspectivesLibri10.1515/libri-2023-0082Online publication date: 17-May-2024
      • (2024)Dynamic Agent Affiliation: Who Should the AI Agent Work for in the Older Adult's Care Network?Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661500(1774-1788)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2024)"This really lets us see the entire world:" Designing a conversational telepresence robot for homebound older adultsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660710(2450-2467)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2024)“I have the Feeling that the Person is Here”: Older Adults’ Attitudes, Usage Intentions, and Requirements for a Telepresence RobotInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-024-01143-z16:7(1619-1639)Online publication date: 22-May-2024
      • (2024)Toward Intelligent Telepresence Robotics for Enhancing Elderly Healthcare in Smart Care HomeHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_14(180-195)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
      • (2023)Developmental Study on “Smart Silver Care”: A Mobile Application to Alleviate Loneliness in Older Adults within the CommunityHealthcare10.3390/healthcare1117237611:17(2376)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2023
      • (2023)Strengthening Social Capital to Address Isolation and Loneliness in Long-Term Care Facilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Research on Information and Communication TechnologiesJMIR Aging10.2196/467536(e46753)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2023
      • (2023)Social Prescription Interventions Addressing Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Meta-Review Integrating On-the-Ground ResourcesJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4021325(e40213)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
      • (2023)Mobility and Utility in Robot Mediated InteractionProceedings of the 25th International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3565066.3609791(1-5)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023
      • (2023)Toward AI-Enabled Commercial Telepresence Robots to Combine Home Care Needs and AffordabilityIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters10.1109/LRA.2023.33103968:10(6691-6698)Online publication date: Oct-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media