Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1352922.1352926acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The MERL motion detector dataset

Published: 15 November 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Looking into the future of residential and office building Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs (MERL) has been collecting motion sensor data from a network of over 200 sensors for a year. The data is the residual traces of year in the life of a research laboratory. It contains interesting spatio-temporal structure ranging all the way from the seconds of individuals walking down hallways, the minutes in lobbies chatting with colleagues, the hours of dozens of people attending talks and meetings, the days and weeks that drive the patterns of life, to the months and seasons with their ebb and flow of visiting employees. This document describes that dataset, which contains well over 30 million raw motion records, spanning a calendar year and two floors of our research laboratory, as well as calender, weather, and some intermediate analytic results. The dataset was originally released as part of the 2007 Workshop on Massive Datasets. The dataset can be obtained from http://www.merl.com/wmd.

References

[1]
G. Abowd, A. Bobick, I. Essa, E. Mynatt, and W. Rogers. The aware home: Developing technologies for successful aging. In Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Automation as a Care Giver, 2002.
[2]
R. Aipperspach, E. Cohen, and J. Canny. Modeling human behavior from simple sensors in the home. In Proceedings Of The IEEE Conference On Pervasive Computing, 2006.
[3]
A. Baumberg and D. Hogg. An efficient method for contour tracking using active shape models. In Proceeding of the Workshop on Motion of Nonrigid and Articulated Objects. IEEE Computer Society, 1994.
[4]
A. F. Bobick. Movement, activity and action: the role of knowledge in the perception of motion. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 352(1358):1257--1265, 1997.
[5]
T. Choudhury and A. Pentland. Characterizing social networks using the sociometer. In Proceedings of the North American Association of Computational Social and Organizational Science (NAACSOS), 2004.
[6]
G. C. de Silva, T. Yamasaki, and K. Aizawa. An interactive multimedia diary for the home. Computer, 40(5):52--59, 2007.
[7]
N. Eagle and A. Pentland. Reality mining: Sensing complex social systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(4):255--268, 2006.
[8]
I. Essa. Ubiquitous sensing for smart and aware environments. IEEE Personal Communications, October 2000. Special Issue on Networking the Physical World.
[9]
D. Estrin, R. Govindan, J. Heidemann, and S. Kumar. Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks. In MobiCom '99: Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pages 263--270, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM, ACM Press.
[10]
J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. E. Culler, and K. S. J. Pister. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 93--104, 2000.
[11]
Y. A. Ivanov, C. R. Wren, A. Sorokin, and I. Kaur. Visualizing the history of living spaces. Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6):1153--1160, 2007.
[12]
I. Kaur. Openspace: Enhancing social awareness at the workplace. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007.
[13]
S.-N. Lim, L. S. Davis, and A. Elgammal. A scalable image-based multi-camera visual surveillance system. In IEEE AVSS, Miami, Florida, July 2003.
[14]
T. Mori, K. Asaki, H. Noguchi, and T. Sato. Accumulation and summarization of human daily action data in one-room-type sensing system. Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2001. Proceedings. 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, 4:2349--2354, 2001.
[15]
E. Munguia Tapia, S. S. Intille, L. Lopez, and K. Larson. The design of a portable kit of wireless sensors for naturalistic data collection. In Proceedings of PERVASIVE 2006, Dublin, Ireland, 2006. Springer-Verlag.
[16]
A. Rahimi, B. Dunagan, and T. Darrell. Simultaneous calibration and tracking with a network of non-overlapping sensors. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 187--194. IEEE Computer Society, June 2004.
[17]
C. J. Reynolds and C. R. Wren. Worse is better for ambient sensing. In Pervasive: Workshop on Privacy, Trust and Identity Issues for Ambient Intelligence, May 2006.
[18]
H. S. Sawhney, A. Arpa, R. Kumar, S. Samarasekera, M. Aggarwal, S. Hsu, D. Nister, and K. Hanna. Video flashlights: real time rendering of multiple videos for immersive model visualization. In Proceedings of the 13th Eurographics workshop on Rendering, pages 157--168, 2002.
[19]
C. Stauffer and K. Tieu. Automated multi-camera planar tracking correspondence modeling. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 259--266. IEEE, July 2003.
[20]
D. H. Wilson and C. Atkeson. Simultaneous tracking & activity recognition (star) using many anonymous, binary sensors. In The Third International Conference on Pervasive Computing, pages 62--79, 2005.
[21]
C. R. Wren, U. M. Erdem, and A. J. Azarbayejani. Functional calibration for pan-tilt-zoom cameras in hybrid sensor networks. ACM Multimedia Systems Journal, 12(3):255--268, December 2006.
[22]
C. R. Wren, Y. A. Ivanov, D. Leigh, and J. Westhues. Buzz: measuring and visualizing conference crowds. In SIGGRAPH '07: ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies, page 25, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[23]
C. R. Wren, Y. A. Ivanov, D. Leigh, and J. Westhues. The merl motion detector dataset: 2007 workshop on massive datasets. Technical Report TR2007-069, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Cambridge, MA, USA, August 2007.
[24]
C. R. Wren, Y. A. Ivanov, D. Leigh, and J. Westhues. The merl motion detector dataset: 2007 workshop on massive datasets. Technical Report 069, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, 2007.
[25]
C. R. Wren, D. Minnen, and S. G. Rao. Similarity-based analysis for large networks of ultra-low resolution sensors. Pattern Recognition, 39(10):1918--1931, October 2006. Special Issue on Similarity-Based Pattern Recognition.
[26]
C. R. Wren and E. Munguia Tapia. Toward scalable activity recognition for sensor networks. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3987, pages 168--185, Dublin, Ireland, 2006. 2nd International Workshop on Location- and Context-Awareness.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)TG-SPRED: Temporal Graph for Sensorial Data PREDictionACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/364989220:3(1-20)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2024
  • (2024)SPRIGHT: High-Performance eBPF-Based Event-Driven, Shared-Memory Processing for Serverless ComputingIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2024.336656132:3(2539-2554)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2022)SPRIGHTProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference10.1145/3544216.3544259(780-794)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MD '07: Proceedings of the 2007 workshop on Massive datasets
November 2007
15 pages
ISBN:9781595938718
DOI:10.1145/1352922
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 November 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. architecture
  2. data mining
  3. motion
  4. sensor networks
  5. tracking
  6. visualization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICMI07
Sponsor:

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 22 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)TG-SPRED: Temporal Graph for Sensorial Data PREDictionACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/364989220:3(1-20)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2024
  • (2024)SPRIGHT: High-Performance eBPF-Based Event-Driven, Shared-Memory Processing for Serverless ComputingIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2024.336656132:3(2539-2554)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2022)SPRIGHTProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference10.1145/3544216.3544259(780-794)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2022
  • (2022)On Predicting Sensor Readings With Sequence Modeling and Reinforcement Learning for Energy-Efficient IoT ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems10.1109/TSMC.2021.311614152:8(5140-5151)Online publication date: Aug-2022
  • (2022)Deep Learning for Estimating Sleeping Sensor’s Values in Sustainable IoT Applications2022 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom)10.1109/BalkanCom55633.2022.9900817(147-151)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2022
  • (2021)DLionProceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing10.1145/3431379.3460643(227-238)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Differential privacy applied to smart metersProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3412841.3442360(761-770)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Creation, evolution, and dissolution of social groupsScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-021-96805-711:1Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
  • (2020)Sensor data quality: a systematic reviewJournal of Big Data10.1186/s40537-020-0285-17:1Online publication date: 11-Feb-2020
  • (2020)R2DP: A Universal and Automated Approach to Optimizing the Randomization Mechanisms of Differential Privacy for Utility Metrics with No Known Optimal DistributionsProceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3372297.3417259(677-696)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media