Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/133160.133169acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Incremental relevance feedback

Published: 01 June 1992 Publication History

Abstract

Although relevance feedback techniques have been investigated for more than 20 years, hardly any of these techniques has been implemented in a commercial full-text document retrieval system. In addition to pure performance problems, this is due to the fact that the application of relevance feedback techniques increases the complexity of the user interface and thus also the use of a document retrieval system. In this paper we concentrate on a relevance feedback technique that allows easily understandable and manageable user interfaces, and at the same time provides high-quality retrieval results. Moreover, the relevance feedback technique introduced unifies as well as improves other well-known relevance feedback techniques.

References

[1]
J.J. Aalbersberg and F. Sijstermans, itigh-Quality and High-Performance Full-Text Document Retrieval: the Parallel InfoGuide System, Proc. 1st International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Information Systenls (PDIS 91), Miami Beach, FL (December 1991), 152- 150.
[2]
D.C. Blair, Language and Representatton,n {nformatzon Retrieval, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Tile Netherlands (1990).
[3]
A. Bookstein, Information Retrieval: A Sequential Learning Process, Journal of the ASIS 34 (1983), 331 - 342.
[4]
Y.K. Chang, C. Cirillo, and J. Razon, Evaluation of Feedback Retrieval Using Modified Freezing, Residual Collection, and Test and Control Group, in: G. Salton (ed.), The SMART Retrzeval System- Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, Prentice-tiall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1971), 355- 370.
[5]
C. Fox, A Stop List, for General Text, SIGIR Forum 24, No. 1 - 2 (1989/1990), 19- 35.
[6]
S. Gauch, Evaluation of an Expert S~,stelr, for Searching in Full Text, Proc. 13th International Conference oil Research and Development ill Information Retrieval (SIGIR 90), Brussels, Belgium (September 1990), 255- 277.
[7]
D. Harman, Relevance Feedback Revisited, Proc. 15th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 92), Copenhagen, Denmark (June 1992).
[8]
D. tiarman and G. Candela, Retrieving Records from a Gigabyte of Text on a Minicompllter Using Statistical Ranking, Journal of the ASIS 41 (1990), 581 - 589.
[9]
E. ide, New Experiments in Relevance Feedback, in: G. Salton (ed.), The SMART Relr, et, al System - Expemments '~n A utomatzc Documen! Proce,~slng, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff{s, NJ (197l), 337- 354.
[10]
j.B. Lovins, Development of a Stemming Algorithm, Mechanical Translation and ComputalTonal L,nguzst,cs 11 (1968), 22 - 31.
[11]
C.A. Pogue and P. Willett, Use of Text Signatures for Docuinent Retrieval in a {tighly Parallel Environment, Parallel Computlng 4 (1987), 259- 268.
[12]
J.A.T. Pritchard, ElectTvnlc FthT~g and Retr, e~,al: Developmenls ~n Full-T(a't Relrieval, NCC Publications, Manchester, United Kingdom (1989).
[13]
S.E. Robertson and K. Sparck Jones, Relevance Weighting of Search Terms, Journal of the ASIS 27 (1976), 129- 146.
[14]
J.J. Rocchio, Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval, in: G. Salton (ed.), The SMART Relr~eval System-- Experimenls in Aulomal'~c Document Processzng, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1971), 313- 323.
[15]
G. Salton (ed.), The SMART R~'lrzeval System - Experiments ~n Aulomal~c Docume'nl Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1971).
[16]
G. Salton, Automa/tc Text Processzng: The Transformatzon, Analys~s, and Retrieval of Information by Computer, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1989).
[17]
G. Salton and C. Buckley, Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval, Informat'ton Processzng and Management 24 (1988), 513- 523.
[18]
G. Salton and C. Buckley, Improving Retrieval Performance by Relevance Feedback, Journal of the ASIS 41 (1990), 288- 297.
[19]
K. Sparck Jones, A Statistical Interpretation of Term Specificity and its Application in Retrieval, Journal of Documentation 28 (1972), 11 - 21.
[20]
C. Stanfill and B. Kahle, Parallel Free-Text Search on the Connection Machine System, Communications of the ACM 29 (1986), 1229- 1239.
[21]
C. Stanfill and R. Thau, Information Retrieval on the Connection Machine: 1 to 8192 Gigabytes, Information Proce.ss~ng and MaT~agemenl 27 (1991), 285- 310.
[22]
J. Tague and R. Schultz, Some Measures and Procedures for Evaluation of the User interface in an Information Retrieval System, Proc. l lth International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 88). Grenoble, France (June 1988), :aT1 - 385.
[23]
Virginia Disc One, CD-ROM from Virginia Folytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA (1990).
[24]
S. Walker and R. De Vere, Improving Subject Retrieval in O~lline Catalogues: (2) Relevance Feedback and Query Expansion, British Library Research Paper 72, 1990.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Relevance Feedback with Brain SignalsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363787442:4(1-37)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2023
  • (2023)TRAVERS: A Diversity-Based Dynamic Approach to Iterative Relevance Search over Knowledge GraphsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543507.3583429(2560-2571)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
  • (2021)Impact of Interaction Strategies on User Relevance FeedbackProceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval10.1145/3460426.3463663(590-598)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGIR '92: Proceedings of the 15th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
June 1992
352 pages
ISBN:0897915232
DOI:10.1145/133160
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 1992

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGIR92
Sponsor:
  • SIGIR
  • Royal School of Lib.

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)73
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Relevance Feedback with Brain SignalsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363787442:4(1-37)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2023
  • (2023)TRAVERS: A Diversity-Based Dynamic Approach to Iterative Relevance Search over Knowledge GraphsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543507.3583429(2560-2571)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
  • (2021)Impact of Interaction Strategies on User Relevance FeedbackProceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval10.1145/3460426.3463663(590-598)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2021
  • (2019)Answer Interaction in Non-factoid Question Answering SystemsProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3295750.3298946(249-253)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2019
  • (2019)Evaluating sentence-level relevance feedback for high-recall information retrievalInformation Retrieval Journal10.1007/s10791-019-09361-0Online publication date: 13-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Iterative Relevance Feedback for Answer Passage Retrieval with Passage-Level Semantic MatchAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-030-15712-8_36(558-572)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2019
  • (2015)Smart Multitask Bregman Clustering and Multitask Kernel ClusteringACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/274787910:1(1-29)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2015
  • (2015)Discovering Information Propagation Patterns in Microblogging ServicesACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/274280110:1(1-22)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2015
  • (2015)Utility-Theoretic Ranking for Semiautomated Text ClassificationACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/274254810:1(1-32)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2015
  • (2015)Using a Combination of Micro--Computed Tomography, CAD and 3D Printing Techniques to Reconstruct Incomplete 19th-Century Cantonese Chess PiecesJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/26296827:4(1-6)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media