Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1054972.1055033acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Improving aviation safety with information visualization: a flight simulation study

Published: 02 April 2005 Publication History

Abstract

Many aircraft accidents each year are caused by encounters with invisible airflow hazards. Recent advances in aviation sensor technology offer the potential for aircraft-based sensors that can gather large amounts of airflow velocity data in real-time. With this influx of data comes the need to study how best to present it to the pilot - a cognitively overloaded user focused on a primary task other than that of information visualization.We focus on one particular aviation application, but the results may be relevant to user interfaces in other operationally stressful environments.

References

[1]
Advanced Rotorcraft Technology, Inc., 1685 Plymouth St., Suite 250, Mountain View, CA, USA 94043, http://www.flightlab.com.
[2]
Alter, K.W., Barrows, A.K., Jennings, C., Powell, J.D. 3-D Perspective Primary Flight Displays for Aircraft. Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, (2000).
[3]
Aragon, C. Usability Evaluation of a Flight-Deck Airflow Hazard Visualization System. 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (2004).
[4]
Bailey, R.E., Parrish, R.V., Kramer, L J., Harrah, S.D., Arthur, J.J. III. Technical Challenges In the Development of a NASA Synthetic Vision System Concept. NATO RTA (2003).
[5]
Brita, C. L., Kelly, C. W. User's Guide for an Airborne Doppler Weather Radar Simulation (ADWRS), NASA TPAWS (2002).
[6]
Buning, P. Numerical algorithms in CFD post-processing, Computer Graphics and Flow Visualization in Computational Fluid Dynamics, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series 1989-07.
[7]
Chambers, J. Concept to Reality, NASA SP-2003-4529, http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Concept2Reality/wind_shear.html.
[8]
Endsley, M.R. Designing for Situation Awareness in Complex Systems, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on symbiosis of humans, artifacts and environment, Kyoto, Japan (2001).
[9]
FAA National Aviation Safety Analysis Center, https://www.nasdac.faa.gov/.
[10]
Furmanski, C., Azuma, R. and Daily, M., Augmented-reality visualizations guided by cognition: Perceptual heuristics for combining visible and obscured information. Proceedings of IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2002), 2002, 215--224.
[11]
He, C. and Goericke, J., Army ART TR 2011 - DAAH10-03-C-0001, FLIGHTLAB UH-60L Simulation Model Validation, 2004.
[12]
Holforty, W. Flight-Deck Display of Neighboring Aircraft Wake Vortices, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University (2003).
[13]
Julier, S., Lanzagorta, M., Baillot, Y. and Brown, D. Information Filtering for Mobile Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 22 (5), 2002, 12--15.
[14]
Kao, C.-Y. J., Cooper, D.I., Reisner, J.M., Eichinger, W.E., and Ghil, M. Probing Atmospheric Turbulence with High-Resolution Lidar and Models, J. Geophys. Res. (2002) 107(D9): 7 1--7.10.
[15]
Lane, D.A. Visualizing Time-Varying Phenomena in Numerical Simulations of Unsteady Flows, NASA NAS Technical Report NAS-96-001 (1996).
[16]
Latorella, K., Chamberlain, J. Graphical Weather Information System Evaluation: Usability, Perceived Utility, and Preferences from General Aviation Pilots, NASA AWIN technical report (2002).
[17]
Lee, A.T. Aircrew Decision-Making Behavior in Hazardous Weather Avoidance, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine (1991).
[18]
Max, N., Becker, B., Crawfis, R. Flow Volumes for Interactive Vector Field Visualization, Proceedings of Visualization 93, IEEE Computer Society Press (1993), 19--23.
[19]
McCann, R.S., Foyle, D.C. Superimposed symbology: Attentional problems and design solutions, SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, 103 (1994), 2009--2016.
[20]
Mewhinney, M. Flow over helicopter carriers, NASA Ames Astrogram, October 30, 1998.
[21]
Milgram, P. and Kishino, F. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, E77-D (12), 1994.
[22]
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Lidar Tutorial, http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/sparcle/sparcle_tutorial.html.
[23]
Naval Safety Center Aviation Data Analysis Division, http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/aviation/aviationdata/default.htm.
[24]
Orlady, H.W. The professional airline pilot of today: All the old skills--and more. International Airline Pilot Training Seminar, Caracas, Venezuela (1989).
[25]
Particle Image Velocimetry at NASA Glenn, http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/OptInstr/piv/background.htm.
[26]
Post, F., van Wijk, J. Visual representation of vector fields: recent developments and research directions, Scientific Visualization Advances and Challenges, Academic Press (1993), 367--390.
[27]
Prinzel, L. Head-Up Displays and Attention Capture, NASA Technical Memorandum 2004-213000.
[28]
Roscoe, S.N. Airborne displays for flight and navigation, Human Factors, 10 (1968), 321--322.
[29]
Shaw, C.D., Jiang, F.T., Parry, R.M., Plale, B., Wasilewski, A., Ribarsky, W., Faust, N.L. Real-Time Weather Data on Terrain, NASA AWIN, SPIE Vol. #4368, Radar Sensor Technology and Data Visualization (2001).
[30]
Spence, R. Information Visualization, Addison-Wesley/ACM Press (2001).
[31]
Spirkovska, L., Lodha, S.K. AWE: Aviation weather data visualization environment, Computers and Graphics, 26 (2002), 169.
[32]
Spitzer, C. R., Parrish, R.V., Baize, D.G., Lewis, M.S. The Avionics Handbook: Synthetic Vision, NASA Aviation Safety Program (2001).
[33]
Strid, T., Rizzi, A., Oppelstrup, J. Development and use of some flow visualization algorithms, Computer Graphics and Flow Visualization in Computational Fluid Dynamics, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series 1989-07 (1989).
[34]
Strope, K., Borden, C. and Harding, J., Verification and Validation of a UH-60 FLIGHTLAB model in support of the UH-60M Limited User Test. American Helicopter Society 60th Annual Forum (2004).
[35]
Sujudi, D., Haimes, R. Identification of Swirling Flow in 3D Vector Fields, AIAA Paper 95-1715, San Diego, CA, USA (1995).
[36]
Switzer, G., Britt, C. Performance of the NASA Airborne Radar with the Windshear Database for Forward-Looking Systems, NASA CR 201607 (1996).
[37]
Turner, B., Leclerc, M.Y., Gauthier, M., Moore, K., and Fitzjarrald, D. Identification of Turbulence Structures above a Forest Canopy using the Wavelet Transform, J. Geophys. Res. 99 D1 (1994), 1919--1926.
[38]
Uenking, M.D., Hughes, M.F. The Efficacy of Using Synthetic Vision Terrain-Textured Images to Improve Pilot Situation Awareness, SAE World Aviation Congress (2002).
[39]
United States Department of Commerce, 1986, The Crash of Delta Flight 191 at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport on 2 August 1985: Multiscale Analysis of Weather Conditions, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA.
[40]
United States Navy, A1-H60BB-NFM-000, NATOPS Flight Manual - Navy Model SH-60B Aircraft (2004).
[41]
Wallace, L. Airborne Trailblazer, NASA Langley Wind Shear Program (1993), http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/trailblazer/SP-4216/.
[42]
Wickens, C.D., Carbonari, R., Merwin, D., Morphew, E., O'Brien, J. Cockpit Displays to Support Hazard Awareness in Free Flight. NASA Technical Report ARL-97-7/NASA-97-4 (1997).
[43]
Wilkinson, C.H., Zan, S.J., Gilbert, N.E., Funk, J.D. Modelling and Simulation of Ship Air Wakes for Helicopter Operations. Fluid Dynamics Problems of Vehicles Operating Near or in the Air-Sea Interface RTO-MP-15 (1999).
[44]
Williams, S.L., Long, K.R. Dynamic Interface Flight Tests and the Pilot Rating Scale. American Helicopter Soc. 53rd Annual Forum (1997).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)User Evaluation of Conversational Agents for Aerospace DomainInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.223954440:19(5549-5568)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Are the Pilots Onboard? Equipping Radiologists for Clinical Implementation of AIJournal of Digital Imaging10.1007/s10278-023-00892-zOnline publication date: 9-Aug-2023
  • (2022)An experimental study into the fault recognition of onboard systems by navigational officersJournal of Marine Engineering & Technology10.1080/20464177.2022.214331222:2(101-110)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2005
928 pages
ISBN:1581139985
DOI:10.1145/1054972
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 April 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. airflow hazards
  2. augmented reality
  3. flight-deck displays
  4. helicopters
  5. human factors in aviation
  6. information visualization
  7. presentation of safety-critical information

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

CHI05
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CHI '05 Paper Acceptance Rate 93 of 372 submissions, 25%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)User Evaluation of Conversational Agents for Aerospace DomainInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.223954440:19(5549-5568)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Are the Pilots Onboard? Equipping Radiologists for Clinical Implementation of AIJournal of Digital Imaging10.1007/s10278-023-00892-zOnline publication date: 9-Aug-2023
  • (2022)An experimental study into the fault recognition of onboard systems by navigational officersJournal of Marine Engineering & Technology10.1080/20464177.2022.214331222:2(101-110)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
  • (2021)User Interface Pattern for AR in Industrial ApplicationsInformation10.3390/info1206025112:6(251)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2021
  • (2019)Effects of "Real-World" Visual Fidelity on AR Interface Assessment: A Case Study Using AR Head-up Display Graphics in Driving2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR.2019.00-10(145-156)Online publication date: Oct-2019
  • (2017)Aeonium: Visual analytics to support collaborative qualitative coding2017 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2017.8031598(220-229)Online publication date: Apr-2017
  • (2017)Articulation Work in Subsea Operations: Taking Teamwork Seriously in Assessment of Subsea Operations2017 5th International Conference on Enterprise Systems (ES)10.1109/ES.2017.13(30-37)Online publication date: Sep-2017
  • (2014)Previsualization with computer animation (Previs)Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design10.1145/2686612.2686616(11-20)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2014
  • (2012)VizDeckCHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2212776.2223690(1667-1672)Online publication date: 5-May-2012
  • (2012)Watch thisProceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST)10.1109/VAST.2012.6400552(193-202)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2012
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media