Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Pricing of Platforms in Two-Sided Markets with Heterogeneous Agents and Limited Market Size

  • Mathematical Game Theory and Applications
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies equilibrium in a two-sided market represented by network platforms and heterogeneous agents. The setup below is based on the Armstrong monopoly model suggested in 2006 under the following assumptions: (1) a continuum of agents of limited size on each side of the market and (2) the heterogeneous utility of agents with the Hotelling specification. We show that the monopoly’s optimal pricing strategy always results in a corner solution in terms of the equilibrium market share. In addition, we solve the social planner’s optimization problem, obtaining a similar corner solution. Finally, we find the exact values for the equilibrium in the case of duopoly in a two-sided market with two platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong, M., Competition in Two-Sided Markets, RAND J. Econom., 2006, vol. 37, pp. 668–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, M. and Wright, J., Two-Sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts, Econom. Theory, 2007, vol. 32, pp. 353–380.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baye, M. and Morgan, J., Information Gatekeepers on the Internet and the Competitiveness of Homogenous Product Markets, Am. Econom. Rev., 2001, vol. 91, pp. 454–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caillaud, B. and Jullien, B., Chicken and Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers, RAND J. Econom., 2003, vol. 34, pp. 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, M., Lien, J.W., and Zheng, J., First Mover Advantage versus Price Advantage—The Role of Network Effect in the Competition between Proprietary Software (PS) and Opensource Software (OSS), Working Paper, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, M., Lien, J.W., and Zheng, J., Timing in Bricks versus Clicks: Real and Virtual Competition with Sequential Entrants, Working Paper, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, M. and Zheng, J., Open Source Software Movement: A Challenging Opportunity for the Development of China’s Software Industry, J. Electron. Sci. Technol. China, 2004, vol. 2(3), pp. 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lien, J.W., Mazalov, V.V., Melnik, A.V., and Zheng, J., Wardrop Equilibrium for Networks with the BPR Latency Function, Proc. 9th Intern. Conf. on Discrete Optimization and Operations Research (DOOR 2016), in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2016, vol. 9869, pp. 37–49.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazalov, V.V., Chirkova, Yu.V., Zheng, J., and Lien, J.W., A Game-Theoretic Model of Virtual Operators Competition in a Two-Sided Telecommunication Market, Autom. Remote Control, 2018, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 737–756.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazalov, V.V. and Melnik, A.V., Equilibrium Prices and Flows in the Passenger Traffic Problem, Int. Game Theory Rev., 2016, vol. 18(1), pp. 1–19.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker, G. and van Alstyne, M., Information Complements, Substitutes, and Strategic Product Design, New Orleans: Mimeo, Tulane Univ. and Univ. of Michigan, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Rochet, J.C. and Tirole, J., Cooperation among Competitors: The Economics of Payment Card Associations, RAND J. Econom., 2002, vol. 33, pp. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rochet, J.C. and Tirole, J., Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets, J. Eur. Econom. Ass., 2003, vol. 1, pp. 990–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rochet, J.C. and Tirole, J., Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report, RAND J. Econom., 2006, vol. 37, pp. 645–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmalensee, R., Payment Systems and Interchange Fees, J. Industr. Econom., 2002, vol. 50, pp. 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Jaimie W. Lien, Xinhong Hu, and Xinhan Zhang for careful reading of the manuscript and helpful remarks.

This work was supported by Tsinghua University, project no. 20151080397, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, project no. 61661136002, and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 16-51-55006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Z. Feng, T. Liu, V. V. Mazalov or J. Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, Z., Liu, T., Mazalov, V.V. et al. Pricing of Platforms in Two-Sided Markets with Heterogeneous Agents and Limited Market Size. Autom Remote Control 80, 1347–1357 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117919070117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117919070117

Keywords

Navigation