Risk and the Public Acceptance of New Technologies

• B. Adam and J. van Loon, ‘Introduction: repositioning risk’, in Adam, B., Beck, U. and van Loon, J. (eds) The Risk Society and Beyond (London: Sage, 2000).

  Google Scholar 

• C.E. Althaus, ‘A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk’, Risk Analysis, 25, 3 (2005) 567–588.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• U. Beck, Risk Society: towards a new modernity (London: Sage, 1992).

  Google Scholar 

• U. Beck, ‘Politics of risk society’, in Franklin, J. (ed.) The Politics of Risk Society (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998).

  Google Scholar 

• U. Beck, ‘Risk society revisited’, in Adam, B., Beck, U. and van Loon, J. (eds) The Risk Society and Beyond (London: Sage, 2000).

  Google Scholar 

• R. Boyne, Risk (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2003).

  Google Scholar 

• L. Clarke and J.F. Short, ‘Social organization and risk: some current controversies’, Annual Review of Sociology, 19 (1993) 375–399.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• A. Elliott, ‘Beck’s sociology of risk: a critical assessment’, Sociology, 36, 2 (2002) 293–315.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• J. Flynn, P. Slovic and H. Kunreuther, ‘Preface’, in Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Kunreuther, H. (eds) Risk, Media and Stigma (London: Earthscan Publications, 2001).

  Google Scholar 

• R. Flynn, ‘Health and risk’, in Mythen, G. and Walklate, S. Beyond the Risk Society (Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2006).

  Google Scholar 

• L.J. Frewer, S. Miles and R. Marsh, ‘The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk’, Risk Analysis, 22, 4 (2002) 701–711.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• F. Furedi, Culture of Fear (London: Cassell, 1997).

  Google Scholar 

• A. Giddens, ‘Risk society’, in Franklin, J. (ed.) The Politics of Risk Society (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998).

  Google Scholar 

• A. Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).

  Google Scholar 

• R. Grove-White, P. Macnaghten and B. Wynne, Wising Up: the public and new technologies, Research Report by Centre for the Study of Environmental Change (Lancaster: Lancaster University, November 2000).

  Google Scholar 

• HM Government, Securing the Future: The UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy, Cm 6467 (London: HMSO, March 2005).

  Google Scholar 

• K. Hobson, ‘Sustainable lifestyles: rethinking barriers and behaviour change’, in Cohen, M.J. and Murphy, J. (eds) Exploring Sustainable Consumption: environmental policy and the social sciences (Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier, 2001).

  Google Scholar 

• A. Irwin, Sociology and the Environment (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001a).

  Google Scholar 

• A. Irwin, ‘Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the bio-sciences’, Public Understanding of Science, 10 (2001b) 1–18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• A. Irwin and B. Wynne, ‘Introduction’, in Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (eds) Misunderstanding Science? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• A. Irwin and M. Michael, Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge (Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2003).

  Google Scholar 

• T. Jackson, Motivating Sustainable Consumption: a review of the evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change, Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network (Centre for Environmental Strategy: University of Surrey, 2005).

  Google Scholar 

• J. Kasperson, R. Kasperson, N. Pidgeon and P. Slovic, ‘The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory’, in Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R. and Slovic, P. (eds) The Social Amplification of Risk (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

  Google Scholar 

• R. Kasperson, N. Jhaveri and J. Kasperson, ‘Stigma and the social amplification of risk’, in Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Kunreuther, H. (eds) Risk, Media and Stigma (London: Earthscan Publications, 2001).

  Google Scholar 

• A. Klinke and O. Renn, ‘A new approach to risk-evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based and discourse-based strategies’, Risk Analysis, 22, 6 (2002) 1071–1094.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds) Social Theories of Risk (Westport and London: Praeger, 1992).

  Google Scholar 

• S. Krimsky, ‘The role of theory in risk studies’, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds) Social Theories of Risk (Westport and London: Praeger, 1992).

  Google Scholar 

• M. Leach, I. Scoones and B. Wynne, ‘Introduction: science, citizenship and globalization’, in Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B. (eds) Science and Citizens (London: Zed Books, 2005).

  Google Scholar 

• D. Lupton, Risk (London: Routledge, 1999).

  Google Scholar 

• G. Mythen, Ulrich Beck: a critical introduction to the risk society (London: Pluto Press, 2004).

  Google Scholar 

• G. Mythen and S. Walklate, ‘Introduction: thinking beyond the risk society’, in Mythen, G. and Walklate, S. (eds) Beyond the Risk Society (Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2006a).

  Google Scholar 

• G. Mythen and S. Walklate, ‘Conclusion: towards a holistic approach to risk and human security’, in Mythen, G. and Walklate, S. (eds) Beyond the Risk Society (Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2006b).

  Google Scholar 

• Office of Science and Technology and Wellcome Trust, ‘Science and the Public: a review of science communication and public attitudes to science in Britain’, Public Understanding of Science, 10 (2001) 315–330.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• H. Otway, ‘Public wisdom, expert fallibility: toward a contextual theory of risk’, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds) Social Theories of Risk (Westport and London: Praeger, 1992).

  Google Scholar 

• N. Pidgeon, R. Kasperson and P. Slovic, ‘Introduction’, in Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R. and Slovic, P. (eds) The Social Amplification of Risk (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• W. Poortinga and N. Pidgeon, ‘Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?’, Risk Analysis, 25, 1 (2005) 199–209.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• W. Poortinga and N. Pidgeon, ‘Trust, the asymmetry principle and the role of prior beliefs’, Risk Analysis, 24, 6 (2004) 1475–1486.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• K. Purcell, L. Clarke and L. Renzulli, ‘Menus of choice: the social embeddedness of decisions’, in Cohen, M. (ed.) Risk in the Modern Age (Houndmills: Macmillan, 2000).

  Google Scholar 

• O. Renn, ‘Concepts of risk: a classification’, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds) Social Theories of Risk (Westport and London: Praeger, 1992).

  Google Scholar 

• O. Renn, ‘A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management’, Policy Analysis, 33, 18 (1999) 3049–3055.

  Google Scholar 

• G. Rowe and L. Frewer, ‘Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 25, 1 (2000) 3–29.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• G. Rowe, T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls and N. Pidgeon, ‘Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation public debate about transgenic crops’, Public Understanding of Science, 14 (2005) 331–352.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• P. Saunders, Capitalism: a social audit (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995).

  Google Scholar 

• M. Siegrist and G. Cvetcovich, ‘Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge’, Risk Analysis, 20, 5 (2000) 713–719.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• M. Siegrist, ‘The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology’, Risk Analysis, 20, 2 (2000) 195–203.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• M. Siegriep, H. Gutscher and T.C. Earle, ‘Perception of risk: the influence of general trust and general confidence’, Journal of Risk Research, 8, 2 (2005) 145–156.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• P. Slovic, The Perception of Risk (London: Earthscan Publications, 2000).

  Google Scholar 

• P. Slovic, ‘Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm’, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds) Social Theories of Risk (Westport and London: Praeger, 1992).

  Google Scholar 

• A. Stirling, ‘Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology’, in Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B. (eds) Science and Citizens (London: Zed Books, 2005).

  Google Scholar 

• Sustainable Development Commission, I Will if You Will: towards sustainable consumption, Report of the Sustainable Consumption Roundtable (London: Sustainable Development Commission, May 2006). Accessed 2 May 2006 from http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications.php?id=367

  Google Scholar 

• P. Taylor-Gooby and J.O. Zinn, ‘The current significance of risk’, in Taylor-Gooby, P. and Zinn, J.O. (eds) Risk in Social Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).

  Google Scholar 

• J. Tulloch and D. Lupton, Risk and Everyday Life (London: Sage, 2003).

  Google Scholar 

• A. Webster, ‘State of the art: risk, science and policy’, Policy Studies, 25, 1 (2004) 5–18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• A. Wildavsky and K. Dake, ‘Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?’, Daedalus, 119, 4 (1990) 41–60.

  Google Scholar 

• I. Wilkinson, Anxiety in a Risk Society (London: Routledge, 2001a).

  Book  Google Scholar 

• I. Wilkinson, ‘Social theories of risk perception’, Current Sociology, 49, 1 (2001b) 1–22.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• I. Wilkinson, ‘Psychology and risk’, in Mythen, G. and Walklate, S. (eds) Beyond the Risk Society (Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2006).

  Google Scholar 

• J. Wilsdon and R. Willis, See-through Science: why public engagement needs to move upstream (London: Demos, 2004).

  Google Scholar 

• A.K. Wolfe, D.J. Bjornstad, M. Russell and N.D. Kerchner, ‘A framework for analyzing dialogues over the acceptability of controversial technologies’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 27, 1 (2002) 134–159.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• B. Wynne, ‘Risk and social learning: reification to engagement’, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds) Social Theories of Risk (Westport and London: Praeger, 1992).

  Google Scholar 

• B. Wynne, ‘May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide’, in Scott, L., Szerszynski, B. and Wynne, B. (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity (London: Sage, 1996).

  Google Scholar 

• B. Wynne, ‘Risk as a globalizing “democratic” discourse? Framing subjects and citizens’, in Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B. (eds) Science and Citizens (London: Zed Books, 2005).

  Google Scholar 

Download references