Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Weeds in agricultural landscapes. A review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is currently an increasing societal and political shift towards more sustainable agricultural systems to provide both food production and ecological biodiversity levels. This shift has recently modified scientific questioning and brought up new research challenges for agro-ecological research. This is the case in particular for weed management, where issues have so far largely focused on the conflict between weeds and crop productivity. Here, we review recent findings that have led to a changing perception on weeds in agro-ecosystems and upcoming areas in terms of weed management options. Our main findings are that weeds have numerous interactions with other organisms and, in turn, some of these interactions can have direct, either negative or positive, effects on the functioning of the agro-ecosystem. Many interactions are species-specific, and therefore assessing the role of weed communities in the agro-ecosystem would benefit from further development in the functional grouping of weed species. In terms of weed management our review shows that alternative cropping systems can deliver both good levels of crop productivity and of weed management at the field level. Weeds respond to landscape attributes and there is a need to fully assess the scope for utilizing the spatio-temporal organization of cropping systems and uncultivated habitats as a tool for minimizing weed infestations. Weeds are also submitted to biological regulation through the predation of their seeds and further research is required to assess the effect of cropping systems and landscape on levels of weed natural enemies, and therefore on the potential contribution of biological regulation in the management of weeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht H. (2003) Suitability of arable weeds as indicator organisms to evaluate species conservation effects of management in agricultural ecosystems, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 98, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alignier A., Meiss H., Petit S., Reboud X. (2008) Variation of postdispersal weed seed predation according to weed species, space and time, J. Plant. Dis. Prot. 21, 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri M.A. (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture, Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri M.A. (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 74, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. (2007) Managing weeds with a dualistic approach of prevention and control. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2, 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen C., Stryhn H., Streibig J.C. (1996) Decline of flora in Danish arable fields, J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 619–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2008) Ecophyto 2018. Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche, 10 septembre 2008, 20 p.

  • Arias-Estevez M., Lopez-Periago E., Martinez-Carballo E. (2008) The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 123, 247–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Backman J.P.C., Tiainen J. (2002) Habitat quality of field margins in a Finnish farmland area for bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombus and Psithyrus), Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 88, 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baessler C., Klotz S. (2006) Effects of changes in agricultural land use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation in the last 50 years, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 115, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baraibar B., Westerman P.R., Carrion E., Recasens J. (2009) Effects of tillage and irrigation in cereal fields on weed seed removal by seed predators, J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 380–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bàrberi P. (2002) Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? Weed Res. 42, 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaans L, Kropff M.J., Goudriaanb J., van Laar H.H. (2000) Design of weed management systems with a reduced reliance on herbicides poses new challenges and prerequisites for modeling crop-weed interactions, Field Crop. Res. 67, 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaans L., Paolini R., Baumann D.T. (2008) Focus on ecological weed management: what is hindering adoption? Weed Res. 48, 481–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton T.G., Vickery J.A., Wilson J.D. (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 182–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuti S. (2007) Weed seed movement and dispersal strategies in the agricultural environment, Weed Biol. Manag. 7, 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller C., Guichard L., Makowski D., Aveline A., Girardin P., Plantureux S. (2008) Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohan D.A., Hawes C., Haughton A.J., Denholm I., Champion G.T., Perry J.N., Clark S.J. (2007) Statistical models to evaluate invertebrate-plant trophic interactions in arable systems, Bull. Entomol. Res. 97, 265–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Booman G.C., Laterra P., Comparatore V., Murillo N. (2009) Postdispersal predation of weed seeds by small vertebrates: interactive influences of neighbor land use and local environment, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 129, 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brust G.E. (1994) Seed-predators reduce broadleaf weed growth and competitive ability, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 48, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butault J.P., Dedryver C.A., Gary C., Guichard L., Jacquet F., Meynard J.M., Nicot P., Pitrat M., Reau R., Sauphanor B., Savini I., Volay T. (2010) Ecophyto R & D. Quelles voies pour réduire l’usage des pesticides ? Synthèse du rapport d’étude, INRA Editeur (France), 90 p.

  • Cardina J., Norquay H.M., Stinner B.R., McCartney D.A. (1996) Postdispersal predation of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds, Weed Sci. 44, 534–539.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chikowo R., Faloya V., Petit S., Munier-Jolain N. (2009) Integrated Weed Management systems allow reduced reliance on herbicides and long term weed control, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 132, 237–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins S.A.O., Aggemyr E. (2008) The influence of field shape, area and surrounding landscape an plant species richness in grazed ex-fields, Biol. Conserv. 141, 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromar H.E., Murphy S.D., Swanton C.J. (1999) Influence of tillage and crop residue on postdispersal predation of weed seeds. Weed Sci. 47, 184–194.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debaeke P., Aboudrare A. (2004) Adaptation of crop management to water-limited environments, Eur. J. Agron. 21, 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornelas M., Moonen A.C., Magurran A.E., Barberi P. (2009) Species abundance distributions reveal environmental heterogeneity in modified landscapes, J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 666–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firbank L.G., Watkinson A.R. (1985) On the analysis of competition within two-species mixtures of plants, J. Appl. Ecol. 22, 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firbank L.G., Petit S., Smart S.M., Blain A., Fuller R.J. (2008) Assessing the impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity: a British perspective, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363, 777–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke A.C., Lotz L.A.P., Van der Burg W.J., Van Overbeek L. (2009) The role of arable weed seeds for agroecosystem functioning, Weed Res. 49, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried G. (2007) Variations spatiale et temporelle des communautés adventices des cultures annuelles en France, Thèse de doctorat, INRA-Université de Bourgogne, France, 357 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried G., Norton L.R., Reboud X. (2008) Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 128, 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried G., Petit S., Dessaint F., Reboud X. (2009) Arable weed decline in Northern France: Crop edges as refugia for weed conservation? Biol. Conserv. 142, 238–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel D., Thies C., Tscharntke T. (2005) Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity, Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 7, 85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallandt E.R., Molloy T., Lynch R.P., Drummond F.A. (2005) Effect of cover-cropping systems on invertebrate seed predation, Weed Sci. 53, 69–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerowitt B. (2003) Development and control of weeds in arable farming systems, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 98, 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibot-Leclerc S., Brault M., Pinochet X., Sallé G. (2003) Rôle potentiel des plantes adventices du colza d’hiver dans l’extension de l’orobanche rameuse en Poitou-Charentes, C.R. Biol. 326, 645–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons D.W., Bohan D.A., Rothery P. (2006) Weed seed resources for birds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 1921–1928.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson R.H., Nelson I.L., Hopkins G.W., Hamlett B.J., Memmott J. (2006) Pollinator webs, plant communities and the conservation of rare plants: arable weeds as a case study, J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes C., Haughton A.J., Bohan D.A., Squire G.R. (2009) Functional approaches for assessing plant and invertebrate abundance patterns in arable systems, Basic Appl. Ecol. 10, 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes C., Haughton A.J., Osborne J.L., Roy D.B., Clark S.J., Perry J.N., Rothery P., Bohan D.A., Brooks D.R., Champion G.T., Dewar A.M., Heard M.S., Woiwod I.P., Daniels R.E., Young M.W., Parish A.M., Scott R.J., Firbank L.G., Squire G.R. (2003) Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358, 1899–1913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heggenstaller A.H., Menalled F.D., Liebman M., Westerman P.R. (2006) Seasonal patterns in post-dispersal seed predation of Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi in three cropping systems, J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 999–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honek A., Martinkova Z., Jarosik V. (2003) Ground beetles (Carabidae) as seed predators, Eur. J. Entomol. 100, 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honek A., Martinkova Z., Saska P., Pekar S. (2007) Size and taxonomic constraints determine the seed preferences of Carabidae (Coleoptera), Basic Appl. Ecol. 8, 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper D.U., Solan M., Symstad A., Diaz, S., Gessner M.O., Buchmann N., Degrange V., Grime P., Hulot F., Mermillod-Bondin F., Roy J., Spehn E., Van Peer L. (2002) Species diversity, functional diversity, and ecosystem functioning in: Loreau M., Naeem S., Inchausti P. (Eds.), Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Synthesis and perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 195–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyvönen T. (2007) Can conversion to organic farming restore the species composition of arable weed communities, Biol. Conserv. 137, 382–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyvönen T., Huusela-Veistola E. (2008) Arable weeds as indicators of agricultural intensity — a case study from Finland, Biol. Conserv. 141, 2857–2864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs R., Tuell J., Fiedler A., Gardiner M., Landis D. (2009) Maximizing arthropod-mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: the role of native plants, Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson L.E., Pascual U., Hodgkin T. (2007) Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 121, 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob H.S., Minkey D.M., Gallagher R.S., Borger C.P. (2006) Variation in postdispersal weed seed predation in a crop field, Weed Sci. 54, 148–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • JørnsgÃ¥rd B., Rasmussen K., Hill J., Christiansen L.J. (1996) Influence of nitrogen on competition between cereals and their natural weed populations, Weed Res. 36, 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann J., Bassin S. (2001) Effects of management on seed predation in wildflower strips in northern Switzerland, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 83, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibblewhite M.G., Ritz K., Swift M.J. (2008) Soil health in agricultural systems, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363, 685–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koocheki A., Nassiri M., Alimoradi L., Ghorbani R. (2009) Effect of cropping systems and crop rotations on weeds, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29, 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kromp B. (1999) Carabid beetles in sustainable agriculture: a review on pest control efficacy, cultivation impacts and enhancement, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 74, 187–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavina A., Aramburu J., Moriones E. (1996) Occurrence of tomato spotted wilt and cucumber mosaic virus in fieldgrown crops and associated weeds in northeastern Spain, Plant Pathol. 45, 837–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman L., Davis A.S. (2000) Integration of soil, crop, and weed management in low-external-input farming systems, Weed Res. 40, 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey J.E., Vaughan M. (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects, BioScience 56, 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace K., Morlon P., Munier-Jolain N.M., Quere L. (2007) Time scales as a factor in decision-making by French farmers on weed management in annual crops, Agric. Syst. 93, 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson R.H., Stiles E.W. (1998) Links between microhabitat preferences and seed predation by small mammals in old fields, Oikos 82, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantle P.G., Shaw S. (1977) A Case Study of the Aetiology of Ergot Disease of Cereals and Grasses, Plant Pathol. 26, 121–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P. (2009) The impact of landscape structure and sown grass margin strips on weed assemblages in arable crops and their boundaries, Weed Res. 49, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P., Arnold G.M. (1995) Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK, Landscape Urban Plan. 31, 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P., Brown V.K., Boatman N.D., Lutman P.J.W., Squire G.R., Ward L.K. (2003) The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields, Weed Res. 43, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauchline A.L., Watson S.J., Brown V.K., Froud-Williams R.J. (2005) Post-dispersal seed predation of non target weeds in arable crops, Weed Res. 45, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiss H., Lagadec L., Munier-Jolain N., Waldhardt R., Petit S. (2010) Weed seed predation increases with vegetation cover in perennial forage crops. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 38, 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: biodiversity synthesis. Washington, DC, World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely J.A., Scherr S.J. (2003) Ecoagriculture. Washington, Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menalled F.D., Marino P.C., Renner K.A., Landis D.A. (2000) Postdispersal weed seed predation in Michigan crop fields as a function of agricultural landscape structure, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 77, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menalled F.D., Smith R.G., Dauer J.T., Fox T.B. (2007) Impact of agricultural management on carabid communities and weed seed predation, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 118, 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moonen A.C., Barberi P. (2008) Functional biodiversity: an agroecosystem approach, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 127, 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouron P., Scholz R.W., Nemecek T., Weber O. (2006) Life cycle management on Swiss fruit farms: Relating environmental and income indicators for apple-growing, Ecol. Econ. 58, 561–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navntoft S., Wratten S.D., Kristensen K., Esbjerg P. (2009) Weed seed predation in organic and conventional fields, Biol. Control. 49, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T., Von Richthofen J.S., Dubois G., Casta P., Charles R., Pahl H. (2008) Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations, Eur. J. Agron. 28, 380–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacha M., Petit S. (2008) The effect of landscape structure and habitat quality on the occurrence of Geranium sylvaticum in fragmented hay meadows, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 123, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo G., Riravololona M., Munier-Jolain N.M. (2010) Using a farming system model to evaluate cropping system prototypes: are labour constraints and economic performances hampering the adoption of Integrated Weed Management? Eur. J. Agron. 33, 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit S., Chamberlain D., Haysom K., Pywell R., Allen D., Firbank L. (2003) Knowledge-based models for predicting species occurrence in arable conditions, Ecography 26, 626–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit S., Firbank L., Wyatt B., Howard D. (2001) MIRABEL: Models for Integrated Review and Assessment of Biodiversity in European Landscapes, Ambio 30, 81–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petit S., Gaba S., Dessaint F., Chauvel B. (2009) Arable weeds in the agro-ecosystem: landscape effects on species richness and diversity at the regional level, in: European Landscapes in Transformation Challenges for Landscape Ecology and Management, European IALE Conference 2009, Salzburg, Austria, pp. 214–216.

  • Petit S., Griffiths L., Smart S.M., Stuart R.C, Smith G., Wright S. (2004) Effects of area and isolation of woodland patches on plant species richness across Great Britain, Landscape Ecol. 19, 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D.P., Hepperly J., Hanson D., Douds, Seidel R. (2005) Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems, BioScience 55, 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saska P., Van der Werf W., De Vries E., Westerman P.R. (2008) Spatial and temporal patterns of carabid activity-density in cereals do not explain levels of weed seed predation, Bull. Entomol. Res. 98, 169–181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storkey J. (2006) A functional group approach to the management of UK arable weeds to support biological diversity, Weed Res. 46, 513–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storkey J., Cussans J.W. (2007) Reconciling the conservation of in-field biodiversity with crop production using a simulation model of weed growth and competition, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 122, 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storkey J., Westbury D.B. (2007) Managing arable weeds for biodiversity, Pest. Manag. Sci. 63, 517–523.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe O.L., Kay Q.O.N. (2000) Changes in the arable flora of central southern England since the 1960s, Biol. Conserv. 93, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K., Green A., Jewels A.M. (1994) Seeds in soil and worm casts from a neutral grassland, Funct. Ecol. 8, 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooley J., Brust G.E. (2002) Weed seed predation by carabid beetles in: Holland J.M. (Ed.), The Agroecology of Carabid Beetles, Intercept, Andover, pp. 215–229.

  • Tscharntke T., Klein A.M., Kruess A., Steffan-Dewenter I., Thies C. (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity — ecosystem service management, Ecol. Lett. 8, 857–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulber L., Steinmann H.H., Klimek S., Isselstein J. (2009) An on-farm approach to investigate the impact of diversified crop rotations on weed species richness and composition in winter wheat, Weed Res. 49, 534–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker K.J., Critchley C.N.R., Sherwood A.J., Large R., Nuttall P., Hulmes S., Rose R., Mountford J.O. (2007) The conservation of arable plants on cereal field margins: an assessment of new agrienvironment scheme options in England, UK, Biol. Conserv. 136, 260–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman P.R., Hofman A., Vet L.E.M., Van Der Werf W. (2003) Relative importance of vertebrates and invertebrates in epigeaic weed seed predation in organic cereal fields, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 95, 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman P., Lieberman M., Menalled F.D., Heggenstaller A.H., Hartzler R.G., Dixon P.M. (2005) Are many little hammers effective? velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) population dynamics in two and four year crop rotation systems, Weed Sci. 53, 382–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A., Bellon S., Doré T., Francis C., Vallod D., David C. (2009) Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29, 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White S., Renner K.A., Menalled F.D., Landis D.A. (2007) Feeding Preferences of Weed Seed Predators and Effect on Weed Emergence, Weed Sci. 55, 606–612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J.D., Morris A.J., Arroyo B.E., Clack S.C., Bradbury R.B. (1999) A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 75, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson P.J., Aebischer N.J. (1995) The distribution of dicotyledonous arable weeds in relation to distance from the field edge, J. Appl. Ecol. 32, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisler G.C., Norris R.E. (2005) Interactions between weeds and cultivated plants as related to management of plant pathogens, Weed Sci. 53, 914–917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INRA, UMR 1210 Biologie et Gestion des Adventices, 21000, Dijon, France

    Sandrine Petit, Aline Boursault, Mélanie Le Guilloux, Nicolas Munier-Jolain & Xavier Reboud

Authors
  1. Sandrine Petit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aline Boursault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mélanie Le Guilloux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicolas Munier-Jolain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xavier Reboud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandrine Petit.

Additional information

Selected article from the International Conference on Weed Biology, Dijon, France, 2009.

About this article

Cite this article

Petit, S., Boursault, A., Le Guilloux, M. et al. Weeds in agricultural landscapes. A review. Agronomy Sust. Developm. 31, 309–317 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010020

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010020

Keywords

Search

Navigation