Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Exploring public opinion about liability and responsibility in surgical robotics

Nature Machine Intelligence volume 2, pages 194–196 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

As robotic systems become more autonomous, it gets less straightforward to determine liability when humans are harmed. This is an emerging challenge, with legal implications, in the field of surgical robotic systems. The iRobotSurgeon Survey explores public opinions about responsibility and liability in the area of surgical robotics.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The iRobotSurgeon Survey.

References

  1. Yang, G.-Z. et al. Sci. Robot. 2, eaam8638 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nathoo, N., Çavuşoğlu, M. C., Vogelbaum, M. A. & Barnett, G. H. Neurosurgery 56, 421–433 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed, A. K. et al. Comput. Assist. Surg. 24, 13–17 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, Z. & Chiu, P. W.-Y. Visc. Med. 34, 45–51 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shademan, A. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 337ra64 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barfield, W. Paladyn 9, 193–203 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones versus W+M Automation 31 AD 3d 1099 (2006).

  8. Abraham, K. The Forms and Functions of Tort Law (Foundation, 1997).

  9. O’Sullivan, S. et al. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. 15, e1968 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Piao, J. et al. Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 2168–2177 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurney, J. K. J. Law Technol. Pol. 2, 247–277 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elish, M. C. Engag. Sci. Technol. Soc. 5, 40–60 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Awad, E. et al. Nature 563, 59–64 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their thanks to D. Stoyanov, P. Palmisciano, D. Taylor, H. Lambert, E. Vayena, K. Kerr, J. Collins and J. Davidson for their support and contribution in developing the iRobotSurgeon Survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK

    Aimun A. B. Jamjoom

  2. Department of Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK

    Ammer M. A. Jamjoom

  3. Wellcome EPSRC centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK

    Hani J. Marcus

  4. Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK

    Hani J. Marcus

Authors
  1. Aimun A. B. Jamjoom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ammer M. A. Jamjoom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hani J. Marcus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.A.B.J. conceived of the idea for the Comment, led the writing, reviewed and agreed on the final version. A.M.A.J. contributed to the writing, reviewed and agreed on the final version. H.J.M. conceived of the idea for the Comment, contributed to the writing, reviewed and agreed on the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aimun A. B. Jamjoom.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamjoom, A.A.B., Jamjoom, A.M.A. & Marcus, H.J. Exploring public opinion about liability and responsibility in surgical robotics. Nat Mach Intell 2, 194–196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0169-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0169-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing