Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Multinary alloying for facilitated cation exchange and suppressed defect formation in kesterite solar cells with above 14% certified efficiency

Nature Energy volume 9, pages 1095–1104 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Kesterite Cu2ZnSn(S, Se)4 (CZTSSe) solar cells are highly promising low-cost thin-film photovoltaics. However, the efficiency of these solar cells is challenged by severe charge losses and complex defects. Here we reveal through a data-driven correlation analysis that the dominant deep defect in CZTSSe exhibits a donor character. We further propose that incomplete cation exchange in the multi-step crystallization reactions of CZTSSe is the kinetic mechanism responsible for the defect formation. To facilitate the cation exchange, we introduce a multi-elemental alloying approach aimed at weakening the metal–chalcogen bond strength and the stability of intermediate phases. This strategy leads to a significant reduction in charge losses within the CZTSSe absorber and to a total-area cell efficiency of 14.6% (certified at 14.2%). Overall, these results not only present a significant advancement for kesterite solar cells but could also help identify and regulate defects in photovoltaic materials.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Defect-type analysis of CZTSSe.
Fig. 2: Kinetic mechanism and regulation of SnZn defect formation.
Fig. 3: Influence of elemental alloying on the solid-phase reaction in CZTSSe films.
Fig. 4: Solar cell characterization.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the main text, Supplementary Information and source data files. The structures used in the theoretical modelling are provided as Supplementary Datasets. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Polman, A., Knight, M., Garnett, E. C., Ehrler, B. & Sinke, W. C. Photovoltaic materials: present efficiencies and future challenges. Science 352, aad4424 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park, J. S., Kim, S., Xie, Z. & Walsh, A. Point defect engineering in thin-film solar cells. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 194–210 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitzi, D. B., Gunawan, O., Todorov, T. K., Wang, K. & Guha, S. The path towards a high-performance solution-processed kesterite solar cell. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, 1421–1436 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siebentritt, S. & Schorr, S. Kesterites—a challenging material for solar cells. Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 20, 512–519 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong, Y. et al. Elemental de-mixing-induced epitaxial kesterite/CdS interface enabling 13%-efficiency kesterite solar cells. Nat. Energy 7, 966–977 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Antunez, P. D., Bishop, D. M., Luo, Y. & Haight, R. Efficient kesterite solar cells with high open-circuit voltage for applications in powering distributed devices. Nat. Energy 2, 884–890 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, J. et al. Unveiling microscopic carrier loss mechanisms in 12% efficient Cu2ZnSnSe4 solar cells. Nat. Energy 7, 754–764 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, S., Walsh, A., Gong, X.-G. & Wei, S.-H. Classification of lattice defects in the kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4 Earth-abundant solar cell absorbers. Adv. Mater. 25, 1522–1539 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, S., Márquez, J. A., Unold, T. & Walsh, A. Upper limit to the photovoltaic efficiency of imperfect crystals from first principles. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 1481–1491 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Larramona, G. et al. Fine-tuning the Sn content in CZTSSe thin films to achieve 10.8% solar cell efficiency from spray-deposited water–ethanol-based colloidal inks. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501404 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan, Z. et al. Engineering solar cell absorbers by exploring the band alignment and defect disparity: the case of Cu- and Ag-based kesterite compounds. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 6733–6743 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong, Y. et al. Ag incorporation with controlled grain growth enables 12.5% efficient kesterite solar cell with open circuit voltage reached 64.2% Shockley–Queisser limit. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2101927 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Du, Y. et al. Defect engineering in Earth-abundant Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 photovoltaic materials via Ga3+-doping for over 12% efficient solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2010325 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, W. et al. Device characteristics of CZTSSe thin-film solar cells with 12.6% efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1301465 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Son, D.-H. et al. Effect of solid-H2S gas reactions on CZTSSe thin film growth and photovoltaic properties of a 12.62% efficiency device. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 25279–25289 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, J. et al. Defect control for 12.5% efficiency Cu2ZnSnSe4 kesterite thin-film solar cells by engineering of local chemical environment. Adv. Mater. 32, 2005268 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Su, Z. et al. Device postannealing enabling over 12% efficient solution-processed Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells with Cd2+ substitution. Adv. Mater. 32, 2000121 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo, H. et al. Band-gap-graded Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 drives highly efficient solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 693–704 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, J. et al. Control of the phase evolution of kesterite by tuning of the selenium partial pressure for solar cells with 13.8% certified efficiency. Nat. Energy 8, 526–535 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bourdais, S. et al. Is the Cu/Zn disorder the main culprit for the voltage deficit in kesterite solar cells? Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502276 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Duan, B. et al. Underlying mechanism of the efficiency loss in CZTSSe solar cells: disorder and deep defects. Sci. China Mater. 63, 2371–2396 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. He, M. et al. Kesterite solar cells: insights into current strategies and challenges. Adv. Sci. 8, 2004313 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoo, H. et al. Investigation of the solid state reactions by time-resolved X-ray diffraction while crystallizing kesterite Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin films. Thin Solid Films 535, 73–77 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gunawan, O., Todorov, T. K. & Mitzi, D. B. Loss mechanisms in hydrazine-processed Cu2ZnSn(Se,S)4 solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 233506 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar, A. & Thakur, A. D. Comprehensive loss modeling in Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells. Curr. Appl. Phys. 19, 1111–1119 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu, X. et al. Efficient and composition-tolerant kesterite Cu2ZnSn(S, Se)4 solar cells derived from an in situ formed multifunctional carbon framework. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2102298 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou, J. et al. Regulating crystal growth via organic lithium salt additive for efficient kesterite solar cells. Nano Energy 89, 106405 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Levcenko, S. et al. Deep defects in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells with varying Se content. Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 024004 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, S., Park, J. S. & Walsh, A. Identification of killer defects in kesterite thin-film solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 496–500 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu, Y., Yang, J., Chen, S. & Gong, X. G. Defect-assisted nonradiative recombination in Cu2ZnSnSe4: a comparative study with Cu2ZnSnS4. Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 025403 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yin, X., Tang, C., Sun, L., Shen, Z. & Gong, H. Study on phase formation mechanism of non- and near-stoichiometric Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 film prepared by selenization of Cu−Sn−Zn−S precursors. Chem. Mater. 26, 2005–2014 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hages, C. J., Koeper, M. J., Miskin, C. K., Brew, K. W. & Agrawal, R. Controlled grain growth for high performance nanoparticle-based kesterite solar cells. Chem. Mater. 28, 7703–7714 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Giraldo, S. et al. How small amounts of Ge modify the formation pathways and crystallization of kesterites. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 582–593 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hsu, W. C., Bob, B., Yang, W., Chung, C. H. & Yang, Y. Reaction pathways for the formation of Cu2ZnSn(Se,S)4 absorber materials from liquid-phase hydrazine-based precursor inks. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8564–8571 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Goodenough, J. B. Electronic and ionic transport properties and other physical aspects of perovskites. Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 1915–1993 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheng, Y. Q. & Ma, E. Atomic-level structure and structure–property relationship in metallic glasses. Prog. Mater. Sci. 56, 379–473 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, M. & Meng, S. Atomly Modernize the Materials Science (Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020); https://atomly.net/#/matdata

  38. Liu, M. & Meng, S. Atomly.net materials database and its application in inorganic chemistry. Sci. Sin. Chim. 53, 19–25 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hasaneen, M. F., Ali, H. M., Abd El-Raheem, M. M. & Abdel Hakeem, A. M. Structure and optical properties of thermally evaporated Te doped ZnSe thin films. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 262, 114704 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Paier, J., Asahi, R., Nagoya, A. & Kresse, G. Cu2ZnSnS4 as a potential photovoltaic material: a hybrid Hartree-Fock density functional theory study. Phys. Rev. B 79, 115126 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yee, Y. S., Magyari-Köpe, B., Nishi, Y., Bent, S. F. & Clemens, B. M. Deep recombination centers in Cu2ZnSnSe4 revealed by screened-exchange hybrid density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 92, 195201 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Walter, T., Herberholz, R., Müller, C. & Schock, H. W. Determination of defect distributions from admittance measurements and application to Cu(In,Ga)Se2 based heterojunctions. J. Appl. Phys. 80, 4411–4420 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shi, J., Li, D., Luo, Y., Wu, H. & Meng, Q. Opto-electro-modulated transient photovoltage and photocurrent system for investigation of charge transport and recombination in solar cells. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 123107 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li, Y. et al. Exploiting electrical transients to quantify charge loss in solar cells. Joule 4, 472–489 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Luckert, F. et al. Optical properties of high quality Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 062104 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tennyson, E. M. et al. Nanoimaging of open-circuit voltage in photovoltaic devices. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501142 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kang, Z. et al. Kelvin probe force microscopy for perovskite solar cells. Sci. Chin. Mater. 62, 776–789 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Teymur, B. et al. Top stack optimization for Cu2BaSn(S, Se)4 photovoltaic cell leads to improved device power conversion efficiency beyond 6%. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2201602 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhu, H., Kalkan, A. K., Hou, J. Y. & Fonash, S. J. Applications of AMPS-1D for solar cell simulation. AIP Conf. Proc. 462, 309–314 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu, Y., Sun, Y. & Rockett, A. A new simulation software of solar cells—WxAMPS. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 98, 124–128 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Clark, S. J. et al. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Kristallogr. 220, 567–570 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Baroni, S., de Gironcoli, S., Corso, A. D. & Giannozzi, P. Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515–562 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, Y. et al. Cation disorder engineering yields AgBiS2 nanocrystals with enhanced optical absorption for efficient ultrathin solar cells. Nat. Photon. 16, 235–241 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhao, Y. et al. Regulating deposition kinetics via a novel additive-assisted chemical bath deposition technology enables fabrication of 10.57%-efficiency Sb2Se3 solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 5118–5128 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen, X. et al. Solvent-assisted hydrothermal deposition approach for highly-efficient Sb2(S,Se)3 thin-film solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300391 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yan, C. et al. Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells with over 10% power conversion efficiency enabled by heterojunction heat treatment. Nat. Energy 3, 764–772 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Excellent Science and Technology Innovation Group of Jiangsu Province in Nanjing University of Science and Technology for their help in the theoretical calculations and appreciate the valuable help from B. Yang and Z. Li at Hebei University in the deep level transient spectroscopy measurements. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (numbers 52222212 (J.S.), U2002216 (Q.M.), 52227803 (Q.M.), 51972332 (H.W.), 52172261 (Y.L.), 52103284 (F.M.)). J.S. sincerely appreciates the support from the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2022006).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Jiangjian Shi, Jinlin Wang, Fanqi Meng, Jiazheng Zhou.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Renewable Energy Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Jiangjian Shi, Jinlin Wang, Jiazheng Zhou, Xiao Xu, Kang Yin, Licheng Lou, Menghan Jiao, Bowen Zhang, Huijue Wu, Yanhong Luo, Dongmei Li & Qingbo Meng

  2. School of Physics Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Jinlin Wang, Jiazheng Zhou, Xiao Xu, Kang Yin, Licheng Lou, Menghan Jiao, Bowen Zhang, Yanhong Luo, Dongmei Li & Qingbo Meng

  3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Fanqi Meng

  4. Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan, People’s Republic of China

    Yanhong Luo, Dongmei Li & Qingbo Meng

  5. Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Qingbo Meng

Authors
  1. Jiangjian Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinlin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fanqi Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiazheng Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kang Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Licheng Lou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Menghan Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bowen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Huijue Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yanhong Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dongmei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Qingbo Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.S., J.W. and Q.M. conceived the idea. J.S. did the device simulation, data analysis, device characterization and theoretical calculations and proposed the kinetic mechanism. J.W. and J.Z. fabricated solar cells and did the material/device characterization. F.M. did the STEM characterization and data analysis. X.X., K.Y. and L.L. participated in the device fabrication, optimization and data collection. M.J. and B.Z. participated in the device fabrication. H.W., Y.L. and D.L. participated in the experiment design and discussions. J.S. and Q.M. participated in paper writing and revising. All authors were involved in the discussions and approved the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingbo Meng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Jonathan Staaf Scragg and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Note 1, Figs. 1–33 and Tables 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Dataset 1

Cif files for the DFT calculations.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Source data for device performance and temperature-dependent PL intensity.

Source Data Fig. 4

Unprocessed current–voltage and EQE data of the champion cell.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, J., Wang, J., Meng, F. et al. Multinary alloying for facilitated cation exchange and suppressed defect formation in kesterite solar cells with above 14% certified efficiency. Nat Energy 9, 1095–1104 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01551-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01551-5

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing