Abstract
The deep ocean, Earth’s untouched expanse, presents immense challenges for exploration due to its extreme pressure, temperature, and darkness. Unlike traditional marine robots that require specialized metallic vessels for protection, deep-sea species thrive without such cumbersome pressure-resistant designs. Their pressure-adaptive forms, unique propulsion methods, and advanced senses have inspired innovation in designing lightweight, compact soft machines. This perspective addresses challenges, recent strides, and design strategies for bioinspired deep-sea soft robots. Drawing from abyssal life, it explores the actuation, sensing, power, and pressure resilience of multifunctional deep-sea soft robots, offering game-changing solutions for profound exploration and operation in harsh conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The exploration of Earth’s oceans presents a highly significant endeavor, holding the potential to unravel oceanic mysteries1 and unveil concealed marine biodiversity2,3,4, energy resources5,6,7,8, and mineral reserves9,10. Despite recent advances in exploring the ocean’s shallow layers11,12,13, the profound depths of the deep sea present daunting challenges marked by extreme hydrostatic pressure, chilling temperatures, and perpetual darkness14,15,16. Defined as ocean regions between 1000 and 11,000 m in depth, the deep sea remains 95% uncharted. This vast unexplored domain has spurred the development of deep-sea robotic technology14,17,18,19,20,21,22, and empowering humanity to accelerate the discovery of these untrodden frontiers.
Deep-sea vehicles and mobile robots are pivotal for various oceanic missions23,24,25,26 but are often encased in ‘pressure-resistant’ designs that encompass metallic pressure enclosures26,27,28 and pressure-compensation systems. These protective measures safeguard the embedded electronics and mechatronic systems from the relentless pressures of the deep sea26 (Fig. 1a). However, these hard machines face limitations, including increased weight, risk of structural fatigue failure, and restricted adaptability when dealing with delicate deep-sea specimens29,30,31,32. The incident involving the Nereus HROV, a prominent deep-sea vehicle, exemplifies these challenges when its onboard pressure vessel imploded at a depth of 9900 m30. Consequently, researchers have turned to deep-sea organisms for inspiration, seeking innovative solutions to enhance the resilience and agility of deep-sea exploration technology.
In contrast, deep-sea creatures thrive in extreme depths33,34,35,36,37, displaying remarkable pressure resilience, mobility, and sensory acumen (Fig. 1b). Soft robots, inspired by these remarkable organisms, replicate muscle-like actuation and theoretically offer unlimited degrees of freedom38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45. Their fully soft-bodied structures, composed of pliable materials and highly deformable components, enable gentle interactions with fragile specimens45,46,47,48,49 and adaptability in unstructured environments50,51,52,53,54 (Fig. 1c). Additionally, the concept of morphological intelligence, observed in deep-sea creatures like octopuses, has influenced the design of soft robots endowed with mechanical intelligence. This approach simplifies control, streamlines algorithms, and reduces the reliance on complex control systems and computing hardware, which may be particularly valuable in harsh deep-sea conditions55,56,57. Innovations such as soft actuators inspired by muscular hydrostats, fluidic-driven soft actuators inspired by hydrostatic skeletons58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65, and dielectric elastomer-driven soft robots with decentralized electronics66,67 exemplify the pivotal role of bioinspiration in the development of soft machines for deep-sea exploration (Fig. 1d–j). This perspective explores the principles of designing deep-sea soft machines, from bioinspired insights to their applications in actuation, perception, and pressure resilience. It also highlights recent achievements in delicate manipulation and untethered locomotion, and outlines future directions in this field, including enhancing locomotor and sensing capabilities, and pursuing sustainable development for deep-sea soft machines.
Bioinspired deep-sea soft machines
The fields of ‘aquatic soft robotics’ and ‘deep-sea exploration’ have both seen rapid progress in recent decades. Thanks to the abundance of inspirations from deep-sea creatures, deep-sea soft robots are likely to demonstrate limitless potential for deep-sea tasks such as delicate manipulation and non-destructive exploration. However, incorporating advances from these two fields remains a daunting technical challenge, due in part to a lack of established design principles and the complexities of combining key techniques. Therefore, more collaborations among roboticists, biologists, material scientists, and engineers are needed to construct bioinspired soft robots capable of exploring the vast uncharted oceans. Approaches for actuation, sensing, and mechanical design must be redefined to address the challenges posed by these harsh conditions. In essence, comprehending the impact of depth on these tasks constitutes a fundamental question. Here, we refine the major existing questions and aim to provide solutions for designing deep-sea soft robots from a bioinspired viewpoint. We also outline representative applications in this area.
Designing principles for soft actuation in the deep ocean
Bioinspired deep-sea hydraulic soft actuation
Deep-sea invertebrates utilize hydrostatic skeletons and muscular hydrostats to support their soft bodies, achieve actuation, and enable locomotion under extreme pressures33,37,68. A hydrostatic skeleton typically consists of a fluid-filled cavity (coelom) surrounded by muscle layers, which act against the internal fluidic pressure to generate movement58,59. For example, sea anemones regulate their body shape by actively manipulating internal water, functioning like hydraulic pumps (Fig. 2a). By contrast, a muscular hydrostat is a structure composed of densely arranged muscles, providing skeletal support and generating the forces necessary for movement and deformation. Deep-sea octopuses, similar to an elephant’s trunk, execute dexterous manipulations with their entirely soft arms (Fig. 2a).
Largely inspired by the hydrostatic skeletons of deep-sea invertebrates, hydraulic soft actuators have been developed. These actuators consist of a flexible chamber filled with water that acts as both pressure compensation and actuation fluids61. Due to the pressure balance between its internal chamber and the surrounding open water, this type of soft actuator is inherently suitable for operation under high hydrostatic pressure conditions. When the internal fluid (water) is pumped into or out of the the mechanically programmed chamber, multi-degree-of-freedom (multi-DOF) motions including extending, bending, and wrestling can be executed47,60.
Additionally, a universal jamming gripper serves as another option for deep-sea soft manipulation. This gripper consists of a flexible balloon filled with granular particles and fluid. When the internal fluid is pumped out, the grains (granular particles) jam together, causing deformation in the balloon generating grasping force63 (Fig. 2b). This strategy enables several soft manipulators to delicately envelope and manipulate fragile deep-sea specimens60,61,62,63,64 (Fig. 2b). However, these soft actuators still require hydraulic pumps and pressure-regulating components. The bulky mechatronic components typically used for these functions pose significant challenges in the design and system integration of untethered deep-sea soft robots based on hydraulics.
Muscle-like deep-sea soft actuation
Deep-sea vertebrates swim by exerting force against the surrounding water. The periodic contraction and relaxation of the muscles, attached to their supporting skeletons, generate forward thrust and control the swim direction66 (Fig. 2c). Artificial muscles such as dielectric elastomer actuators (DEAs) have the potential to provide a similar function in soft actuation69. When a voltage is applied on a DE membrane, the induced electrostatic force deforms the membrane, causing a decrease in its thickness and an increase in its area67,70 (Fig. 2d). In contrast to the aforementioned hydraulic soft actuators, DEAs are easily untethered powered and controlled, and have been widely used in aquatic soft robots51,66. DEAs stand out among stimuli-responsive actuators due to their large actuation, rapid response, and low power consumption. These features make them particularly suitable for deep-sea soft machines, especially when compared to thermally responsive actuators for periodic soft actuation task. However, it should be noted that a decrease in this voltage-induced strain has been observed under harsh deep-sea conditions66. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and in-situ tensile tests have confirmed that this decrease is due to the increased hardness of the soft material under low temperatures and high pressures. To address this drawback, an optimized DEA material with a lower glass-transition temperature (Tg) has been employed to enhance its voltage-induced actuation in the deep sea71.
Thermal based phase-transition material for deep-sea actuation
Without the need of internal air bladder, sperm whales can attain neutral buoyancy at various depths by controlling the temperature and phase transition (liquid-solid) of their spermaceti organ72 (Fig. 2e). This serves as a potential solution for compact buoyancy regulation for deep-sea soft robots. By integrating distributed ethanol micro-bubbles into silicone materials, a phase-change soft actuator achieves a strain up to 900%73 (Fig. 2f). However, the high pressure in the deep sea remains a significant obstacle for achieving the phase change from liquid to gas74. In this regard, a wax-filled chamber integrated with heating circuits can achieve a volume change of 10–15%, coupled with the phase-change from solid to liquid, even at pressures up to 200 MPa75. This actuator has also been used to adjust buoyancy at the depth of 3223 m. Future efforts may focus on engineering soft materials capable of phase transition with better energy efficiency and faster response speeds.
Designing principles for soft machine pressure resilience in the deep ocean
Deep-sea creatures have evolved special adaptations that allow them to survive the extreme pressure. For those without rigid bones (e.g., sea anemones), a fully soft-bodied structure, completely filled with internal fluid, enables both inherent pressure resilience and actuation33. This insight could be valuable for designing a fully soft hydraulically-driven deep-sea robot. In a recent surprising discovery, hadal snailfish was found to inhabit ocean depths below 8000 m35,76. Unlike the bulky and fully enclosed skulls of three-spine stickleback fish that inhabit shallow waters77, the skulls of hadal snailfish are partially enclosed and appear as smaller pieces scattered throughout soft tissue, which helps to mitigate the shear stress induced by extreme hydrostatic pressure (Fig. 3a). Finite element analysis (FEA) reveals significant differences in shear stress distribution between shallow-water stickleback fish77 and the hadal snailfish35. Under the same hydrostatic pressure (i.e., 110 MPa), the maximum shear stress on the snailfish’s skulls to be approximately 7 MPa, or less than half of the shear stress that is acting on the stickleback fish (approximately 18 MPa) (Fig. 3b, c).
The morphology of the hadal snailfish (e.g., a low-modulus skeleton, distributed skulls) has served as inspiration for the ‘pressure-resilient’ design of a deep-sea soft robot capable of surviving intense hydrostatic pressure66. In this design, the onboard electronics are wire-connected or separately distributed onto small PCBs, which are then encapsulated within a soft matrix in a decentralized manner (Fig. 3d, e). FEA results shows that the shear stress between the decentralized electronics is effectively mitigated under a hydrostatic pressure of 110 MPa, compared to the centralized design where the electronic were densely packed. Furthermore, a series of experiments are conducted to validate pressure resilience of decentralized electronics embedded in a soft matrix66.
This ‘decentralized’ design approach for mitigating the shear stress distribution of encapsulated electronics has been refined as the strategy of detaching, distancing, and eliminating voids. Specifically, ‘detaching’ means eliminating ‘hard-hard’ interfaces by removing the direct contacts among the rigid components with distinct mechanical contrast. ‘Distancing’ refers to increasing the spaces between neighboring electronics on PCBs. To ensure proper functionality under extreme pressures, the use of electronics without internal voids is a must, for instance, ceramic capacitor is an ideal alternative to electrolytic ones. Future directions may involve flexible electronics and soft circuits (e.g., liquid metal), which also offer promising solutions for integrated power, control, and sensing of fully soft-bodied intelligent machines, owing to their inherent pressure resilience in the deep sea78,79.
Designing principles for soft machine sensing in the deep ocean
Tactile sensing
Deep-sea creatures have impressively evolved with a variety of sensory modalities to intensify situational awareness for dealing with the complicated situations in the deep sea. To deal with the total darkness, some deep-sea fish (e.g., lizardfish, tripod fish), have developed long appendages, abundant spines, and other unique organs to enhance their tactile sensitivity80 (Fig. 4a). Sea robins walk on the ocean floor and use whiskers consisting of bony plates along their bodies and branched barbels to navigate their terrain81. Besides, fish can detect the presence of object in the surrounding water through the lateral line system of mechanosensors, facilitated by hydrodynamics wakes created by the object. Although there is no physical touching between the fish and object in this situation, it is still commonly considered a form of touch transmitted through the surrounding water.
Taking inspiration from above deep-sea creatures, tactile-based sensing modality is an option for monitoring deep-sea manipulation in light-limited conditions. Embedded in a deep-sea gripper, tactile sensors are potential to provide feedback to contribute a non-destructive interaction during the collection of fragile specimens. As a typical electrical-based tactile sensor, resistive skins rely on the resistance changes of conductive liquid filled channel, which are less susceptible to electric noise, in comparison to capacitive modality. However, their suitability for deep-sea applications remains questionable due to potential issues such as thermal drift and freezing of internal liquid conductive materials. An optical waveguide-based tactile sensor is attached to a rigid gripper for object recognition and localization in a pressure chamber under 600 bars (or 592 atm)82 (Fig. 4b). This light modulation sensor was also integrated with soft robotic fingers to enable soft manipulation with touch sensing, showing a performance that is less susceptible to hydrostatic pressure64. Besides, a whisker-inspired piezoresistive sensor was designed for ultrasensitive underwater flow sensing and wake tracking83. These tactile sensing strategies have the potential to enable soft robots to perform intelligent tasks with feedback in the deep sea.
Contactless sensing
Certain deep-sea creatures (e.g., Benthobatis moresbyi) have evolved with special organs to emit weak electric field and electroreceptor arrays to detect their surrounding objects (Fig. 4c). By comparing the intensity of electric fields sensed by each electroreceptor, these creatures can achieve contactless perception and localization, a capability known as electrolocation84. With the same mechanism, a soft artificial electroreceptor consisting of an ionic conductive hydrogel-filled canal has been developed to detect the changes of electric field85. Similarly, the change in induced-voltage of the artificial receptors is correlated to the distance between the approaching object and the sensor. The integration of transmitter which emit electric field lines, and flexible electroreceptor array, will enable soft manipulator to locate and autonomously grasp objects85 (Fig. 4d). This technology can also enable soft swimmers to navigate and avoid obstacles in the deep sea.
In contrast, cetaceans use echolocation to pinpoint the location of objects at greater distances by emitting sound and detecting the reflected acoustic waves86 (Fig. 4e). Inspired by this concept, a bioinspired flexible acoustic transceiver, composed of piezoelectric electrodes attached to a flexible substrate, has been developed to achieve distance communication and echolocation. When functioning as a transmitter, the device transforms electric signal into a modulated acoustic wave. Simultaneously, as a receiver, it detects incoming acoustic waves and generates net charges on the electrodes, which can be converted into measurable electrical signals52,87 (Fig. 4f). The integration of this type of compact and flexible acoustic sensor can potentially enable soft robots to perform remote communication, sensing, and echolocation in harsh deep-sea conditions. To enhance the sensing distance and resolution ratio, future directions involve advancing materials with high piezoelectric coefficient and optimizing the distribution of the electrodes.
Applications
Deep-sea soft manipulation
As a long-term hotspot of hadal exploration, deep-sea manipulation continually contributes to the work of biologists, geologists, and archeologist. Galloway et al. have made a significant breakthrough in ‘non-destructive deep-sea soft manipulation’, in which they present a soft gripper featuring ultra-gentle interaction when sampling delicate biological spices. Carried and powered by a ROV, this hydraulic soft gripper operates reliably at depths greater than 800 m and was able to collect soft coral at a depth of 100 m61. Vogt et al. have utilized 3D-printed soft hydraulic grippers to collect delicate deep-sea organisms at a depth of 2224 m. Real-time control from the ROV pilot enables delicate wrapping and manipulation of fragile deep-sea organisms62. Additionally, Stephen et al. have developed a universal jamming gripper by filling an enclosed elastic membrane with a mixture of water and glass beads. This design strategy is validated through a series of experiments in a hydrostatic pressure testing chamber and field tests in the deep sea (depth ≥ 1200 m)63.
In addition to grippers, soft robotic arms have been developed for deep-sea exploration. Phillips et al. have presented a multi-DOF soft manipulator that integrates bending, rotary, and grasping units, achieving dexterous movements and a delicate grasping motion. The deep-sea soft manipulator is actuated using the surrounding water and remotely controlled via a flexible, wearable sensor integrated into a compact glove. The feasibility of operation is validated under a hydrostatic pressure of 23 MPa, equivalent to a depth of 2300 m, as well as field-tested to demonstrate deep-sea sampling capabilities60. Also, soft robotic arms can be combined with locomotion for seabed operations. Modeling the locomotion strategies of benthic animals like octopuses, legged robots equipped with continuum arms have been developed to perform walking and manipulation on the largely unexplored seabed88,89. These achievements offer promising and effective solutions for delicate interaction with deep-sea specimens.
Deep-sea swimmers
Inspired by the unique body features of deep-sea snailfish, Li et al. have designed an untethered, DE-driven soft robotic fish that can operate at the seabed of the Mariana Trench. Without the need for any bulky metallic vessels, this soft robot can withstand an extreme pressure of 110 MPa. The swimming performance and pressure adaptability of this robot are rigorously validated through systematic experiments conducted in a pressure testing chamber. Notably, this soft robot exhibits free-swimming capabilities at a depth exceeding 3000 m. It is also field-tested and actuated reliably at a depth around 10,900 m in the deep sea66. This research paves the way for a new generation of deep-sea mobile explorers, highlighting the promising direction of bioinspired soft machines that can be used in extreme conditions.
Challenges and outlooks
Early attempts in deep-sea exploration have showcased the impressive capabilities of soft robots, including delicate manipulation, untethered locomotion, and perceptions. The existing question lies in synergistically integrating those discussed powerful actuation, advanced sensing, self-energy regeneration, as well as envisioning practical applications for these bioinspired machines in real deep-sea exploration scenarios. More breakthroughs can be expected from the improved locomotor, sensing capabilities, embodied power regeneration, and sustainability for deep-sea soft machines. By addressing these challenges, researchers can unlock new possibilities and enhance the effectiveness of soft robots for deep-sea exploration.
Actuation
Due to their low output power, weak locomotor capabilities, and poor perception abilities, it is challenging for soft robots to effectively navigate and adapt to the unpredictable deep-sea environment. For instance, soft robotic fish often struggle to resist disturbances and move at slower speed compared to conventional deep-sea robots67. To address this issue, a primary effort is to develop soft active materials that offer deep-sea actuation featuring fast response, large deformation, high output force, and ease of untethered power. Electroactive actuators may stand as a better options to deliver these attributes compared to thermal responsive actuators.
Nevertheless, soft electroactive materials face a common challenge of increased elastic modulus at low temperature and high pressure, which hampers their actuation performance. As a potential solution, soft electrostatic hydraulics drive local redistribution of the internal liquid dielectric, enabling deformation of the soft structure without the need of an external pump90,91,92. One future direction is to develop liquid dielectric materials with a lower viscosity and increased dielectric constant, thereby offering large, quick, and low-energy actuation for self-contained deep-sea soft machines.
Sensing
From system design standpoint, the integration of sensing and actuation will enable deep-sea soft robots to better understand and react to their environment. For deep-sea sensing, the grand challenges lie in maintaining its precision, sensitivity, and accuracy, due to the change of material properties (e.g., elastic modulus, viscoelasticity) under low temperature and high pressure. For the ones that rely on deformations of a conductive material or liquid, the increase in pressure shifts the resting baseline of the sensor and alters the dynamic range64,93. Additionally, low temperatures cause bulk sensor materials to stiffen and the conductivity of conductors to change. Fundamentally, one approach is to use analytical models to calibrate and adjust the perception signals to account for the dynamic range. This calibration process can help maintain the accuracy and sensitivity of the sensors despite variations in material properties. Otherwise, integrating multiple sensor modalities (e.g., contactless modality, tactile) can increase the density and diversity of sensing capabilities, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the surrounding water. Ultimately, the integration of sensor skins into deep-sea soft robots offers the potential of real-time feedback in teleoperation, allowing operators to perceive the underwater environment through virtual reality and make informed decisions94. Furthermore, sensor skins enable high-level autonomous behaviors and task planning in the deep sea, facilitating the robot’s ability to adapt and perform complex tasks.
Embodied energy regeneration
The embodied energy storage that is mainly based on rechargeable battery, remains a major limitation for deep-sea robots in terms of long endurance to perform extensive operations. Previous attempts have been made to design energy-dense aquatic soft robots to ensure their long operation, by integrating flow shell battery into soft materials and structures instead of using separate battery packs53,95. Nevertheless, there is still a trade-off to be considered in the range of total mission time, size, weight, and mobility of the overall system. It is noteworthy that one species of white skate has been recently reported to brilliantly utilize hydrothermal heat for egg-case incubation, inspiring embodied energy harvesting/regeneration for deep-sea soft machines23. Driven by seafloor volcanism, hydrothermal vents are among the most spectacular features on the seabed and contain enormous thermal energy, which holds promising potential for exploitation6,7,8. In the future, untethered soft robots integrated with thermal electric skins-an energy harvesting system, may thrive near hydrothermal vents to derive energy, thus, unleashing the possibility of long-term and self-contained mission96. Future directions can focus on improving the flexibility and thermoelectric properties in the deep sea.
Manufacturing and sustainability
For real-world applications, flexible circuits and electronics can be integrated into deep-sea soft robotic systems for power, sensing, and on-board processing97 (Fig. 5a). To achieve this, hierarchical and precise technologies for fabricating multi-material and multifunctional soft structures with pressure resilience should be advanced. At this point, soft robot fabrication should be considered in respect to diverse sustainability niches. It can begin with the selection of raw materials that are derived from natural resources or recycled materials, followed by establishing soft robot fabrication process with lower carbon footprint. At the end of their life cycle, the ideal building materials should either have self-healing properties to prolong lifespan or be capable of biodegrading into non-toxic constituents, ensuring no harm to the ecology and environment98. Developing deep-sea soft robot using self-healable materials faces challenges due to harsh conditions including extreme hydrostatic pressure, low temperatures, and corrosive seawater99. These factors can profoundly impact the performance and stability of self-healing materials. Therefore, it is crucial to develop materials that can withstand these conditions without compromising their healing capabilities. In the future, soft sustainable machines with integrated flexible onboard systems and artificial intelligence algorithms will offer more effective solutions for deep-sea tasks (Fig. 5a).
Future envisions
Despite the existing open questions in this area, we believe that bioinspired soft robot is a promising technology to initiate a completely different set of deep-sea missions in the future. Developments in actuation, sensing, energy, and manufacturing technologies will push the boundaries of soft machines for the deep ocean exploration, as well as other tasks in various harsh conditions. In the next decades, well-designed soft robots will safely navigate biotic community and coral reefs, as well as contribute to constructing seamless interaction between humanity and deep-sea creatures (Fig. 5b). Also, soft robots make it possible for researchers to perform in situ investigation of the deep-sea habitats, thus helping scientists to preserve the natural ecosystem and uncover more secrets in this endless frontier. We hope the design strategies, directions, and future opportunities discussed in this perspective will provide effective guidelines for deep-sea soft robotics and boost more breakthroughs in this field.
References
Rhein, M. Taking a close look at ocean circulation. Science 363, 456–457 (2019).
Grassle, J. F. Deep-sea benthic biodivers. Biosci 41, 464–469 (1991).
Kunzig, R. Deep-sea biology: living with the endless frontier. Science 302, 991 (2003).
Brandt, A. et al. First insights into the biodiversity and biogeography of the Southern Ocean deep sea. Nature 447, 307–311 (2007).
Stetter, K. O. et al. Hyperthermophilic archaea are thriving in deep North Sea and Alaskan oil reservoirs. Nature 365, 743–745 (1993).
Xie, Y., Wu, S. & Yang, C. Generation of electricity from deep-sea hydrothermal vents with a thermoelectric converter. Appl. Energ. 164, 620–627 (2016).
Yamamoto, M., Nakamura, R. & Takai, K. Deep-sea hydrothermal fields as natural power plants. ChemElectroChem 5, 2162–2166 (2018).
Gai, X., Wu, S. & Yang, C. Hydrothermal fluid ejector for enhanced heat transfer of a thermoelectric power generator on the seafloor. Sustain. Energ. Fuels. 5, 4377–4388 (2021).
Takaya, Y. et al. The tremendous potential of deep-sea mud as a source of rare-earth elements. Sci. Rep. 8, 5763 (2018).
Hein, J. R., Koschinsky, A. & Kuhn, T. Deep-ocean polymetallic nodules as a resource for critical materials. Nat. Rev. Earth. Env. 1, 158–169 (2020).
Sujit, P. B., Sousa, J. & Pereira, F. L. UAV and AUVs coordination for ocean exploration. In Europe Oceans IEEE, (IEEE, 2009) pp 1–7.
Wynn, R. B. et al. Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs): their past, present and future contributions to the advancement of marine geoscience. Mar. Geol. 352, 451–468 (2014).
Chen, G., et al. Modeling of swimming posture dynamics for a beaver-like robot. Ocean Eng. 279, 114550 (2023).
Kunz, C., et al., Deep sea underwater robotic exploration in the ice-covered arctic ocean with AUVs. In 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IEEE, 2008) pp 22–26.
Brown, A., Thatje, S. & Hauton, C. The effects of temperature and hydrostatic pressure on metal toxicity: Insights into toxicity in the deep sea. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 51, 10222–10231 (2017).
Danovaro, R. et al. The deep-sea under global change. Curr. Biol. 27, R461–R465 (2017).
Clarke, T. Robots in the deep. Nature 421, 468–470 (2003).
Roman, C. Singh, H., Consistency based error evaluation for deep sea bathymetric mapping with robotic vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (IEEE, 2006), pp 3568–3574.
Yoerger, D. R. et al. Techniques for deep sea near bottom survey using an autonomous underwater vehicle. Int. J. Robot. Res. 26, 41–54 (2007).
Fromm, T., et al., Efficient continuous system integration and validation for deep-sea robotics applications. In Oceans Conference, (IEEE, 2017).
Masmitja, I. et al. Mobile robotic platforms for the acoustic tracking of deep-sea demersal fishery resources. Sci. Robot. 5, eabc3701 (2020).
Neettiyath, U. et al. Deep-sea robotic survey and data processing methods for regional-scale estimation of manganese crust distribution. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 46, 102–114 (2021).
Salinas-de-Leon, P. et al. Deep-sea hydrothermal vents as natural egg-case incubators at the Galapagos Rift. Sci. Rep. 8, 1788 (2018).
Vecchione, M. Rov observations on reproduction by deep-sea cephalopods in the central pacific ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 403 (2019).
Smith, K. L. Jr. et al. Abyssal Benthic Rover, an autonomous vehicle for long-term monitoring of deep-ocean processes. Sci. Robot. 6, eabl4925 (2021).
Yoerger, D. R. et al. A hybrid underwater robot for multidisciplinary investigation of the ocean twilight zone. Sci. Robot. 6, eabe1901 (2021).
Stachiw, D. J. D., et al., Ceramic external pressure housings for deep sea vehicles. In Oceans Conference (IEEE, 2006).
Błachut, J. & Smith, P. Buckling of multi-segment underwater pressure hull. Ocean Eng. 35, 247–260 (2008).
Strutt, J. E. Report of the inquiry into the loss of Autosub2 under the fimbulisen (National Oceanography Centre Southampton, 2006).
Lippsett, L., R.I.P. A.B.E.: The pioneering autonomous benthic explorer is lost at sea (Oceanus Magazine, 2010), pp 42–43.
Showstack, R. Unmanned research vessel lost on deep sea dive. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. 95, 168 (2014).
Wang, B. et al. Survivability design for a hybrid underwater vehicle. AIP Conf. Proc. 1648, 650007 (2015).
Kawabata, T. et al. Evaluation of the bioactivities of water-soluble extracts from twelve deep-sea jellyfish species. Fish. Sci. 79, 487–494 (2013).
Yancey, P. H. et al. Marine fish may be biochemically constrained from inhabiting the deepest ocean depths. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4461–4465 (2014).
Wang, K. et al. Morphology and genome of a snailfish from the Mariana Trench provide insights into deep-sea adaptation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 823–833 (2019). Learning from deep-sea creatures, such as Pseudoliparis swirei, provides insights into their adaptation to extreme pressure, as demonstrated by their unique morphology and genome.
Burford, B. P. & Robison, B. H. Bioluminescent backlighting illuminates the complex visual signals of a social squid in the deep sea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 8524–8531 (2020).
Jamieson, A. J., Vecchione, M. First in situ observation of Cephalopoda at hadal depths (Octopoda: Opisthoteuthidae: Grimpoteuthis sp.). Mar. Biol. 167, 82 (2020).
Shepherd, R. F. et al. Multigait soft robot. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20400–20403 (2011).
Rus, D. & Tolley, M. T. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521, 467–475 (2015).
Wehner, M. et al. An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536, 451–455 (2016).
Rich, S. I., Wood, R. J. & Majidi, C. Untethered soft robotics. Nat. Electron. 1, 102–112 (2018).
Cacucciolo, V. et al. Stretchable pumps for soft machines. Nature 572, 516–519 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. A comprehensive review on fish-inspired robots. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 19, 3 (2022).
Liu, S. et al. A fluid-driven soft robotic fish inspired by fish muscle architecture. Bioinspir. Biomim. 17, 026009 (2022).
Laschi, C. et al. Soft robot arm inspired by the octopus. Adv. Robot. 26, 709–727 (2012).
Yuk, H. et al. Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water. Nat. Commun. 8, 14230 (2017).
Kurumaya, S. et al. A modular soft robotic wrist for underwater manipulation. Soft Robot 5, 399–409 (2018).
Gu, H. et al. Magnetic cilia carpets with programmable metachronal waves. Nat. Commun. 11, 2637 (2020).
Xie, Z. et al. Octopus arm-inspired tapered soft actuators with suckers for improved grasping. Soft Robot 7, 639–648 (2020).
Hawkes, E. W. et al. A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Sci. Robot. 2, eaan3028 (2017).
Li, T. et al. Fast-moving soft electronic fish. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602045 (2017).
Katzschmann, R. K. et al. Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish. Sci. Robot. 3, eaar3449 (2018).
Aubin, C. A. et al. Electrolytic vascular systems for energy-dense robots. Nature 571, 51–57 (2019).
Drotman, D. et al. Electronics-free pneumatic circuits for controlling soft-legged robots. Sci. Robot. 6, eaay2627 (2021).
Laschi, C. & Mazzolai, B. Lessons from animals and plants: the symbiosis of morphological computation and soft robotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 23, 107–114 (2016).
George Thuruthel, T. et al. Control strategies for soft robotic manipulators: a survey. Soft Robot 5, 149–163 (2018).
Wang, J. & Chortos, A. Control strategies for soft robot systems. Adv. Intell. Syst 4, 2100165 (2022).
Quillin, K. J. Kinematic scaling of locomotion by hydrostatic animals: ontogeny of peristaltic crawling by the earthworm lumbricus terrestris. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 661–674 (1999).
Kier, W. M. The diversity of hydrostatic skeletons. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 1247–1257 (2012).
Phillips, B. T. et al. A dexterous, glove-based teleoperable low-power soft robotic arm for delicate deep-sea biological exploration. Sci. Rep. 8, 14779 (2018).
Galloway, K. C. et al. Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robot 3, 23–33 (2016). This article introduces a hydraulic soft gripper, utilizing soft robotics technology to delicately manipulate and sample fragile species on the deep reef, demonstrating its pressure adaptation and successful operation under 800m, marking a significant milestone in nondestructive sampling of benthic fauna in the deep sea.
Vogt, D. M. et al. Shipboard design and fabrication of custom 3D-printed soft robotic manipulators for the investigation of delicate deep-sea organisms. PLoS One 13, e0200386 (2018).
Licht, S. et al. Stronger at depth: Jamming grippers as deep sea sampling tools. Soft Robot 4, 305–316 (2017).
Teeple, C. B., Becker, K. P. Wood, R. J., Soft curvature and contact force sensors for deep-sea grasping via soft optical waveguides. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (IEEE, 2018). This work presents the first deep-sea actuator equipped with a contact force sensor, utilizing soft, intentionally-lossy optical waveguides to enable proprioception and contact force sensing in a soft robotic hand for grasping applications in the deep-sea
Gruber, D. F. & Wood, R. J. Advances and future outlooks in soft robotics for minimally invasive marine biology. Sci. Robot. 7, eabm6807 (2022).
Li, G. et al. Self-powered soft robot in the Mariana Trench. Nature 591, 66–71 (2021). Inspired by a deep-sea snailfish, this work reports on a self-powered soft robot capable of withstanding the extreme pressure at Earth’s deepest point.
Laschi, C. & Calisti, M. Soft robot reaches the deepest part of the ocean. Nature 591, 35–36 (2021).
Hoving, H. J. et al. First in situ observations of the deep-sea squid Grimalditeuthis bonplandi reveal unique use of tentacles. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20131463 (2013).
Madden, J. D. et al. Artificial muscle technology: physical principles and naval prospects. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 29, 706–728 (2004).
Carpi, F., Bauer, S. & De Rossi, D. Materials science. Stretching dielectric elastomer performance. Science 330, 1759–1761 (2010).
Yang, C., Gao, X., Luo, Y. End-block-curing ABA triblock copolymer towards dielectric elastomers with both high electro-mechanical performance and excellent mechanical properties. Chem. Eng. J. 382, 123037 (2020).
Clarke, M. R. Buoyancy control as a function of the spermaceti organ in the sperm whale. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 58, 27–71 (1978).
Miriyev, A., Stack, K. & Lipson, H. Soft material for soft actuators. Nat. Commun. 8, 596 (2017).
Zhang, A. et al. A unified theory for bubble dynamics. Phys. Fluids 35, 033323 (2023).
Hou, J., et al. Development and experiments of an electrothermal driven deep-sea buoyancy control module. Micromachines 11, 1017 (2020).
Gerringer, M. E. et al. Habitat influences skeletal morphology and density in the snailfishes (family Liparidae). Front. Zool. 18, 16 (2021).
Wiig, E. et al. Variation in lateral plate quality in threespine stickleback from fresh, brackish and marine water: a micro-computed tomography study. PLoS One 11, e0164578 (2016).
Markvicka, E. J. et al. An autonomously electrically self-healing liquid metal-elastomer composite for robust soft-matter robotics and electronics. Nat. Mater. 17, 618–624 (2018).
Ye, J. et al. Lm-jelly: liquid metal enabled biomimetic robotic jellyfish. Soft Robot 9, 1098–1107 (2022).
Jones, A. T. & Sulak, K. J. First central pacific plate and hawaiian record of the deep-sea tripod fish bathypterois grallator (Pisces: Chlorophthalmidae). Pac. Sci. 44, 254–257 (1990).
Bardach, J. E. & Case, J. Sensory capabilities of the modified fins of squirrel hake (Urophycis chuss) and searobins (Prionotus Carolinus and P. Evolans). Copeia 2, 194–206 (1965).
Aggarwal, A. et al. Haptic object recognition in underwater and deep-sea environments. J. Field Robot. 32, 167–185 (2015).
Zheng, X. et al. 3D printed graphene piezoresistive microelectromechanical system sensors to explain the ultrasensitive wake tracking of wavy seal whiskers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2207274 (2022).
Dimble, K. D., Faddy, J. M. & Humbert, J. S. Electrolocation-based underwater obstacle avoidance using wide-field integration methods. Bioinspir. Biomim. 9, 016012 (2014).
Song, W. J. et al. Soft artificial electroreceptors for noncontact spatial perception. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg9203 (2021). The technology is potentially applicable for underwater or deep-sea non-contact spatial perception, drawing inspiration from the electroreceptor system of elasmobranch fishes.
Soto, N. A. et al. Cheetahs of the deep sea: deep foraging sprints in short-finned pilot whales off Tenerife (Canary Islands). J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 936–947 (2008).
Zhang, Q. et al. Multifunctional and wearable patches based on flexible piezoelectric acoustics for integrated sensing, localization, and underwater communication. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 202209667 (2023).
Liu, J. et al. Underwater mobile manipulation: a soft arm on a benthic legged robot. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 27, 12–26 (2020).
Picardi, G. et al. Bioinspired underwater legged robot for seabed exploration with low environmental disturbance. Sci. Robot. 5, aaz1012 (2020).
Acome, E. et al. Hydraulically amplified self-healing electrostatic actuators with muscle-like performance. Science 359, 61–65 (2018). This study describes the first electrohydraulic soft actuator, known as hydraulically amplified self-healing electrostatic (HASEL) actuators, which exhibit robust and muscle-like performance and hold potential for deep-sea applications in next-generation soft robotic devices.
Rumley, E. H. et al. Biodegradable electrohydraulic actuators for sustainable soft robots. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf5551 (2023). In the pursuit of sustainability and adaptability, this study presents the potential application of fully biodegradable, high-performance electrohydraulic soft actuators, offering insights into environmentally friendly developments in soft robotics, including deep-sea applications.
Wang, T. et al. A versatile jellyfish-like robotic platform for effective underwater propulsion and manipulation. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg0292 (2023).
Godaba, H., et al., A bending sensor insensitive to pressure: soft proprioception based on abraded optical fibres. In 2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics, (IEEE, 2020).
Yu, X. et al. Skin-integrated wireless haptic interfaces for virtual and augmented reality. Nature 575, 473–479 (2019).
Aubin, C. A. et al. Towards enduring autonomous robots via embodied energy. Nature 602, 393–402 (2022).
Kim, S. J. et al. High-performance flexible thermoelectric power generator using laser multiscanning lift-off process. ACS Nano 10, 10851–10857 (2016). This paper introduces an innovative high-performance flexible thermoelectric power generator, with unique potential for embeded energy regeneration in deep-sea soft robots.
Fan, J. A. et al. Fractal design concepts for stretchable electronics. Nat. Commun. 5, 3266 (2014).
Tan, Y. J. et al. Progress and roadmap for intelligent self-healing materials in autonomous robotics. Adv. Mater. 33, e2002800 (2021).
Cho, S. H. et al. Polydimethylsiloxane-based self-healing materials. Adv. Mater. 18, 997–1000 (2006).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Stable Supporting Fund of Science and Technology on Underwater Vehicle Technology (JCKYS2022SXJQR-03), National Natural Science Foundation of China (12102398, 92048302, 52088102, 11822207, 51925904, and 91748209), and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (R18A020004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.L., T.L., A.Z., L.W., C.L., M.T. initiated the paper and developed its outline. G.L., T-W.W., B.S., C.G., L.W., J.L., T.W., X.L., J.Y., B.W., F.Y., Y.C., Y.L., Y.X., C.W., S.H., wrote the first draft. G.L., T-W.W., T.W., X.L. contributed substantially by revising the manuscript. T.L, A.Z., L.W., C.L., M.T. provided additional guidance at various stages of revision. All authors approved the submission.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Robert Katzschmann and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, G., Wong, TW., Shih, B. et al. Bioinspired soft robots for deep-sea exploration. Nat Commun 14, 7097 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42882-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42882-3
This article is cited by
-
Steering characteristics and path following control of a bionic underwater vehicle with multiple locomotion modes
Nonlinear Dynamics (2025)
-
Bioinspired electronics for intelligent soft robots
Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering (2024)
-
Large-Deformation Electrothermal Actuation Inchworm-Like Crawling Robot Based on Bistable Structures for Load Carrying
Applied Composite Materials (2024)
-
Thermodynamically induced crystal restructuring to make CsPbCl3 single crystal films for weak light detection
Nano Research (2024)