Article
Open access
Published: 14 December 2022

Ba⁺² ion trapping using organic submonolayer for ultra-low background neutrinoless double beta detector

Nature Communications volume 13, Article number: 7741 (2022) Cite this article

2640 Accesses
4 Citations
68 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

If neutrinos are their own antiparticles the otherwise-forbidden nuclear reaction known as neutrinoless double beta decay can occur. The very long lifetime expected for these exceptional events makes its detection a daunting task. In order to conduct an almost background-free experiment, the NEXT collaboration is investigating novel synthetic molecular sensors that may capture the Ba dication produced in the decay of certain Xe isotopes in a high-pressure gas experiment. The use of such molecular detectors immobilized on surfaces must be explored in the ultra-dry environment of a xenon gas chamber. Here, using a combination of highly sensitive surface science techniques in ultra-high vacuum, we demonstrate the possibility of employing the so-called Fluorescent Bicolor Indicator as the molecular component of the sensor. We unravel the ion capture process for these molecular indicators immobilized on a surface and explain the origin of the emission fluorescence shift associated to the ion trapping.

Fluorescent bicolour sensor for low-background neutrinoless double β decay experiments

Article 22 June 2020

Hybrid halide perovskite neutron detectors

Article Open access 30 August 2021

Magneto-optical trapping and sub-Doppler cooling of a polyatomic molecule

Article 01 June 2022

Introduction

The rare neutrinoless double beta (β β0ν) decay, (Z, A) → (Z + 2, A) + 2e⁻, can occur if and only if neutrinos are Majorana particles¹, i.e., identical to their antiparticles. An unambiguous observation of such a decay would have deep implications in particle physics and cosmology^2,3,4,5,6. The conventional double beta decay (β β2ν), in which two neutrinos are emitted in addition to the electrons, occurs in a handful of isotopes, some of which also offer the necessary features (a reasonable isotopic abundance, a decay energy sufficiently high, etc.) to be used as sources/targets in experiments seeking to observe the β β0ν decay. Examples of such isotopes which have been used for large-scale searches are ⁷⁶Ge, ¹³⁰Te, and ¹³⁶Xe. All attempts to detect a signal so far have not succeeded, and experimental bounds in excess of 10²⁶ years have been set for the most sensitive searches based on ¹³⁶Xe and ⁷⁶Ge^7,8,9,10. The field is currently aiming to increase the sensitivity by at least one, and eventually two or more orders of magnitude¹¹. This, in turn, implies large exposures, measured in ton-years, and even more importantly, a greatly enhanced capability to suppress radioactive backgrounds.

In a high-pressure xenon gas time projection chamber (HPXe-TPC) such as those being developed by the NEXT experiment^12,13, the double beta decay of ¹³⁶Xe will create a ¹³⁶Ba⁺²dication and two electrons, ¹³⁶Xe → ¹³⁶Ba⁺² + 2e⁻ + (2ν). The decay mode with two neutrinos, β β2ν, has been observed in xenon with a lifetime of the order of 2 × 10²¹ years¹⁴. The signal is the same as that of β β0ν, except for the total energy of the electrons, which is a continuous distribution for the β β2ν case and spikes around the decay energy, Q_{β β} (about 2.45 MeV in the case of ¹³⁶Xe) for β β0ν¹⁵. The excellent energy resolution of NEXT allows suppressing the contamination of β β2ν to β β0ν by at least nine orders of magnitude^15,16,17, and thus, β β2ν is not a significant background for NEXT up to lifetimes of β β0ν in the order of 10³⁰ years.

In the HPXe-TPC, the electric field that drifts the ionization electrons from the two emitted electrons towards the detector anode, will cause the Ba⁺² dication to drift towards the cathode¹⁸. Thus, it is feasible to trigger on interesting events (e.g., those with sufficiently high energy). The barycenter of the electron tracks can be used to predict the impact position of the ion, or alternatively, ion transport devices, known as RF carpets could be used to direct the ion to a specific region in the cathode¹⁹. Furthermore, it is possible to correlate the arrival time of the dication to the cathode with the electrons detected in the anode. Such coincidence could lead to a virtually background-free experiment.

Although the Barium tagging concept was proposed more than three decades ago²⁰, a practical way to detect Ba⁺² in situ in a HPXe-TPC was only conceived recently^21,22. The idea relies on the capability of fluorescent molecules of changing their optical properties upon detecting target analytes^23,24. An initial proof of concept²⁵ resolved individual Ba⁺² dications in aqueous solution using Fluo-3, a well-known commercial indicator. A suitable Barium detector in NEXT requires a functionalized surface that must include a monolayer of the molecular sensor and must efficiently operate in a noble gas atmosphere. Over the last three years an intense R&D program to develop chemosensors able to form a supramolecular complex with Ba⁺² in dry medium has been carried out^15,26,27. To date, no experiments have been conducted in which the processes of chelation and detection occur fully under such conditions.

One of the sensors developed by NEXT, the so-called Fluorescent Bicolor Indicator (FBI)¹⁵, combines an enhanced fluorescence with a shift of the emission spectrum (about 61 nm towards the blue) when the indicator is complexed with Ba⁺². This is due to the specific molecular design of the fluorescent indicator having a crown ether connected to a benzo[a]imidazo[5,1,2-cd]indolizine fluorophore by a phenyl group. The benzoimidazoindolizine group has been shown to have highly tunable bright emission^28,29 while the crown ether is capable of interacting with Ba⁺² ions^23,30. In the presence of a Ba⁺² ion, calculations predict that coordination happens between the cation, one nitrogen atom of the fluorophore, the crown ether and the para-substituted phenyl ring, causing a torsion-induced decoupling between non-coplanar components of the fluorophore with respect to the non-chelated molecule. This induces a large change in the electronic properties of the dye, causing a blue-shift in emission, which can be used to filter the signal of chelated indicators.

All the indicators developed by the NEXT experiment are based on crown ethers. Because of their capability to capture a variety of guest species, including metal cations, protonated species, and neutral and ionic molecules³¹, crown ethers³² have been extensively used to recognize and trap metal or molecular ions^30,33. However, they have been poorly studied in solid state. Few examples can be found in the literature where self-assembled monolayers of crown ether derivatives have been grown and used on surfaces. Moreover, in all previous studies, either the growth or ion trapping or both have taken place in solution^34,35,36. There are only two works, as far as we know, where crown ethers were deposited under UHV conditions³⁷ and their metal trapping capability was proven also under UHV³⁸. Thus, in addition to the progress relevant for a future β β0ν experiment, the work presented here advances substantially the understanding of the physico-chemical properties of crown ethers immobilized on solid surfaces.

In this paper we combine two highly sensitive surface techniques: X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS) and Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy and Spectroscopy (STM/STS), to prove how different ions interact with FBI molecules deposited on suitable substrates. We demonstrate that Ba⁺² ions induce molecular conformation changes, modifying the electronic structure that would affect the fluorescence emission at suitable surfaces. Coordination with crown ether happens entirely in ultra-high vacuum (UHV) (see model in Fig. 1), which ensures that chemical, structural and electronic changes happen in the absence of solvents, air molecules or spurious contaminants. This is, therefore, a crucial step toward the development of a Ba⁺² detector.

**Fig. 1: Model of the FBI molecules before and after chelation.**

Results and discussion

Molecular sublimation in vacuum

In order to characterize the ion trapping capability of the FBI molecules, first it is mandatory to deposit these FBI molecules on a surface by sublimation in UHV and characterize them structurally and chemically. Thus, we chose a gold substrate, the Au(111) face (single crystal cut to present (111) close-packed planes parallel to the surface), because it is a well-known noble metal surface where very low substrate-molecule interaction was expected. We used XPS to determine their chemical composition. Since XPS sensitivity is limited to a depth of a few nanometers, molecular coverages below 1 monolayer (ML) were always used in this study. This ensures access to the substrate core levels for calibration.

Figure 2a shows the XPS spectra of the three molecular core levels of FBI, i.e., O 1s, N 1s, and C 1s. The spectra were measured for 0.6 monolayer (ML) of FBI deposited on Au(111) at room temperature (RT). The C 1s core level can be fitted using two components, one centered at around 284.7 eV and a second and more intense one at 286.3 eV. The former component corresponds to C–C bonds whereas the component at higher binding energy (BE) includes contributions from C–O and C–N bonds, with their relative intensities in agreement with having intact molecules. In the N 1s region, around 400.4 eV, a faint peak is visible. The position of the maximum is compatible with the enamine-imine groups of the molecular composition. Finally, the O 1s core level presents a single component peak centered at around 533.0 eV, which is compatible with previous reports on closely related crown ether groups³⁸. The ratios between the core levels, C/O = 6.2, C/N = 10.3, are in agreement with having molecules of C₃₁N₃O₅H₃₅ stoichiometry on the surface (FBI molecule stoichiometry).

**Fig. 2: XPS demonstration of the chemical changes induced by the molecular chelation.**

In addition to the XPS analysis, we have confirmed the intact sublimation of the molecules by STM. Deposition of a submonolayer of FBI mostly leads in disordered islands coexisting with isolated molecules (Fig. 3a). The lack of chemical order on the islands makes it difficult to identify specific molecules, and interpretation depends on the viewer. However, it is feasible to spot characteristics that mirror the features of such molecules (some examples are illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1). With this, molecular fragmentation at the surface or in the evaporation process is ruled out. STM images of single molecules (inset in Fig. 3a) are identified by two main triangular-like lobes. Based on the molecular structure, one of them should correspond to the fluorophore and the other to the crown ether moiety bonded to the phenyl ring. The apparent height of both is different, with one of them appearing lower and flatter than the other.

**Fig. 3: STM images of FBI and FBI derivative molecules on Au(111).**

In order to correlate the apparent molecular shape and the molecular structure, bond-resolved STM images were taken. For that, the STM tip was functionalized with CO molecules operating in the repulsive tip-sample interaction regime, a method extensively used for characterizing planar organic molecules^39,40. Application of this measurement mode to the FBI molecule results in the images displayed in Fig. 3b. For eye guidance, the STM image has been shown twice, one with and one without the superimposed molecular model. An internal bonding structure close to the fluorophore structure is resolved on the left region of the molecule, while the aza-crown ether region is not well resolved. Due to its larger conformational flexibility and its non-planarity, tip stability is not good enough and, as a consequence, the contrast observed in the aza-crown ether part is an artefact related to excessively strong interactions with the flexible CO tip-apex.^41,42. To confirm the imaging signature of the fluorophore, we also sublimated two FBI derivatives specifically synthesized without the aza-crown ether component. Figure 3c and d shows the bond-resolving images of FBI derivatives sublimated on Au(111) surface: the fluorophore (Fig. 3c) and the fluorophore with the phenyl ring but without the aza-crown ether (Fig. 3d). The absence of the aza-crown ether allowed the molecules on the surface to adopt a planar, rigid conformation, which clearly improves the image acquisition, with the carbon framework of the fluorophore well visualized. It is remarkable that none of these FBI derivatives forms molecular islands. Instead, only dimers or molecular tetrameters are distinguished in the STM images. This supports the previous assessment, that FBI molecules remain intact (non fragmented) after sublimation.

Chemical demonstration of chelation

Once the presence of intact FBI molecule on the surface was confirmed, BaCl₂ was sublimated to test the molecular chelation. Prior to the sublimation on the FBI, BaCl₂ was sublimated on clean Au(111) surface to confirm its stoichiometry. By comparing the core level intensities of Ba 3d and Cl 2p core levels (taking into account the corresponding sensitivity factor of each element), the ratio Ba:Cl was 1:2 as expected. Surprisingly, when BaCl₂ was deposited on FBI-functionalized Au(111), this ratio changes, being around 1:1.5 ± 0.2, meaning that there is a partial desorption of chlorine atoms when BaCl₂ reached the sample. From the simulations we have performed on the way that BaCl₂ interacts with the FBI molecule (see details of the calculations in Supplementary Note 2) we conclude that the chlorine atoms behave as passive spectators in the chelation. When the FBI molecule is chelated with BaCl₂ salt, the coordination pattern (N ⋅ Ba⁺², Ph ⋅ Ba⁺² and crown ether ⋅ Ba⁺²) is the same as the one calculated in ref. 15 and the Cl atoms play no role (see Supplementary Fig. 2). As a result, when the BaCl₂ molecules are placed on the FBI functionalized surface, the BaCl₂ molecules split, releasing Cl atoms. The fluctuations in the Ba:Cl ratio are due to partial desorption of Cl atoms from the surface. In any case, the Ba 3d core level does not show any significant shift when comparing the sublimation of BaCl₂ on bare or functionalized gold surface (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 3), suggesting that there is no change in the barium chemical oxidation state⁴³. Because of this lack of stoichiometry, we refrain from using BaCl₂ ML to refer to the amount of sublimated molecules and, instead, we will refer to the Ba⁺² ions per FBI molecule. The Ba⁺² dose, θ_Ba, was estimated using the ratio between the XPS intensities of the Ba 3d and N 1s core levels divided by the corresponding sensitivity factor, and always taking into account that there are 3 N atoms per molecule. The details of the ion dose calculations are included in Methods Section.

After sublimation of 0.80 Ba⁺² per FBI molecule (Fig. 2b) the molecular core levels slightly shift. Even though the three core levels shifted toward higher binding energies, the magnitude of each shift is different, being the highest for O 1s (upward shift of 0.5 eV). Since each shift is different in size, there must be a chemical change and not charge doping (associated to non reacted ions), which would show a rigid shift of all core levels. According to the O 1s core level curve fitting, the peak width grows and a new component has to be introduced at a higher BE position, as shown in Fig. 2d. The new component, added to the non-chelated FBI component at 532.95 eV, is centered at around 533.9 eV, position consistent with O-Ba interaction (chelated crown ether)³⁸. This new component remains unshifted even for θ_Ba above one Ba⁺² ion per FBI molecule, as can be seen in Fig. 2c, where the θ_Ba was increased up to 3 Ba⁺² per FBI molecule. Figure 2e shows the evolution of the O 1s for incremental amounts of Ba⁺² ions, from 0 to almost 0.5 Ba⁺² ions per FBI molecule, on 0.9 ML of FBI on Au(111). There is a monotonous shift toward higher binding energies of the maximum of the spectra. Once BaCl₂ is added to the sample, the O 1s peak width increments by 9% FWHM and, again, a new component at around 533.9 eV is necessary to properly fit the core level spectrum. This new component remains constant in energy, and only its intensity changes (the fit is included in Supplementary Fig. 3). However, quantification is complicated because of the close proximity of the right tail of the Au 4p_3/2 core level (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 3). The O 1s spectra shown in Fig. 2d and e were plotted after subtracting the contribution of the Au 4p_3/2 core level in order to emphasize the spectral changes.

It is important to note at this point that, even when the number of Ba ions per molecule permitted it, we never observed a complete chelation of the FBI. It is challenging to determine whether this is due to ineffective chelation or because of the designed experiment, as the latter certainly limits it. To demonstrate the Ba⁺² trapping by FBI molecule the XPS experiment needs a coverage below or close to the monolayer to avoid interference from molecular stacking (FBI molecules forming multilayer structures). Under these conditions, sublimated BaCl₂ can still form islands on bare gold regions (as we have seen in the STM images). This can prevent them from participating in the chelation process.

As previously discussed, the calculations determine that Ba-chelated conformation is maintained regardless of the ion source (naked Ba⁺² cation or BaCl₂ salt). In order to simulate this final conformation, the BaCl₂ molecules were initially positioned on the periphery of the crown ether rather than close to the center. Because the crown ether has both concave and convex sides, we have also performed a simulation where the barium cation was forced to interact with the sensor through the convex face. However, the most stable conformation is that in which Ba⁺² is trapped in the concave part (fully optimized geometry shown in Supplementary Fig. 2). We investigated this possibility because this oordination mode appears plausible on surfaces. In both cases, the ions starting in a lateral position with respect to the crown ether can find a metastable conformation with all the O-Ba⁺² equidistant. These calculations rule out two possible causes of the O 1s core level shift: chelation of molecules at the edges of the BaCl₂ islands, and interactions between BaCl₂ (Ba⁺²) and the periphery of the crown ether. Therefore, in terms of XPS, it seems reasonable to interpret the O 1s core level shift as a chelation fingerprint.

To evaluate whether the nature of the ions has any influence on the oxygen core level shift for the FBI molecules, we tested the chelation with Na⁺. We selected this ion because it was also the choice of the only prior study in which crown ether was chelated on surfaces³⁸. Figure 2c shows the O 1s, N 1s and C 1s core levels measured on 0.6 ML of FBI on Au(111) before and after the sublimation of θ_Na = 2.60 per FBI (θ_Na is computed analogously to θ_Ba). The maximum of the O 1s core level shifts again for Na⁺-chelated FBI molecules 0.5 eV toward higher BE, while there is no apparent shift on the N 1s (nor C 1s) core level. This results reveals that N 1s is not as involved in the ion trapping as before, which agrees with the theoretical calculations where almost no FBI distortion is predicted upon chelation with Na⁺ (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4). This difference between Ba⁺²- and Na⁺-chelation can be interpreted as a first proof that the molecular conformation of FBI and the cation-phenyl interaction varies depending on the nature of the trapped ions.

Molecular structural rearrangement induced by chelation

In order to visualize the structural changes undergone by the FBI molecules upon chelation, STM experiments were carried out again. Figure 4a shows the schematic representation of the most stable conformation calculated for the molecules in gas phase before and after chelation with Na⁺ and Ba⁺² (calculation details in Supplementary Note 4). In all cases the crown ether ring is out of the plane with respect to the fluorophore, and in the case of the Ba⁺²-chelated molecule, this group is folded over the fluorophore. For molecules lying on a surface, we expect to have the fluorophore parallel to the substrate, and the crown ether region out of the plane, as corroborate the STM images (Fig. 4b–d). In the three images, the fluorophore and the aza-crown ether region are distinguished. In the case of Na⁺-chelated FBI identification is easier than for Ba⁺²-chelated because the image remains almost unchanged compared to the non-chelated FBI. FBI chelated with Ba⁺² has a more complex shape. Interpretation of constant current mode STM images is always difficult because of the convolution of topographical and electronic contributions. To reduce as much as possible the influence of the latter, the images included in Fig. 4b–d were measured using bias voltages inside the molecular gap. Taking into account that the three STM images are plotted with a common color code, it can be directly observed that the apparent heights of the crown ether follow the expected trend (higher for Ba⁺²-chelated molecule). Indeed, the apparent height for each molecule, as measured on the highest point of the crown, is 2.5 ± 0.1 Å, 2.1 ± 0.1 Å, and 2.9 ± 0.1 Å, for the pristine FBI and the Na⁺- and Ba⁺²-chelated molecules respectively. Thus, complexation of crown ethers with alkali metals like Na⁺ causes the oxygen atoms to point to the center, forcing the ring to adopt a flatter conformation relative to the native molecule. Instead, the FBI molecule adopts a more three-dimensional conformation upon chelation with Ba⁺². It is worth mentioning that the aspect of these STM images resembles the electron density simulations associated with the most stable conformers shown in Fig. 4a (electron density simulations shown in Supplementary Fig. 4). To establish a more quantitative relationship between apparent molecular structural modification and chelation, scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) measurements were performed.

**Fig. 4: Molecular chelation probed by STM/STS.**

STS permits to map the local density of states and to visualize the orbitals around the Fermi level, i.e., the Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO) and the Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital (HOMO). Calculations done by DFT in ref. 15 reveal that these frontier orbitals change their relative distances upon chelation (the HOMO-LUMO gap is higher for Ba⁺²-chelated molecules than for native ones). Moreover, for both unchelated and Ba⁺²-chelated FBI molecules, these orbitals are mainly located at the fluorophore region (the benzoimidazoindolizine group). This is an advantage because we can scan the local density of states on the fluorophore region by STS and correlate the spectral changes with the variation in the electronic structure of the whole molecule. Thus, Fig. 4e shows the associated STS measured for the three molecules of Fig. 4b–d in the fluorophore region. The FBI molecule deposited on Au(111) has a HOMO-LUMO gap of 3.17 eV. Complexation with Na⁺ slightly changes this band gap, while complexation with Ba⁺² increases it up to 3.63 eV.

The DFT calculations¹⁵ also show that the lowest fluorescence emission peak of the non-chelated FBI molecule mainly comes from the de-excitation of electrons from the LUMO to both HOMO and HOMO-1. For Ba⁺²-chelated molecules, the torsion of the phenyl group decreases the effective π-conjugation and promotes the LUMO-HOMO transition over the LUMO-HOMO-1 as the lowest emission channel. By STS we observed a clear variation in the electronic gap upon chelation with Ba⁺²: the LUMO-HOMO gap increases, which explains the blue-shift fluorescence emission spectra measured in solution (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of STS gap values and absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy

Full size table

For Na⁺, while there is a small variation of the electronic gap, the molecule remains planar. This planarity of the molecule after chelation does not modify the π-conjugation, which is still extended into the phenyl ring. Therefore, the LUMO-HOMO distance does not significantly change. However, this small shift seems to be in contradiction with the fluorescence measurements, where no shift was measured for Na⁺-chelated FBI molecules compared to unchelated FBI. While the magnitude of the HOMO-LUMO gap defines the maximum emission energy, the closely spaced vibrational energy levels in the ground state result in a distribution of photon energies. As a result, fluorescence is normally observed as intensity over a band of wavelengths rather than a sharp line. Hence, the small gap modification we have measured by STS could produce a correspondingly small shift in the emission spectra. However, this shift would be undetectable because of the broadness of the spectra. Table 1 summarizes the absorption and fluorescence emission maxima \({{{{{{{\rm{{\lambda }}}}}}}_{max}^{emi}}}\) and \({{{{{{{\rm{{\lambda }}}}}}}_{max}^{abs}}}\) associated to the transition of electrons from HOMO to LUMO+n states (absorption), as well as from LUMO, to HOMO-n (fluorescence).Unfortunately, because of the metallic character of the substrate we cannot measure the fluorescence emission directly on gold (the excitation energy is dumped to the metal without further emission).

Chelation tested on different surface supports

Finally, we have observed that chelation also takes place on other surfaces, in particular Cu(111) and Indium Tin Oxide (ITO). We chose Cu(111) because it is a more reactive substrate. This enabled us to study whether the molecule-substrate interaction could alter the chelation response. On the other hand, ITO was selected as a promising candidate for the potential implementation of a Barium tagging detector on a xenon-based TPC¹⁵. As a degenerated semiconductor, ITO is transparent, which would allow the direct detection of fluorescence in transmission. Furthermore, its conductivity is high enough to guide the Ba⁺² ions towards the sensor surface, thus facilitating their capture by FBI. On the other side, the conductivity of ITO may be potentially low enough to avoid the fluorescence quenching that is expected at conductive surfaces.

As previously discussed, we focus again on the O 1s core level to see whether the conclusions extracted before about its shift apply also on these surfaces and we can use it as a fingerprint of the chelation. Figure 5 shows the O 1s core level of FBI on Cu(111) and ITO. We used a Ba⁺² dosing of θ_Ba = 10 for 0.6 ML of FBI on Cu(111) and θ_Ba = 17.5 for 0.7 ML of FBI on ITO. In both cases, we observed the chemical shift on the O 1s towards higher BE, indicating that chelation is happening. In the case of Cu(111), the shift is about 0.7 eV, while for ITO it is around 0.9 eV. As far as ion capture is concerned, FBI chelation of Na⁺ on Cu(111) was also tested with θ_Na = 3.6. Again, O 1s shows an upwards shift associated with chelation (inset in Fig. 5a). Supplementary Figure 6 shows that the O 1s shifts for low θ_Ba doses on Cu(111), with a similar shift evolution as the one observed on Au(111) for low θ_Ba doses (in Fig. 2d).

**Fig. 5: O 1s core level evolution upon chelation measured on two submonolayer FBI-functionalized surfaces.**

Quantifying the exact values of the O 1s core level shift and chelation efficiency was not possible. Notice that in the case of Cu(111), when the FBI-functionalized surface is exposed to BaCl₂, the residual contamination partially oxidizes the surface. For this reason, the core level has a smaller component at lower BE, around 531 eV (see Supplementary Fig. 6), associated to Cu₂O⁴⁴. On the other hand, because of the presence of oxygen in the ITO structure, the analysis of the O 1s core level shifts required a subtraction of the core level measured on the bare ITO to highlight the FBI and Ba⁺² chelated FBI contributions (O_FBI). The result of the subtraction is shown in Fig. 5b, and the inset gathers the original normalized spectra, including the contribution to the O 1s coming from the ITO (O_ITO).

These results ensure that chelation is independent from the choice of substrate, even though the values of the shifts are different for the three substrates. In photoemission, the absolute value of the core level shift depends on many factors such as the substrate, the molecular coverage, the presence of defects or other molecules. However, what is important here is that in the three cases the core level shifts in the same direction and with similar magnitude.

To summarize, by combination of highly sensitive surface science techniques, we have unraveled the chemical and conformational changes that occur upon chelation of FBI molecules. We started with Au(111), a well-known surface that served as model, and moved on toward more suitable surfaces. Furthermore, the changes are in agreement with the calculations for the behavior of free standing molecules. Regarding the bicolor property of the sensor, fluorescence emission could not be directly measured because of the metallic character of the substrates. Nonetheless, the measured variations in the molecular HOMO-LUMO gap are consistent with the observed emission shift for Ba²⁺-chelated molecules. Moreover, they are also consistent with the absence of such shift, observed and predicted for other ions, such as Na⁺.

The demonstration of chelation in vacuum of FBIs by Ba⁺² ions on surfaces in submonolayer regime is a major step towards the development of a sensor capable of single barium tagging. This sensor would have the immediate application in a new, ultra-low background xenon-based β β0ν detection experiment. Furthermore, this study has also important implications beyond the field of particle physics. Aza-crown ether groups have demonstrated to chelate alkali ions with high affinity in solution. Here we showed the capability of these molecules to trap big or small ions (Ba⁺² or Na⁺) on surfaces too. This could have important applications in drug carriers⁴⁵, photo-switching devices^46,47, or different types of ion sensors.

Methods

The experiments were performed in two different UHV chambers, one for XPS experiments and the other for STM experiments. Both chambers have a base pressure of 1 × 10⁻¹⁰ mbar. Prior to molecular deposition, the Au(111) and Cu(111) and Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) surfaces were cleaned via cycles of Ar sputtering and annealing to 500 °C and their cleanliness was checked by XPS. The agreement between experiments performed on different substrates and subsequent preparations confirmed the reproducibility of the evaporation and chelation processes.

Molecular evaporation

Pure FBI, BaCl₂, and NaCl powders were evaporated from homemade Knudsen cell evaporators. To avoid cross-talk between FBI and the salts and to exclude any possibility of chelation of the molecule inside the cell, the FBI and BaCl₂(NaCl) evaporators were located in two separated parts of the UHV chambers. To ensure sublimation reproducibility, each molecular evaporator cell (containing the FBI, BaCl₂, and NaCl) was removed from the XPS chamber and installed in the STM chamber.

FBI molecules were synthesized using the procedure described in ref. 15, while BaCl₂ and NaCl were commercially (Sigma–Aldrich) available. The molecules were used after degassing in UHV. The molecular evaporation rate was monitorized using a quartz microbalance. Afterwards, the amount of molecules on the surfaces was quantified by analyzing the relative intensity of the XPS core level peaks and the percentage of covered surface in STM. FBI evaporation was very stable and very reproducible, since the same rate for the same sublimation temperature was monitored. This reproducibility rules out fragmentation inside the evaporation cell. In the opposite case, if the molecules broke during the evaporation process, then the evaporation fragments would sublimate at different sublimation temperatures, and the evaporation would became non-reproducible. The simpler FBI derivative molecules (without crown ether) sublimate at 60–80 °C while the intact FBI molecule sublimates at 140–150 °C.

Absorption and emission spectra

UV-vis spectra were acquired on a Shimadzu UV-2600 Spectrophotometer. Emission spectra were acquired on an Agilent Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer. Excitation and emission monochromator bandwidth was fixed at 5 nm. Spectra were recorded at 5 × 10⁻⁵ M solutions of FBI and equimolecular quantities of the corresponing perchlorate cation salt for the chelated species. Emission spectra were acquired using 250 nm light.

STM experiments

STM experiments were performed with a commercial Scienta-Omicron ultra-high vacuum LT-STM at 4.3 K. A W-tip was used. Topography images were measured using constant current mode, while for bond resolution images constant height mode was used (Fig. 3b–d). During the STM experiments, the tip was functionalized with CO for bond resolution STM by exposing the sample to low pressure (~1 × 10⁻⁸ mbar) of CO whilst the sample was held below 7 K. CO molecules were trapped by the tip from their adsorption sites via scanning over them or by applying ~2 V bias voltage pulses.

XPS experiments

The XPS measurements were carried out using a Phoibos-100 electron analyzer (SPECS GmbH), using a non monochromatic Al Kα photon source of 1486.6 eV. The spectra were calibrated to the substrates main core level (Au 4f, Cu 2p, and In 3d, respectively).

The evaporation thicknesses were estimated using the attenuation of the most intense substrate core levels, i.e., Au 4f, Cu 2p, and In 3d for Au(111), Cu(111), and ITO, respectively. The calculations followed the guidelines provided in ref. 48. For this purpose, we estimated the electron Effective Attenuation Length (EAL) through the FBI layers for electrons with kinetic energies of 1402.6, 1041.6, and 554.6 eV (corresponding to Au f_5/2, In 3d_5/2 and Cu 2p_3/2 for Al Kα radiation). The resulting EALs are 3.87, 3.05, and 1.85 nm, respectively. The thickness of the FBI samples was then estimated using the intensity of clean substrate core level as reference and the attenuated intensity after the evaporation. To correct for systematic uncertainties affecting different sets of data, the intensities of all spectra were rescaled to the main substrate core levels (Au 4f, Cu 2p, and In 3d, respectively). The core level peak areas were numerically integrated between fixed local minima. This yields an error in the stoichiometry ratios of 7%.

The stoichiometry of the FBI (BaCl₂) was calculating following the expression R(A/B) = (I_A/I_B ⋅ S_B/S_A) where A and B are the different molecular elements, I_X is the integrated area under the main core level and S_X is the corresponding sensitivity factor of this core level.

The amount of Ba⁺²(Na⁺) per FBI molecule were estimated by computing the ratio θ = I_{B a}/(I_N/3) ⋅ S_N/S_{B a}, where I_{B a}, I_N are total areas of Ba 3d and N 1s core levels, respectively, and S_{B a} = 25.84, S_N = 1.80 are the corresponding atomic sensitivity factors⁴⁹. The factor 3 responds to stoichiometric reasons, considering 3 N atoms per molecule.

XPS fitting

The spectra fitting was performed using custom-made software written in Python and the lmfit library⁵⁰. An example of fit can be seen in Fig. 6. The core levels were modeled as a pseudo-Voigt function (Lorentzian to Gaussian ratio of 0.6) convoluted with a Shirley type background. The error in the estimation of the position of the maxima derived from fitting is 50 meV. However we only consider as significant shifts higher than 100 meV, which is the energy step we use in the adquisition. The goodness of fit is given by a χ² parameter of about 0.05 counts (in A.U.) when the data are normalized to a maximum intensity of 1. Here \({\chi }^{2}={\sum }_{i}{({y}_{i}-{Y}_{i})}^{2}/{Y}_{i}\), where y_i and Y_i are the data intensity values and the expected values from the fit, respectively.

**Fig. 6: Curve deconvolution for O 1s in FBI 0.6 ML on Au(111) before and after chelation.**

Data availability

The original XPS core level data presented in this study have been deposited in the Source Data file. The STM data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Majorana, E. Theory of the symmetry of electrons and positrons. Nuovo Cim. 14, 171–184 (1937).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Sakharov, A. D. Violation of cp invariance, c asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe. Pisma Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 5, 32–35 (1967).
Fukugita, M. & Yanagida, T. Baryogenesis without grand unification. Phys. Lett. B174, 45–47 (1986).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M., Ramond, P. & Slansky, R. Complex spinors and unified theories. Conf. Proc. C790927, 315–321 (1979).
Google Scholar
Yanagida, T. Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos. Conf. Proc. C7902131, 95–99 (1979).
Google Scholar
Mohapatra, R. N. & Senjanovic, G. Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
Article ADS CAS MATH Google Scholar
Gando, A. et al. Search for majorana neutrinos near the inverted mass hierarchy region with KamLAND-Zen. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 109903 (2016).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Agostini, M. et al. Improved limit on neutrinoless double-β decay of ⁷⁶Ge from GERDA phase II. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 132503 (2018).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Albanese, V. et al. The SNO+ experiment. J. Inst. 16, P08059 (2021).
CAS Google Scholar
Adams, D. et al. Search for Majorana neutrinos exploiting millikelvin cryogenics with CUORE. Nature 604, 53–58 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
Gomez-Cadenas, J. J. Status and prospects of the NEXT experiment for neutrinoless double beta decay searches (2019). Preprint at arXiv.1906.01743 (2019).
Martín-Albo, J. et al. Sensitivity of NEXT-100 to neutrinoless double beta decay. JHEP 05, 159 (2016).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Adams, C. et al. Sensitivity of a tonne-scale NEXT detector for neutrinoless double beta decay searches. JHEP 08, 164 (2021).
ADS Google Scholar
Ackerman, N. et al. Observation of two-neutrino double-beta decay in Xe-136 with EXO-200. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 212501 (2011).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Rivilla, I. et al. Fluorescent bicolour sensor for low-background neutrinoless double β decay experiments. Nature 583, 48–54 (2020).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Álvarez, Vea Near-intrinsic energy resolution for 30-662kev gamma rays in a high pressure xenon electroluminescent tpc. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sec. A 708, 101–114 (2013).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Renner, J. et al. Energy calibration of the NEXT-White detector with 1% resolution near Q_{β β} of¹³⁶Xe. JHEP 10, 230 (2019).
ADS Google Scholar
Bainglass, E., Jones, B. J. P., Foss, F. W., Huda, M. N. & Nygren, D. R. Mobility and clustering of barium ions and dications in high pressure xenon gas. Phys. Rev. A97, 062509 (2018).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Jones, B. J. P. et al. The dynamics of ions on phased radio-frequency carpets in high pressure gases and application for barium tagging in xenon gas time projection chambers. JHEP 1039, 167000 (2022).
CAS Google Scholar
Moe, M. K. Detection of neutrinoless double-beta decay. Phys. Rev. C44, 931–934 (1991).
ADS Google Scholar
Nygren, D. R. Detecting the barium daughter in136xe 0-ν β β decay using single-molecule fluorescence imaging techniques. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 650, 012002 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Jones, B. J. P., McDonald, A. D. & Nygren, D. R. Single molecule fluorescence imaging as a technique for barium tagging in neutrinoless double beta decay. JINST 11, P12011 (2016).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Valeur, B. & Berberan-Santos, M. N. Chemical Sensing via Fluorescence. In Molecular Fluorescence: Principles and Applications. 409–478 (Joh Wiley & Sins, Inc. 2012).
Wolfbeis, O. S. Materials for fluorescence-based optical chemical sensors. J. Mater. Chem. 15, 27–28 (2005).
McDonald, A. D. et al. Demonstration of single barium ion sensitivity for neutrinoless double beta decay using single molecule fluorescence imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 132504 (2018).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Thapa, P. et al. Barium chemosensors with dry-phase fluorescence for neutrinoless double beta decay. Sci. Rep. 9, 15097 (2019).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Thapa, P. et al. Demonstration of selective single-barium ion detection with dry diazacrown ether naphthalimide turn-on chemosensors. ACS Sens. 6, 192–202 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stasyuk, A. J., Banasiewicz, M., Ventura, B., Cyrański, M. K. & Gryko, D. T. Benzo[a]imidazo[5,1,2-cd]indolizines—a new class of molecules displaying excited state intramolecular proton transfer. N. J. Chem. 38, 189–197 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lévesque, E. et al. General c-h arylation strategy for the synthesis of tunable visible light-emitting benzo[a]imidazo[2,1,5-c,d]indolizine fluorophores. J. Org. Chem. 82, 5046–5067 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Maleknia, S. & Brodbelt, J. Cavity-size-dependent dissociation of crown ether/ammonium ion complexes in the gas phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 2837–2843 (1993).
Dobler, M. Ionophores and Their Structures (John Wiley, 1981).
Gokel, G. W. & Stoddart, J. F. Crown Ethers and Cryptands Monographs in Supramolecular Chemistry (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 1991).
More, M. B., Ray, D. & Armentrout, P. B. Intrinsic affinities of alkali cations for 15-crown-5 and 18-crown-6: Bond dissociation energies of gas-phase M⁺-crown ether complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 417–423 (1999).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yoshimoto, S., Suto, K., Itaya, K. & Kobayashi, N. Host-guest recognition of calcium by crown-ether substituted phthalocyanine array on Au(111): relationship between crown moieties and gold lattice. Chem. Commun. 17, 2174–2175 (2003).
Flink, S., van Veggel, F. C. J. M. & Reinhoudt, D. N. Recognition of cations by self-assembled monolayers of crown ethers. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 6515–6520 (1999).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Inokuchi, Y. et al. New insights into metal ion-crown ether complexes revealed by SEIRA spectroscopy. N. J. Chem. 39, 8673–8680 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Feng, Z., Kladnik, G., Comelli, G., Dri, C. & Cossaro, A. Growth of regular nanometric molecular arrays on a functional 2D template based on a chemical guest-host approach. Nanoscale 10, 2067–2072 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stredansky, M. et al. On-surface trapping of alkali atoms by crown ethers in ultra high vacuum. Nanoscale Adv. 1, 1721–1725 (2019).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Gross, L. Recent advances in submolecular resolution with scanning probe microscopy. Nat. Chem. 3, 273–278 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gross, L. et al. Atomic force microscopy for molecular structure elucidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 3888–3908 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Moll, N., Gross, L., Mohn, F., Curioni, A. & Meyer, G. The mechanisms underlying the enhanced resolution of atomic force microscopy with functionalized tips. N. J. Phys. 12, 125020 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hapala, P. et al. Mechanism of high-resolution STM/AFM imaging with functionalized tips. Phys. Rev. B 90, 085421 (2014).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Crist, V. B. & The XPS Library, The International XPS Database, Barium Fluoride (BaF2) XPS Spectra. https://xps-database.com/barium-spectra-baf2/. (2022).
Zhu, C., Osherov, A. & Panzer, M. J. Surface chemistry of electrodeposited Cu2O films studied by XPS. Electrochim. Acta 111, 771–778 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Uchegbu, I. F. & Vyas, S. P. Non-ionic surfactant based vesicles (niosomes) in drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 172, 33–70 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Malval, J.-P., Gosse, I., Morand, J.-P. & Lapouyade, R. Photoswitching of cation complexation with a monoaza-crown dithienylethene photochrome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 904–905 (2002).
Uda, R. M., Matsui, T., Oue, M. & Kimura, K. Membrane potential photoresponse of crowned malachite green derivatives affording perfect photoswitching of metal ion complexation. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 51, 111–117 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Powell, C. J. Practical guide for inelastic mean free paths, effective attenuation lengths, mean escape depths, and information depths in x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 38, 023209 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Scofield, J. H. Hartree-Slater subshell photoionization cross-sections at 1254 and 1487 eV. J. Electron Spectrosc. Related Phenom. 8, 129–137 (1976).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Matthew Newville, Till Stensitzki, Renee Otten, and others. Python and lmfit library. https://lmfit.github.io/lmfit-py/ (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the following agencies and institutions: the European Research Council (ERC) under ERC-2020-SyG 951281; the MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 of Spain and ERDF A way of making Europe under grants PID2020-114252GB-I00, PID2019-107338RB-C63, PID2019-104772GB-I00, PID2019-111281GB-I00, and RTI2018-095979, the Severo Ochoa Program grant CEX2018-000867-S; the Basque Government (GV/EJ) under grants IT-1553-22, IT-1591-22. The NEXT Collaboration acknowledges support from the following agencies and institutions: the European Union’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (2014-2020) under Grant Agreement No. 957202-HIDDEN; the MCIN/AEI of Spain and ERDF A way of making Europe under grants RTI2018-095979 and PID2021-125475NB, the Severo Ochoa Program grant CEX2018-000867-S and the Ramón y Cajal program grant RYC-2015-18820; the Generalitat Valenciana of Spain under grants PROMETEO/2021/087 and CIDEGENT/2019/049; the Department of Education of the Basque Government of Spain under the predoctoral training program non-doctoral research personnel; the Portuguese FCT under project UID/FIS/04559/2020 to fund the activities of LIBPhys-UC; the Pazy Foundation (Israel) under grants 877040 and 877041; the US Department of Energy under contracts number DE-AC02-06CH11357 (Argonne National Laboratory), DE-AC02-07CH11359 (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory), DE-FG02-13ER42020 (Texas A&M), DE-SC0019054 (Texas Arlington) and DE-SC0019223 (Texas Arlington); the US National Science Foundation under award number NSF CHE 2004111; the Robert A Welch Foundation under award number Y-2031-20200401. Finally, we are grateful to the Laboratorio Subterráneo de Canfranc for hosting and supporting the NEXT experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Centro de Física de Materiales (CSIC-UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, E-20018, Spain
P. Herrero-Gómez, J. P. Calupitan, M. Ilyn, A. Berdonces-Layunta, T. Wang, D. G. de Oteyza, M. Corso, R. González-Moreno, C. Rogero & R. González-Moreno
Donostia International Physics Center (DIPC), San Sebastián, E-20018, Spain
P. Herrero-Gómez, A. Berdonces-Layunta, T. Wang, D. G. de Oteyza, M. Corso, R. González-Moreno, I. Rivilla, F. Monrabal, F. P. Cossío, J. J. Gómez-Cadenas, C. Rogero, J. M. Benlloch-Rodríguez, P. Ferrario, J. Generowicz, L. Larizgoitia, M. Martínez-Vara, A. Nuñez, E. Oblak, M. Odriozola-Gimeno, B. Romeo & J. Torrent
Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, E-48009, Spain
D. G. de Oteyza, I. Rivilla, Z. Freixa, F. Monrabal, J. J. Gómez-Cadenas & P. Ferrario
Department of Organic Chemistry I, Centro de Innovación en Química Avanzada (ORFEO-CINQA), University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, E-20018, Spain
I. Rivilla, B. Aparicio & F. P. Cossío
Department of Applied Chemistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, E-20018, Spain
A. I. Aranburu, Z. Freixa & Z. Freixa
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439, USA
C. Adams, K. Bailey, K. Hafidi, Z. E. Meziani & L. Rogers
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Manchester University, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
H. Almazán, S. Bounasser, A. Fahs, R. Guenette, J. Ho, D. Lopez Gutierrez, B. Palmeiro, C. Stanford & J. Waiton
Instituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular I3M (CSIC-UPV), Valencia, E-46022, Spain
V. Álvarez, F. Ballester, R. Esteve, V. Herrero, N. López-March, F. J. Mora, J. Rodríguez & J. F. Toledo
Unit of Nuclear Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 8410501, Israel
L. Arazi, R. Felkai, Y. Ifergan, G. Martínez-Lema, A. B. Redwine & A. Simón
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA, 99352, USA
I. J. Arnquist & E. Church
II. Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
S. Ayet & T. Dickel
Institute of Nanostructures, Nanomodelling and Nanofabrication (i3N), Universidade de Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal
C. D. R. Azevedo, A. L. Ferreira & J. F. C. A. Veloso
LIP, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, 3004-516, Portugal
F. I. G. M. Borges, C. A. N. Conde, J. Escada & F. P. Santos
Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
N. Byrnes, B. J. P. Jones, K. Mistry, K. Navarro & D. R. Nygren
Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC), CSIC & Universitat de Val`encia, Paterna, E-46980, Spain
S. Cárcel, J. V. Carrión, J. Martín-Albo, M. Martínez-Vara, J. Muñoz Vidal, P. Novella, M. Querol, C. Romo-Luque, M. Sorel & A. Usón
Centro de Astropartículas y Física de Altas Energías (CAPA), Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, E-50009, Spain
S. Cebrián
Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
T. Contreras & J. Haefner
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
A. A. Denisenko, E. Dey, F. W. Foss, P. Ho, R. Madigan, R. Miller & T. T. Vuong
Instituto Gallego de Física de Altas Energías, Univ. de Santiago de Compostela, Campus sur, Santiago de Compostela, E-15782, Spain
G. Díaz, J. A. Hernando Morata, M. Kekic & J. Renner
LIBPhys, Physics Department, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, 3004-516, Portugal
L. M. P. Fernandes, E. D. C. Freitas, C. A. O. Henriques, R. D. P. Mano, C. M. B. Monteiro, J. M. F. dos Santos & J. M. R. Teixeira
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
A. Goldschmidt
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-3160, USA
J. Hauptman
Departamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus de Cantoblanco, Madrid, E-28049, Spain
L. Labarga
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL, 60510, USA
P. Lebrun & A. Para
Escola Polit`ecnica Superior, Universitat de Girona, Girona, E-17071, Spain
L. Ripoll & J. Torrent
Laboratorio Subterráneo de Canfranc, Canfranc Estación, E-22880, Spain
B. Romeo
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4242, USA
J. T. White

Authors

P. Herrero-Gómez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
J. P. Calupitan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
M. Ilyn
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
A. Berdonces-Layunta
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
T. Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
D. G. de Oteyza
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
M. Corso
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
R. González-Moreno
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
I. Rivilla
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
B. Aparicio
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
A. I. Aranburu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Z. Freixa
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
F. Monrabal
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
F. P. Cossío
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
J. J. Gómez-Cadenas
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
C. Rogero
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

NEXT collaboration

C. Adams
, H. Almazán
, V. Álvarez
, B. Aparicio
, A. I. Aranburu
, L. Arazi
, I. J. Arnquist
, S. Ayet
, C. D. R. Azevedo
, K. Bailey
, F. Ballester
, J. M. Benlloch-Rodríguez
, F. I. G. M. Borges
, S. Bounasser
, N. Byrnes
, S. Cárcel
, J. V. Carrión
, S. Cebrián
, E. Church
, C. A. N. Conde
, T. Contreras
, F. P. Cossío
, A. A. Denisenko
, E. Dey
, G. Díaz
, T. Dickel
, J. Escada
, R. Esteve
, A. Fahs
, R. Felkai
, L. M. P. Fernandes
, P. Ferrario
, A. L. Ferreira
, F. W. Foss
, E. D. C. Freitas
, Z. Freixa
, J. Generowicz
, A. Goldschmidt
, J. J. Gómez-Cadenas
, R. González-Moreno
, R. Guenette
, J. Haefner
, K. Hafidi
, J. Hauptman
, C. A. O. Henriques
, J. A. Hernando Morata
, P. Herrero-Gómez
, V. Herrero
, J. Ho
, P. Ho
, Y. Ifergan
, B. J. P. Jones
, M. Kekic
, L. Labarga
, L. Larizgoitia
, P. Lebrun
, D. Lopez Gutierrez
, N. López-March
, R. Madigan
, R. D. P. Mano
, J. Martín-Albo
, G. Martínez-Lema
, M. Martínez-Vara
, Z. E. Meziani
, R. Miller
, K. Mistry
, F. Monrabal
, C. M. B. Monteiro
, F. J. Mora
, J. Muñoz Vidal
, K. Navarro
, P. Novella
, A. Nuñez
, D. R. Nygren
, E. Oblak
, M. Odriozola-Gimeno
, B. Palmeiro
, A. Para
, M. Querol
, A. B. Redwine
, J. Renner
, L. Ripoll
, I. Rivilla
, J. Rodríguez
, C. Rogero
, L. Rogers
, B. Romeo
, C. Romo-Luque
, F. P. Santos
, J. M. F. dos Santos
, A. Simón
, M. Sorel
, C. Stanford
, J. M. R. Teixeira
, J. F. Toledo
, J. Torrent
, A. Usón
, J. F. C. A. Veloso
, T. T. Vuong
, J. Waiton
& J. T. White

Contributions

J.J.G.-C., F.P.C., and C.R. conceived the project. C.R. designed and coordinated the experiments and data analysis. P.H.G. and M.I. performed and analyzed the XPS experiments. J.P.C., A.B.L., T.W., D.G.O., and M.C. performed the STM experiments. I.R. and B.A. carried out the chemical synthesis. R.G.M., A.A., and Z.F. performed the characterization in solution of fluorescence studies. F.P.C. performed the DFT calculations. P.H.G., J.J.G.-C., F.P.C., and C.R. wrote the manuscript. F.M. and the NEXT collaboration assisted with editing and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Rogero.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrero-Gómez, P., Calupitan, J.P., Ilyn, M. et al. Ba⁺² ion trapping using organic submonolayer for ultra-low background neutrinoless double beta detector. Nat Commun 13, 7741 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35153-0

Download citation

Received: 10 February 2022
Accepted: 21 November 2022
Published: 14 December 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35153-0