Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The pelvic fin and girdle of Panderichthys and the origin of tetrapod locomotion

Abstract

One of the most marked transformations in the vertebrate transition to land was that of fins to limbs. This transformation involved not only the generation of morphological novelties (digits, sacrum) but also a shift in locomotory dominance from the pectoral to the pelvic appendage1. Despite its importance, the transformation from pelvic fin to hindlimb is the least studied and least well-documented part of this transformation, which is bracketed by the osteolepiform Eusthenopteron and the early tetrapods Ichthyostega and Acanthostega, but is not directly illuminated by any intermediate form. Panderichthys is the closest tetrapod relative currently represented by complete fossils2, but its pelvic fin skeleton has not been described. Here, I present the only known articulated pelvic fin endoskeleton and associated partial pelvis of Panderichthys. The pelvic girdle is even less tetrapod-like than that of the osteolepiform Eusthenopteron3, but the pelvic fin endoskeleton shares derived characteristics with basal tetrapods despite being more primitive than the pectoral fin of Panderichthys4,5. The evolution of tetrapod locomotion appears to have passed through a stage of body-flexion propulsion, in which the pelvic fins played a relatively minor anchoring part, before the emergence of hindlimb-powered propulsion in the interval between Panderichthys and Acanthostega.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Pictures and drawings of Panderichthys rhombolepis, specimen GIT434-1.
Figure 2: Comparison of pectoral and pelvic fins.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coates, M. I., Jeffery, J. E. & Ruta, M. Fins to limbs: what the fossils say. Evol. Dev. 4, 390–401 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlberg, P. E. & Johanson, Z. Osteolepiforms and the ancestry of tetrapods. Nature 395, 792–794 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, M. S. & Westoll, S. T. The postcranial skeleton of Eusthenopteron foordi Whiteaves. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 68, 207–328 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vorobyeva, E. I. The shoulder girdle of Panderichthys rhombolepis (Gross) (Crossopterygii), Upper Devonian, Latvia. Geobios 19, 285–288 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vorobyeva, E. I. Morphology of the humerus in the Rhipidistian crossopterygii and the origin of tetrapods. Paleontol. J. 34, 632–641 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coates, M. I. The Devonian tetrapod Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik: postcranial anatomy, basal interrelationships and patterns of skeletal evolution. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 87, 363–421 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jarvik, E. Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates (Academic, London, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carroll, R. L., Irwin, J. & Green, D. M. Thermal physiology and the origin of terrestriality in vertebrates. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 143, 345–358 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vorobyeva, E. I. Evolution of the rhipidistia (Crossopterygii) pectoral girdle in the context of the origin of tetrapods. Paleontol. Zh. 3, 3–11 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clack, J. A. in Amphibian Biology Vol. 4 Palaeontology: the Evolutionary History of Amphibians (eds Heatwole, H. & Carroll, R. L.) 979–1029 (Surrey Beaty and Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vorobyeva, E. I. The role of development and function in formation of tetrapod-like pectoral fins. Zh. Obshch. Biol. 53, 149–158 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vorobyeva, E. I. & Kuznetsov, A. in Fossil Fishes as Living Animals (ed. Mark-Kurik, E.) 131–140 (Academy of Sciences of Estonia, Tallinn, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schultze, H.-P. & Arsenault, M. The Panderichthyid fish Elpistostege: a close relative of tetrapods? Palaeontology 28, 293–309 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vorobyeva, E. I. & Schultze, H.-P. in Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods: Controversy and Consensus (eds Schultze, H.-P. & Trueb, L.) 68–109 (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank E. Mark-Kurik for collecting and allowing access to the specimen; P. E. Ahlberg for discussions; and Vetenskapsrådet for financial support through a grant to P. E. Ahlberg.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine A. Boisvert.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boisvert, C. The pelvic fin and girdle of Panderichthys and the origin of tetrapod locomotion. Nature 438, 1145–1147 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04119

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing